my NC marc lewis is telling me that he is seeing dupes from my end and to check my settings, not sure what im looking for
Re: fidonet dupesif
By: Richard Williamson to digitalman on Tue Oct 15 2019 03:52 pm
I guess start by reviewing your log files (e.g. data/sbbsecho.log) and see
you see the same messages being repeatedly exported or what.
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #15:
Review on "Shark Sandwich", merely a two word review: "Shit Sandwich".
Norco, CA WX: 74.0¨F, 34.0% humidity, 2 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
seeRe: fidonet dupes
By: Richard Williamson to digitalman on Tue Oct 15 2019 03:52 pm
I guess start by reviewing your log files (e.g. data/sbbsecho.log) and
if you see the same messages being repeatedly exported or what.
looked, im only seeing imports not exports
Re: fidonet dupes
By: Richard Williamson to Digital Man on Wed Oct 16 2019 01:07 am
Do you have any details on these dupes - like message-IDs or anything? If your system isn't exporting them, then it's quite possible they're just not coming from your system to begin with.
digital man
Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #31:
FTP = File Transfer Protocol
Norco, CA WX: 69.9¨F, 39.0% humidity, 0 mph SW wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
my NC marc lewis is telling me that he is seeing dupes from my end and tocheck
my settings, not sure what im looking for
---
? Synchronet ? Richard's Fun House BBS | http://richardf.ddns.net
Re: fidonet dupes
By: Richard Williamson to Digital Man on Wed Oct 16 2019 01:07 am
Do you have any details on these dupes - like message-IDs or anything? If your system isn't exporting them, then it's quite possible they're just not coming from your system to begin with.
not really this is the message i got from marc
From: Marc Lewis <Marc Lewis@1:396/45> on Tue Oct 15 11:54:42 2019
Subject: Dupes
Hello Richard!
I am getting Dupes from your system, most notably in the COOKING echo. Please check your tosser configuration.
Many thanks!
Best regards,
Marc
is there a binkit log or is that sbbsecho.log
humm
i think i got some info on the fidonet dupes
2019-10-22 09:02:19 Unpacking bundle: /home/richard/sbbs/fido/inbound/00090014.TUX (7.7KB)
2019-10-22 09:02:19 Importing /home/richard/sbbs/fido/inbound/daf19d44.pkt (Type 2+, 17.8KB) from 1:396/45 to 1:387/25
2019-10-22 09:02:19 Imported: 5 msgs fidonet_cooking <- COOKING 2019-10-22 09:02:19 Imported: 5 msgs total
2019-10-22 09:02:19 Sending packet (/home/richard/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/5daf0beb.pkt, 17.9KB) from 1:387/25 to 1:396/45
2019-10-22 09:02:19 File (../fido/outbound/5daf0beb.pkt, 17.9KB) for 1:396/45 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound/018c002d.flo
2019-10-22 09:02:19 SBBSecho (PID 29126) exiting with error level 0, Bundles(1 unpacked, 0 sent), Packets(1 imported, 1 sent), EchoMail(5 imported, 0 exported)
everything else isn't doing a flo file
yeah me and wkitty42 were checking that and they had me put in debug mode and made my blinds 1-6
areas.bbs just has
fidonet_cooking COOKING 1:396/45
which is the same thing every other area has
[...]2019-10-22 09:02:19 Importing /home/richard/sbbs/fido/inbound/daf19d44.pkt (Type 2+, 17.8KB) from 1:396/45 to 1:387/25
I don't see any exporting going on. Do you have downlinks for your COOKING area in your area file (data/areas.bbs)?2019-10-22 09:02:19 File (../fido/outbound/5daf0beb.pkt, 17.9KB) for 1:396/45 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound/018c002d.flo
I don't follow. That's a log of *importing* into your fidonet_cooking sub.
Re: Re: fidonet dupes
By: Digital Man to Richard Williamson on Tue Oct 22 2019 10:46:51
1:396/452019-10-22 09:02:19 Importing /home/richard/sbbs/fido/inbound/daf19d44.pkt (Type 2+, 17.8KB) from
to 1:387/25discord...
[...]
2019-10-22 09:02:19 File (../fido/outbound/5daf0beb.pkt, 17.9KB) for 1:396/45 added to BSO/FLO file: ../fido/outbound/018c002d.flo
I don't follow. That's a log of *importing* into your fidonet_cooking sub. I don't see any exporting going on. Do you have downlinks for your COOKING area in your area file (data/areas.bbs)?
it took me a minute to see it, too... i'm working with him on the
there's only the one system in his areas.bbs file... only the one entry in the linked systems in echocfg... the thing above shows 17k coming in and17k
going right back out... we're trying to figure out why... i've not caught anything more from him since i had him set the sbbsecho logging to debugging...
Are you seeing the log message "Adding COOKING message from <name> topacket for 1:396/45: <path/to/pkt>" in the log?
Re: Re: fidonet dupes
By: Digital Man to Rampage on Tue Oct 22 2019 23:02:29
i haven't seen another log from him, yet...
)\/(ark
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
Re: Re: fidonet dupes
By: Digital Man to Rampage on Tue Oct 22 2019 23:02:29
i haven't seen another log from him, yet...
)\/(ark
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
Re: Re: fidonet dupes
By: Digital Man to Rampage on Tue Oct 22 2019 23:02:29
i haven't seen another log from him, yet...
)\/(ark
---
Synchronet The SouthEast Star Mail HUB - SESTAR
yes in a matter of factto
2019-10-23 09:02:21 Adding COOKING message from Ruth Haffly (1:396/45.28)
packet for 1:396/45: /home/richard/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/5db05d6d.pkt
Re: Re: fidonet dupes
By: Richard Williamson to Rampage on Wed Oct 23 2019 02:04 pm
Okay, that sounds like "396/45" was not in the SEENBY's of that message. That's unexpected. Perhaps you can find that actual message in the COOKING echo and look at its header fields. Since the message came *from* 396/45, that address should be listed in one of the SENBY lines.
digital man
Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #22:
DSL = Digital Subscriber Line
Norco, CA WX: 94.5¨F, 12.0% humidity, 2 mph W wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
yeah im watching the logs to see if it happens again, doesn't happen allthe time
COOKING2019-10-23 09:02:21 Adding COOKING message from Ruth Haffly
(1:396/45.28) to packet for 1:396/45:
/home/richard/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/5db05d6d.pkt
Okay, that sounds like "396/45" was not in the SEENBY's of that message. That's unexpected. Perhaps you can find that actual message in the
echo and look at its header fields. Since the message came *from* 396/45, that address should be listed in one of the SENBY lines.
On 2019 Oct 23 13:30:24, you wrote to Richard Williamson:the
richard has finally caught one of those packets with posts from one of the haffly's points off of marc lewis' 1:396/45 node... what i notice is that
396/45 entry is the last entry in the sole seenby line...an
could it be that sbbsecho is somehow missing the entry when the sending system is listed last on a seenby line when it looks at the seenbys? maybe
off-by-one error?
)\/(ark
Once men turned their thinking over to machines in the hope that this would set
them free. But that only permitted other men with machines to enslave them. ... When oh when will the advertisers finally run out of nauseating ideas? ---
* Origin: (1:3634/12.73)
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
im kinda wondering if i should set it up in 4D instead of 3D aka :1:396/45.0
On 2019 Oct 23 13:30:24, you wrote to Richard Williamson:in
2019-10-23 09:02:21 Adding COOKING message from Ruth Haffly
(1:396/45.28) to packet for 1:396/45:
/home/richard/sbbs/temp/sbbsecho/5db05d6d.pkt
Okay, that sounds like "396/45" was not in the SEENBY's of that message. That's unexpected. Perhaps you can find that actual message
lines.the COOKING echo and look at its header fields. Since the message came *from* 396/45, that address should be listed in one of the SENBY
richard has finally caught one of those packets with posts from one of the haffly's points off of marc lewis' 1:396/45 node... what i notice is that the 396/45 entry is the last entry in the sole seenby line...
could it be that sbbsecho is somehow missing the entry when the sending system is listed last on a seenby line when it looks at the seenbys? maybe an off-by-one error?
theOn 2019 Oct 23 13:30:24, you wrote to Richard Williamson:
richard has finally caught one of those packets with posts from one of
maybehaffly's points off of marc lewis' 1:396/45 node... what i notice is that the 396/45 entry is the last entry in the sole seenby line...
could it be that sbbsecho is somehow missing the entry when the sending system is listed last on a seenby line when it looks at the seenbys?
:1:396/45.0an off-by-one error?
im kinda wondering if i should set it up in 4D instead of 3D aka
could it be that sbbsecho is somehow missing the entry when the
sending system is listed last on a seenby line when it looks at
the seenbys? maybe an off-by-one error?
Anything's possible. Can someone send me one of these packets for
a look-see?
Re: fidonet dupesthe
By: Digital Man to mark lewis on Sat Oct 26 2019 16:47:23
could it be that sbbsecho is somehow missing the entry when the
sending system is listed last on a seenby line when it looks at
the seenbys? maybe an off-by-one error?
Anything's possible. Can someone send me one of these packets for
a look-see?
sure... i've sent two to your email... one is good and doesn't get dupes sent back and the other does... the one that does has only one seenby and 396/45 is the last system on the line... there's also only one system in
path...
Thanks. I wrote some test cases using those SEEN-BY lines and could find noissue with the parsing or checking of SEEN-BYs in that format.
Do you know which *specific* messages in the db45e6c4.pkt were looped back?
As an experiment, I added an additional loop check to also check if adownlink's address is in a message's PATH. Please have Richard Williamson update and check again to see if the issue persists.
I'm still unsure as to what the exact trigger/bug is here.
Re: fidonet dupes
By: Rampage to Digital Man on Sun Oct 27 2019 07:24 am
Thanks. I wrote some test cases using those SEEN-BY lines and could find no issue with the parsing or checking of SEEN-BYs in that format.
Do you know which *specific* messages in the db45e6c4.pkt were looped back?
As an experiment, I added an additional loop check to also check if a downlink's address is in a message's PATH. Please have Richard Williamson update and check again to see if the issue persists.
I'm still unsure as to what the exact trigger/bug is here.
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #3:
How much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black. Norco, CA WX: 60.6¨F, 41.0% humidity, 0 mph S wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
I'll update as soon as I can
Re: fidonet dupes
By: Rampage to Digital Man on Sun Oct 27 2019 07:24 am
Thanks. I wrote some test cases using those SEEN-BY lines and could find no issue with the parsing or checking of SEEN-BYs in that format.
Do you know which *specific* messages in the db45e6c4.pkt were looped back?
As an experiment, I added an additional loop check to also check if a downlink's address is in a message's PATH. Please have Richard Williamson update and check again to see if the issue persists.
I'm still unsure as to what the exact trigger/bug is here.
digital man
This Is Spinal Tap quote #3:
How much more black could this be? and the answer is none. None more black. Norco, CA WX: 60.6¨F, 41.0% humidity, 0 mph S wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
¨ Synchronet ¨ Vertrauen ¨ Home of Synchronet ¨
[vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 369 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 101:36:12 |
Calls: | 7,897 |
Files: | 12,968 |
Messages: | 5,793,763 |