https://x.com/elonmusk/status/1823073478481965199
Elon said, all view across platforms added up, there were almost 1
BILLION views of his interview with Trump.
And this was also hindered with a DDOS.
I heard about the DDOS attack on Fox News, but there was no mention of it on CNN. They don't want people to know that there was an effort to get people to not watch the interview.
I heard about the DDOS attack on Fox News, but there was no mention of i CNN. They don't want people to know that there was an effort to get peop not watch the interview.
You heard of the DDOS attack on fox news, and you believed it?
Staffers at X said there was no DDOS attack.
Elon Musk, owner of X, said it was a DDOS attack. What is the name of the "staffer" who said that it was "NOT" a DDOS attack?
Elon Musk, owner of X, said it was a DDOS attack. What is the name of th "staffer" who said that it was "NOT" a DDOS attack?
Several staffers. try to keep up.
Several staffers. try to keep up.
I'd like to offer you a volcano insurance policy at a rate that you're gonna love. Experts say, and studies suggest, that now is the best time to buy, because statistics show that these rates won't last much longer.
Several staffers agree that protecting your property from lava is one of the smartest investments you'll ever make. There's no commitment, and you can cancel at any time.
Several staffers agree that protecting your property from lava is one of smartest investments you'll ever make. There's no commitment, and you ca cancel at any time.
https://tinyurl.com/3ekwyvy7
Ridiculous. "Several staffers" isn't a person, and it's not a people either. It's a made up lie. It doesn't matter how many "sources" say it, there's no truth in it unless you (at least) have names.
Did they show you their Twitter work badge? Did they show you a Twitter paystub? Did they show you their Twitter parking placard?
No, no, and no. And they didn't even tell you their name(s). Some idiot said "several staffers" and you fell for it.
I often read cnn.com's news, and today they have an article that attempts to compete with Tim Walz's negative publicity by attacking JD Vance. Apparently, Vance was a board member of a company that ran a greenhouse in Kentucky. The article says that workers complained about it being "too hot" in the greenhous
and that they faced scrutiny from management when they tried to use a doctor's
note to excuse them from work.
To me, this is part of what the medium what talking about. There's 2 sides to every story, but "too hot in a greenhouse" isn't a very good squaking point.
Ridiculous. "Several staffers" isn't a person, and it's not a people eit It's a made up lie. It doesn't matter how many "sources" say it, there's truth in it unless you (at least) have names.
And you believe fox news?
Fox news has a long history of lies and distortions.
Fox news has a "mixed" score for factual reporting according to mediabiasfactcheck.com due to numerous failed fact checks. They also
have an extreme right bias.
Several staffers. try to keep up.
I'd like to offer you a volcano insurance policy at a rate that you're gonna love. Experts say, and studies suggest, that now is the best time
to buy, because statistics show that these rates won't last much longer.
Several staffers agree that protecting your property from lava is one of the smartest investments you'll ever make. There's no commitment, and
you can cancel at any time.
Ridiculous. "Several staffers" isn't a person, and it's not a people
either.
It's a made up lie. It doesn't matter how many "sources" say it, there's
no
truth in it unless you (at least) have names.
And you believe fox news?
Fox news has a long history of lies and distortions.
Mediabiasfactcheck.com isn't a government agency. What authority do they have to tell us anything?
For goodness gracious me. Are you really *REALLY* that daft?
Many millions of users (including me) confirmed that X worked completely
Can you please leave at least this conspiracy theory for now?
Mediabiasfactcheck.com isn't a government agency. What authority do they hav
Mediabiasfactcheck.com isn't a government agency. What authority do the
Wait I'm confused; aren't you right wingers all "oh no! deep state!"?
I would have thought conservatives would *prefer* a non-governmental
fact che... ahhh yea, FACTS. That's where we got off the rails. Facts are anathema, forgot that heh.
Yea, it's almost like if you fire all the engineers who are responsible for
making your web presense stable and reliable, you may have problems like this.
Who'd have thought? :D
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 374 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 131:15:56 |
Calls: | 7,957 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 13,008 |
Messages: | 5,812,960 |