As long as there is a moderation/validation feature where posts from telegram get validated to be sent to Fidonet, I would have no issues as a user and a fidonet node.
382.fido-future4f@1:153/757.2 241b4783as a
Re: Ideas for authorized gates
By: Matt Munson to All on Wed Nov 18 2020 09:51 pm
As long as there is a moderation/validation feature where posts from telegram get validated to be sent to Fidonet, I would have no issues
ask someone who does to grant them access.user and a fidonet node.
I don't use telegram myself but I think someone who wants access needs to
Ttyl :-),
Al
... IBM: It may be slow, but at least it's expensive.
Re: Ideas for authorized gatesask someone who does to grant them access.
By: Matt Munson to All on Wed Nov 18 2020 09:51 pm
As long as there is a moderation/validation feature where posts fromI don't use telegram myself but I think someone who wants access needs to
telegram get validated to be sent to Fidonet, I would have no issues as
user and a fidonet node.
I don't use telegram myself but I think someone who wants access
needs to ask someone who does to grant them access.
Sounds like a bbs. Yell sysop and ask for more rights. :D
That's correct. Access can be shared by either being invited (added) to the group or by being given the link. Same results.
Since they are private groups you can't just join them or search them, so actually more secure than the echo side.
Most (not all) of the BBSes I've seen allow anyone to access message areas, including the admin echoes.
Sounds like a bbs. Yell sysop and ask for more rights. :D
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 412 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 130:13:28 |
Calls: | 8,600 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,234 |
Messages: | 5,934,914 |