AS many of you might know Janis Kracht has shut down here servers so
five of
us have taken over as Star systems with three in North America, me in Europe
and one is Australiasia namely :
AS many of you might know Janis Kracht has shut down here servers
so five of us have taken over as Star systems with three in North
America, me in Europe and one is Australiasia namely :
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the
loss of one of the star systems?
Bj”rn Felten wrote to mark lewis <=-
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the
loss of one of the star systems?
When it's a matter of very limited interest, and it's cross
posted in almost a dozen major echoes plus netmail to all RCs,
well, I think a *question* is relevant.
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the
loss of one of the star systems?
When it's a matter of very limited interest,
It's *NOT* a matter of limited interest.
apparently that's your problem... there seem to be quite a few people interested in what is going on... it is ok if you don't care, though... you are allowed that ;)
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the loss o one of the star systems?
One of your stars felt compelled enough to link to everything here, a non-star system. You "stars" are tripping over yourselves to do what Fidoweb peers have done for years now.
AS many of you might know Janis Kracht has shut down here servers
so five of us have taken over as Star systems with three in North
America, me in Europe and one is Australiasia namely :
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since
the loss of one of the star systems?
When it's a matter of very limited interest, and it's cross posted
in almost a dozen major echoes plus netmail to all RCs, well, I think
a *question* is relevant.
AS many of you might know Janis Kracht has shut down here servers so
five of us have taken over as Star systems with three in North
America, me in Europe and one is Australiasia namely :
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
Bj”rn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-
It's *NOT* a matter of limited interest.
Of course it is. It's an outdated topology that matters none.
It was not sent out to RC's directly only nodes that are listed in file FILEGATE.ZXX as contributors.
It was not sent out to RC's directly only nodes that are listed
in file FILEGATE.ZXX as contributors.
So why did I get a copy? Are you saying that someone added *me* to
that list without my consent?
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the loss of one of the star systems?
Ward Dossche wrote to mark lewis <=-
do you have a problem with him publishing what is going on since the loss of one of the star systems?
Nobody gives a shit about te Star-system ...
As far as I'm concerned these 5 people can call themselves whatever
they want ...
Nobody gives a shit about the Star-system ...
Absolutely untrue.
Bj”rn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Nobody gives a shit about the Star-system ...
Absolutely untrue.
Not just untrue, but even *absolutely* untrue?
And you know this how? I mean, absolutely...
The moron known as "Lee Lofaso"
Bj”rn Felten wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I don't give Lee "access" to this echo, I let him, and anyone
else interested, read here.
We have a saying over here in the
*really* free world: Information wants to be free. A totally
alien concept in certain corrupt societies, I know...
The name of the echo is FidoNet Sysops. Is Lee a FidoNet sysop? No.
We have a saying over here in the
*really* free world: Information wants to be free. A totally
alien concept in certain corrupt societies, I know...
Your belief is that ALL information should be available to all persons?
I don't have time to look for a Rules file for the echo, but simple
common sense would indicate that that means *ONLY* FidoNet sysops should have access to even *read* it, much lest post to it.
Nick Andre wrote to Dan Clough <=-
On 06 Jan 22 15:09:00, Dan Clough said the following to Bj*Rn
Felten:
The name of the echo is FidoNet Sysops. Is Lee a FidoNet sysop? No.
Masturbatory sock puppets usually never are...
We have a saying over here in the
*really* free world: Information wants to be free. A totally
alien concept in certain corrupt societies, I know...
Your belief is that ALL information should be available to all persons?
Ask him for his banking credentials, Pin numbers, computer
passwords since that information wants to be free...
David Drummond wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I don't have time to look for a Rules file for the echo, but simple
common sense would indicate that that means *ONLY* FidoNet sysops should have access to even *read* it, much lest post to it.
Anyone operating a "system" in the Fido network is obviously a
"sysop". Why shouldn't they have at least read access here?
Unless, of course, that "Lee" is actually "Bjorn", posting from his
own system. I think this latest slip-up by Bjorn makes that even more obvious than it may have already been. So, as soon as Bjorn admits
Nick Andre wrote to Dan Clough <=-
On 06 Jan 22 18:53:00, Dan Clough said the following to David
Drummond:
Unless, of course, that "Lee" is actually "Bjorn", posting from his
own system. I think this latest slip-up by Bjorn makes that even more obvious than it may have already been. So, as soon as Bjorn admits
Theres also Lee's long-time weird obsession with Janis, the ZC1
hat and Policy 4 for years... BBS user trolls normally don't do
this and I've ran a BBS since '93. I've seen every stinkin' troll
there was. But not someone like this. BBS trolls normally stick
to trolling other users or cheat in doorgames.
A long time ago it was speculated that the initial tone and style
of messaging was simular in the Politics echo between those two.
Suddenly, that stopped. Then theres the situation that when
Bjorn's system goes offline, so does Lee... you don't see him pop
up on anyone else's system or BBS. And if he does, its all
newsreader crap that only a tech person cares to get into.
Nick Andre wrote to Dan Clough <=-
On 06 Jan 22 18:53:00, Dan Clough said the following to David
Drummond:
Is "Lofaso" operating a system as a sysop? No. He's calling in to a system as a USER and reading/posting. That's why he shouldn't have access. He's NOT a Sysop.
To further add to my other message... I've politely offered Lee a
node number almost to the point of hand-holding. Several times I
think... and every single time theres always some lame excuse
from the puppet. He doesn't want to follow Policy 4, he's
currently on "probation status", or some other weird reason that
drifts from the usual style of Sysop-oriented trolling.
So let see, he's smart enough to debate Policy 4 like a lawyer
(the only troll that reads it) and troll Janis, but when backed
into a corner on the tech, he's suddenly a moron. But again,
morons do not know about newsreaders or use them into 2022 or
that you can do Fido stuff from them and even if Bjorn was
holding his hand, the Sysop-oriented trolling just gives him
away. Every. Single. Time.
Now watch - Soon, one of two things will happen. He will try to
troll me in Fidonews based on the contents of this Sysop-only
echo, with messages to "All" (just like Bjorn used to do all the
time in the 2010's) or he won't say anything because Bjorn will
instruct him or his right hand not to do so.
Even if none of this was true, even if Bjorn runs a secure
system, some way, somehow, Lee ends up knowing what happens here.
Even if he were to Google the contents of here, that still takes
some techie know-how to really dig up what you're after.
I would have a LOT more respect for Bjorn if he would just admit
the charade.
On the other hand I actually respect David Drummond because at
least with him, you know what you're going to get... (a swollen
sheep's anus)
Your belief is that ALL information should be available to all persons?
I would have a LOT more respect for Bjorn if he would just admit
the charade.
Same. Somehow I doubt that will happen.
Is "Lofaso" operating a system as a sysop? No. He's calling in to a system as a USER and reading/posting. That's why he shouldn't have
access. He's NOT a Sysop.
The moron known as "Lee Lofaso"
Isn't that defamatory? Is that the type of Fidonet you want?
I don't give Lee "access" to this echo, I let him, and anyone else interested, read here.
We have a saying over here in the *really* free world: Information wants to be free. A totally alien concept in certain corrupt societies, I know...
We have a saying over here in the
*really* free world: Information wants to be free. A totally
alien concept in certain corrupt societies, I know...
Your belief is that ALL information should be available to all persons?
Ask him for his banking credentials, Pin numbers, computer passwords since that information wants to be free...
I don't have time to look for a Rules file for the echo, but simple
common sense would indicate that that means *ONLY* FidoNet sysops
should have access to even *read* it, much lest post to it.
Anyone operating a "system" in the Fido network is obviously a "sysop". Why shouldn't they have at least read access here?
Nothing "secret" is ever discussed - it's just another chat echo.
Nick Andre wrote to Dan Clough <=-
I would have a LOT more respect for Bjorn if he would just admit
the charade.
Same. Somehow I doubt that will happen.
Anyhow... fun stuff. Hope the new years are going good for you?
To further add to my other message... I've politely offered Lee a node number almost to the point of hand-holding. Several times I think... and every single
time theres always some lame excuse from the puppet. He doesn't want to follow
Policy 4, he's currently on "probation status", or some other weird reason that drifts from the usual style of Sysop-oriented trolling.
So let see, he's smart enough to debate Policy 4 like a lawyer (the only troll
that reads it)
To further add to my other message... I've politely offered Lee NA>a nodenumber almost to the point of hand-holding. Several times NA>I think... and
every single time theres always some lame excuse NA>from the puppet. He doesn't want to follow Policy 4, he's currently NA>on "probation status", or some other weird reason that drifts from NA>the usual style of Sysop-oriented trolling.
"Janis is out to get him" was another one, I think, and it would
no longer apply.
So let see, he's smart enough to debate Policy 4 like a lawyer (the
only troll that reads it)
"Lee" once netmailed me about the FIDO rules to solve disagreements MP>between two network sysops. I pointed out to him that he was not a MP>network sysop so they did not apply. I never heard anything back.
I suspect that might have been an "oopsie."
No private echolist has any official status in Fidonet.
The rules are also posted here once a month.
"Lee" once netmailed me about the FIDO rules to solve disagreements between two network sysops. I pointed out to him that he was not a network sysop so they did not apply. I never heard anything back. I suspect that might have been an "oopsie."
Nick Andre wrote to Mike Powell <=-between
On 07 Jan 22 17:48:00, Mike Powell said the following to Nick
Andre:
"Lee" once netmailed me about the FIDO rules to solve disagreements
two network sysops. I pointed out to him that he was not a network sysop so they did not apply. I never heard anything back. I suspect that might have been an "oopsie."
And see his reply to you now. Definately another "oopsie"...
Lee Lofaso wrote to ALL <=-and
-= the the entity known as Mike Powell wrote to another entity
known as Nick Andre about something neither of them can
understand =-
To further add to my other message... I've politely offered Lee NA>a nodenumber almost to the point of hand-holding. Several times NA>I think...
every single time theres always some lame excuse NA>from the puppet. He doesn't want to follow Policy 4, he's currently NA>on "probation status", or some other weird reason that drifts from NA>the usual style of Sysop-oriented trolling.
"Janis is out to get him" was another one, I think, and it would
no longer apply.
Fidonet is not, and has never been, limited to sysops only. As
such, all are welcome to play. Both sysops and probationary
sysops alike.
Wrong. Not in sysop-only echos. You are neither a sysop or a "probationary sysop" (whatever that is), anyway.
Hello Bj”rn!
Wednesday January 05 2022 07:42, you wrote to me:
AS many of you might know Janis Kracht has shut down here servers
so five of us have taken over as Star systems with three in North
America, me in Europe and one is Australiasia namely :
Don't you have a dedicated echo for your five person network?
This posting is for ANY one who might be a file contributor and as I do not know what areas they read I have posted it on a few areas that they 'might' reading.
Vincent
When it's a matter of very limited interest,
apparently that's your problem... there seem to be quite a few people interested in what is going on... it is ok if you don't care, though...
you are allowed that ;)
Here's a question for you: The moron known as "Lee Lofaso" recently
quoted me in the FidoNews echo, from a post I made in the FidoNet Sysop echo. The question is - why are you allowing him access to that
sysop-only echo? Oh, and I know this because his posts come from your system.
"Lee" once netmailed me about the FIDO rules to solve disagreements betwee
two network sysops. I pointed out to him that he was not a network sysop so they did not apply. I never heard anything back. I suspect that might
have been an "oopsie."
And see his reply to you now. Definately another "oopsie"...
Ward Dossche wrote to Dan Clough <=-
Here's a question for you: The moron known as "Lee Lofaso" recently quoted me in the FidoNews echo, from a post I made in the FidoNet Sysop echo. The question is - why are you allowing him access to that sysop-only echo? Oh, and I know this because his posts come from your system.
Well, Bjorn is that echo's moderator ...
Do we agree it's a moderators choice wether to allow that or not
... ?
Well, Bjorn is that echo's moderator ...
Isn't that convenient.
At least it's all out here for the public to see, and know what a twit Bjorn really is. What a buffoon.
Have you ever used a public urinal when a bunch of other guys
are taking a leak at the same time? Notice how careful all of them
are not to look at another man's weiner. There a reason why ...
Wrong. Not in sysop-only echos.
Nothing "secret" is ever discussed - it's just another chat echo.
Have you ever used a public urinal when a bunch of other guys
are taking a leak at the same time? Notice how careful all of them
are not to look at another man's weiner. There a reason why ...
A FN_SYSOP related reason? If not you cannot mention it here apparently.
Lee Lofaso wrote to David Drummond <=-
Have you ever used a public urinal when a bunch of other guys
are taking a leak at the same time? Notice how careful all of them
are not to look at another man's weiner. There a reason why ...
A FN_SYSOP related reason? If not you cannot mention it here apparently.
Oh, come now. Stalls are for women.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 412 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 14:17:28 |
Calls: | 8,617 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 13,235 |
Messages: | 5,936,868 |