@MSGID: 144.fidonet_fidotest@1:105/44 282ac4b1
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TZUTC: -0800
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@BBSID: XBITBBS
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (ICE style)
ping? <g>
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: The X-Bit BBS - x-bit.org - Forest Grove, Or (1:105/44) SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/7 10 11 44 81 85 SEEN-BY: 105/500 106/201 120/340 123/131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 650 700 720 830 840 850 860 870 880 SEEN-BY: 218/900 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 200 206 SEEN-BY: 229/275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125 301/1 SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1
@PATH: 105/44 81 229/426 218/700 103/705 280/464
You're not in the nodelist, and your real name is broken. But other then that your message seems fine. ;-)
ping? <g>
You're not in the nodelist, and your real name is broken. But other
then that your message seems fine. ;-)
Thank you for the pong! Well, so far so "almost good" :)
Hope to be in the node list soon and I should now be posting with real names <g>.
What would be agood echo to post fido newbie Q&A's?
@TZUTC: -0800
@MSGID: 144.fidonet_fidotest@1:105/44 282ac4b1
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (ICE style)
ping? <g>
SEEN-BY: 1/123 10/0 1 15/0 90/1 102/401 103/1 705 105/7 10 11 44 81 85 SEEN-BY: 105/500 106/201 120/340 123/131 124/5016 153/757 7715 154/10 SEEN-BY: 203/0 214/22 218/0 1 215 650 700 720 830 840 850 860 870 880 SEEN-BY: 218/900 221/0 226/30 227/114 229/110 111 112 113 114 200 206 SEEN-BY: 229/275 307 317 400 424 426 428 452 470 550 664 700 240/1120 SEEN-BY: 240/5832 266/512 280/464 5003 5555 282/1038 292/854 8125
301/1
SEEN-BY: 301/1 310/31 317/3 320/219 322/757 341/66 234 342/200 396/45 SEEN-BY: 423/120 460/58 633/280 712/848 770/1
@PATH: 105/44 81 229/426 218/700 103/705 280/464
@TZUTC: -0800
@MSGID: 144.fidonet_fidotest@1:105/44 282ac4b1
@PID: Synchronet 3.19b-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Win32 master/a2a9dc027 Jan 2 2022 MSC 1928
@BBSID: XBITBBS
@CHRS: ASCII 1
@NOTE: SlyEdit 1.75 (2021-12-11) (ICE style)
ping? <g>
--- SBBSecho 3.14-Win32
* Origin: The X-Bit BBS - x-bit.org - Forest Grove, Or (1:105/44)
SEEN-BY: 30/0 221/1 240/1120 1634 8002 8005 280/464 5003 291/111 301/1 313/41
SEEN-BY: 335/364 371/0 52 382/147 530/204 3634/12
@PATH: 105/44 81 229/426 153/7715 3634/12 240/1120 371/0
telnet://bbs.roonsbbs.hu:1212 <<=-
Hope to be in the node list soon and I should now be posting with real names <g>.
Your real name is fine now and you are in the nodelist. I fail to make
a connect however:
20 Jan 2023 12:24, Michiel van der Vlist wrote to you:
Your real name is fine now and you are in the nodelist. I fail to
make a connect however:
I tried some minutes ago and connected successfully.
Your real name is fine now and you are in the nodelist. I fail to make a connect however:
Your real name is fine now and you are in the nodelist. I fail to
make a connect however:
I tried some minutes ago and connected successfully.
I tried some minutes ago and connected successfully.
Welcome!
As for the connection, its open and packets are flowing with my hub.
But I do have your geo location blocked. When i was first setting up
my Spitfire BBS using NetSerial a year ago i was getting a number of
bots from that location and it was crashing Spitfire so I may have got overly aggressive.
I just put a few IP's on a whitelist so perhaps its working now?
I just put a few IP's on a whitelist so perhaps its working now?
I just put a few IP's on a whitelist so perhaps its working now?
To do it right all fidonet nodes (and points) should be able to deliver crashmail. As you can't know all their IP adresses, it would be best if at least your binkp port is open to the world...
I just put a few IP's on a whitelist so perhaps its working now?
MvdV> Yes, I can connect now:
MvdV> + 13:58 [3224] call to 1:105/44@fidonet
MvdV> 13:58 [3224] trying x-bit.org [50.109.246.145]:24556...
MvdV> 13:58 [3224] connected
I still can't. :-( ;-)
To do it right all fidonet nodes (and points) should be able to deliver crashmail. As you can't know all their IP adresses, it would be best if at least your binkp port is open to the world...
I just put a few IP's on a whitelist so perhaps its working now?
MvdV> Yes, I can connect now:
MvdV> + 13:58 [3224] call to 1:105/44@fidonet
MvdV> 13:58 [3224] trying x-bit.org [50.109.246.145]:24556...
MvdV> 13:58 [3224] connected
I still can't. :-( ;-)
To do it right all fidonet nodes (and points) should be able to
deliver crashmail. As you can't know all their IP adresses, it would
be best if at least your binkp port is open to the world...
Worked for me..
= 08:51:21 CONNECT
To do it right all fidonet nodes (and points) should be able to
deliver crashmail. As you can't know all their IP adresses, it would
be best if at least your binkp port is open to the world...
Good call <g>. That would be quite a bit of work for everyone if I asked for all nodes to please send me your static <g>.
Working now on allowing my binkp port.
Worked for me..
= 08:51:21 CONNECT
Apparently you're in trusted territory... ;-)
Bye, Wilfred.
Worked for me..
= 08:51:21 CONNECT
Apparently you're in trusted territory... ;-)
Bye, Wilfred.
Is it still a no go for you? I pushed a rule whitelisting my binkp.
Worked for me..
Working now on allowing my binkp port.
I can now connect on your 24556 port!
Is it still a no go for you? I pushed a rule whitelisting my
binkp.
Yep it works now for me, see my previous message...
To do it right all fidonet nodes (and points) should be able to deliver crashmail. As you can't know all their IP adresses, it would be best if at least your binkp port is open to the world...
I'm now allowing my binkp port as well as tcp/23 for telnet access to
my synchronet and fido bbs. The reason I got so aggressive with geo blocking is because of my Spitfire BBS that would crash when pushed
with bots.
Re: 1st test from 1:105/44
By: August Abolins to Wilfred van Velzen on Fri Jan 20 2023 08:53 am
Worked for me..
I got the crash but when i replied I received the following:
BINKPOLL JSBinkP/4 callout to 2:221/1.58@fidonet started
BINKPOLL Connecting to 2:221/1.58@fidonet at p58.f1.n221.z2.binkp.net:24554 BINKPOLL Connection to p58.f1.n221.z2.binkp.net:24554 failed (Error: No such host is known.)
that's probably because a point is not usually accessible directly like that ;)
that's probably because a point is not usually accessible
directly like that ;)
Good point.. still "re"learning.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 368 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 53:43:24 |
Calls: | 7,887 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,962 |
Messages: | 5,788,817 |