1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FIDOSOFT.HUSKY

  • A point question

    From Deon George@3:633/509 to All on Sat Jun 6 15:45:57 2020
    Howdy,

    I just discovered in my outbound, a message to a downlink's point. (The downlink is 21:3/101 and the packet is to 21:3/101.1.)

    Because its in my outbound (I'm 21:3/100), I must have something in my routing that placed it there, instead of bundling it to the downlink. Is there a way that any mail to a point is automatically bundled to the downlink?

    Here is my routes if that helps:

    Route 21:3/101.0 direct (flavour: hold)
    Route 21:3/* direct (flavour: crash)
    Route 21:* via 21:1/100 (flavour: crash)

    (Other than some other downink hold statements, this is essentially my config for zone 21/3...).

    Should I change the middle statement to 21:3/*.0 direct? (I have it there so that all mail goes out crash to my downlinks unless on hold by a specific route above it.)

    ...ëîåï

    ... Screw up your courage! You've screwed up everything else.
    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1 to Deon George on Sat Jun 6 13:26:22 2020

    06 Jun 20 15:45, Deon George wrote to All:

    Howdy,

    I just discovered in my outbound, a message to a downlink's point. (The
    downlink is 21:3/101 and the packet is to
    21:3/101.1.)

    route direct boss 21:3/101.*

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: rbb.fidonet.fi (2:221/1)
  • From Angel Ripoll@2:341/66 to Deon George on Sat Jun 6 13:03:28 2020
    Hola Deon!

    06 Jun 20 15:45, Deon George escribi¢ a All:

    Howdy,

    I just discovered in my outbound, a message to a downlink's point. (The downlink is 21:3/101 and the packet is to 21:3/101.1.)

    Route 21:3/101.0 direct (flavour: hold)

    I think this causes the node (.0) to go direct, but not its points.

    I would put

    Route hold 21:3/101 21:3/101.*

    Un saludo,
    Angel Ripoll
    aripoll(at)zruspas.org

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707 + HPT 1.9 + Binkd 1.1 en Debian
    * Origin: Synchronet - bbs.zruspas.org - Zruspa's BBS - (2:341/66)
  • From Deon George@3:633/509 to Tommi Koivula on Sat Jun 6 21:19:23 2020
    Re: A point question
    By: Tommi Koivula to Deon George on Sat Jun 06 2020 01:26 pm

    Hi Tommi,

    route direct boss 21:3/101.*

    I was hoping to not do this for every downstream node. (I may not know that they stand up points.)

    Would "route direct boss *" work? (And not affect other crash/hold configs?)

    ...ëîåï

    ... Diplomacy is the art of letting someone else have your way.
    --- SBBSecho 3.11-Linux
    * Origin: I'm playing with ANSI+videotex - wanna play too? (3:633/509)
  • From Tommi Koivula@2:221/1.1 to Deon George on Sun Jun 7 18:21:52 2020
    Hi Deon.

    06 Jun 20 21:19:22, you wrote to me:

    route direct boss 21:3/101.*

    I was hoping to not do this for every downstream node. (I may not know
    that they stand up
    points.)

    Would "route direct boss *" work? (And not affect other crash/hold
    configs?)

    It would. But it depends on the order of your route lines how wise it is... :)

    'Tommi

    ---
    * Origin: Point One, Somewhere (2:221/1.1)