What makes you think, that merging Zones is viable, in a network, where
merging nets seems almost impossible, although it is suggested in policy.
Been there, done that (R20 - R23 -> R20) and it went without a glitch. Except of course that one of the hosts keep complaining about how I
handle the nodelist segment for R20... :-)
Merging nets means changing node numbers.
Been there, done that (R20 - R23 -> R20) and it went without a glitch.
Except of course that one of the hosts keep complaining about how I
handle the nodelist segment for R20... :-)
Indeed so, but the subject is "merging zones" meaning massive renumberings.
Besides, have you ever toyed with the idea of just having a single net in R20 and forcing everyone in it?
And your friend Jan.
The previous RC28 was someone else...
So what. It was never a problem to the previous RC28. Nor to the Kv>Kv>> previous ZC2. Even though it invalidated some payware licences.
Ron Dwight ?
And your friend Jan.
So what. It was never a problem to the previous RC28. Nor to the
previous ZC2. Even though it invalidated some payware licences.
Ron Dwight ?
So what. It was never a problem to the previous RC28. Nor to the
previous ZC2. Even though it invalidated some payware licences.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 368 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 40:54:56 |
Calls: | 7,884 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,962 |
Messages: | 5,787,512 |