• There's no place like home...to track bl

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Tue Sep 28 21:30:42 2021
    There's no place like home...to track blood pressure

    Date:
    September 28, 2021
    Source:
    American Heart Association
    Summary:
    Adults with elevated blood pressure who had not been diagnosed
    with high blood pressure found that monitoring their blood
    pressure at home was more acceptable than going to a kiosk,
    clinic or using a 24-hour wearable monitoring device. Adults were
    more likely to record the minimum number of measurements with
    at-home or clinic-based blood pressure monitoring versus going
    to a kiosk. Adults found the 24-hour wearable blood pressure
    measuring device least acceptable among the options. Health care
    professionals should consider talking with people who have high
    blood pressure about the option of home monitoring and providing
    the tools and education necessary to do it correctly.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Adults who needed to track their blood pressure regularly to confirm
    or refute a hypertension diagnosis preferred monitoring blood pressure
    at home versus at a clinic, kiosk or with a 24-hour wearable device,
    according to preliminary research presented today at the American Heart Association's Hypertension Scientific Sessions 2021. The meeting is
    the premier scientific exchange focused on recent advances in basic
    and clinical research on high blood pressure and its relationship to
    cardiac and kidney disease, stroke, obesity and genetics, and is being
    held virtually Sept. 27-29, 2021.


    ========================================================================== According to the American Heart Association, about 1 of every 2 of
    U.S. adults has high blood pressure, or hypertension. More than one in
    three adults with high blood pressure might not know they have it. High
    blood pressure is defined as having a systolic pressure (the top number
    in a reading) of 130 mm Hg or higher, or a diastolic pressure (the bottom number) of 80 mm Hg or higher.

    "Most hypertension is diagnosed and treated based on blood pressure measurements taken in a doctor's office, even though the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the American Heart Association recommend that
    blood pressure measurements be taken outside of the clinical setting
    to confirm the diagnosis before starting treatment," said lead study
    author Beverly Green, M.D., M.P.H., senior investigator and family
    physician at Kaiser Permanente Washington Health Research Institute and
    Kaiser Permanente Washington in Seattle. "It is the standard that blood pressure monitoring should be done either using home blood pressure
    monitoring or 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring prior to
    diagnosing hypertension." 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring devices, worn day and night to take continuous blood pressure readings,
    are generally considered the "gold standard" for out-of-office measurement
    to determine a diagnosis of high blood pressure. However, blood pressure measured on a home device, with a traditional blood pressure arm cuff,
    can be a more practical and convenient approach.

    Green and colleagues studied adherence and acceptability of different
    blood pressure measuring methods among 510 adults who had elevated blood pressure yet had not been diagnosed with high blood pressure. They were participants in the Blood Pressure Checks for Diagnosing Hypertension (BP-CHECK) trial.

    Participants in the study were an average age of 59 years old; 75% were
    non- Hispanic white, 7% African American, 6% Asian, 5% Hispanic white
    and 7% other; half were male; and the average blood pressure was 150/88
    mm Hg. None of the participants were taking blood pressure-lowering medications.

    Participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups for determining
    a new diagnosis of hypertension: clinic measurements, home monitoring
    or kiosk blood pressure monitoring.

    Those in the group for clinic measurements were asked to return to the
    clinic for at least one additional blood pressure check, as is routine
    in diagnosing hypertension in clinical practice. The home group received
    home blood pressure machines, were trained to use them and were asked to
    take their blood pressure twice a day with two measurements each time,
    for five days, for a total of 20 measurements. The kiosk group was asked
    to take their blood pressure at a kiosk in their clinic or at a nearby
    pharmacy on three separate days, with three measurements each time, for
    a total of nine measurements. All participants were asked to complete
    their group-assigned diagnostic regimens within 3 weeks, and then to
    complete 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring. Researchers
    compared adherence to and the acceptability among each diagnostic method.

    They measured adherence to monitoring by noting the percent of individuals
    in each group who completed their assigned measurement method as
    instructed. They measured acceptability with questionnaires.

    Researchers found:
    * Overall acceptability was highest for the at-home group, followed
    by the
    clinic and kiosk groups. 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure
    monitoring was the least acceptable option.

    * Participants were least likely to adhere to the monitoring regimen
    in the
    kiosk group. Adherence was more than 90% among those in the home
    testing group; more than 87% in the clinic group; nearly 68% in
    the kiosk group; and 91% for 24-hour ambulatory monitoring among
    all participants.

    "Home blood pressure monitoring was the most preferred option because it
    was convenient, easy to do, did not disturb their daily personal or work routine as much, and was perceived as accurate," Green said. "Participants reported that ambulatory blood pressure monitoring disturbed daily and
    work activities, disrupted sleep and was uncomfortable." When asked
    which diagnostic testing regimen they would prefer, more than half chose
    home blood pressure monitoring, especially if they were assigned to the
    home group, where almost 80% preferred home monitoring.

    Green suggests health care professionals routinely offer home blood
    pressure monitoring to their patients with elevated blood pressure. This
    might involve providing home blood pressure monitors, training patients
    and collecting and averaging several days of blood pressure readings.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by American_Heart_Association. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ==========================================================================


    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/09/210928102219.htm

    --- up 3 weeks, 5 days, 8 hours, 25 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)