• Small stars share similar dynamics to ou

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Mon Aug 9 21:30:48 2021
    Small stars share similar dynamics to our sun, key to planet
    habitability

    Date:
    August 9, 2021
    Source:
    Rice University
    Summary:
    Scientists show that 'cool' stars like the sun share dynamic surface
    behaviors that influence their energetic and magnetic environments.

    Stellar magnetic activity is key to whether a given star can host
    planets that support life.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Stars scattered throughout the cosmos look different, but they may be
    more alike than once thought, according to Rice University researchers.


    ==========================================================================
    New modeling work by Rice scientists shows that "cool" stars like the
    sun share the dynamic surface behaviors that influence their energetic
    and magnetic environments. This stellar magnetic activity is key to
    whether a given star hosts planets that could support life.

    The work by Rice postdoctoral researcher Alison Farrish and
    astrophysicists David Alexander and Christopher Johns-Krull appears
    in a published study inThe Astrophysical Journal.The research links
    the rotation of cool stars with the behavior of their surface magnetic
    flux, which in turn drives the star's coronal X-ray luminosity, in a way
    that could help predict how magnetic activity affects any exoplanets in
    their systems.

    The study follows another led by Farrish and Alexander that showed
    a star's space "weather" may make planets in their "Goldilocks zone" uninhabitable.

    "All stars spin down over their lifetimes as they shed angular momentum,
    and they get less active as a result," Farrish said. "We think the
    sun in the past was more active and that might have affected the early atmospheric chemistry of Earth. So thinking about how the higher energy emissions from stars change over long timescales is pretty important
    to exoplanet studies." "More broadly, we're taking models that were
    developed for the sun and seeing how well they adapt to stars," said Johns-Krull.



    ==========================================================================
    The researchers set out to model what far-flung stars are like based on
    the limited data available. The spin and flux of some stars have been determined, along with their classification -- types F, G, K and M --
    which gave information about their sizes and temperatures.

    They compared the properties of the sun, a G-type star, through its
    Rossby number, a measure of stellar activity that combines its speed of rotation with its subsurface fluid flows that influence the distribution
    of magnetic flux on a star's surface, with what they knew of other cool
    stars. Their models suggest that each star's "space weather" works in
    much the same way, influencing conditions on their respective planets.

    "The study suggests that stars -- at least cool stars -- are not too
    dissimilar from each other," Alexander said. "From our perspective,
    Alison's model can be applied without fear or favor when we look at
    exoplanets around M or F or K stars, as well, of course, as other G stars.

    "It also suggests something much more interesting for established
    stellar physics, that the process by which a magnetic field is generated
    may be quite similar in all cool stars. That's a bit of a surprise,"
    he said. This could include stars that, unlike the sun, are convective
    down to their cores.

    "All stars like the sun fuse hydrogen and helium in their cores and that
    energy is first carried in the radiation of photons toward the surface," Johns-Krull said. "But it hits a zone about 60% to 70% of the way that's
    just too opaque, so it starts to undergo convection. Hot matter moves from below, the energy radiates away, and the cooler matter falls back down.



    ==========================================================================
    "But stars with less than a third of the mass of the sun don't have a
    radiative zone; they're convective everywhere," he said. "A lot of ideas
    about how stars generate a magnetic field rely on there being a boundary between the radiative and the convection zones, so you would expect stars
    that don't have that boundary to behave differently. This paper shows
    that in many ways, they behave just like the sun, once you adjust for
    their own peculiarities." Farrish, who recently earned her doctorate at
    Rice and begins a postdoctoral research assignment at NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center soon, noted the model applies only to unsaturated stars.

    "The most magnetically active stars are the ones we call 'saturated,'"
    Farrish said. "At a certain point, an increase in magnetic activity
    stops showing the associated increase in high energy X-ray emission. The
    reason that dumping more magnetism onto the star's surface doesn't give
    you more emission is still a mystery.

    "Conversely, the sun is in the unsaturated regime, where we do see
    a correlation between magnetic activity and energetic emission," she
    said. "That happens at a more moderate activity level, and those stars
    are of interest because they might provide more hospitable environments
    for planets." "The bottom line is the observations, which span four
    spectral types including both fully and partially convective stars,
    can be reasonably well represented by a model generated from the sun," Alexander said. "It also reinforces the idea that even though a star
    that is 30 times more active than the sun may not be a G-class star,
    it's still captured by the analysis that Alison has done." "We do have
    to be clear that we're not simulating any specific star or system,"
    he said. "We are saying that statistically, the magnetic behavior of a
    typical M star with a typical Rossby number behaves in a similar fashion
    to that of the sun which allows us to assess its potential impact on
    its planets." A critical wild card is a star's activity cycle, which
    can't be incorporated into the models without years of observation. (The
    sun's cycle is 11 years, evidenced by sunspot activity when its magnetic
    field lines are most distorted.) Johns-Krull said the model will still
    be useful in many ways. "One of my areas of interest is studying very
    young stars, many of which are, like low-mass stars, fully convective,"
    he said. "Many of these have disc material around them and are still
    forming planets. How they interact is mediated, we think, by the stellar magnetic field.

    "So, Alison's modeling work can be used to learn about the large-scale structure of very magnetically active stars, and that can then allow us to
    test some ideas about how these young stars and their disks interact."
    Minjing Li, a visiting undergraduate from the University of Science
    and Technology of China, is a co-author of the paper. Alexander is
    a professor of physics and astronomy and director of the Rice Space
    Institute. Johns-Krull is a professor of physics and astronomy.

    A National Science Foundation INSPIRE grant supported the research.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Rice_University. Note: Content may
    be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Alison O. Farrish, David Alexander, Christopher M. Johns-Krull,
    Minjing
    Li. Modeling Stellar Activity-rotation Relations in Unsaturated
    Cool Stars. The Astrophysical Journal, 2021; 916 (2): 99 DOI:
    10.3847/1538- 4357/ac05c7 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/08/210809105853.htm

    --- up 13 weeks, 3 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)