• Carbon taxes that focus on luxury consum

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Tue Jul 11 22:30:30 2023
    Carbon taxes that focus on luxury consumption are fairer than those that
    tax all emissions equally

    Date:
    July 11, 2023
    Source:
    Cell Press
    Summary:
    Not all carbon emissions are made for the same reason -- they range
    from more essential purposes like heating a home to nonessential
    'luxury' activities like leisure travel. However, proposals for the
    implementations of carbon taxes tend to apply to all emissions at
    an equal rate. This can give rise to and exacerbate inequalities. A
    new analysis suggests taxing luxury carbon emissions at a higher
    rate instead; if all 88 countries analyzed in this study adopted
    the luxury- focused policy, this would achieve 75% of the emissions
    reduction needed to reach the Paris Agreement's goal of limiting
    climate change to well below 2DEGC by 2050.


    Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email

    ==========================================================================
    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    Not all carbon emissions are made for the same reason -- they range from
    more essential purposes like heating a home to nonessential "luxury"
    activities like leisure travel. However, proposals for the implementations
    of carbon taxes tend to apply to all emissions at an equal rate. This
    can give rise to and exacerbate inequalities. A new analysis published
    on July 11 in the journal One Earth suggests taxing luxury carbon
    emissions at a higher rate instead; if all 88 countries analyzed in
    this study adopted the luxury-focused policy, this would achieve 75%
    of the emissions reduction needed to reach the Paris Agreement's goal
    of limiting climate change to well below 2DEGC by 2050.

    "There is an injustice in terms of who uses energy, or carbon, for basic
    or luxury purposes, but it hasn't been translated into explicit policy
    yet," says Yannick Oswald, an economist at the University of Leeds. "In
    this study, we test policies derived from this knowledge for the first
    time." Several countries -- such as Canada and Mexico -- have active
    carbon pricing policies. These policies either price all emissions at an
    equal rate or target one type of emission, such as heat or fuel. However,
    past research has shown that, in high-income countries, these policies
    tend to affect low-income households the most while failing to have
    a large impact on emissions. This might be because resources such as
    heat or fuel make up a greater portion of low-income spending and are
    difficult to do without.

    To test the impact of a tax program that distinguishes between carbon
    emissions from basic or luxury activities, the researchers built a model
    based on household carbon footprints from 88 different countries. For
    each country, they designed a tax rate for different types of purchases, ensuring activities that make up a greater proportion of low-income
    spending would be taxed less relative to activities that make up a
    greater proportion of high-income spending. In the US, for example,
    vacation travel would be taxed at a higher rate than heating.

    They used this model to test the outcome of either their luxury carbon
    tax rates or a uniform carbon tax rate. Under a uniform tax rate, 37%
    of global carbon tax revenue would come from luxury purchases. This
    increases to 52% under a luxury-focused tax program.

    Not only was the luxury tax "fairer" based on household income --
    affecting low-income households less and high-income households more --
    it also was slightly better at reducing yearly household emissions in
    the very short-term.

    The researchers note that this might be because it is more feasible to
    forgo luxury purchases than an essential purchase if the price increases.

    While the luxury tax proved fairer in all countries studied, the
    researchers found that, in low-income countries, a uniform tax could
    also be fair. In South Africa, for example, low-income households already
    spend much less on fuel or heating than high-income households. Thus, a
    uniform carbon tax is already targeting high-income groups by design. In contrast, the luxury carbon tax is most beneficial in terms of fairness
    when applied to high-income countries.

    This tax can better account for flexible, nonessential purchases
    in countries like the United States, where it is difficult to avoid carbon-emitting activities like driving a car in a low-income lifestyle.

    While this type of policy could make significant progress towards reducing global emissions, the researchers also note that this goal might be
    difficult to achieve in practice. Few countries have a carbon tax scheme
    that is currently this rigorous. Luxury-focused carbon taxation also
    targets high- income groups, which may be the most equipped to lobby
    against such a policy going into effect.

    "Global support by the public for fair climate policies is high, and
    it is likely that luxury-focused carbon taxes are similarly popular,"
    says Oswald.

    "Despite the model's limitations, the big takeaway is this: when designing climate policies, it is possible to pay attention to the different nature
    of consumption purposes, and this would improve the fairness of climate
    policy almost by default."
    * RELATED_TOPICS
    o Earth_&_Climate
    # Global_Warming # Environmental_Policy # Climate #
    Air_Quality
    o Science_&_Society
    # Poverty_and_Learning # Educational_Policy #
    Resource_Shortage # Environmental_Policies
    * RELATED_TERMS
    o Climate_change_mitigation o
    Climate_model o Automobile_emissions_control o
    IPCC_Report_on_Climate_Change_-_2007 o Global_climate_model o
    Ocean_acidification o Climate_engineering o Sulfur_hexafluoride

    ==========================================================================

    Print

    Email

    Share ========================================================================== ****** 1 ****** ***** 2 ***** **** 3 ****
    *** 4 *** ** 5 ** Breaking this hour ==========================================================================
    * Revolutionary_Electric_Artificial_Muscles *
    Age_of_Universe:_26.7,_Not_13.7,_Billion_Years *
    City_Ground_Is_Deforming:_Buildings_Aren't_Ready
    * The_Sound_of_Silence?_People_Hear_It *
    36-Million-Year_Geological_Cycle_Drives_...

    * Six_Foods_to_Boost_Cardiovascular_Health
    * Cystic_Fibrosis:_Lasting_Improvement *
    Artificial_Cells_Demonstrate_That_'Life_...

    * Advice_to_Limit_High-Fat_Dairy_Foods_Challenged *
    First_Snapshots_of_Fermion_Pairs

    Trending Topics this week ========================================================================== PLANTS_&_ANIMALS Nature Botany Endangered_Plants EARTH_&_CLIMATE Climate Sustainability Water FOSSILS_&_RUINS Early_Climate


    ==========================================================================

    Strange & Offbeat ========================================================================== PLANTS_&_ANIMALS Bees_Make_Decisions_Better_and_Faster_Than_We_Do,_for_the_Things_That_Matter_to Them These_Lollipops_Could_'Sweeten'_Diagnostic_Testing_for_Kids_and_Adults_Alike Why_There_Are_No_Kangaroos_in_Bali_(and_No_Tigers_in_Australia)
    EARTH_&_CLIMATE
    Turning_Old_Maps_Into_3D_Digital_Models_of_Lost_Neighborhoods Squash_Bugs_Are_Attracted_to_and_Eat_Each_Other's_Poop_to_Stock_Their Microbiome How_Urea_May_Have_Been_the_Gateway_to_Life FOSSILS_&_RUINS Giant_Stone_Artefacts_Found_on_Rare_Ice_Age_Site_in_Kent,_UK Fossils_Reveal_How_Ancient_Birds_Molted_Their_Feathers_--_Which_Could_Help Explain_Why_Ancestors_of_Modern_Birds_Survived_When_All_the_Other_Dinosaurs Died Apex_Predator_of_the_Cambrian_Likely_Sought_Soft_Over_Crunchy_Prey
    Story Source: Materials provided by Cell_Press. Note: Content may be
    edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Yannick Oswald, Joel Millward-Hopkins, Julia K. Steinberger,
    Anne Owen,
    Diana Ivanova. Luxury-focused carbon taxation improves fairness of
    climate policy. One Earth, 2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.oneear.2023.05.027 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/07/230711133113.htm

    --- up 1 year, 19 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 50 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)