League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't support that. IREX does, but
League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't support that. IREX does,but
Use GEcho then.
I'll look at that, does it support multiple nets in the same zone?
League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't support that. IREX does,but
Use GEcho then.
I'll look at that, does it support multiple nets in the same zone?
Should if you set it up correctly.
Re: Re: RA to SBBS QWK Networking?
By: T.J. Mcmillen to Martin Kazmaier on Sun Mar 10 2024 08:47 pm
I'll look at that, does it support multiple nets in the same zone?
Should if you set it up correctly.
I think it would need to support 5D addresses (with domains). I don't recall GEcho supporting 5D addresses. -- digital man (rob)
No, but if I run gecho first, anything that isn't destined for it gets renamed from *.pkt to *.dst. I rename those to *.pkt, and let fastecho handle them afterwards. A bit dirty, but it works! I still can't get QWK networking working with SBBS. REP packets go out, but QWK won't come in.
Is anyone doing this? I've tried MKNET and SUARM, both of which send REP packets successfully to SBBS, but neither of which can actually bring in QWK packets. Any RA users out there connecting to SBBS via QWK? I
can't use FTN for one of my networks because 2 networks use the same
zone (Araknet and League10 are both 10:*) and fastecho doesn't
support that. IREX does, but my mail tosser is just as important.
No, but if I run gecho first, anything that isn't destined for it gets renamed from *.pkt to *.dst. I rename those to *.pkt, and letfastecho
handle them afterwards. A bit dirty, but it works! I still can't getQWK
networking working with SBBS. REP packets go out, but QWK won't comein.
Try FidoQWK ... it worked over here ... wasn't the best, but it worked. I
Try FidoQWK ... it worked over here ... wasn't the best, but it worked. I think QWK is a stupid format for a message network instead of FTN and don't understand why ANYTHING is still run this way, but not my software. :)
In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for every involved so long as their software supports it.
In my experience, a QWK network is much easier to manage or join for every involved so long as their software supports it.
But it also leaves it open for a abuse.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 379 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 54:26:10 |
Calls: | 8,066 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 13,055 |
Messages: | 5,841,551 |