Either way, as a result of the stroke and the very brief reoccurrence
of animosity on this thread, I have now made my choice on account of
my earlier indecision regarding whether or not to leave Usenet [...].=20
Hi Everyone,
=20
=20
The following post is a virtually identical copy of a post I made in alt.os.linu.ubuntu two days ago.
=20
The thing is that I had a (mild) stroke on Boxing Day, and I was in
hospital from Tuesday the 27th until the evening of the 29th.
=20
At the moment, I am "fully functional", but my left knee is very weak,
and my upper left arm is completely numb, as if it has been
anesthetized. This numbness extends upwards onto my left ear and
the rear part of my left cheek, as well as downward to below my
left elbow. =20
=20
This leaves me to bid you all a very happy 2023, and I mean that,
because 2022 was a stinker of a year, as were 2021 and 2020 before it.
Maybe we'll meet again — who knows? ;)
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't — I don't have
a crystal ball — but I either way wish you all the best. ;)
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't — I don't have
a crystal ball — but I either way wish you all the best. 😉
Hi Everyone,<snip>
Considering that I'm still well off compared to other people who've had
a stroke — things could have been much worse — I consider it a warning shot across my bow, and therefore I must drastically change my
lifestyle.
I know I cannot quit smoking, but I can at least cut it down somewhat —
as the matter of fact, I'm already doing that right now. I've also
stopped adding salt to my food — I used to overdo it in that
area — and I've also gone almost entirely sugar-free.
This leaves me to bid you all a very happy 2023, and I mean that,
because 2022 was a stinker of a year, as were 2021 and 2020 before it.
Maybe we'll meet again — who knows? ;)
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't — I don't have
a crystal ball — but I either way wish you all the best. ;)
Sayonara! :)
On 4/1/23 02:54, Aragorn wrote:
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't — I don't have
a crystal ball — but I either way wish you all the best. ;)
Sayonara! :)
Good luck Aragorn
I always enjoy your posts
I too have high blood pressure and I'm pre-diabetic.
It would appear that the Gods are after both of us. :-)
faeychild wrote on 5/1/23 8:21 am:on't
On 4/1/23 02:54, Aragorn wrote:
=20
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't =E2=80=94 I d=
;)have a crystal ball =E2=80=94 but I either way wish you all the best. =
=20=20
Sayonara! :) =20
Good luck Aragorn
=20
I always enjoy your posts
I too have high blood pressure and I'm pre-diabetic.
It would appear that the Gods are after both of us. :-) =20
What is recognised as "high blood pressure" now-a-days??
=20
I was diagnosed diabetic following a (very) mild stroke in 1996. I'm
now Insulin dependant (four injections per day!)
=20
My blood pressure is usually about 135/75 but, on one occasion, it
was 107/70 and the GP didn't bat an eyelid.
=20
On another occasion, *prior* to a Heart 'Stress Test' on a treadmill,
it was 185/75. Still not a battered eyelid!!
On 05.01.2023 at 19:52, Daniel65 scribbled:
faeychild wrote on 5/1/23 8:21 am:
On 4/1/23 02:54, Aragorn wrote:
That all said, maybe we'll meet again, or maybe we won't — I don't
have a crystal ball — but I either way wish you all the best. ;)
Sayonara! :)
Good luck Aragorn
I always enjoy your posts
I too have high blood pressure and I'm pre-diabetic.
It would appear that the Gods are after both of us. :-)
What is recognised as "high blood pressure" now-a-days??
I was diagnosed diabetic following a (very) mild stroke in 1996. I'm
now Insulin dependant (four injections per day!)
My blood pressure is usually about 135/75 but, on one occasion, it
was 107/70 and the GP didn't bat an eyelid.
On another occasion, *prior* to a Heart 'Stress Test' on a treadmill,
it was 185/75. Still not a battered eyelid!!
In my case, it was around 160 to 170/80.
On 2023-01-05 10:31, Aragorn wrote:
On 05.01.2023 at 19:52, Daniel65 scribbled:
What is recognised as "high blood pressure" now-a-days??
I was diagnosed diabetic following a (very) mild stroke in 1996.
I'm now Insulin dependant (four injections per day!)
My blood pressure is usually about 135/75 but, on one occasion, it
was 107/70 and the GP didn't bat an eyelid.
On another occasion, *prior* to a Heart 'Stress Test' on a
treadmill, it was 185/75. Still not a battered eyelid!!
In my case, it was around 160 to 170/80.As I misunderstand it, the lower number is the one they get most
alarmed about if on the high side, as the upper number is the one
most influenced by emotions - like the unease of being in a doctor's
office, having your blood pressure measured. A smaller difference
between the two numbers is also more alarming than a higher one.
Then again, I'm a farmer, not a medical professional, so my
statements on this subject should be considered accordingly.
What is recognised as "high blood pressure" now-a-days??
I was diagnosed diabetic following a (very) mild stroke in 1996. I'm now Insulin dependant (four injections per day!)
My blood pressure is usually about 135/75 but, on one occasion, it was 107/70 and the GP didn't bat an eyelid.
On another occasion, *prior* to a Heart 'Stress Test' on a treadmill, it
was 185/75. Still not a battered eyelid!!
Then again, I'm a farmer, not a medical professional, so my statements
on this subject should be considered accordingly.
TJ
On 05.01.2023 at 10:48, TJ scribbled:
As I misunderstand it, the lower number is the one they get most
alarmed about if on the high side, as the upper number is the one
most influenced by emotions - like the unease of being in a doctor's
office, having your blood pressure measured. A smaller difference
between the two numbers is also more alarming than a higher one.
Yes, that is more or less correct. The lower number represents the
diastolic pressure in your blood vessels at all time. The higher
number is the systolic pressure by which the blood is being pumped
around.
Then again, I'm a farmer, not a medical professional, so my
statements on this subject should be considered accordingly.
Wasn't that supposed to go something like, "I'm a doctor Jim, not a..."?
:p
On 5/1/23 19:52, Daniel65 wrote:
What is recognised as "high blood pressure" now-a-days??
ambiguous as hell I think. The Medicos shift the goal posts all the
time
I was diagnosed diabetic following a (very) mild stroke in 1996.
I'm now Insulin dependant (four injections per day!)
My blood pressure is usually about 135/75 but, on one occasion, it
was 107/70 and the GP didn't bat an eyelid.
This morning pre med 168/82 pulse 58 bpm
On another occasion, *prior* to a Heart 'Stress Test' on a
treadmill, it was 185/75. Still not a battered eyelid!!
Ah HA the stress test. I looking down the barrel of that one again as
well. I am also getting to old for treadmills
Ah HA the stress test. I looking down the barrel of that one again asWhen do treadmills get too old?? ;-P
well. I am also getting to old for treadmills
To Aragorn!!! We are way off topic AGAIN :-)
regards
As I misunderstand it, the lower number is the one they get most alarmed about if on the high side, as the upper number is the one most
influenced by emotions - like the unease of being in a doctor's office, having your blood pressure measured. A smaller difference between the
two numbers is also more alarming than a higher one.
Then again, I'm a farmer, not a medical professional, so my statements
on this subject should be considered accordingly.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 368 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:01:03 |
Calls: | 7,895 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,968 |
Messages: | 5,791,775 |