Sorry to be bringing back old scores.
Leafnode insists that I use a proper FQDN. At that time, I was using my allocated domain name, as I still do. Bits recommended that I replace
the term "net" with something else. I did not follow his advice, but I
never explained why.
The first reason was that Bits had already tried his recommended term,
and had run into problems. The second reason was that to be an FQDN.
the whole string must be parseable by the DNS servers. Any term they recognized (.com, .net, .asn, and similar) would be O.K., but anything
else in that position would probably throw up a syntax error. It seemed logical to use the name already assigned to me.
Sorry to be bringing back old scores.
Leafnode insists that I use a proper FQDN. At that time, I was using my allocated domain name, as I still do. Bits recommended that I replace
the term "net" with something else. I did not follow his advice, but I
never explained why.
The first reason was that Bits had already tried his recommended term,
and had run into problems. The second reason was that to be an FQDN.
the whole string must be parseable by the DNS servers. Any term they recognized (.com, .net, .asn, and similar) would be O.K., but anything
else in that position would probably throw up a syntax error. It seemed logical to use the name already assigned to me.
On Mon, 24 Oct 2022 11:28:46 -0400, Doug Laidlaw
<laidlaws@hotkey.net.au> wrote:
Sorry to be bringing back old scores.
Leafnode insists that I use a proper FQDN. At that time, I was using my
allocated domain name, as I still do. Bits recommended that I replace
the term "net" with something else. I did not follow his advice, but I
never explained why.
The first reason was that Bits had already tried his recommended term,
and had run into problems. The second reason was that to be an FQDN.
the whole string must be parseable by the DNS servers. Any term they
recognized (.com, .net, .asn, and similar) would be O.K., but anything
else in that position would probably throw up a syntax error. It seemed
logical to use the name already assigned to me.
Is there a question in there somewhere?
# grep -v -e ^'#' -e ^$ /etc/leafnode/config
expire = 20
server = localhost
port = 564
username = dwhodgins
password = <munged>
timeout = 300
timeout_fetchnews = 300
initialfetch = 500
nodesc = 1
maxage = 5
filterfile = /etc/leafnode/filters
debugmode = 0
create_all_links = 0
allow_8bit_headers = 1
article_despite_filter = 1
noxover = 1
I do use an fqdn in my message id, configured in my newsreader.
Regards, Dave Hodgins
Nowadays, this is the only nntp group I follow, so I no longer need Leafnode. Genealogy has moved to Facebook, and the depression ng is
full of rubbish.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 368 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:52:25 |
Calls: | 7,895 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,968 |
Messages: | 5,791,856 |