1. Forum
  2. DOVE-Net
  3. Debate

  • Kamala Harris

    From Neofree@VERT to All on Sat Aug 24 01:35:09 2024
    Kamala Harris is now the DNC nominee.

    I think she has a great chance of winning.

    I support her, because I don't support Trump.

    I'm sorry for offending anyone by being Pro-Kamala.

    At this point, I think that the United States Constitution is best protected by Kamala winning the White House this year.

    I may be wrong.

    That is fine.

    That is my opinion. And you are free to have your own opinions as well.

    Bout all I have to say at the moment, except for it's 2:34am here in Colorado and I hope you all have a great day!

    Peace, not Hate

    Thank you,

    Tom


    Thanks!
    MajorTom719, formerly Neofree, tom719co and others

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Denn@VERT/OUTWEST to Neofree on Sat Aug 24 12:12:53 2024
    Re: Kamala Harris
    By: Neofree to All on Sat Aug 24 2024 01:35 am

    Kamala Harris is now the DNC nominee.
    I think she has a great chance of winning.
    I support her, because I don't support Trump.
    I'm sorry for offending anyone by being Pro-Kamala.

    Why would we be offended? you support who you want.

    At this point, I think that the United States Constitution is best protected by Kamala winning the White House this year.

    I hate to burst your bubble here, Kamala always talks about "our" democracy, she dosn't have a clue that our form of Government is not a democracy.
    We are a constitutional represenative republic.
    a Democracy is a majority rule.
    a Constitutional Represnative Republic is tied to our Constitution.
    All laws and judicial dicision's are supposed to be made in accordance with the constitution.


    That is my opinion. And you are free to have your own opinions as well.

    Everyone is free to express their opinion.

    ... Two silkworms were having a race, but it ended in a tie.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ the Outwest BBS - outwestbbs.com or outwest.synchro.net
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to NEOFREE on Sat Aug 24 11:01:00 2024
    I support her, because I don't support Trump.

    I'm sorry for offending anyone by being Pro-Kamala.

    I think more people will understand the first statement more than the "Pro-Kamala" statement. Excluding people who only ever vote Democrat and
    don't care who is running, I suspect many of her voters are going to be
    because they "don't support Trump."

    OTOH, Kamala uses a whole lot of words to say basically nothing, so I would find being "Pro-Kamala" a much more difficult position to defend.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Don't blame me, I voted Libertarian.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From KnightMare@VERT/TELEGRAP to Neofree on Tue Aug 27 08:55:46 2024
    Re: Kamala Harris
    By: Neofree to All on Sat Aug 24 2024 01:35 am

    Kamala Harris is now the DNC nominee.

    After getting ZERO votes and working with others in a coup, that has successfully pushed out the Resident of the United States, plus the fact she knew he was mentally NOT FIT yp hold office and never came out the said it.

    I support her, because I don't support Trump.

    Weak excuse ever.
    Let's see:
    1. She's done NOTHING to close the border, let alone GO THERE.

    2. She's planning on doing something when elected, which she CAN DO NOW as Vice Resident. Why wait will November? She's #2 in command! WHY IS SHE WAITING?!

    3. Thirty four days ago she pretty much said she was running. No press, no interviews, no call to action, no words on what her policies are... NOTHING. All she does is talk Trump...

    4. Word salad.

    5. J.D. Vance and her were on the same tarmac as her and just wanted to talk for a mere few seconds and SHE RAN. Like literally ran from Vance.

    6. She lies about everything.

    7. She turned down 3 debates with Trump. Plus now we get word that she wants to have a cheat sheet when she does debate. A debate is off-the-cuff, not to have a crib notes!

    8. When she's nervous or lies, her 'tell' is that cackle of hers. She always giver herself away. Every single time.


    I'm sorry for offending anyone by being Pro-Kamala.
    You're not offending me, I'm just sad for your decision. You do you, Boo.
    Would i still be a friend, and have you over for a couple of beers? Sure. I'm a Republican. We have tolerance, but not when comes to snkes and people that put America other then in first priority.

    At this point, I think that the United States Constitution is best protected by Kamala winning the White House this year.

    I may be wrong.

    You're dead wrong. As CA DA, she wiped her ass with it. You need to open your eyes man, unless you want to stay in this current mess and pay $10 for a dozen eggs. I sure as hell don't want to.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Telegraph BBS - Fayette Co, OH USA
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to KnightMare on Tue Aug 27 13:07:39 2024
    Re: Kamala Harris
    By: KnightMare to Neofree on Tue Aug 27 2024 08:55 am

    I support her, because I don't support Trump.

    Weak excuse ever.

    I've known a lot of people who say they support one candidate because they don't support the other, with the reasoning that they're the "lesser of two evils".

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From KnightMare@VERT/TELEGRAP to Nightfox on Tue Aug 27 22:51:10 2024
    Re: Kamala Harris
    By: Nightfox to KnightMare on Tue Aug 27 2024 01:07 pm

    I've known a lot of people who say they support one candidate because they don't support the other, with the reasoning that they're the "lesser of two evils".

    Meh...

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Telegraph BBS - Fayette Co, OH USA
  • From DaiTengu@VERT/ENSEMBLE to Nightfox on Wed Aug 28 11:15:45 2024
    Re: Kamala Harris
    By: Nightfox to KnightMare on Tue Aug 27 2024 01:07 pm

    I support her, because I don't support Trump.

    Weak excuse ever.

    I've known a lot of people who say they support one candidate because they don't support the other, with the reasoning that they're the "lesser of two evils".

    Since I've been able to vote, I can think of only one candidate on either side that I've voted FOR.

    The "lesser of two evils" has been a thing since before Nixon.


    As Douglas Adams wrote: "Anyone capable of getting themselves made president should on no account be allowed to do the job"

    ...Backup not found: (A)bort (R)etry (F)#@K it!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to NIGHTFOX on Wed Aug 28 10:24:00 2024
    I've known a lot of people who say they support one candidate because they don't support the other, with the reasoning that they're the "lesser of two evils".

    That sad thing is that this seems a lot more common that it used to be.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Wind in my hair - shifting and drifting...
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Matthew Munson@VERT/IUTOPIA to DUMAS WALKER on Fri Aug 30 15:50:00 2024
    DUMAS WALKER wrote to NEOFREE <=-

    I think more people will understand the first statement more than the "Pro-Kamala" statement. Excluding people who only ever vote Democrat
    and don't care who is running, I suspect many of her voters are going
    to be because they "don't support Trump."
    Even if the Democrat is an axe murderer they will choose the Democrat. TDS :( Trump even turned some Republicans into hard core Democrats lol.



    ... He does the work of 3 Men...Moe, Larry & Curly
    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    þ wcQWK 8.0 ÷ Inland Utopia * iutopia.duckdns.org:2323