• r

    From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Bob Latham on Sun Aug 21 16:20:33 2022
    On 21/08/2022 14:43, Bob Latham wrote:
    In article <jmeiu4Fjfa9U1@mid.individual.net>,

    Bob isn't a troll because trolls put up arguments that they don't
    necessarily believe in or they are just pointlessly contrarian. Bob
    is absolutely sincere in his beliefs.

    Thank you for that Bill, you are indeed correct I do firmly believe
    what I write and I never lie.

    [snip rest of self-eulogising crap]

    Here, to remind you yet again, is a list of your many lies told in the past:

    The terms of reference for the IPCC adds more skew, it specifically investigates man-made climate change not the cause of climate change.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    The UN was discussing last week the idea of using force against
    nations that did not comply with their climate hysteria destruction
    of energy usage - yes BY FORCE.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    the*additional* effect of CO2 decreases as you add more to
    the atmosphere.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Well I don't read JJ learnt on any issues,

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    The polar bears are fine as are penguins, there is no evidence that
    storms are getting worse or more frequent

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    United states graphs show that the number of days over 90deg F per
    year peaked in the 1930s and has been dropping ever since.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Then the
    greenhouse gas theory says that the warming should be more noticeable
    in the upper atmosphere where it is supposedly being trapped

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    A court case that found against Mann's hockey stick graph pretty much
    due to lack of supporting evidence.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Nothing, absolutely nothing bad at all related to CO2 is happening
    anywhere.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Even if the planet was a degree or so warmer, all indications are
    that that is a good thing. Sea levels are not rising any faster than
    before

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    and the polar bears are in larger numbers than ever.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    The slightly increased CO2 is greening the planet.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    This isn't even any empirical proof that CO2 in the atmosphere is
    actually trapping heat, there just isn't, at best it's an assumption.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Every prediction made by the climate loons has timed out and all have
    failed miserably to come true. 100% fail.

    Proven lie repeated multiple times.

    Etc, etc, etc. Since I first posted that, there have been many more
    repetition of the above and many new lies propagandised.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to All on Sun Aug 21 16:26:02 2022
    On 21/08/2022 16:20, Java Jive wrote:

    [snip]

    Sorry, change in subject there was entirely accidental.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Woolley@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sun Aug 21 21:10:22 2022
    On 21/08/2022 18:57, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
    not everybody understands this.

    In the current context, negative net emissions are possible, so zero is
    not an asymptote.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Latham@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Mon Aug 22 08:57:14 2022
    In article <tdu3ff$2e0uo$1@dont-email.me>,
    David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> wrote:
    On 21/08/2022 18:57, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
    not everybody understands this.

    In the current context, negative net emissions are possible, so
    zero is not an asymptote.

    It may be possible but in the current context, it is utterly
    pointless and ruinously expensive and it's the poor who'll really
    suffer.

    The most stupid idea in history.


    Bob.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to Bob Latham on Mon Aug 22 17:33:56 2022
    On 22/08/2022 08:57, Bob Latham wrote:

    In article <tdu3ff$2e0uo$1@dont-email.me>,
    David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> wrote:

    On 21/08/2022 18:57, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
    not everybody understands this.

    In the current context, negative net emissions are possible, so
    zero is not an asymptote.

    It may be possible but in the current context, it is utterly
    pointless and ruinously expensive and it's the poor who'll really
    suffer.

    Certainly at least for the poor, it will be even more ruinously
    expensive to do nothing:

    https://resourcecentre.savethechildren.net/document/cost-doing-nothing-humanitarian-price-climate-change-and-how-it-can-be-avoided/

    "In its latest report, The Cost of Doing Nothing, the IFRC presents an
    analysis showing that if no urgent action is taken now, the number of
    people in need of humanitarian assistance annually due to the climate
    crisis could double by 2050. Similarly, financial costs could balloon to
    20 billion US dollars per year.

    In contrast with this pessimistic scenario, the report also shows that,
    if appropriate climate adaptation measures are taken now, these figures
    could also stabilize, and even drop. By investing in climate adaptation
    and disaster risk reduction – building up resilience in communities, countries and regions at risk – and by improving early warning and anticipatory humanitarian action, the world can avoid a future marked by escalating suffering and ballooning response costs."

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Lesurf@21:1/5 to bob@sick-of-spam.invalid on Wed Aug 24 10:30:05 2022
    In article <5a1c9a12f1bob@sick-of-spam.invalid>, Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <5a1c6478dbnoise@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim Lesurf
    <noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
    In article <5a1be79324bob@sick-of-spam.invalid>, Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <5a1b7d849dnoise@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim Lesurf

    Sorry, not interested in your religion.

    LOL. :-)

    The "religion" here is your rigid belief *about something you refuse
    to read*.

    For an educated man you can be such an idiot.

    LOL. :-)

    Jim

    --
    Please use the address on the audiomisc page if you wish to email me. Electronics https://www.st-andrews.ac.uk/~www_pa/Scots_Guide/intro/electron.htm
    biog http://jcgl.orpheusweb.co.uk/history/ups_and_downs.html
    Audio Misc http://www.audiomisc.co.uk/index.html

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)