In article <jmeiu4Fjfa9U1@mid.individual.net>,
Bob isn't a troll because trolls put up arguments that they don't
necessarily believe in or they are just pointlessly contrarian. Bob
is absolutely sincere in his beliefs.
Thank you for that Bill, you are indeed correct I do firmly believe
what I write and I never lie.
The terms of reference for the IPCC adds more skew, it specifically investigates man-made climate change not the cause of climate change.
The UN was discussing last week the idea of using force against
nations that did not comply with their climate hysteria destruction
of energy usage - yes BY FORCE.
the*additional* effect of CO2 decreases as you add more to
the atmosphere.
Well I don't read JJ learnt on any issues,
The polar bears are fine as are penguins, there is no evidence that
storms are getting worse or more frequent
United states graphs show that the number of days over 90deg F per
year peaked in the 1930s and has been dropping ever since.
Then the
greenhouse gas theory says that the warming should be more noticeable
in the upper atmosphere where it is supposedly being trapped
A court case that found against Mann's hockey stick graph pretty much
due to lack of supporting evidence.
Nothing, absolutely nothing bad at all related to CO2 is happening
anywhere.
Even if the planet was a degree or so warmer, all indications are
that that is a good thing. Sea levels are not rising any faster than
before
and the polar bears are in larger numbers than ever.
The slightly increased CO2 is greening the planet.
This isn't even any empirical proof that CO2 in the atmosphere is
actually trapping heat, there just isn't, at best it's an assumption.
Every prediction made by the climate loons has timed out and all have
failed miserably to come true. 100% fail.
Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
not everybody understands this.
On 21/08/2022 18:57, Roderick Stewart wrote:
Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
not everybody understands this.
In the current context, negative net emissions are possible, so
zero is not an asymptote.
In article <tdu3ff$2e0uo$1@dont-email.me>,
David Woolley <david@ex.djwhome.demon.invalid> wrote:
On 21/08/2022 18:57, Roderick Stewart wrote:
Indeed. There are no absolute zeros in real life, only asymptotes, but
not everybody understands this.
In the current context, negative net emissions are possible, so
zero is not an asymptote.
It may be possible but in the current context, it is utterly
pointless and ruinously expensive and it's the poor who'll really
suffer.
In article <5a1c6478dbnoise@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim Lesurf
<noise@audiomisc.co.uk> wrote:
In article <5a1be79324bob@sick-of-spam.invalid>, Bob Latham <bob@sick-of-spam.invalid> wrote:
In article <5a1b7d849dnoise@audiomisc.co.uk>, Jim Lesurf
Sorry, not interested in your religion.
LOL. :-)
The "religion" here is your rigid belief *about something you refuse
to read*.
For an educated man you can be such an idiot.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 11:11:27 |
Calls: | 6,666 |
Files: | 12,213 |
Messages: | 5,336,375 |