• TOT - Disposable Barbecues

    From Java Jive@21:1/5 to All on Mon Aug 15 12:40:18 2022
    Apologies for the OT post but if, like me, you think disposable
    barbecues are environmental disasters waiting to happen, you may want to
    sign this:

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/618664

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Mon Aug 15 13:25:56 2022
    On 15/08/2022 12:40, Java Jive wrote:
    Apologies for the OT post but if, like me, you think disposable
    barbecues are environmental disasters waiting to happen, you may want to
    sign this:

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/618664

    Signed!
    (I think your words "waiting to happen" are superfluous from what's been reported on the TV news)

    --

    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Tue Aug 16 09:26:55 2022
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and safer.
    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Java Jive" <java@evij.com.invalid> wrote in message news:tddbb3$3k4cd$1@dont-email.me...
    Apologies for the OT post but if, like me, you think disposable barbecues
    are environmental disasters waiting to happen, you may want to sign this:

    https://petition.parliament.uk/petitions/618664

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website: www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Tue Aug 16 10:29:03 2022
    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and safer.
    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....

    And allow people to send up those hot air beacons to spread fire far and
    wide.

    The potable barbecues are possibly safer than what a lot of people seem
    to do when away from home. Recently I've seen the remnants of fires
    made on the ground in tinder dry grass car parks.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Tue Aug 16 10:27:03 2022
    "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tdfkci$pm8$1@dont-email.me...
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them
    correctly. Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and safer.
    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....

    I agree, Brian. In an ideal world we should be selling disposable barbecues freely, but policing the use of them better. Restricting the sale affects responsible users just as much as idiots who accidentally *or deliberately* cause fires with them, or who bury a used barbecue in the sand on a beach to "dispose" of it, and then a child comes along, digs in the sand and gets
    badly burned. On a beach, you've got a ready-made supply of water (the sea),
    so a few bucketfuls of sea water will cool it down - or else drag it to the sea. And then take the cooled barbecue away with you.

    If I was going to have any sort of fire (barbecue, bonfire) outside at the moment, I'd have several buckets of water alongside, so I could soak any
    stray embers before they have chance to start a bigger fire. And maybe a hosepipe at the ready as well (hosepipe laws be buggered: preventing a fire
    is even more important!). But really I'd play it safe and not have a bonfire/barbecue in the first place at the moment.

    As for those guys who were seen *deliberately* throwing a barbecue into woodland... That needs to be punished very severely. We've all seen on the
    news the results of wildfires - while people may not care about fields of
    crops being burned (though they *should* do), once the fire burns people's houses, that's much more serious.

    People really don't seem to think any more about the consequences of their actions. There have been numerous deaths or serious injuries from people jumping into lakes, maybe off cliffs, to cool down in the hot weather. But
    that doesn't seem to stop more people doing it - maybe they think that
    *they* will be invincible, unlike the people who have already died. The same applies to wildfires - maybe people think that *their* barbie or bonfire
    won't start a fire, unlike all the previous fires.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to junk@admac.myzen.co.uk on Tue Aug 16 10:32:12 2022
    "alan_m" <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:jm16avFangrU1@mid.individual.net...
    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse
    them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and
    safer.
    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....

    And allow people to send up those hot air beacons to spread fire far and wide.

    The potable barbecues are possibly safer than what a lot of people seem to
    do when away from home. Recently I've seen the remnants of fires made on
    the ground in tinder dry grass car parks.

    It needs proper Boy Sprout training: if you are going to build a fire
    outdoors, surround it with a ring of stones to help prevent the embers from igniting the surrounding grass etc. Have some water and or earth handy in
    case anything ignites. And choose your location very carefully.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Woolley@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Tue Aug 16 11:59:42 2022
    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and safer.

    The problem is that the idiots will take the barbecue home but dispose
    of the embers irresponsibly. You can also do silly things with
    non-disposable ones, like my neighbour who sprays them with, I think,
    diesel fuel to get them started (fortunately they seem to have got the
    message about this not being the right weather for barbecues).

    Whilst is is, unfortunately the case, that without legislation, people
    will sell products with the expectation that they will be used in
    illegal or irresponsible ways, I feel uncomfortable about banning the
    sale of any product that has a legitimate use.

    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that would
    allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a government ban
    if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the creation of
    statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes of product.
    I'm not sure that an Act giving such wide powers would be desirable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Tue Aug 16 12:42:56 2022
    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and safer.

    I agree it shows stupidity but what about the various organisations that
    build picnic sites with tables and benches. They might have a location
    for a barbeque included but do they always include some way of disposing
    of the used barbeque? They often do not provide even adequate provision
    for disposing of rubbish.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 14:30:20 2022
    On 16/08/2022 10:32, NY wrote:

    "alan_m" <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:jm16avFangrU1@mid.individual.net...

    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:

    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....

    And allow people to send up those hot air beacons to spread fire far
    and wide.

    Chinese lanterns, I confess that I and my stepfather used to do that :-(
    However, we usually did it around bonfire time, and the world is
    usually wetter then, but even so, barns full of straw? I was too young
    at the time to realise the dangers, but I've occasionally wondered since
    how many things we set on fire.

    The potable barbecues are possibly safer than what a lot of people
    seem to do when away from home.  Recently I've seen the remnants of
    fires made on the ground in tinder dry grass car parks.

    It needs proper Boy Sprout training: if you are going to build a fire outdoors, surround it with a ring of stones to help prevent the embers
    from igniting the surrounding grass etc.

    Some rock types can contain sufficient moisture in them to explode if
    you do this, so maybe not.

    https://www.google.com/search?q=can+stones+explode+if+you+heat+them+in+a+fire

    Have some water and or earth
    handy in case anything ignites. And choose your location very carefully.

    Or, in weather such as we've had recently, just don't do it.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 14:18:13 2022
    On 16/08/2022 10:27, NY wrote:

    "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tdfkci$pm8$1@dont-email.me...

    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them
    correctly. [snip]

    I agree, Brian. In an ideal world we should be selling disposable
    barbecues freely, but policing the use of them better.

    But, as we see every day, we don't live in an ideal world, and what's
    left of the 'natural' world, already impoverished in ecological terms,
    is rapidly being lost. There are now nearly 8bn people in the world,
    and this country's population is higher than it's ever been before, and
    no-one seems to want to pay for the constant presence of environmental
    police to make all those people behave properly, so, if we are going to
    be able to save anything worth saving, strong laws are needed.

    There are precedents, ring pulls on cans, that used to get left in
    fields where cattle would be injured by swallowing them, were replaced
    by the modern lever system which, theoretically at least, shouldn't
    leave any loose bits beside the can itself. Of course, the slobs just
    through those away still, as I see examples of every day in my walks,
    but at least they are less damaging to farm and wild life.

    And plastic bags now have a surcharge in an attempt to ensure that fewer
    of them end up in the environment, but I see those every day as well,
    and drink bottles, sandwich wrappings, and all the other crap that
    people throw out of their car windows.

    Want to be disgusted? Listen to this:

    Costing the Earth - Litter
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0742d31

    And then please sign this petition. There isn't enough space in the
    world for 8bn people disposing anything at all, let something as
    ill-conceived as disposable BBQs.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Tue Aug 16 14:33:46 2022
    On 16/08/2022 11:59, David Woolley wrote:

    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:

    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and
    safer.

    The problem is that the idiots will take the barbecue home but dispose
    of the embers irresponsibly.  You can also do silly things with non-disposable ones, like my neighbour who sprays them with, I think,
    diesel fuel to get them started (fortunately they seem to have got the message about this not being the right weather for barbecues).

    Whilst is is, unfortunately the case, that without legislation, people
    will sell products with the expectation that they will be used in
    illegal or irresponsible ways, I feel uncomfortable about banning the
    sale of any product that has a legitimate use.

    We already do it with knives and guns.

    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that would
    allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a government ban
    if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the creation of
    statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes of product.
    I'm not sure that an Act giving such wide powers would be desirable.

    As above, there are already relevant classes of product subject to such
    bans, so I can't really see that there would be any judicial difficulty.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Java Jive@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 14:40:13 2022
    On 16/08/2022 12:42, MB wrote:

    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:

    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse
    them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and
    safer.

    I agree it shows stupidity but what about the various organisations that build picnic sites with tables and benches.  They might have a location
    for a barbeque included but do they always include some way of disposing
    of the used barbeque? They often do not provide even adequate provision
    for disposing of rubbish.

    Yes, many lay-bys in Scotland used to have have plastic bins, and some
    in scenic places still do, but do we really want people to set them on
    fire by chucking a BBQ in it? Of course the bins say not to do this,
    but how to dispose of them otherwise, preferably in a safer manner?

    And that's not even allowing for the bored teenagers in local
    playgrounds who set bins on fire deliberately, even piling the wood
    chippings from the ground into them to make the fire worse.

    --

    Fake news kills!

    I may be contacted via the contact address given on my website:
    www.macfh.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 14:43:38 2022
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:18:13 +0100, Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid>
    wrote:

    On 16/08/2022 10:27, NY wrote:

    "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote in message
    news:tdfkci$pm8$1@dont-email.me...

    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them
    correctly. [snip]

    I agree, Brian. In an ideal world we should be selling disposable
    barbecues freely, but policing the use of them better.

    But, as we see every day, we don't live in an ideal world, and what's
    left of the 'natural' world, already impoverished in ecological terms,
    is rapidly being lost. There are now nearly 8bn people in the world,
    and this country's population is higher than it's ever been before, and >no-one seems to want to pay for the constant presence of environmental
    police to make all those people behave properly, so, if we are going to
    be able to save anything worth saving, strong laws are needed.

    There are precedents, ring pulls on cans, that used to get left in
    fields where cattle would be injured by swallowing them, were replaced
    by the modern lever system which, theoretically at least, shouldn't
    leave any loose bits beside the can itself. Of course, the slobs just >through those away still, as I see examples of every day in my walks,
    but at least they are less damaging to farm and wild life.

    And plastic bags now have a surcharge in an attempt to ensure that fewer
    of them end up in the environment, but I see those every day as well,
    and drink bottles, sandwich wrappings, and all the other crap that
    people throw out of their car windows.

    Want to be disgusted? Listen to this:

    Costing the Earth - Litter
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0742d31

    And then please sign this petition. There isn't enough space in the
    world for 8bn people disposing anything at all, let something as >ill-conceived as disposable BBQs.

    The worst examples of careless waste must be open air rock festivals.
    I've never had the tiniest inclination to go to one, but I've seen the aftermath pictures on newspapers' websites, and it's absolutely
    appalling how much potentially useful camping gear is discarded,
    presumably because the people who brought it can't be arsed to take it
    home and clean it.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 16 16:12:04 2022
    On 16/08/2022 12:42, MB wrote:
    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Its not the units its the idiots who use them and more to the point
    misuse
    them or use them in silly places and do not dispose of them correctly.
    Surely a portable reusable one would be far more cost effective and
    safer.

    I agree it shows stupidity but what about the various organisations that build picnic sites with tables and benches.  They might have a location
    for a barbeque included but do they always include some way of disposing
    of the used barbeque? They often do not provide even adequate provision
    for disposing of rubbish.


    My local council built public barbecue facilities at a beach car park
    but had to close it down earlier this year due to (unspecified) abuse.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Woolley@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Tue Aug 16 15:50:50 2022
    On 16/08/2022 14:33, Java Jive wrote:
    We already do it with knives and guns.

    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that
    would allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a
    government ban if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the
    creation of statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes
    of product. I'm not sure that an Act giving such wide powers would be
    desirable.

    As above, there are already relevant classes of product subject to such
    bans, so I can't really see that there would be any judicial difficulty.

    For knives and guns, it is achieved by primary legislation, which
    normally takes a long time to bring into force, as it requires
    parliament to be in session, and to go through Commons, Lords and
    committee stages, and get Royal assent. In exceptional circumstances,
    very small pieces of primary legislation can be put through in a day or
    two, but they have to be exceedingly urgent and non-controversial, and
    having lots of pieces of primary legislation isn't really desirable.

    In the case of knives, flick knives are covered directly by primary legislation, The Restriction of Offensive Weapons Act 1959. Other types
    of knives are covered, indirectly, by the Criminal Justice Act 1988.
    Section 141(2) allows the creation of secondary legislation, and the
    main list is in SI 1988/2019.

    Secondary legislation can be put through parliament on the nod, or even
    on the basis that, if parliament doesn't request a vote, it can go
    through automatically. That means that, once enabled by primary
    legislation the minister, usually acting for the civil service, can make legislation quickly.

    There isn't, I believe, primary legislation that would allow the
    government to create secondary legislation to ban disposable barbecues,
    so the full process for creating primary legislation would be needed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to Java Jive on Tue Aug 16 16:08:21 2022
    On 16/08/2022 14:30, Java Jive wrote:
    On 16/08/2022 10:32, NY wrote:

    "alan_m" <junk@admac.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:jm16avFangrU1@mid.individual.net...

    On 16/08/2022 09:26, Brian Gaff wrote:

    Mind you, we still do allow people to buy fireworks....

    And allow people to send up those hot air beacons to spread fire far
    and wide.

    Chinese lanterns, I confess that I and my stepfather used to do that :-(
     However, we usually did it around bonfire time, and the world is
    usually wetter then, but even so, barns full of straw?  I was too young
    at the time to realise the dangers, but I've occasionally wondered since
    how many things we set on fire.

    The other problem with them is they often had a wire or plastic ring to
    hold the bag open. These often ended up in fields with grazing livestock.


    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Tue Aug 16 18:20:08 2022
    On 16/08/2022 15:50, David Woolley wrote:
    There isn't, I believe, primary legislation that would allow the
    government to create secondary legislation to ban disposable barbecues,
    so the full process for creating primary legislation would be needed.

    It would be difficult to define.

    Why not have a law where an area could be quickly declared a fire risk
    and anyone in the area having any form of fire prosecuted - barbeque,
    open fire, cigarette .......

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Aug 16 18:16:18 2022
    On 16/08/2022 14:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    The worst examples of careless waste must be open air rock festivals.
    I've never had the tiniest inclination to go to one, but I've seen the aftermath pictures on newspapers' websites, and it's absolutely
    appalling how much potentially useful camping gear is discarded,
    presumably because the people who brought it can't be arsed to take it
    home and clean it.


    Glastonbury usually gets false accusations after the festival but has a
    very well organised system to clear the site - they have to clear it
    completely because it is agricultural land and any litter could be fatal
    to farm animals.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Tue Aug 16 18:43:32 2022
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 18:16:18 +0100, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    On 16/08/2022 14:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    The worst examples of careless waste must be open air rock festivals.
    I've never had the tiniest inclination to go to one, but I've seen the
    aftermath pictures on newspapers' websites, and it's absolutely
    appalling how much potentially useful camping gear is discarded,
    presumably because the people who brought it can't be arsed to take it
    home and clean it.


    Glastonbury usually gets false accusations after the festival but has a
    very well organised system to clear the site - they have to clear it >completely because it is agricultural land and any litter could be fatal
    to farm animals.

    I'm sure they do, but it shouldn't be needed. How difficult is it to
    put rubbish in a bin instead of leaving it on the grass, and what's
    wrong with people that makes them abandon perfectly good tents,
    camping chairs etc instead of taking them home to use again?

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Indy Jess John@21:1/5 to David Woolley on Tue Aug 16 21:01:57 2022
    On 16/08/2022 11:59, David Woolley wrote:

    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that would
    allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a government ban
    if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the creation of
    statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes of product.

    It is also quite difficult to frame a Statutory Instrument that is
    immune from circumventions.

    For instance, many years ago I ordered some things by mail order and
    because the total order value was above a threshold I also got what was advertised as a "mystery gift", which in my case was a disposable
    barbecue. Even if there had been legislation at the time banning the
    sale of disposable barbecues, this gift would still have been a legal
    product.

    Jim

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From alan_m@21:1/5 to All on Wed Aug 17 08:09:28 2022
    On 16/08/2022 18:20, MB wrote:
    On 16/08/2022 15:50, David Woolley wrote:
    There isn't, I believe, primary legislation that would allow the
    government to create secondary legislation to ban disposable barbecues,
    so the full process for creating primary legislation would be needed.

    It would be difficult to define.

    Why not have a law where an area could be quickly declared a fire risk
    and anyone in the area having any form of fire prosecuted - barbeque,
    open fire, cigarette .......


    That would be good seeing the number of smokers who think it acceptable
    to throw their still alight dog-ends from car windows.

    --
    mailto : news {at} admac {dot} myzen {dot} co {dot} uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Layman@21:1/5 to Indy Jess John on Wed Aug 17 07:37:39 2022
    On 16/08/2022 21:01, Indy Jess John wrote:
    On 16/08/2022 11:59, David Woolley wrote:

    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that would
    allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a government ban
    if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the creation of
    statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes of product.

    It is also quite difficult to frame a Statutory Instrument that is
    immune from circumventions.

    For instance, many years ago I ordered some things by mail order and
    because the total order value was above a threshold I also got what was advertised as a "mystery gift", which in my case was a disposable
    barbecue. Even if there had been legislation at the time banning the
    sale of disposable barbecues, this gift would still have been a legal product.

    The usual wording to avoid this is "sale or supply".

    --

    Jeff

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Wed Aug 17 09:57:35 2022
    On 16/08/2022 14:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Tue, 16 Aug 2022 14:18:13 +0100, Java Jive <java@evij.com.invalid>
    wrote:

    Costing the Earth - Litter
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b0742d31

    And then please sign this petition. There isn't enough space in the
    world for 8bn people disposing anything at all, let something as
    ill-conceived as disposable BBQs.

    The worst examples of careless waste must be open air rock festivals.
    I've never had the tiniest inclination to go to one, but I've seen the aftermath pictures on newspapers' websites, and it's absolutely
    appalling how much potentially useful camping gear is discarded,
    presumably because the people who brought it can't be arsed to take it
    home and clean it.

    Enables indigent stragglers to earn a few bob clearing it up.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Wed Aug 17 11:17:23 2022
    On 16/08/2022 18:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    I'm sure they do, but it shouldn't be needed. How difficult is it to
    put rubbish in a bin instead of leaving it on the grass, and what's
    wrong with people that makes them abandon perfectly good tents,
    camping chairs etc instead of taking them home to use again?

    Unfortunately many locations either don't have bins or never seem to
    empty them.

    People tend to use cheap tents at music festivals because they are left unattended most of the time which would be risky if they were expensive
    ones.

    The organisers collect up the tents afterwards, some are given to
    charities to be re-used and the cheaper ones re-cycled for the materials.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tiny task@21:1/5 to Indy Jess John on Sun Sep 18 05:20:40 2022
    On Wednesday, August 17, 2022 at 1:32:00 AM UTC+5:30, Indy Jess John wrote:
    On 16/08/2022 11:59, David Woolley wrote:
    In practice, I'm not sure what enabling legislation there is that would allow the sale to be banned. You are only going to get a government ban
    if there is an Act of Parliament that authorises the creation of
    statutory instruments to ban the sale of relevant classes of product.
    It is also quite difficult to frame a Statutory Instrument that is
    immune from circumventions.

    For instance, many years ago I ordered some things by mail order and
    because the total order value was above a threshold I also got what was advertised as a "mystery gift", which in my case was a disposable
    barbecue. Even if there had been legislation at the time banning the
    sale of disposable barbecues, this gift would still have been a legal product.

    Jim
    yes, have a look at this https://tinytask.pro/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)