• 5G and American airports

    From williamwright@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 18 19:46:22 2022
    Discuss

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to R. Mark Clayton on Tue Jan 18 21:13:25 2022
    R. Mark Clayton <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com wrote:
    Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the
    FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.


    Not 28GHz but much lower down in C band

    https://www.icao.int/safety/FSMP/MeetingDocs/FSMP%20WG11/IP/FSMP-WG11-IP08_ICAO%20Flight%20Operations%20Panel%20and%20IATA%20%20IFALPA%205G%20problem%20statement.pdf

    Radar altimeters (RA), operating at 4.2-4.4 GHz, are the only sensors
    onboard a civil aircraft which provide a direct measurement of the
    clearance height of the aircraft over the terrain or other obstacles (i.e.
    the Above Ground Level - AGL - information).

    The RA systems’ input is required and used by many aircraft systems when
    AGL is below 2500 ft. Any failures or interruptions of these sensors can therefore lead to incidents with catastrophic outcome, potentially
    resulting in multiple fatalities. The radar altimeters also play a crucial
    role in providing situational awareness to the flight crew. The
    measurements from the radar altimeters are also used by Automatic Flight Guidance and Control Systems (AFGCS) during instrument approaches, and to control the display of information from other systems, such as Predictive
    Wind Shear (PWS), the Engine-Indicating and Crew-Alerting System (EICAS),
    and Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring (ECAM) systems, to the
    flight crew.

    There is a major risk that 5G telecommunications systems in the 3.7–3.98
    GHz band will cause harmful interference to radar altimeters on all types
    of civil aircraft—including commercial transport airplanes; business, regional, and general aviation airplanes; and both transport and general aviation helicopters. If there is no proper mitigation, this risk has the potential for broad impacts to aviation operations in the United States as
    well as in other regions where the 5G network is being implemented next to
    the 4.2-4.4 GHz frequency band.

    An example listed further below shows, that the identified risk has materialized during certain airline operations impacted by similar interference.

    (See link for more info)


    See also https://www.faa.gov/5g

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to wrightsaerials@aol.com on Tue Jan 18 12:27:52 2022
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com wrote:
    Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Woody@21:1/5 to Tweed on Tue Jan 18 23:24:59 2022
    On Tue 18/01/2022 21:13, Tweed wrote:
    R. Mark Clayton <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com wrote: >>> Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the
    FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't
    [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.


    Not 28GHz but much lower down in C band

    https://www.icao.int/safety/FSMP/MeetingDocs/FSMP%20WG11/IP/FSMP-WG11-IP08_ICAO%20Flight%20Operations%20Panel%20and%20IATA%20%20IFALPA%205G%20problem%20statement.pdf

    Radar altimeters (RA), operating at 4.2-4.4 GHz, are the only sensors
    onboard a civil aircraft which provide a direct measurement of the
    clearance height of the aircraft over the terrain or other obstacles (i.e. the Above Ground Level - AGL - information).

    The RA systems’ input is required and used by many aircraft systems when AGL is below 2500 ft. Any failures or interruptions of these sensors can therefore lead to incidents with catastrophic outcome, potentially
    resulting in multiple fatalities. The radar altimeters also play a crucial role in providing situational awareness to the flight crew. The
    measurements from the radar altimeters are also used by Automatic Flight Guidance and Control Systems (AFGCS) during instrument approaches, and to control the display of information from other systems, such as Predictive Wind Shear (PWS), the Engine-Indicating and Crew-Alerting System (EICAS),
    and Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring (ECAM) systems, to the
    flight crew.

    There is a major risk that 5G telecommunications systems in the 3.7–3.98 GHz band will cause harmful interference to radar altimeters on all types
    of civil aircraft—including commercial transport airplanes; business, regional, and general aviation airplanes; and both transport and general aviation helicopters. If there is no proper mitigation, this risk has the potential for broad impacts to aviation operations in the United States as well as in other regions where the 5G network is being implemented next to the 4.2-4.4 GHz frequency band.

    An example listed further below shows, that the identified risk has materialized during certain airline operations impacted by similar interference.

    (See link for more info)


    See also https://www.faa.gov/5g


    Am I mistaken or don't commercial aircraft have wi-fi on board these
    days (I don't fly)? They are wideband in nearby frequency ranges and I
    would guess perhaps phone/tablets are not as spectrally clean as the
    avionics equipment and could splatter all over it?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Woody on Wed Jan 19 06:54:36 2022
    Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:
    On Tue 18/01/2022 21:13, Tweed wrote:
    R. Mark Clayton <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com wrote: >>>> Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the
    FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't >>> [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.


    Not 28GHz but much lower down in C band

    https://www.icao.int/safety/FSMP/MeetingDocs/FSMP%20WG11/IP/FSMP-WG11-IP08_ICAO%20Flight%20Operations%20Panel%20and%20IATA%20%20IFALPA%205G%20problem%20statement.pdf

    Radar altimeters (RA), operating at 4.2-4.4 GHz, are the only sensors
    onboard a civil aircraft which provide a direct measurement of the
    clearance height of the aircraft over the terrain or other obstacles (i.e. >> the Above Ground Level - AGL - information).

    The RA systems’ input is required and used by many aircraft systems when >> AGL is below 2500 ft. Any failures or interruptions of these sensors can
    therefore lead to incidents with catastrophic outcome, potentially
    resulting in multiple fatalities. The radar altimeters also play a crucial >> role in providing situational awareness to the flight crew. The
    measurements from the radar altimeters are also used by Automatic Flight
    Guidance and Control Systems (AFGCS) during instrument approaches, and to
    control the display of information from other systems, such as Predictive
    Wind Shear (PWS), the Engine-Indicating and Crew-Alerting System (EICAS),
    and Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring (ECAM) systems, to the
    flight crew.

    There is a major risk that 5G telecommunications systems in the 3.7–3.98 >> GHz band will cause harmful interference to radar altimeters on all types
    of civil aircraft—including commercial transport airplanes; business,
    regional, and general aviation airplanes; and both transport and general
    aviation helicopters. If there is no proper mitigation, this risk has the
    potential for broad impacts to aviation operations in the United States as >> well as in other regions where the 5G network is being implemented next to >> the 4.2-4.4 GHz frequency band.

    An example listed further below shows, that the identified risk has
    materialized during certain airline operations impacted by similar
    interference.

    (See link for more info)


    See also https://www.faa.gov/5g


    Am I mistaken or don't commercial aircraft have wi-fi on board these
    days (I don't fly)? They are wideband in nearby frequency ranges and I
    would guess perhaps phone/tablets are not as spectrally clean as the
    avionics equipment and could splatter all over it?


    I think the worry is that an altimeter filter that allows 4.2 GHz won’t reject 3.98 GHz sufficiently. They are concerned about the power of the
    base station, and if you read the FAA document, the radiation pattern of
    the base station antennas (not sufficiently tilted downwards).

    WiFi in planes is much further away in frequency and very much lower in
    power and is largely contained by the cabin structure . It also tends to
    get turned off during takeoff and landing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to Tweed on Wed Jan 19 07:37:51 2022
    That sounds more feasible but its still a very high frequency for mobile
    comms.
    I think 5g is ill thought out in the first place, its a mish-mash of bits
    of spectrum which is spare and who was responsible for looking at the world usage and possible cross mod effects, or de-sensing for that matter. One of
    the countermeasures we were looking at at Racal in the 80s for military use
    was interfering with radio altimeters to cause cruise missiles problems as
    well as helicopters.
    Its no big secret how such things work after all.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Tweed" <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote in message news:ss7ahl$1nk$1@dont-email.me...
    R. Mark Clayton <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote:
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com
    wrote:
    Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at
    ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the
    FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't
    [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.


    Not 28GHz but much lower down in C band

    https://www.icao.int/safety/FSMP/MeetingDocs/FSMP%20WG11/IP/FSMP-WG11-IP08_ICAO%20Flight%20Operations%20Panel%20and%20IATA%20%20IFALPA%205G%20problem%20statement.pdf

    Radar altimeters (RA), operating at 4.2-4.4 GHz, are the only sensors
    onboard a civil aircraft which provide a direct measurement of the
    clearance height of the aircraft over the terrain or other obstacles (i.e. the Above Ground Level - AGL - information).

    The RA systems' input is required and used by many aircraft systems when
    AGL is below 2500 ft. Any failures or interruptions of these sensors can therefore lead to incidents with catastrophic outcome, potentially
    resulting in multiple fatalities. The radar altimeters also play a crucial role in providing situational awareness to the flight crew. The
    measurements from the radar altimeters are also used by Automatic Flight Guidance and Control Systems (AFGCS) during instrument approaches, and to control the display of information from other systems, such as Predictive Wind Shear (PWS), the Engine-Indicating and Crew-Alerting System (EICAS),
    and Electronic Centralized Aircraft Monitoring (ECAM) systems, to the
    flight crew.

    There is a major risk that 5G telecommunications systems in the 3.7-3.98
    GHz band will cause harmful interference to radar altimeters on all types
    of civil aircraft-including commercial transport airplanes; business, regional, and general aviation airplanes; and both transport and general aviation helicopters. If there is no proper mitigation, this risk has the potential for broad impacts to aviation operations in the United States as well as in other regions where the 5G network is being implemented next to the 4.2-4.4 GHz frequency band.

    An example listed further below shows, that the identified risk has materialized during certain airline operations impacted by similar interference.

    (See link for more info)


    See also https://www.faa.gov/5g


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to williamwright on Wed Jan 19 07:27:11 2022
    Yes is it not the case that in the US 5g is using more bands and lower frequencies in some countries.
    Its interesting to note that as well as 118 to 136Mhz am for aircraft,
    there are some allocations in the 400 mhz area for ground vehicles, and some odd ones for ILS systems as well.
    I also note that as well as satellite linked comms for long haul they still use short wave frequencies for this a lot, you can hear them on ssb. The
    ones I normally hear are Shanwick, but often Gander and the one in the
    Azores as well.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "williamwright" <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote in message news:j4ojoeF1h59U1@mid.individual.net...
    Discuss

    Bill


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 19 07:30:37 2022
    Is that not a little high for communications?
    In the clear its only going to be line of sight.
    Also, a lot of satellites use frequencies up there for remote sensing too,
    so speckles all over the pictures on very expensive sats would I assume not
    be welcome either!
    Was not a problem recently in Japan when somebody tried to do uplinks to
    sats from individual dishes on houses? Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "R. Mark Clayton" <notyalckram@gmail.com> wrote in message news:16f08189-074f-4fd5-a808-746f4af68766n@googlegroups.com...
    On Tuesday, 18 January 2022 at 19:46:25 UTC, wrightsaerials@aol.com wrote:
    Discuss

    Bill

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at
    ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to R. Mark Clayton on Wed Jan 19 09:20:33 2022
    R. Mark Clayton wrote:

    wrightsaerials wrote:

    Discuss

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.

    The "flap" I've seen has not been regarding mmWave but the 3550-3980 MHz band and possible interference with radio altimeters between 4200 and 4400 MHz,
    I've seen others rebut it.

    Also the n77 & n79 bands run much closer directly below 4200 and directly above 4400.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to All on Wed Jan 19 04:32:44 2022
    On Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 07:30:42 UTC, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    Is that not a little high for communications?

    No current satellite transceivers operate 10GHz down and usually ~30GHz up.

    In the clear its only going to be line of sight.

    Yep.

    Also, a lot of satellites use frequencies up there for remote sensing too,
    so speckles all over the pictures on very expensive sats would I assume not be welcome either!

    They are hundred(s) of km up, not flying 1km overhead.

    Was not a problem recently in Japan when somebody tried to do uplinks to
    sats from individual dishes on houses? Brian

    Dunno.

    --
    SNIP

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at
    ~28GHz and up.

    They claim it will interfere with avionics (radio altimeters?), so the FAA has suspended introduction for six months.

    As it happens there is no mmWave in Europe and 5G phones sold here don't [yet] have it in, so no need to duck when a plane goes over.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Wed Jan 19 04:51:25 2022
    On Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 09:20:36 UTC, Andy Burns wrote:
    R. Mark Clayton wrote:

    wrightsaerials wrote:

    Discuss

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.
    The "flap" I've seen has not been regarding mmWave but the 3550-3980 MHz band and possible interference with radio altimeters between 4200 and 4400 MHz, I've seen others rebut it.

    Also the n77 & n79 bands run much closer directly below 4200 and directly above
    4400.

    Yes - better information makes that clear. In the UK 3g4Hz to 3G8Hz is used for 5G.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to R. Mark Clayton on Thu Jan 20 02:45:16 2022
    On Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 12:51:26 UTC, R. Mark Clayton wrote:
    On Wednesday, 19 January 2022 at 09:20:36 UTC, Andy Burns wrote:
    R. Mark Clayton wrote:

    wrightsaerials wrote:

    Discuss

    The US airlines are flapping, well not literally, about 5G mmWave at ~28GHz and up.
    The "flap" I've seen has not been regarding mmWave but the 3550-3980 MHz band
    and possible interference with radio altimeters between 4200 and 4400 MHz, I've seen others rebut it.

    Also the n77 & n79 bands run much closer directly below 4200 and directly above
    4400.
    Yes - better information makes that clear. In the UK 3g4Hz to 3G8Hz is used for 5G.

    OTOH BA not flying to USA: - https://bmmagazine.co.uk/news/british-airways-cancels-us-flights-over-5g-safety-fears

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Jan 22 00:29:58 2022
    On 19/01/2022 06:54, Tweed wrote:
    Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:
    Am I mistaken or don't commercial aircraft have wi-fi on board these
    days (I don't fly)? They are wideband in nearby frequency ranges and I
    would guess perhaps phone/tablets are not as spectrally clean as the
    avionics equipment and could splatter all over it?

    WiFi in planes is much further away in frequency and very much lower in
    power and is largely contained by the cabin structure . It also tends to
    get turned off during takeoff and landing.

    How do planes get the backhaul connection to the internet to provide a
    wifi connection? Do they have receivers that can track the satellites
    that provide satellite internet feeds to buildings on the ground that
    can't get decent xDSL broadband?

    I've not been on a plane since I've owned a mobile phone (so over 20
    years) and I hadn't realised that internet on a plane was even possible.
    Do planes provide a femtocell for voice calls on a mobile via the same backhaul? I'd always assumed that "flight mode" was provided mobiles
    because they weren't allowed to have voice, mobile internet or wifi
    turned on *at all*, rather than being allowed except during take-off and landing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Sat Jan 22 07:50:00 2022
    NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:
    On 19/01/2022 06:54, Tweed wrote:
    Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:
    Am I mistaken or don't commercial aircraft have wi-fi on board these
    days (I don't fly)? They are wideband in nearby frequency ranges and I
    would guess perhaps phone/tablets are not as spectrally clean as the
    avionics equipment and could splatter all over it?

    WiFi in planes is much further away in frequency and very much lower in
    power and is largely contained by the cabin structure . It also tends to
    get turned off during takeoff and landing.

    How do planes get the backhaul connection to the internet to provide a
    wifi connection? Do they have receivers that can track the satellites
    that provide satellite internet feeds to buildings on the ground that
    can't get decent xDSL broadband?

    I've not been on a plane since I've owned a mobile phone (so over 20
    years) and I hadn't realised that internet on a plane was even possible.
    Do planes provide a femtocell for voice calls on a mobile via the same backhaul? I'd always assumed that "flight mode" was provided mobiles
    because they weren't allowed to have voice, mobile internet or wifi
    turned on *at all*, rather than being allowed except during take-off and landing.


    Where a plane does have inflight WiFi the back haul is to geostationary satellites. It is WiFi rather than a femto cell, so no native voice calls. Latency is terrible and throughput rates low, so no chance of running over
    the top voice via the likes of WhatsApp. It’s adequate for messaging, basic email etc.

    I’ve never seen under the pod enclosure on the top of the plane, but I’m assuming the antenna is some sort of phased array rather than a
    mechanically steered dish.

    The last time I used it was on a Norwegian service from Bergen. It was good enough to load Google maps and it was interesting to see where we were and
    what was to be seen out of the window in more detail than the inflight map display shows.

    Having the access points for the WiFi in the cabin keeps the RF power
    levels low. Much better than a cellular handset upping its transmit power levels trying to maintain a link to a ground base station.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)