• Re: Driving a sound bar

    From Woody@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sun Feb 12 15:31:20 2023
    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:
    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use
    Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Chris J Dixon@21:1/5 to Woody on Mon Feb 13 08:43:11 2023
    Woody wrote:

    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    When my TV failed a couple of years ago, whilst I awaited a
    replacement, I hooked up a spare computer monitor to my PVR, and
    its headphone socket to my hi-fi, and it all worked surprisingly
    well. Surely it can't simply be penny-pinching that it is no
    longer a TV feature.

    Chris
    --
    Chris J Dixon Nottingham UK
    chris@cdixon.me.uk @ChrisJDixon1

    Plant amazing Acers.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Mon Feb 13 09:23:04 2023
    On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:31:20 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:
    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is
    sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use
    Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    Better still, don't use the TV for reception at all but only picture
    display, then you won't have this problem. Feed your PVR, streaming
    device, satellite receiver, Bluray player and anything else through an
    HDMI switch and then a single HDMI cable to the TV set.

    You can derive an analogue signal for a hi-fi amplifier from an HDMI pass-through audio extractor just after the switch, or you could use a
    switch that includes one.

    A setup like this means that if you need to replace the TV set you
    don't need to worry about any obscure technical features because
    you're only using a feature that they all have - HDMI input - which
    widens your choice.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jeff Gaines@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Mon Feb 13 09:49:56 2023
    On 13/02/2023 in message <ukvjuh9uhgovpht9akonfs9l3ghgu7nt5a@4ax.com>
    Roderick Stewart wrote:

    On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:31:20 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
    wrote:

    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:
    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is >>>sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use >>>Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    Better still, don't use the TV for reception at all but only picture
    display, then you won't have this problem. Feed your PVR, streaming
    device, satellite receiver, Bluray player and anything else through an
    HDMI switch and then a single HDMI cable to the TV set.

    You can derive an analogue signal for a hi-fi amplifier from an HDMI >pass-through audio extractor just after the switch, or you could use a
    switch that includes one.

    A setup like this means that if you need to replace the TV set you
    don't need to worry about any obscure technical features because
    you're only using a feature that they all have - HDMI input - which
    widens your choice.

    Rod.

    The Yamaha-RX-S601D can switch 6 HDMI inputs. I feed everything in to it
    then send the picture to the TV and the sound to a pair of Aviano 1's. It
    would allow replacing the TV with a monitor.

    --
    Jeff Gaines Dorset UK
    George Washington was a British subject until well after his 40th birthday. (Margaret Thatcher, speech at the White House 17 December 1979)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Mon Feb 13 12:53:04 2023
    On 13/02/2023 09:23, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:31:20 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:

    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is
    sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use
    Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    Better still, don't use the TV for reception at all but only picture
    display, then you won't have this problem. Feed your PVR, streaming
    device, satellite receiver, Bluray player and anything else through an
    HDMI switch and then a single HDMI cable to the TV set.

    You can derive an analogue signal for a hi-fi amplifier from an HDMI pass-through audio extractor just after the switch, or you could use a
    switch that includes one.

    Won't work with my VCR or LaserDisc. They both need SCART. And an extra
    bit of kit. My current TV has four HDMI inputs; do modern ones have fewer?

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to max_demian@bigfoot.com on Tue Feb 14 09:52:00 2023
    On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:53:04 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    On 13/02/2023 09:23, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:31:20 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:

    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is
    sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use
    Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    Better still, don't use the TV for reception at all but only picture
    display, then you won't have this problem. Feed your PVR, streaming
    device, satellite receiver, Bluray player and anything else through an
    HDMI switch and then a single HDMI cable to the TV set.

    You can derive an analogue signal for a hi-fi amplifier from an HDMI
    pass-through audio extractor just after the switch, or you could use a
    switch that includes one.

    Won't work with my VCR or LaserDisc. They both need SCART. And an extra
    bit of kit. My current TV has four HDMI inputs; do modern ones have fewer?

    The problem with using the TV itself to switch between HDMI inputs,
    (if it even has enough of them) is that you would need a TV with an
    audio output after its input selector, and they don't all have this.
    Also, you need a thick the bundle of cables going to the TV - one more
    than the number of HDMI sources that you want, to include one for the
    sound coming back to the hi-fi amplifier. If you do all the switching elsewhere, the TV only needs two reasonably thin cables - power and
    HDMI - which is much easier to manage if you have to route them to a
    wall bracket. It also means that if you ever need to replace the TV
    you don't need to worry about what features it has.

    If you really must preserve something that only has a SCART output,
    just type "scart to hdmi adaptor" into the search box on Amazon and
    you'll see a choice of fairly cheap devices that would probably do the
    trick. The only SCART device I still have is a VHS machine that is fed
    as an input to a PVR and DVD recorder that has a SCART output. I used
    it once a few weeks ago to make a DVD copy for a family member, and I
    couldn't even remember when I had last used it before then, but it was definitely several years. It might be worth dividing AV gubbins into
    two categories, the stuff that gets used every day, and the stuff that
    could be kept on a trolley in a cupboard and only wheeled in and
    connected up on the rare occasions when it's needed. Just a thought.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Davey@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Feb 14 11:04:00 2023
    On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:52:00 +0000
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    The problem with using the TV itself to switch between HDMI inputs,
    (if it even has enough of them) is that you would need a TV with an
    audio output after its input selector, and they don't all have this.

    Yup, my 12-year old Toshiba is like this. It's most annoying. If I use
    the PVR as a video source, the TV set still sends out the audio from
    whatever TV Channel it's tuned to. So I have to provide a method of
    sending each external device's sound output individually to the Hi-Fi
    for the loudspeakers.
    And the set has 3 HDMI inputs, and with my new Firestick, I now have 4
    external HDMI devices. Time for an HDMI switch.
    --
    Davey.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Feb 14 12:25:02 2023
    On 14/02/2023 09:52, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Mon, 13 Feb 2023 12:53:04 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 13/02/2023 09:23, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Sun, 12 Feb 2023 15:31:20 +0000, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com>
    wrote:
    On Sun 12/02/2023 14:17, Max Demian wrote:

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is >>>>> sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use
    Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce
    delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.


    Tried to find a TV with a headphone socket these days? Rocking horse
    manure springs to mind....

    Better still, don't use the TV for reception at all but only picture
    display, then you won't have this problem. Feed your PVR, streaming
    device, satellite receiver, Bluray player and anything else through an
    HDMI switch and then a single HDMI cable to the TV set.

    You can derive an analogue signal for a hi-fi amplifier from an HDMI
    pass-through audio extractor just after the switch, or you could use a
    switch that includes one.

    Won't work with my VCR or LaserDisc. They both need SCART. And an extra
    bit of kit. My current TV has four HDMI inputs; do modern ones have fewer?

    The problem with using the TV itself to switch between HDMI inputs,
    (if it even has enough of them) is that you would need a TV with an
    audio output after its input selector, and they don't all have this.
    Also, you need a thick the bundle of cables going to the TV - one more
    than the number of HDMI sources that you want, to include one for the
    sound coming back to the hi-fi amplifier. If you do all the switching elsewhere, the TV only needs two reasonably thin cables - power and
    HDMI - which is much easier to manage if you have to route them to a
    wall bracket. It also means that if you ever need to replace the TV
    you don't need to worry about what features it has.

    If you really must preserve something that only has a SCART output,
    just type "scart to hdmi adaptor" into the search box on Amazon and
    you'll see a choice of fairly cheap devices that would probably do the
    trick. The only SCART device I still have is a VHS machine that is fed
    as an input to a PVR and DVD recorder that has a SCART output. I used
    it once a few weeks ago to make a DVD copy for a family member, and I couldn't even remember when I had last used it before then, but it was definitely several years. It might be worth dividing AV gubbins into
    two categories, the stuff that gets used every day, and the stuff that
    could be kept on a trolley in a cupboard and only wheeled in and
    connected up on the rare occasions when it's needed. Just a thought.

    You have a DVD recorder that can record from an external source, like
    VCR? Lucky you. I used to have one of them, but my current (Panasonic)
    one will only record from Freeview (via HDD).

    With any luck my 10yo Sony will last a few more years.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Tue Feb 14 12:35:29 2023
    On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 11:04:00 +0000, Davey <davey@example.invalid>
    wrote:

    On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 09:52:00 +0000
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    The problem with using the TV itself to switch between HDMI inputs,
    (if it even has enough of them) is that you would need a TV with an
    audio output after its input selector, and they don't all have this.

    Yup, my 12-year old Toshiba is like this. It's most annoying. If I use
    the PVR as a video source, the TV set still sends out the audio from
    whatever TV Channel it's tuned to. So I have to provide a method of
    sending each external device's sound output individually to the Hi-Fi
    for the loudspeakers.

    That's exactly what I did for several years. I had to select the video
    on the TV and the audio on the hi-fi amplifier. I got used to it, but
    it's only since being able to switch audio and video together with the
    same control that I realise how daft it was.

    And the set has 3 HDMI inputs, and with my new Firestick, I now have 4 >external HDMI devices. Time for an HDMI switch.

    The remote control for the 4k max version has infra red as well as
    Bluetooth, and can be configured to control the volume on a Cambridge
    Audio hi-fi amplifier (and there was a big list of other brands too).
    Not only that but the power button can be separately configured to
    switch the TV on and off, so now I have one remote that can control
    the three pieces of equipment that I use most of the time, which
    leaves the coffee table a lot tidier than it was.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to max_demian@bigfoot.com on Tue Feb 14 12:44:02 2023
    On Tue, 14 Feb 2023 12:25:02 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    You have a DVD recorder that can record from an external source, like
    VCR? Lucky you. I used to have one of them, but my current (Panasonic)
    one will only record from Freeview (via HDD).

    Yes, it's a DMR-EX83. It's SD only, but has both a hard drive and a
    recordable DVD drive, so it's possible to use its edit function to top
    and tail a VHS copy to make it neat before burning it to a disc. This
    is the only reason I've kept it, though I've used it so rarely
    recently that I won't bother trying to replace it if it fails.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to Paul on Wed Feb 15 05:29:14 2023
    On Sunday, 12 February 2023 at 18:04:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
    On 2/12/2023 9:17 AM, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:
    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.

    The connection method affects the channel configuration you can do.

    A TOSLink is stereo or AC3 5.1, or can be quad (at reduced quality).
    And I've never run into someone with a working quad option (as proof
    there really is a quad option). There may not be enough bandwidth in
    the bitstream for a more-fancy format.

    The TOSLink in stereo mode, should be every bit as good as analog stereo, and with the optical path, there's no ground loop.

    "TOSLINK cables are usually limited to 5 meters in length,
    with a technical maximum of 10 meters"

    And that's because the transmitter and receiver, have
    low material cost. They do the link, the way a hobbyist
    would create a link. One benefit of the choice of visible
    red light, is it's easier to check "it's working".

    Paul

    I have a 10m TOSLink fibre from my PC to the AV amp in the lounge. Works fine. IIRC it cost about £3 and shipped from PRC.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sat Feb 18 05:41:41 2023
    On Saturday, 18 February 2023 at 12:28:29 UTC, Max Demian wrote:
    On 18/02/2023 11:17, Adrian Caspersz wrote:
    SNIP

    Do turntables have optical outputs?

    Never seen this, although my Blue Ray player does have coax and optical out.

    And why is the whole caboodle called
    a turntable so you have to say "platter" for the bit that goes round?
    No eye deer.

    And why aren't the preamps of both the turntable and amplifier
    switchable so you can plug anything into anything?

    My mate's turntable is switchable and has USB out, mine isn't. His AV amp has phono and aux inputs, but you have to plug into different sockets, mine needs a pre-amp.

    The reason is that the phono out is a few mV and needs a lot of amplification, whereas line out is about 600mV [RMS], and will over drive the phono input.

    Whilst even fairly ordinary shielded cables are unlikely to suffer much from EMI, the same cannot be said of a phono connection, so good quality well shielded cable is recommended.

    My mate's oddly came with 3.5mm jack to RCA, but it works fine even on phono. Mine has s captive cable to the pre-amp, but also works fine.

    Given the relatively poor quality of vinyl compared to CD most listeners won't notice any noise arising from the analogue connection.

    You don't need fancy cables for digital audio connections - the signal either gets there or it does not.

    My router is connected to a cabinet 500m away via very thin unshielded untwisted cable, some of it near half century old corroding aluminium, with numerous joints, some wet and underground and yet manages 50Mbps down and 10Mbps up with a negligible BERR,
    which is in any event error corrected. When the same connection was ISDN (2km all the way to the exchange) the BERR was zero.

    So what error rate would expect on a meter or two of shielded cable at perhaps 500kbps?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to max_demian@bigfoot.com on Sun Feb 19 09:59:12 2023
    On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 17:52:07 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    On 18/02/2023 16:53, Rod Speed wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Feb 2023 23:28:27 +1100, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
    wrote:

    I think there's something funny about airports, especially the foreign
    language terms for entry and exit. Does exit mean the exit to the plane,

    Nope, thats the gate.

    What about foreign airports with their funny foreign names?

    or to the countryside?

    To outside the terminal.

    Maybe it's only confusing if you don't know the lingo.

    You need to know not just the lingo but what particular style or
    convention has been adopted in a specific instance.

    Imagine you are rummaging through the cables under the floor or behind
    the racks in a broadcasting installation of some kind, and you find
    one that someone has labelled "thingummybobble output" (or something equivalent) what do you think it means? Does it mean that the cable is
    supposed to be plugged *to* the output of the thingummybobble, or does
    it mean that the cable carries the output signal *from* the
    thingummybobble and should be plugged to whatever piece of equipment
    requires this signal? Hopefully whoever designed the installation will
    have made it clear in the documentation what convention they have
    adopted, and they will have been consistent in how they have adopted
    it, because there doesn't seem to be enough informatuon in the
    labelling alone.

    In many cases it will be obvious what a label means. A key that is
    labelled "front door" for example, is quite clearly not a door itself
    but something to be applied to one, but some things can work either
    way. Cables can be either outputs or intended to be plugged to
    outputs, and when you have hundreds of them behind an equipment rack
    it's important to know which.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From R. Mark Clayton@21:1/5 to Paul on Sun Feb 19 04:14:37 2023
    On Sunday, 12 February 2023 at 18:04:23 UTC, Paul wrote:
    On 2/12/2023 9:17 AM, Max Demian wrote:
    On 11/02/2023 21:24, pinnerite wrote:
    My TV has a sound bar.

    It is connected by an optical cable.

    The TV itelf is connected to an ethernet switch, an HDMI cable
    and by coax to TV aerial distribution amplifier.

    People make things so complicated these days. A simple audio cable is sufficient. Even a headphone output will do. Some sound bars use Bluetooth even though the bar is inches from the TV, and introduce delays in the sound leading to loss of lip-sync.

    The connection method affects the channel configuration you can do.

    A TOSLink is stereo or AC3 5.1, or can be quad (at reduced quality).
    And I've never run into someone with a working quad option (as proof
    there really is a quad option). There may not be enough bandwidth in
    the bitstream for a more-fancy format.

    The TOSLink in stereo mode, should be every bit as good as analog stereo,
    and with the optical path, there's no ground loop.

    "TOSLINK cables are usually limited to 5 meters in length,
    with a technical maximum of 10 meters"

    And that's because the transmitter and receiver, have
    low material cost. They do the link, the way a hobbyist
    would create a link. One benefit of the choice of visible
    red light, is it's easier to check "it's working".

    Paul

    A sound bar can do stereo, but NOT 5.1. It only needs one woofer because bass placement by human ear is limited (to the extent that one can position one's sub-woofer anywhere in the room).

    So stereo via optical out will work just fine.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)