When I heard the news countdown music, I looked up from the PC as I
usually do - and noticed (this was coming up to 13:00 today, I think, on
the news channel 231) the usual countdown wasn't there. I at first
thought this might be someone forgot to press something, but _thought_
there was also a slight change to the audio - whenever the "rays"
connecting the reporter back to mother BBC appeared, I thought I heard a
slight extra whooshing.

Anyone know if it's changed? I'll miss the countdown if it has been
dropped (even though I know it isn't actually tied to any actual time
signal, at least I don't think it is).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

The thing about smut is it harms no one and it's rarely cruel. Besides, it's a gleeful rejection of the dreary and the "correct".
- Alison Graham, RT 2014/10/25-31

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

When I heard the news countdown music, I looked up from the PC as I usually do -
and noticed (this was coming up to 13:00 today, I think, on the news channel 231) the usual countdown wasn't there. I at first thought this might be someone
forgot to press something, but _thought_ there was also a slight change to the
audio - whenever the "rays" connecting the reporter back to mother BBC appeared,
I thought I heard a slight extra whooshing.

I just heard the 4pm intro, and nothing sounded different, I wasn't looking at the screen.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Sun, 28 Nov 2021 at 16:11:37, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote
(my responses usually follow points raised):

J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

When I heard the news countdown music, I looked up from the PC as I >>usually do - and noticed (this was coming up to 13:00 today, I think,
on the news channel 231) the usual countdown wasn't there. I at first >>thought this might be someone forgot to press something, but
_thought_ there was also a slight change to the audio - whenever the >>"rays" connecting the reporter back to mother BBC appeared, I thought
I heard a slight extra whooshing.

I just heard the 4pm intro, and nothing sounded different, I wasn't
looking at the screen.

I've seen a later one than the one I mentioned, and the countdown is
back. The whoosh accompanying the rays is very subtle - maybe it's
always been there.
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

We'd agreed to overlook each others' families and everything, and get married" (The Trouble with Harry)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

Do you mean the hidden one bbc radio uses to help the local presenters stop talking at the right time? I'm hearing the last few counts of that a lot
more of late, sloppy mixing.
Which reminds me, Has BBC radio Sussex got a deaf sound mixer on the staff. Every now and then the levels vary widely between presenter and music and suddenly somebody shoves up or down the level in the middle of a song, or
adds excessive limiting instead as if they have no idea what does what on
the desk or they are fighting the presenter on one slider with their own slider.
Brian

--

This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
Blind user, so no pictures please
Note this Signature is meaningless.!
"J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote in message news:vpw79ucMV5ohFwIX@255soft.uk...

When I heard the news countdown music, I looked up from the PC as I
usually do - and noticed (this was coming up to 13:00 today, I think, on
the news channel 231) the usual countdown wasn't there. I at first thought this might be someone forgot to press something, but _thought_ there was
also a slight change to the audio - whenever the "rays" connecting the reporter back to mother BBC appeared, I thought I heard a slight extra whooshing.

Anyone know if it's changed? I'll miss the countdown if it has been
dropped (even though I know it isn't actually tied to any actual time
signal, at least I don't think it is).
--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

The thing about smut is it harms no one and it's rarely cruel. Besides,
it's a
gleeful rejection of the dreary and the "correct".
- Alison Graham, RT 2014/10/25-31

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)