• Re: Medium wave

    From JMB99@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Fri Mar 1 15:53:49 2024
    On 01/03/2024 12:57, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Is it not time we used this underused part of the spectrum for digital stuff like they suggested some years ago.


    Why not invest any savings from MW, LW and VHF FM close down in
    completing DAB coverage. There are lots of receivers out there for DAB.

    Who is going to want to invest in building DRM sites where there are
    very few receivers and available and none in most cars.

    How many years would it be before there was DRM coverage everywhere.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Fri Mar 1 16:33:22 2024
    On 01/03/2024 12:57, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Is it not time we used this underused part of the spectrum for digital stuff like they suggested some years ago. I know radios were made for this as I found one abroad back when I could see. OK, so it was mono, but far better
    at removing interference than AM analogue is and now we are closing the stations seems a got time to exploit it again. Obviously fading could be an issue, but most medium wave outlets were meant to be for local consumption,

    The MF band is no use to anyone now. Only 1 MHz of spectrum, no one is
    going to bother with any broadcast system, and what other use can you
    think of ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Sat Mar 2 10:17:23 2024
    On Fri, 1 Mar 2024 16:33:22 +0000, Mark Carver <mark@invalid.com>
    wrote:

    On 01/03/2024 12:57, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Is it not time we used this underused part of the spectrum for digital stuff >> like they suggested some years ago. I know radios were made for this as I
    found one abroad back when I could see. OK, so it was mono, but far better >> at removing interference than AM analogue is and now we are closing the
    stations seems a got time to exploit it again. Obviously fading could be an >> issue, but most medium wave outlets were meant to be for local consumption,

    The MF band is no use to anyone now. Only 1 MHz of spectrum, no one is
    going to bother with any broadcast system, and what other use can you
    think of ?

    It would be a lost learning opportunity if they closed it down. I
    remember when it was possible to make a radio receiver with nothing
    more than three components and a lot of wire, and apart from that
    you'd only need a high impedance earphone to listen to it. It was
    doing this that took away the mystery of it and made me realise that
    if I could make things myself that really worked, maybe radio and
    electronics could actually be within my understanding, so maybe it
    would be worth reading more about it. It's difficult to exaggerate the
    amount of encouragement a simple thing like this can give.

    Nowadays you need to be fairly well educated already before you can
    hope to understand anything, and most ordinary household technology is
    beyond anybody's hope of being able to make one themselves without
    fairly complicated subassemblies that someone else has already
    created. I wonder how anybody learns about this stuff today?

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Mar 2 10:52:42 2024
    On 02/03/2024 10:17, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    It would be a lost learning opportunity if they closed it down.



    Nice clear MW and LW bands for someone to build a small transmitter and
    receive on a crystal set.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sat Mar 2 12:29:11 2024
    On 02/03/2024 11:11, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Other uses? Well part of it used to be used for analogue portable phones.



    Are they still used?

    You used to hear some very "interesting" things from them. :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sat Mar 2 21:24:47 2024
    In message <urv14t$1rd21$1@dont-email.me> at Sat, 2 Mar 2024 11:04:58,
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes
    I was thinking of an on the cheap community station that Offcom does not >charge an arm and a leg for, or are we now going over to mobile broadband >supplied radio, which in effect is not free as you have to pay for the >connection. Brian

    The assumption is that everybody has, everywhere, an always-on
    connection. I find it an infuriating assumption, but that's not going to
    stop them assuming it; I can't think of anything that will - even a few high-profile anti-discrimination cases won't, they'll probably if
    anything have the opposite effect (of removing the requirement not to so discriminate).
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    All humanity is divided into three classes: those who are immovable, those who are movable, and those who move! - Benjamin Franklin

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sun Mar 3 18:48:14 2024
    In message <us22o9$2hruk$1@dont-email.me> at Sun, 3 Mar 2024 14:50:49,
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes
    No most of them have died by now. They used vhf for the handset to the base >unit, and just the top end of medium wave for the other way. This worked
    []
    If you mean analogue fobile moans, I don't think it's that they've died,
    but that the base stations they worked with - by modern parlance maybe
    that'd be G1, or even G0 perhaps? - were I think turned off many years
    ago. The 'phones probably _would_ have died too, if only the batteries -
    I think we're talking long ago enough that a fair number of them were
    NiCd batteries, which (on the whole) don't last well.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Once a mind is opened it is very hard to shut.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to All on Wed Mar 6 12:08:03 2024
    In article <us9fms$asjm$1@dont-email.me>, Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:
    No I men the old analogue walk about phones. They simply used 49Mhz and
    just at the high frequency end ofmedium wave. They had no protection
    against eavesdroppers as they used narrow band FM. I do also admit in its day, owning a Rabbit system With my base station up high in the
    building I found in places I could get a mile out of them. The idea was
    also that you had rbbit phone points around the place and you could also communicate via those. For what it was, it worked for many years as a cordless digital mobile. I don't know what protocols it used but the frequencies were high. After a while phone got shut down of course as
    nobody wanted to pay a connection rate to the company which ran them.

    T Are there any mobiles around now which can be used the house on a
    landline and as a mobile? Brian

    With landlines about to vanish this is not a concern. I am told that when I move to VOIP, an app will allow me to pick up VOIP calls on my mobile.
    Problem solved.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to charles on Wed Mar 6 14:01:01 2024
    On 06/03/2024 12:08, charles wrote:
    With landlines about to vanish this is not a concern. I am told that when I move to VOIP, an app will allow me to pick up VOIP calls on my mobile. Problem solved.

    The app can already be installed on your mobile if you set up a VOIP
    account on your broadband and have a router with a Wifi connection.

    Landlines are not going to disappear. They will, though, no longer be
    analogue with a digital overlay, but will be digital with an analogue
    converter in the router.

    If you do not have broadband via landline, you will get a router with a converter installed, and you will plug your existing phone into the
    router, and will carry on as before. You nay need to update your burglar
    alarm and any personal alarm buttons you use to call help after a fall
    or medical emergemcy.

    If you have broadband and a modern alarm system, the only change you
    will probably notice is that you need to plug your phone into the
    router, not the socket on the wall.

    It will be a good idea to install a standby or uninterruptable power
    supply for the router.

    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than
    landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Wed Mar 6 14:56:20 2024
    In message <us9fms$asjm$1@dont-email.me> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024 10:14:50,
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes
    No I men the old analogue walk about phones. They simply used 49Mhz and just >at the high frequency end ofmedium wave. They had no protection against >eavesdroppers as they used narrow band FM.

    Ah yes. I think I still have one (though I usually use a corded 'phone).

    I do also admit in its day, owning a Rabbit system With my base station up
    high in the building I found in places I could get a mile out of them. The >idea was also that you had rbbit phone points around the place and you could >also communicate via those. For what it was, it worked for many years as a >cordless digital mobile. I don't know what protocols it used but the >frequencies were high. After a while phone got shut down of course as nobody >wanted to pay a connection rate to the company which ran them.

    I remember seeing the base stations at motorway services and the like. I
    think they continued to work as a home cordless after they turned off
    the network.

    T
    Are there any mobiles around now which can be used the house on a landline >and as a mobile?
    Brian

    Good question! I'm not aware of any. Though when we switch to VoIP, I
    think it'll become moot, in that you'll be able to use your VoIPphone
    wherever you can get internet (at call costs of whatever your VoIPphone provider - who doesn't have to be your broadband provider, and in the
    case of PlusNet certainly won't be). The one I looked at (VoIPfone) was
    IIRR 1p/minute (or 7p/minute to UK mobiles!), though had packages
    similar to mobile ones of so many minutes a month (to both land and
    mobiles) for a monthly fee (e. g. IIRR 100 minutes for the fiver-a-month
    one). (2p/min to USA, including USA mobiles, i. e. yes, outside monthly
    package minutes, UK mobiles cost more to call than US ones.)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The first draft was "flick me all over with ..." (RT Chtr 2020)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Wed Mar 6 15:12:13 2024
    In message <l4rb8tFq7htU1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    14:01:01, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 06/03/2024 12:08, charles wrote:
    With landlines about to vanish this is not a concern. I am told that when I >> move to VOIP, an app will allow me to pick up VOIP calls on my mobile.
    Problem solved.

    The app can already be installed on your mobile if you set up a VOIP
    account on your broadband and have a router with a Wifi connection.

    The VoIP account doesn't have to be with the same provider as your
    broadband. (In the case of PlusNet, they're still saying they're not
    offering it - they'll move you to BT, though [part of the same company,
    though most of the time they operate separately] if you want.)

    Landlines are not going to disappear. They will, though, no longer be >analogue with a digital overlay, but will be digital with an analogue >converter in the router.

    Assuming your broadband supplier (or you) supply a router with such a
    converter built in. If not, you can get external converters that go
    between your old 'phone and the router (some of them even support pulse dialling!). Or, you can get a dedicated VoIP 'phone.

    If you do not have broadband via landline, you will get a router with a >converter installed, and you will plug your existing phone into the
    router, and will carry on as before. You nay need to update your

    PlusNet's "Hub 2" router has a (BT type!) socket on it, under a sticker
    saying Digital Voice Customers Only; looks like they're not going to
    enable it though, which seems silly to me!

    burglar alarm and any personal alarm buttons you use to call help after
    a fall or medical emergemcy.

    If you have broadband and a modern alarm system, the only change you
    will probably notice is that you need to plug your phone into the
    router, not the socket on the wall.

    I think plugging the master plug from your extension wiring into the
    router (via a converter if necessary) should make all your old kit work
    via the new system, though it may be inconvenient if your router is not currently near your master socket.

    It will be a good idea to install a standby or uninterruptable power
    supply for the router.

    For the amount of power the average router uses, a UPS of the sort that provides mains would be overkill, though all that is available at the
    moment; those with sufficient technical skill should be able to rig up something with rechargeable cells (which after all is all that's in a
    UPS, other than mains-to-DC and DC-to-mains converters).

    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than >landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.

    Only cheaper than landline, for some people, if they pay a monthly
    mobile fee anyway. I have anytime landline calls with my broadband and
    am _not_ paying extra; however, may be because I'm a long-time customer.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The first draft was "flick me all over with ..." (RT Chtr 2020)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Wed Mar 6 17:02:46 2024
    On 06/03/2024 15:12, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4rb8tFq7htU1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    14:01:01, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes

    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than
    landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.

    Only cheaper than landline, for some people, if they pay a monthly
    mobile fee anyway. I have anytime landline calls with my broadband and
    am _not_ paying extra; however, may be because I'm a long-time customer.

    I have unlimited calls, text and broadband on my pay monthly cell
    connection, and it costs me about half the price that an equivalent
    landline package would.

    If your cell is costing you more per month than a landline, then as most
    pay as you use it packages require a minimum top up every month anyway,
    you may as well go for the unlimited contract option.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Wed Mar 6 22:52:31 2024
    In message <l4rltmFrqh2U1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    17:02:46, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 06/03/2024 15:12, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4rb8tFq7htU1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    14:01:01, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes

    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than
    landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.

    Only cheaper than landline, for some people, if they pay a monthly
    mobile fee anyway. I have anytime landline calls with my broadband and
    am _not_ paying extra; however, may be because I'm a long-time customer.

    I have unlimited calls, text and broadband on my pay monthly cell
    connection, and it costs me about half the price that an equivalent
    landline package would.

    Interesting! Who are you with? Do you find broadband-via-mobile is
    adequate technically (speed, reliability, other)? How much _do_ you pay? (Obviously feel free not to answer that - or any of this of course!)

    If your cell is costing you more per month than a landline, then as
    most pay as you use it packages require a minimum top up every month
    anyway, you may as well go for the unlimited contract option.

    Indeed; it hearkens back to the old dial-up days, when the knowledge
    that every minute was costing you inhibited use. You say "than a
    landline" - I don't consider that I pay separately for my landline, just
    all as part of my broadband; last real haggle on that was switching from evening-and-weekend-calls-free to anytime calls, in return for a halving
    of broadband speed, which was fine by me and I don't notice it: I'm the
    only user in this household and don't download HD movies, and normally
    am unaware of any broadband speed limit. YMMV, especially if you're a multi-user household.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I know people who worry more about the health consequences of drinking a coffee at breakfast than a bottle of urine at dinner
    - Revd Richard Cole, RT 2021/7/3-9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 07:25:05 2024
    On 06/03/2024 22:52, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    I have unlimited calls, text and broadband on my pay monthly cell
    connection, and it costs me about half the price that an equivalent
    landline package would.

    Interesting! Who are you with? Do you find broadband-via-mobile is
    adequate technically (speed, reliability, other)? How much _do_ you pay? (Obviously feel free not to answer that - or any of this of course!)

    I have SIM my accounts with EE and Vodafone at about thirty quid a month
    each. Netter deals are probably available, but ICBA looking. The phine
    cost me £160, and the router cost me £30. If I were willing to put up
    with losing the internet on one account while talking on the other, it
    takes two SIMs. It happily carries on working if I use the BB account on
    the SIM I'm talking via.

    Last time I asked the question, a landline was about £55.

    For the majority of the time I can stream 2K definition video on either accounts. Occasionally, one of them drops out.

    If your cell is costing you more per month than a landline, then as
    most pay as you use it packages require a minimum top up every month
    anyway, you may as well go for the unlimited contract option.

    Indeed; it hearkens back to the old dial-up days, when the knowledge
    that every minute was costing you inhibited use. You say "than a
    landline" - I don't consider that I pay separately for my landline, just
    all as part of my broadband;

    I remember maxing out my 20GB landline data allowance on the dim and
    distant past. I also remember uploading and downloading stuff via 2G
    cellphone at 9600 baud, and paying by the minute.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 08:16:50 2024
    Sm9obiBXaWxsaWFtc29uIHdyb3RlOg0KDQo+IExhc3QgdGltZSBJIGFza2VkIHRoZSBxdWVz dGlvbiwgYSBsYW5kbGluZSB3YXMgYWJvdXQgwqM1NS4NCg0KUGx1c25ldCBjdXJyZW50bHkg Y29zdHMgbWUgwqMyNi4yMC9tIGZvciBsaW5lIHJlbnRhbCwgb2ZmLXBlYWsgY2FsbHMgYW5k IA0KODAvMjBNYiBicm9hZGJhbmQgKGZyb20gbmV4dCBtb250aCwgdGhlIENQSSszLjklIHdp bGwgc2VlIGl0IHJpc2UgdG8gwqMyOC4zNykNCg0K

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Mar 7 08:32:13 2024
    On 06/03/2024 14:01, John Williamson wrote:
    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.


    Any listener to radio phone-ins and radio news programmes will know just reliable VOIP is!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to Tweed on Thu Mar 7 08:58:34 2024
    On 07/03/2024 08:45, Tweed wrote:
    That’s more a function of a poor quality communication link rather than VOIP as a technology.

    Does not matter what the cause is if you cannot communicate with people
    because of it.

    Occasionally the person in the studio will give up and connect by
    landline and straight away get a perfect connection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 09:09:29 2024
    On 07/03/2024 08:32, JMB99 wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 14:01, John Williamson wrote:
    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than
    landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.


    Any listener to radio phone-ins and radio news programmes will know just reliable VOIP is!



    The problem isn't the VOIP element, it is the cellular system it is
    using. A lot of reporters seem to be calling in using Zoom or a similar technology over a poor quality connection. If they made a standard voice
    call instead, they need less bandwidth and the error correction seems to
    be better.

    Back in the day, there used to be a technician on all BBC phone in
    programmes who would call you back after you called in and check the
    line quality before you went on air. Nowadays, it sounds as if they just
    put you on hold until it's your turn and hope for the best.

    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 09:49:37 2024
    On Wed, 6 Mar 2024 15:12:13 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk>
    wrote:

    I think plugging the master plug from your extension wiring into the
    router (via a converter if necessary) should make all your old kit work
    via the new system, though it may be inconvenient if your router is not >currently near your master socket.

    It will work, and even if the router is not conveniently near where
    you would really like your phone to be, just move the base station of
    the phone next to the router anyway and buy another extension handset.

    Or you might be able to obtain just another charging stand (from
    Ebay?) for the handset you already have in the base station, so that
    you can continue to use it somewhere else. You'll then have a base
    station with no handset next to the router, and the same number of
    handsets around the house that you had previously, at very little
    extra expense.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Mar 7 10:49:28 2024
    In message <l4tbfiF4fn8U1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    08:16:50, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> writes
    John Williamson wrote:

    Last time I asked the question, a landline was about £55.

    Plusnet currently costs me £26.20/m for line rental, off-peak calls and >80/20Mb broadband (from next month, the CPI+3.9% will see it rise to
    £28.37)

    I too am paying PlusNet twentysomething - "line rental" (I'll certainly
    be glad to see _that_ term consigned to history!), anytime calls, and (I
    think) 30/10 broadband; as you say, the CPI+3.9 cuts in at the end of
    this month.

    (Where did the 3.9% come from? It seems to be used by most providers.
    [And one - fortunately not PlusNet - provider uses RPI not CPI.])

    The cost of a _new_ landline, if you don't have one, I _think_ is in
    three figures, but that's one-off. After end of POTS, I don't know what
    will happen there: presumably there'll still be an installation cost for
    new users, though presumably fibre. (As, presumably, is happening for
    new builds, such as estates.)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Worst programme ever made? I was in hospital once having a knee operation and I watched a whole episode of "EastEnders". Ugh! I suppose it's true to life. But so is diarrhoea - and I don't want to see that on television. - Patrick Moore, in Radio Times 12-18 May 2007.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Mar 7 10:44:37 2024
    In message <l4t8ehF4l60U1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    07:25:05, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 06/03/2024 22:52, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    I have unlimited calls, text and broadband on my pay monthly cell
    connection, and it costs me about half the price that an equivalent
    landline package would.

    Interesting! Who are you with? Do you find broadband-via-mobile is
    adequate technically (speed, reliability, other)? How much _do_ you pay?
    (Obviously feel free not to answer that - or any of this of course!)

    I have SIM my accounts with EE and Vodafone at about thirty quid a
    month each. Netter deals are probably available, but ICBA looking. The
    phine cost me £160, and the router cost me £30. If I were willing to
    put up with losing the internet on one account while talking on the
    other, it takes two SIMs. It happily carries on working if I use the BB >account on the SIM I'm talking via.

    I've not noticed any degradation of my landline-based broadband when I'm
    using the 'phone.

    Last time I asked the question, a landline was about £55.

    For monthly cost, see Andy's post and my reply.

    For the majority of the time I can stream 2K definition video on either >accounts. Occasionally, one of them drops out.

    So to get _reliable_ BB, you're paying about 2 × 30 = 60 quid a month.

    If your cell is costing you more per month than a landline, then as
    most pay as you use it packages require a minimum top up every month
    anyway, you may as well go for the unlimited contract option.

    Indeed; it hearkens back to the old dial-up days, when the knowledge
    that every minute was costing you inhibited use. You say "than a
    landline" - I don't consider that I pay separately for my landline, just
    all as part of my broadband;

    I remember maxing out my 20GB landline data allowance on the dim and
    distant past. I also remember uploading and downloading stuff via 2G >cellphone at 9600 baud, and paying by the minute.

    I don't think most landline-based broadband has an allowance these days
    - well, I'm sure they do (hidden under "fair usage", a weasel term I
    don't think the industry should be allowed), but high enough most people
    never hit it. Do mobile-based BB contracts have a limit?

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I'd rather trust the guys in the lab coats who aren't demanding that I get up early on Sundays to apologize for being human.
    -- Captain Splendid (quoted by "The Real Bev" in mozilla.general, 2014-11-16)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Thu Mar 7 10:57:08 2024
    In message <usc43n$10731$1@dont-email.me> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:15:16,
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes
    That sounds daft. You might as well call via whatsapp then.

    Yes on Rabbit, they would have gone on working but I got fed up with >eternally replacing the rechargeable batteries as one always lost capacity >before the other one did. Nickel-Metal Hydrides were in mine but I don't >think double A sized ones were as high capacity as the more modern ones and >had a habit of self discharging. Eventually the legends wore off the keys
    and some keys needed to be wobbled to make contact, they were heavy too. >Brian

    There are now two sorts of nickel metal hydride cells. In AA size, the
    ordinary sort are pushing 3 amp hours (I refuse to continue to use milliamp-hours now we're so far past 1 - you can get 1 in triple A cells
    now!), though seem not to quite reach it - 2.95 seems common. The other
    sort are low self-discharge - retain 80-90% capacity even after a year -
    and those seem to be about 2.5 Ah capacity; the practical difference
    therefore favours the latter sort, for nearly all purposes (maybe people
    using high-discharge _regularly_ might go for the other sort just for
    the high capacity - professional photographers, modellers). The low self-discharge sort are distinguishable by usually being sold charged -
    "ready to use"; there are several known makes (or rather models, from
    known makes), the one I can think of being eneloop though I can't
    remember who from, but Lidl also sell them occasionally (they also
    occasionally sell the ordinary sort, so look for the "ready to use" or
    similar wording).
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Worst programme ever made? I was in hospital once having a knee operation and I watched a whole episode of "EastEnders". Ugh! I suppose it's true to life. But so is diarrhoea - and I don't want to see that on television. - Patrick Moore, in Radio Times 12-18 May 2007.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 11:29:47 2024
    On 07/03/2024 10:49, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4tbfiF4fn8U1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    08:16:50, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> writes
    John Williamson wrote:

    Last time I asked the question, a landline was about £55.

    Plusnet currently costs me £26.20/m for line rental, off-peak calls
    and 80/20Mb broadband (from next month, the CPI+3.9% will see it rise
    to £28.37)

    It seems I am out of date, then, but as I am not able to make use of a
    fixed connection point, it's not that important to me. Plusnet isn't all
    that far off what I am paying, it seems.

    I too am paying PlusNet twentysomething - "line rental" (I'll certainly
    be glad to see _that_ term consigned to history!), anytime calls, and (I think) 30/10 broadband; as you say, the CPI+3.9 cuts in at the end of
    this month.

    There will still be a monthly fee for the service, no matter what they
    call it. There has to be a connection to your premises as well as other
    stuff going on, all of which which costs money to maintain. Switching to
    VOIP will make it easier for them to alter the cost of use as well as connection quality on a packet by packet basis if needed as a load
    balancing measure.

    All that going over to VOIP will change is that there will be one less conversion from digital to analogue and vice versa in the exchange. That conversion will, instead, be done at your end of the "last mile". What
    happens now is that your analogue signals get converted to digital in
    the exchange and squirted along their internal VOIP networks, then
    reconverted to squirt the analogue down your POTS wires, which currently
    also carry the broadband signal as modulated HF signals. It has been a
    long time since exchanges were full of clattering rotary switches and
    relays. In most villages, the exchange is under a manhole cover outside
    the old exchange which is now someone's home, and the operator is as
    likely as not to be working from home in Dundee or somewhere.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 11:28:14 2024
    J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Where did the 3.9% come from?

    I started-off assuming +3.9% was the max allowed by OFCOM, but it
    appears OFCOM also wondered where it comes from ... their conclusion
    just seems to be that a pounds+pence increase must be quoted rather than
    a formula ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Mar 7 12:10:01 2024
    In message <l4tmmdF6j4oU2@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    11:28:14, Andy Burns <usenet@andyburns.uk> writes
    J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Where did the 3.9% come from?

    I started-off assuming +3.9% was the max allowed by OFCOM, but it
    appears OFCOM also wondered where it comes from ... their conclusion
    just seems to be that a pounds+pence increase must be quoted rather
    than a formula ...

    I think PlusNet _have_ always told me in pounds and pence, but cited the CPI+3.9% as the _reason_ - and they added _that_ to the contract terms,
    I think about three or four years ago. I'm glad to hear OFCom are also
    puzzled by where it comes from - but not surprised they haven't pursued
    the matter: OFCom, like most of the OFs, mostly do _not_ operate in the _customer's_ interests, but the industry's.


    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right. -H.L. Mencken, writer, editor, and critic (1880-1956)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 11:41:40 2024
    On 07/03/2024 10:57, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <usc43n$10731$1@dont-email.me> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024 10:15:16,
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes
    That sounds daft. You might as well call via whatsapp then.

    Yes on Rabbit, they would have gone on working but I got fed up with
    eternally replacing the rechargeable batteries as one always lost
    capacity
    before the other one did. Nickel-Metal Hydrides were in mine but I don't
    think double A sized ones were as high capacity as the more modern
    ones and
    had a habit of self discharging. Eventually the legends wore off the keys
    and some keys needed to be wobbled to make contact, they were heavy too.
    Brian

    There are now two sorts of nickel metal hydride cells. In AA size, the ordinary sort are pushing 3 amp hours (I refuse to continue to use milliamp-hours now we're so far past 1 - you can get 1 in triple A cells now!), though seem not to quite reach it - 2.95 seems common. The other
    sort are low self-discharge - retain 80-90% capacity even after a year -
    and those seem to be about 2.5 Ah capacity; the practical difference therefore favours the latter sort, for nearly all purposes (maybe people using high-discharge _regularly_ might go for the other sort just for
    the high capacity - professional photographers, modellers). The low self-discharge sort are distinguishable by usually being sold charged - "ready to use"; there are several known makes (or rather models, from
    known makes), the one I can think of being eneloop though I can't
    remember who from, but Lidl also sell them occasionally (they also occasionally sell the ordinary sort, so look for the "ready to use" or similar wording).

    Replacing time expired NiMH or NiCd cells is normally easy. Open the
    cover, replace the useless cells and you're good for another year or
    two. My cordless landline phone was on its third or fourth set when I
    moved on to the boat, so couldn't make use of it any longer. They can
    even be replaced by primary cells in an emergency. They are also easily recyclable.

    The lithium batteries are usually permanently built in, with the cells
    custom designed to fit and welded in place. This means that when they do eventually fail, the device is scrap. For consumer devices, they are
    usually sized to give the minimum acceptable run time between charges,
    so for extended use, you need either a spare device or an external power
    pack. They are also currently not easy to recycle, though there are a
    few places which now do it.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 12:31:02 2024
    On 06/03/2024 15:12, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4rb8tFq7htU1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    14:01:01, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 06/03/2024 12:08, charles wrote:
    With landlines about to vanish this is not a concern. I am told that
    when I
    move to VOIP, an app will allow me to pick up VOIP calls on my mobile.
    Problem solved.

    The app can already be installed on your mobile if you set up a VOIP
    account on your broadband and have a router with a Wifi connection.

    The VoIP account doesn't have to be with the same provider as your
    broadband. (In the case of PlusNet, they're still saying they're not
    offering it - they'll move you to BT, though [part of the same company, though most of the time they operate separately] if you want.)

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet.
    Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an
    analogue phone? Will I be "encouraged" to switch to fibre of some
    flavour, and will this be FTTC, FTTN or what? ATM the (copper) phone connections are embedded in the walls of the block of flats I live in,
    so FTTP would not be very nice, as in wires laid on the ground and holes drilled in walls. (A neighbour in the same block has a CityFibre
    connection done in this way.)

    I know that BT own PlusNet but I still want to keep PlusNet as my ISP.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 12:52:17 2024
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:31:02 +0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
    wrote:

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet.
    Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an >analogue phone?

    I don't think they will. Currently Plusnet don't seem to offer a VOIP
    service of their own, so if you stay with Plusnet and upgrade to fibre
    you would have to subscribe to a VOIP service from somebody else, and
    probably have to obtain extra equipment to use it.

    If your landline phone is vital to you, the simplest way would seem to
    be to change both internet and landline to another service provider
    that *does* offer a VOIP service, then upgrade to fibre. It's not the
    only way, but it seems simplest to get all your communication services
    from the same company.

    BT and Zen are just two companies I happen to know about that offer
    both internet and VOIP phone. There are probably others, but don't
    assume that they all do.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Mar 7 12:18:46 2024
    In message <l4tmpbF6o7aU1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    11:29:47, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 07/03/2024 10:49, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    []
    I too am paying PlusNet twentysomething - "line rental" (I'll certainly
    be glad to see _that_ term consigned to history!), anytime calls, and (I
    []
    There will still be a monthly fee for the service, no matter what they
    call it. There has to be a connection to your premises as well as other

    Yes, but I pay a monthly fee for my broadband. Now that that's fixed
    (and has been for some years) rather than usage-based, any reference to
    "line rental" is just plain irritating.

    stuff going on, all of which which costs money to maintain. Switching
    to VOIP will make it easier for them to alter the cost of use as well
    as connection quality on a packet by packet basis if needed as a load >balancing measure.

    Though - unless they invoke traffic shaping, which I would hope even
    OFCom would take a dim view of if used against third party companies -
    they (the broadband provider) won't be able to affect those using a
    third party VoIP provider (which PlusNet customers at present it appears
    will have to).

    All that going over to VOIP will change is that there will be one less >conversion from digital to analogue and vice versa in the exchange.
    That conversion will, instead, be done at your end of the "last mile".
    What happens now is that your analogue signals get converted to digital
    in the exchange and squirted along their internal VOIP networks, then >reconverted to squirt the analogue down your POTS wires, which
    currently also carry the broadband signal as modulated HF signals. It

    Which (the modulated HF) will of course continue for many customers,
    just the AF (and DC signalling) will cease.

    has been a long time since exchanges were full of clattering rotary
    switches and relays. In most villages, the exchange is under a manhole
    cover outside the old exchange which is now someone's home, and the
    operator is as likely as not to be working from home in Dundee or
    somewhere.

    I was surprised to find that in my village (small town? 2,766 in 2011,
    so probably still a village), it's actually a substantial building; I'd
    been expecting a cabinet. Operator! Now there's a quaint concept; I
    don't think I've dialled - 100 is it? - for decades!
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right. -H.L. Mencken, writer, editor, and critic (1880-1956)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Mar 7 12:22:52 2024
    In message <l4tnfkF6r3tU1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    11:41:40, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 07/03/2024 10:57, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    []
    There are now two sorts of nickel metal hydride cells. In AA size, the
    ordinary sort are pushing 3 amp hours (I refuse to continue to use
    []
    sort are low self-discharge - retain 80-90% capacity even after a year -
    and those seem to be about 2.5 Ah capacity; the practical difference
    []
    Replacing time expired NiMH or NiCd cells is normally easy. Open the
    cover, replace the useless cells and you're good for another year or
    two. My cordless landline phone was on its third or fourth set when I
    moved on to the boat, so couldn't make use of it any longer. They can
    even be replaced by primary cells in an emergency. They are also easily >recyclable.

    I probably shouldn't have brought up the two sorts of NiMH in this
    context, as for cordless home handsets self-discharge isn't really a
    problem, as they're mostly placed back on a charger when the call is
    finished (though I guess some people don't). As you say, it's more a
    matter of replacing cells when they no longer hold much charge.

    The lithium batteries are usually permanently built in, with the cells
    custom designed to fit and welded in place. This means that when they

    Though I think the EC at least have legislated against that - isn't the
    latest iPhone different to previous ones in that respect?

    do eventually fail, the device is scrap. For consumer devices, they are >usually sized to give the minimum acceptable run time between charges,
    so for extended use, you need either a spare device or an external
    power pack. They are also currently not easy to recycle, though there
    are a few places which now do it.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Under democracy one party always devotes its chief energies to trying to prove that the other party is unfit to rule - and both commonly succeed, and are right. -H.L. Mencken, writer, editor, and critic (1880-1956)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Thu Mar 7 13:06:35 2024
    On 07/03/2024 12:22, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4tnfkF6r3tU1@mid.individual.net> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    11:41:40, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes

    The lithium batteries are usually permanently built in, with the cells
    custom designed to fit and welded in place. This means that when they

    Though I think the EC at least have legislated against that - isn't the latest iPhone different to previous ones in that respect?

    The EU repair rules mean that Apple now have to sell you the tools
    needed to replace the battery, rather than only letting their approved workshops have them. The battery itself is still glued inside the case
    using glue which can only be melted by a suitable heat source.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Thu Mar 7 13:30:03 2024
    In article <uscc26$11oo2$1@dont-email.me>,
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:
    On 06/03/2024 15:12, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <l4rb8tFq7htU1@mid.individual.net> at Wed, 6 Mar 2024
    14:01:01, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 06/03/2024 12:08, charles wrote:
    With landlines about to vanish this is not a concern. I am told that
    when I
    move to VOIP, an app will allow me to pick up VOIP calls on my mobile. >>> Problem solved.

    The app can already be installed on your mobile if you set up a VOIP
    account on your broadband and have a router with a Wifi connection.

    The VoIP account doesn't have to be with the same provider as your broadband. (In the case of PlusNet, they're still saying they're not offering it - they'll move you to BT, though [part of the same company, though most of the time they operate separately] if you want.)

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet.
    Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an analogue phone? Will I be "encouraged" to switch to fibre of some
    flavour, and will this be FTTC, FTTN or what? ATM the (copper) phone connections are embedded in the walls of the block of flats I live in,
    so FTTP would not be very nice, as in wires laid on the ground and holes drilled in walls. (A neighbour in the same block has a CityFibre
    connection done in this way.)

    As I understand it, you simply need a "phone adaptor" plugged into a
    network output of your router. Yes, you might get a new router with the
    adaptor incorporated, but that's not essential.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Thu Mar 7 14:30:03 2024
    In article <78djuil9jq0mcgssfgfspafo7lcbh6ctc2@4ax.com>,
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:31:02 +0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
    wrote:

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet. >Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an >analogue phone?

    I don't think they will. Currently Plusnet don't seem to offer a VOIP
    service of their own, so if you stay with Plusnet and upgrade to fibre
    you would have to subscribe to a VOIP service from somebody else, and probably have to obtain extra equipment to use it.

    If your landline phone is vital to you, the simplest way would seem to
    be to change both internet and landline to another service provider
    that *does* offer a VOIP service, then upgrade to fibre. It's not the
    only way, but it seems simplest to get all your communication services
    from the same company.

    BT and Zen are just two companies I happen to know about that offer
    both internet and VOIP phone. There are probably others, but don't
    assume that they all do.

    I use Orpheus Internet for Fibre (used to be ADSL2) and will be moving to
    VOIP from them shortly.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to charles on Thu Mar 7 17:52:48 2024
    In message <5b3de7e8a3charles@candehope.me.uk> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    13:30:03, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> writes
    []
    As I understand it, you simply need a "phone adaptor" plugged into a
    network output of your router. Yes, you might get a new router with the >adaptor incorporated, but that's not essential.

    For the _technical_ requirement, yes. You also need a VoIP _service_,
    which your broadband provider may or may not provide (PlusNet at present
    are not planning to).

    For another premises I know of where BT provide both anyway, I've seen a
    letter suggesting the transition will be fairly seamless - it's just a "something will happen, we'll tell you more nearer the time" letter at
    the moment, but I presume a new router (or adapter) will be required, as
    the existing router there doesn't have any unusual sockets on it.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Everybody's throwing dinner parties, cooking this, baking that... Food has eaten television here. - Sam Neill (RT 2014/10/11-17)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Thu Mar 7 17:47:31 2024
    In message <78djuil9jq0mcgssfgfspafo7lcbh6ctc2@4ax.com> at Thu, 7 Mar
    2024 12:52:17, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> writes
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:31:02 +0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
    wrote:

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet. >>Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an >>analogue phone?

    I don't think they will. Currently Plusnet don't seem to offer a VOIP
    service of their own, so if you stay with Plusnet and upgrade to fibre
    you would have to subscribe to a VOIP service from somebody else, and >probably have to obtain extra equipment to use it.

    PlusNet's "hub 2" router has a (BT style!) socket, under a sticker
    labelled Digital Phone Customers Only. The latest knowledge anyone has, however, is that PlusNet - as such - _aren't_ going to be offering VoIP,
    though I'm hoping they're going to change their mind. If they don't, I
    don't know if the electronics behind that socket (if any!) can be
    enabled.

    When I mentioned the subject in passing when talking to them about
    something else, they said they'd put me onto their "partner company" or
    some such phrase, BT. Whether that means transfer of whole thing -
    broadband and VoIP - or just the VoIP part, I didn't pursue at that
    point.

    If your landline phone is vital to you, the simplest way would seem to
    be to change both internet and landline to another service provider
    that *does* offer a VOIP service, then upgrade to fibre. It's not the
    only way, but it seems simplest to get all your communication services
    from the same company.

    Has advantages and disadvantages. Probably little or no _technical_
    advantage to going separate, as if broadband fails, VoIP will anyway;
    there may or may not be financial advantage. If separate, the VoIP
    company will almost certainly have a monthly charge - but I suspect the broadband company will add one for providing VoIP as well; it's then
    down to how much those monthly charges are, how many free minutes (or
    can you have anytime), how much minutes beyond the free cost (and to
    where - do you call a particular country a lot or not), and so on.

    BT and Zen are just two companies I happen to know about that offer
    both internet and VOIP phone. There are probably others, but don't
    assume that they all do.

    And voipfone at least - probably others - offer VoIP only. (1.50 a month including 0 minutes, 5.00 including IIRR 100, and other packages.)

    Rod.
    John
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    "Bother," said Pooh, as Windows crashed into piglet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 18:23:14 2024
    In article <usbvjp$uv9g$7@dont-email.me>, JMB99 <mb@nospam.net>
    scribeth thus
    On 07/03/2024 08:45, Tweed wrote:
    That’s more a function of a poor quality communication link rather than
    VOIP as a technology.

    Does not matter what the cause is if you cannot communicate with people >because of it.

    Occasionally the person in the studio will give up and connect by
    landline and straight away get a perfect connection.



    Most likely the mobile fone signal in the studio is very weak some even
    have metal plates around them and foil coated fibreboard and the like...

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Thu Mar 7 18:21:18 2024
    In article <usbu2d$uv9g$1@dont-email.me>, JMB99 <mb@nospam.net>
    scribeth thus
    On 06/03/2024 14:01, John Williamson wrote:
    If, like many people, you use only cell based comms, (Now cheaper than
    landline and which are not locked to any particular location) you will
    wonder what all the fuss is about.


    Any listener to radio phone-ins and radio news programmes will know just >reliable VOIP is!




    Been using to for years and can't fault it!....

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Thu Mar 7 19:48:42 2024
    On 07/03/2024 12:52, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 12:31:02 +0000, Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com>
    wrote:

    I currently have my landline from BT and Internet (ADSL2+) from PlusNet.
    Does anyone know how they will deal with the change to digital phone?
    Like, who will provide the new router and will it have a socket for an
    analogue phone?

    I don't think they will. Currently Plusnet don't seem to offer a VOIP
    service of their own, so if you stay with Plusnet and upgrade to fibre
    you would have to subscribe to a VOIP service from somebody else, and probably have to obtain extra equipment to use it.

    If your landline phone is vital to you, the simplest way would seem to
    be to change both internet and landline to another service provider
    that *does* offer a VOIP service, then upgrade to fibre. It's not the
    only way, but it seems simplest to get all your communication services
    from the same company.

    BT and Zen are just two companies I happen to know about that offer
    both internet and VOIP phone. There are probably others, but don't
    assume that they all do.

    I can manage without a landline phone but someone has to maintain the
    physical landline. Perhaps PlusNet will do it (indirectly) as they do
    currently offer landlines on a "local loop" basis.

    I do want to keep PlusNet as my ISP for the email address and webspace
    they provide (FOC), plus Usenet, though others provide the latter (such
    as ES that I mostly use currently).

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 09:14:32 2024
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:52:48 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk>
    wrote:

    In message <5b3de7e8a3charles@candehope.me.uk> at Thu, 7 Mar 2024
    13:30:03, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> writes
    []
    As I understand it, you simply need a "phone adaptor" plugged into a >>network output of your router. Yes, you might get a new router with the >>adaptor incorporated, but that's not essential.

    For the _technical_ requirement, yes. You also need a VoIP _service_,
    which your broadband provider may or may not provide (PlusNet at present
    are not planning to).

    For another premises I know of where BT provide both anyway, I've seen a >letter suggesting the transition will be fairly seamless - it's just a >"something will happen, we'll tell you more nearer the time" letter at
    the moment, but I presume a new router (or adapter) will be required, as
    the existing router there doesn't have any unusual sockets on it.

    Yes, that's what happens. I've helped to set up such a system for
    somebody and there wasn't much to it, the only initial setting up
    being to reconnect all wi-fi devices to the new code.

    The new router, or "hub" as BT call it, does have a phone socket on
    the back, which worked straight away with the existing phone, but it
    can also function as a DECT base station with their own handsets, so
    you can have one less box plugged into the mains. Two handsets were
    provided with this setup, and they worked alongside the old plugged-in
    phone, but even though both types of phone were BT ones, there didn't
    seem to be a quick way of transferring the stored phone numbers from
    the old to the new, so I just sat down with both phones and copied the
    numbers across by typing them in. Then we unplugged the old phone.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JMB99@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Mar 8 09:36:24 2024
    On 08/03/2024 09:14, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    The new router, or "hub" as BT call it, does have a phone socket on
    the back, which worked straight away with the existing phone, but it
    can also function as a DECT base station with their own handsets, so
    you can have one less box plugged into the mains.


    I understood that BT will enable the sockets remotely when the
    changeover comes.

    I think remember that an earlier BT hub had a DECT base station
    incorporated into it with a different telephone number using VOIP. I
    think there was a charger base incorporated for one of the DECT handsets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Fri Mar 8 12:37:31 2024
    There's so little you can do to fix a smartphone now, it's usually not
    even possible to replace the battery, and they often contain so much
    essential personal info you wouldn't want to let it out of your grasp
    for someone else to fix it, so my policy for smartphones is roughly
    this:-

    1. Don't buy an Apple one.

    2. Don't buy a stupidly expensive one, or one that's so cheap that
    it's rubbish. Get a middle range one with a decent camera and mentally
    divide the price by the number of years you expect to keep it.

    3. Don't regard it as a phone with a camera included, but as a camera
    with a phone included, and look after it as you would a camera.
    Hopefully it will last long enough for the cost per year to be
    reasonable even if it eventually becomes effectively useless. I still
    have the first camera I was ever given, which is the one my father
    saved up his pocket money to buy when he was a boy in the 1930s, and
    I'm sure it would still work if I put film in it, but today's
    technology is often as ephemeral as the software that drives it. Such
    is life.

    Rod.

    On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:29:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Not so sure about that. My apple is apparently like that, but the newer ones >are apparently easer to get into and change the batteries. I don't know
    about other makes, Its true though that a battery for one model may not fit >another even from the same company. I also think Apple have stopped
    including a special design that stops third party screens from working. Mind >you to crack that screen you are obviously in need of a military spec phone. >Its pretty tough even if you don't have a case. I always have had mine in a >case. Wy would you spend so much on a phone and make it so easy to
    damage.I'd also like to see a wall wart packaged with usb items again, as >there are so many naff ones on sale it cannot be good for thee phone. often >you can hear the buzz from the phone when you connect a cheap one.
    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Mar 8 13:51:54 2024
    In message <72llui5o5f7g3ik7kthsce0qtrcj5ah7o6@4ax.com> at Fri, 8 Mar
    2024 09:14:32, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> writes
    On Thu, 7 Mar 2024 17:52:48 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver" <G6JPG@255soft.uk>
    wrote:
    []
    For another premises I know of where BT provide both anyway, I've seen a >>letter suggesting the transition will be fairly seamless - it's just a >>"something will happen, we'll tell you more nearer the time" letter at
    the moment, but I presume a new router (or adapter) will be required, as >>the existing router there doesn't have any unusual sockets on it.

    Yes, that's what happens. I've helped to set up such a system for
    somebody and there wasn't much to it, the only initial setting up
    being to reconnect all wi-fi devices to the new code.

    These days, where households have several wifi-connected devices, it
    surprises me that people do that, rather than changing the one new
    router to the old wifi ID and key. (Also, can use a personalised wifi
    ID.) [I've yet to encounter a router where you can't change those.]

    The new router, or "hub" as BT call it, does have a phone socket on

    Probably a better name, though still not completely ... when discussing
    with US people, I always have to explain that we in UK _mostly_ just
    have one device, that serves the function of MoDem, router, switch, and
    wifi base station. And we (because our industry does) call this combined
    box a router.

    the back, which worked straight away with the existing phone, but it
    can also function as a DECT base station with their own handsets, so
    you can have one less box plugged into the mains. Two handsets were

    The BT "router" at the BT household I know _doesn't_ have any different sockets, so will presumably need replacing.

    provided with this setup, and they worked alongside the old plugged-in
    phone, but even though both types of phone were BT ones, there didn't
    seem to be a quick way of transferring the stored phone numbers from
    the old to the new, so I just sat down with both phones and copied the >numbers across by typing them in. Then we unplugged the old phone.

    Presumably under VoIP, there'll probably be the option to store your
    numbers remotely, and/or in the "router". (Yes, with all the security
    concerns that involves, but I expect most people will accept those for
    the convenience.)

    Rod.
    John
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The first banjo solo I played was actually just a series of mistakes. In fact it was all the mistakes I knew at the time. - Tim Dowling, RT2015/6/20-26

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Mar 8 14:08:41 2024
    In message <eg1mui90qm92pf45sk3b1l3v97esipo8ob@4ax.com> at Fri, 8 Mar
    2024 12:37:31, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> writes
    There's so little you can do to fix a smartphone now, it's usually not
    even possible to replace the battery, and they often contain so much

    That's what we've been discussing - a recent EC directive has forced
    them (even Apple) to make the cell replaceable by other than the
    manufacturer. (Of course, I'm sure they all use different shapes and
    sizes, but at least you _can_ in theory replace it.)

    essential personal info you wouldn't want to let it out of your grasp
    for someone else to fix it, so my policy for smartphones is roughly
    this:-

    1. Don't buy an Apple one.

    Mine too, but mainly on expense and walled-garden grounds, assuming the
    EC directive works.

    2. Don't buy a stupidly expensive one, or one that's so cheap that
    it's rubbish. Get a middle range one with a decent camera and mentally
    divide the price by the number of years you expect to keep it.

    What would you say _is_ the life of a (new) smartphone? Last time I paid
    much attention (I only have a dumbphone at the moment), I got the
    impression it was 3 years or less, which I resent. Seems (for Android
    'phones) you're at the mercy of the manufacturer whether they upgrade
    the Android version, and for how long. Of course, non-upgraded ones
    don't stop working, but new "app"s won't work with older Androids -
    anything more than 12-18 months was the impression I got last time I
    paid any attention; is that still so, or have things got more sensible?
    (Or less?)

    3. Don't regard it as a phone with a camera included, but as a camera
    with a phone included, and look after it as you would a camera.
    Hopefully it will last long enough for the cost per year to be
    reasonable even if it eventually becomes effectively useless. I still

    I use a separate camera. Last time I had a 'phone with a camera in, it - although it had ridiculously more pixels than my separate camera - was significantly inferior; especially for photographing flowers.

    have the first camera I was ever given, which is the one my father
    saved up his pocket money to buy when he was a boy in the 1930s, and
    I'm sure it would still work if I put film in it, but today's
    technology is often as ephemeral as the software that drives it. Such
    is life.

    My old standard 8 Bell and Howell (similar or same model to Mr.
    Zapruder's) would I'm sure still work; when I was showing it to someone
    a few years ago I moved the "take" lever, and was startled when it made
    a whirring noise - it must have been decades since I'd wound it.

    Rod.

    On Fri, 8 Mar 2024 11:29:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff" <brian1gaff@gmail.com>
    wrote:

    Not so sure about that. My apple is apparently like that, but the newer ones >>are apparently easer to get into and change the batteries. I don't know >>about other makes, Its true though that a battery for one model may not fit >>another even from the same company. I also think Apple have stopped

    But at least in theory you _can_ change it without having to take it to
    an Apple store.
    []
    damage.I'd also like to see a wall wart packaged with usb items again, as

    Agreed.

    there are so many naff ones on sale it cannot be good for thee phone. often >>you can hear the buzz from the phone when you connect a cheap one.
    Brian

    I wonder how long before most mains sockets have then built in (and how good/bad those are, and how easy to replace if they fail).

    I remember a suggestion - a decade or two ago? - that new-build houses
    would come wired with mains AC and a lower voltage DC; I think at that
    time 12V was the suggested level (I remember my school physics labs had
    that). I guess 5V via USB A sockets is the modern equivalent.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The first banjo solo I played was actually just a series of mistakes. In fact it was all the mistakes I knew at the time. - Tim Dowling, RT2015/6/20-26

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to J. P. Gilliver on Fri Mar 8 14:44:54 2024
    On 08/03/2024 13:51, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Probably a better name, though still not completely ... when discussing
    with US people, I always have to explain that we in UK _mostly_ just
    have one device, that serves the function of MoDem, router, switch, and
    wifi base station. And we (because our industry does) call this combined
    box a router.

    Not to be confused with a router, which is a tool for mangling wood.



    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Mar 8 15:08:03 2024
    In article <l50mj6FkpbuU1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 08/03/2024 13:51, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Probably a better name, though still not completely ... when discussing with US people, I always have to explain that we in UK _mostly_ just
    have one device, that serves the function of MoDem, router, switch, and wifi base station. And we (because our industry does) call this combined box a router.

    Not to be confused with a router, which is a tool for mangling wood.

    which might be why in the US the computer type is pronounced a "ROWTER"

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té²
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Mar 8 15:36:46 2024
    In message <l50mj6FkpbuU1@mid.individual.net> at Fri, 8 Mar 2024
    14:44:54, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 08/03/2024 13:51, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Probably a better name, though still not completely ... when discussing
    with US people, I always have to explain that we in UK _mostly_ just
    have one device, that serves the function of MoDem, router, switch, and
    wifi base station. And we (because our industry does) call this combined
    box a router.

    Not to be confused with a router, which is a tool for mangling wood.

    Indeed (though pronounced differently - ours is roota, the woodworking
    one is row-ta [row as in argument, not rowboat]).

    Another woodworking thing is a profiling tool - despite what some
    software writers think; when I hear someone (such as a politician) has
    been profiled, I may be pleased, depending on whether I like them or
    not.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The average age of a single mum in this country is 37
    - Jane Rackham, RT 2016/5/28-6/3

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Mar 8 15:38:50 2024
    In message <5b3e757df1charles@candehope.me.uk> at Fri, 8 Mar 2024
    15:08:03, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> writes
    In article <l50mj6FkpbuU1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 08/03/2024 13:51, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Probably a better name, though still not completely ... when discussing
    with US people, I always have to explain that we in UK _mostly_ just
    have one device, that serves the function of MoDem, router, switch, and
    wifi base station. And we (because our industry does) call this combined >> > box a router.

    Not to be confused with a router, which is a tool for mangling wood.

    which might be why in the US the computer type is pronounced a "ROWTER"

    Oh. That's how I pronounce the woodworking one. Do they pronounce route
    - a line on a map - the way I pronounce rout (a significant defeat)?
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The average age of a single mum in this country is 37
    - Jane Rackham, RT 2016/5/28-6/3

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)