• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBXaGF0IHNvcnQgb2YgbWFjaGluZSBtYWRlIHRoaXMgZGlzdG9yd

    From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 14:37:20 2024
    On Fri Jan 26 13:37:38 2024 "J. P. Gilliver" wrote:
    In message <5b28be12a5charles@candehope.me.uk> at Fri, 26 Jan 2024
    12:00:06, charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> writes
    In article <l1hed2Fg967U1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    []
    Quad head video is very intolerant of incorrect tape speed, so even
    slight corruption of the sync pulses will cause all sorts of problems.
    This is why it can not be used for things like still frames and slow
    motion.

    Not quite true. BBC Designs Dept developed a slow motion facility for quad >machines. It was used in the 1966 World Cup coverage

    I thought the "instant replay" - used for sporting events, football
    goals mainly - used a spinning magnetic disc (capable of storing, I
    don't know, a second or less)?

    Ampex HS-100, 36 seconds PAL, 30 seconds NTSC

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 14:44:01 2024
    On Thu Jan 25 19:34:36 2024 John Williamson wrote:
    On 25/01/2024 18:08, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dCOcmGyqnLU - 2:51 in.

    Banded into about four horizontal, fairly static bars. And then briefly
    at the end of the bad patch - about 3:05 - a large number of bars.

    The show is 1978, so I presume well after 2" formats were in general
    use; of course, who knows what it's been stored on subsequently. Audio solid throughout.

    Not being in the profession, I can't really guess - other than that I
    can't think of any mechanism whereby this distortion could have come
    from a domestic machine. (Though from the bandwidth, I think it's been stored on one at the final level - though one in excellent condition.)

    Quad tape was in regular use until the mid 1980s, and the four bars are
    a common fault. Somebody will likely be along shortly to explain how it happened here.

    The recording has also been through a domestic system, probably VHS,
    which has left the trademark noise bar from a poorly aligned machine or
    dirt on the head drum at the bottom of the picture. That may also be
    where the total breakdown of the picture into noise bars came from, indicating that the edge of the tape may have been damaged, causing loss
    of sync.

    The quad errors are is typical of one badly clogged head and with the dropout comp working overtime to generate the stepped effect visible on the 15/16 line segments - the sudden disappearance is typical of a judiciouly applied thumbnail.

    The tearing at the bottom is from a domestic format.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 14:59:31 2024
    On Fri Jan 26 11:31:53 2024 "J. P. Gilliver" wrote:
    In message <l1hi0vFgv3vU1@mid.individual.net> at Fri, 26 Jan 2024
    11:06:07, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 26/01/2024 10:59, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

    Wow, that's quite fast! I can see that it will indeed cross many tracks, >> if it gets to a poor speed (or stops).

    I've just seen the typo. Early machines ran at 15 ips, later ones at 7.5.



    7.5 was incredibly rare (and required replacement of the head assembly - which was (fortunately)very simple), and of course inb the UK it was 15.625 ips not 15.

    AIUI, the BBC never used 7.8125 ips.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 26 14:54:08 2024
    On Fri Jan 26 09:39:19 2024 "J. P. Gilliver" wrote:
    In message <l1h7ilFeuknU1@mid.individual.net> at Fri, 26 Jan 2024
    08:07:50, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    On 25/01/2024 21:10, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    ss of sync.

    Just before or after the noise, there were multiple picture bars - 10 to >> 13 I would say.

    As the sync pulses degrade, the rest of the circuitry tries to keep
    things running, then gives up until the pulses come back. You can see
    the start of the breakup as the colour problems get worse, and the
    image starts breaking up inside each bar. My guess would be damage to
    the edge of the quad tape due to poor storage or a problem with a
    previous playback.

    I can understand the four-banding - AIUI, there are four head passes to
    a field? - but the 15- or 16-banding (I've been back to count)? Is that
    that, as things fall apart, the heads pass across adjacent tracks? 16
    (or even 4 each main band, though the 16 look even and not grouped into
    4) seems quite a lot of mistracking.

    Each (almost) verical head pass has 15 or 16 LINES of video (the head drum spins at 250 revolutions per second and each of the 1000 video tracks (per second) contains an average of 15.625 lines of video).. the fault is not mistracking but a severe head
    clog, with attemped dropout compenation visible.

    Provided that the head playing back the field interval is good and the control track is solid, lock should remain OK.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 28 11:09:10 2024
    On Sat Jan 27 20:52:24 2024 NY wrote:
    On 27/01/2024 12:48, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 26/01/2024 14:37, Bill Posters wrote:
    On Fri Jan 26 13:37:38 2024 "J. P. Gilliver" wrote:
    I thought the "instant replay" - used for sporting events, football
    goals mainly - used a spinning magnetic disc (capable of storing, I
    don't know, a second or less)?

    Ampex HS-100, 36 seconds PAL, 30 seconds NTSC

    Yep, only ever I gather three in the UK, the Beeb had one, LWT had
    another, and the third was owned by a facilites house in Soho ?

    As few as that? I imagined that they were an integral part of any
    scanner van that was used for sports where action replays were needed.
    Or are you saying that there were many other models of slo-mo, and that
    it is specifically the Ampex HS-100 of which there were only three
    instances in the UK?

    There were other types, the deeply inferior Machtronics, for example.

    http://www.vtoldboys.com/slo60_7.htm

    The disk (behind VT 9 and VT10) was a bookable resource, I'm pretty sure that it was only moved once for an early colour Wimbledon. It could obviously be routed back to an OB as a source on their mixer.

    This was in the days before AST, so even higher quality 1" helical scan machines (e.g IVC-700 series) couldn't do slo-mo - even the IVC-9000 (2 inch helical scan - a bit like B formnat) wasn't capable.

    There was, as has been pointed out, an abortive attempt to do it on Quad for the 1966 World Cup.

    http://www.vtoldboys.com/slo6001.htm

    http://www.vtoldboys.com/smvid01.htm

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)