• =?UTF-8?B?UkU6IFJlOiBXb3VsZCBicm9hZGNhc3QgdmlkZW90YXBlIHJlY29yZGVkIGluI

    From =?UTF-8?B?QmlsbCBQb3N0ZXJz?=@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 5 17:01:11 2024
    On Tue Jan 2 20:23:46 2024 NY wrote:
    On 02/01/2024 19:29, J. P. Gilliver wrote:
    In message <kvj53iFd847U1@mid.individual.net> at Tue, 2 Jan 2024
    19:05:21, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    It let them use the same crystals for sample timing as for the PAL
    colour sub carrier, if I remember correctly. Meant they cost pennies
    instead of pounds when the first CD players came out.

    Oh, I thought it was because of the two different video standards
    (625/25 and 525/30) and the need to find a rate that could be converted
    to both of those.

    Yes I thought it was a frequency that was usable on both TV systems.

    I hadn't realised that recording sound digitally on videotape pre-dated
    the CD standard and therefore determined the CD sampling rate. I'd
    always thought that sound-on-videotape came after CDs.

    The length of early CD's appears to be dictated by the longest U-Matic available, which was 74 minutes and made by BASF

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)