On 13/12/2023 10:22, Brian Gaff wrote:

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio 2 on FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30 seconds or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage of the end of the world, it would be cut short!

Bring back analogue! Actually, even some FM receivers (such as the ones
that some mobile phones have) introduce a small delay; presumably they
are software based (with an FM tuner chip).

--
Max Demian

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13/12/2023 10:22, Brian Gaff wrote:

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio 2 on FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30 seconds or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage of the end of the world, it would be cut short!

Don't forget that ITV would have to have a few adverts first so they
would miss it anyway!

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On Wed, 13 Dec 2023 11:22:24 +0000, Max Demian
<max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

On 13/12/2023 10:22, Brian Gaff wrote:

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio
stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio 2 on >> FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30 seconds >> or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage of the >> end of the world, it would be cut short!

Bring back analogue! Actually, even some FM receivers (such as the ones
that some mobile phones have) introduce a small delay; presumably they
are software based (with an FM tuner chip).

I thought FM was itself delayed compared to long wave but maybe only
by milliseconds.

I thought the world might have ended last night. I woke up about 3 am
and tried counting my fingers in time with the ticking of the clock,
when the ticking stopped. It turned out a new battery was needed. What
are the odds against witnessing and experiencing this exact moment?

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

In message <ulc0m2$454i$1@dont-email.me> at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:22:56,
Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio >stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio 2 on >FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30 seconds >or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage of the >end of the world, it would be cut short!

And of course the BBC countdown, when they show it (and they've changed
it from frames to centiseconds, presumably meaning they now miss every
second one), it isn't actually counting down to anything - even if there _wasn't_ the digital delay.

Back in the Days of Nicam, the delay was very very short, hence the term
near instantaneous. On TV, trying to synchronise picture and voice can still >be a problem today.

Although it _was_ fairly quick, I don't think the "near instantaneous"
meant that the overall delay was short, but that the companding was
rapid - i. e. there wasn't much of a delay connected with the change in
coded level, unlike (some) analogue AGCs (and without the tiring
punchiness you got with an analogue AGC with short response times).

When I could see, I remember some interviews being watched on a Nicam set,
and you got this sneaking feeling that the lips and the sound were not quite >right, so how they do it now must surely mean that thre is some deliberate >delay going on to make them natch.

Brian

--
J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

I would rather be exposed to the inconveniences attending too much liberty than to those attending too small a degree of it. -Thomas Jefferson, 3rd US president, architect and author (1743-1826)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13/12/2023 13:48, J. P. Gilliver wrote:

In message <ulc0m2$454i$1@dont-email.me> at Wed, 13 Dec 2023 10:22:56,
Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> writes

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio
stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio
2 on
FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30
seconds
or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage
of the
end of the world, it would be  cut short!

And of course the BBC countdown, when they show it (and they've changed
it from frames to centiseconds, presumably meaning they now miss every
second one), it isn't actually counting down to anything - even if there _wasn't_ the digital delay.

Back in the Days of Nicam, the delay was very very short, hence the term
near instantaneous. On TV, trying to synchronise picture and voice can
still
be a problem today.

Although it _was_ fairly quick, I don't think the "near instantaneous"
meant that the overall delay was short, but that the companding was
rapid - i. e. there wasn't much of a delay connected with the change in
coded level, unlike (some) analogue AGCs (and without the tiring
punchiness you got with an analogue AGC with short response times).

When I could see, I remember some interviews being watched on a Nicam
set,
and you got this sneaking feeling that the lips and the sound were not
quite
right, so how they do it now must surely mean that thre is some
deliberate
delay going on to make them natch.

ISTM much depends on what is meant by "broadcast live coverage of the
end of the world".

At one extreme there's an instantaneous and non-local event. E.g. all
matter everywhere is converted to energy at UTC 0:00. Analogue can't
broadcast that. It can broadcast up until that time (ideally from a
camera by the transmitter to minimise signal path). But of course that
signal can't reach viewers before they cease to exist.

OTOH if the "end of the world event" is something different it may well
be capable of being broadcast and received by digital services. E.g. if
the event is a planet-busting asteroid striking Australia a
more-than-glancing blow they'd be plenty of time to view in the UK
pictures of the impact from cameras in space and on the surface there or thereabouts. Takes about 20 minutes for the seismic wave to reach us.



--
Robin
reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13/12/2023 12:37, JMB99 wrote:

On 13/12/2023 10:22, Brian Gaff wrote:

Have you noticed the increasing delay in the digital formats of radio
stations over the last couple of years. If you listen to, sayBBC radio
2 on
FM and tune in on DAB, Freeiew or online, the delays can be up to 30
seconds
or even more on line. So if you were going to broadcast live coverage
of the
end of the world, it would be  cut short!

Don't forget that ITV would have to have a few adverts first so they
would miss it anyway!

Iodine tablets and gas masks?

--
Max Demian

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13/12/2023 14:45, Robin wrote:

OTOH if the "end of the world event" is something different it may well
be capable of being broadcast and received by digital services.  E.g. if
the event is a planet-busting asteroid striking Australia a more-than-glancing blow they'd be plenty of time to view in the UK
pictures of the impact from cameras in space and on the surface there or thereabouts.  Takes about 20 minutes for the seismic wave to reach us.

As long as 20 minutes. Put like that, it seems a long time. Mind you,
that's 8000 miles in 20 minutes so 24,000 mph - considerably faster than
the speed of sound through the air (if, hypothetically you could hear an
event happening on the other side of the world)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 14/12/2023 09:22, Brian Gaff wrote:

Sadly the mega compression idiocy has hit even Radio 2 in recent years so it all sounds flat and uninteresting I have two recordings of the same Kiki Dee concert from the 70s, One broadcast at the time, and the other more recently. Clearly the original is far superior on dynamics and detail and most other things.

In the 1970s with analogue distribution and few limiters in the
transmitter input, they would probably be over-deviating . It could be expensive if they did that now.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)

On 13/12/2023 14:45, Robin wrote:

ISTM much depends on what is meant by "broadcast live coverage of the
end of the world".

At least there will be no luvvie asking for a repeat because he forgot
to press a button.

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)