• Internet radio receiver.

    From David Paste@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 29 15:07:14 2023
    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it just best
    to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations available
    on them?

    All comments and gossip gleefully accepted.

    Cheers,

    David Paste.
    (also posted to uk.d-i-y)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to David Paste on Mon Jan 30 08:33:14 2023
    On 29/01/2023 23:07, David Paste wrote:
    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it just best to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations available
    on them?

    All comments and gossip gleefully accepted.


    Just had a quick look and there do seem "HiFi" with Internet radio and
    plenty of portable radios, some of which will have an output connection.

    My Roberts DAB radio has Internet radio though I don't make much use of
    it except for the "Just a Minute" channel when nothing worth listening
    to on the DAB radio (increasingly frequent now) but during the day I
    tend to select the USB memory stick which has most of my DVDs.

    I had a couple of Pure radios but replaced them because of power supply problems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 30 08:34:47 2023
    On 30/01/2023 08:33, MB wrote:
    My Roberts DAB radio has Internet radio



    PS Roberts radio have an 'App' that lets you control the radio from a
    mobile phone or tablet.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to pastedavid@gmail.com on Mon Jan 30 10:14:10 2023
    On Sun, 29 Jan 2023 15:07:14 -0800 (PST), David Paste
    <pastedavid@gmail.com> wrote:

    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it just best >to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations available
    on them?

    All comments and gossip gleefully accepted.

    I have a Roberts Stream 94i in the kitchen. I only listen via
    Internet as the sound quality is so much better than DAB. It operates
    via Wi-Fi, so no ethernet cable needed. The main stations I listen to
    are on presets.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Bob Latham@21:1/5 to David Paste on Mon Jan 30 09:30:04 2023
    In article <9a6d877e-30af-4ec3-b8bf-da7a469449b6n@googlegroups.com>,
    David Paste <pastedavid@gmail.com> wrote:

    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it
    just best to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations
    available on them?

    All comments and gossip gleefully accepted.

    There are dozens of audio player projects based on a Raspberry Pi. I
    use a couple of these and built some for friends, they work very well.

    https://github.com/PeteManchester/MediaPlayer

    Control by tablet/phone, plays hi-res from UPnP server, gapless etc.
    streaming radio, choice of output modules.

    Bob.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to David Paste on Mon Jan 30 10:28:55 2023
    David Paste <pastedavid@gmail.com> wrote:
    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it just best to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations available
    on them?

    I have been out of the market for ~10 years, but I understand that radio stations are sometimes very precious about where their 'product' is made available. Translation: they want to get the revenue from the ads alongside the audio, or they want to advertise their own stuff in that space, or they want the juicy analytics data to understand who is listening. Or they're pushing their own platform (BBC Sounds etc).

    That means they sometimes decide to take their ball home and remove their stream from certain players if they don't get things their way.

    For example: https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/help/questions/recent-changes-to-bbc-sounds/tunein-changes

    I'm not familiar with the current internet radio platforms, but when I had
    one (reciva) it was an endless cat and mouse game: somebody would figure out the URL for the audio streams and publish the station, then later the broadcaster would change the stream URL and it would break. Then somebody would figure it out and resubmit. etc etc. Maybe the big players like the
    BBC have some kind of agreement with the platforms (until they change their mind), but small independent stations in other countries are less likely to.
    It was always pot luck which smaller stations would work.

    So personally I'd stick with a phone or tablet. At least the stations know they need to support iOS and Android and you can always run their
    app/website if they get grumpy about third party platforms.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Theo on Mon Jan 30 13:08:13 2023
    On 30/01/2023 10:28, Theo wrote:
    I have been out of the market for ~10 years, but I understand that radio stations are sometimes very precious about where their 'product' is made available. Translation: they want to get the revenue from the ads alongside the audio, or they want to advertise their own stuff in that space, or they want the juicy analytics data to understand who is listening. Or they're pushing their own platform (BBC Sounds etc).



    I remember in the early days of DAB, it was said that the US was not
    interested because their commercial radio stations did not like the
    concept of multiplexes where all stations in an area would have the same coverage.

    They preferred the system where the person with the most money would run
    the highest power and got most coverage.

    Solutions were suggested where individual services on a multiplex could
    have different coverage by fiddling with the error correction (I think)
    but I don't think it was used.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Tue Jan 31 08:58:29 2023
    On 30 Jan 2023 10:28:55 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    David Paste <pastedavid@gmail.com> wrote:
    Something like a stand-alone separates unit for a Hi-Fi, or is it just best >> to stick with an android tablet plugged into the amp?

    Any operational gotchyas with them? All internet radio stations available
    on them?

    I have been out of the market for ~10 years, but I understand that radio >stations are sometimes very precious about where their 'product' is made >available. Translation: they want to get the revenue from the ads alongside >the audio, or they want to advertise their own stuff in that space, or they >want the juicy analytics data to understand who is listening. Or they're >pushing their own platform (BBC Sounds etc).

    That means they sometimes decide to take their ball home and remove their >stream from certain players if they don't get things their way.

    For example: >https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/help/questions/recent-changes-to-bbc-sounds/tunein-changes

    I'm not familiar with the current internet radio platforms, but when I had >one (reciva) it was an endless cat and mouse game: somebody would figure out >the URL for the audio streams and publish the station, then later the >broadcaster would change the stream URL and it would break. Then somebody >would figure it out and resubmit. etc etc. Maybe the big players like the >BBC have some kind of agreement with the platforms (until they change their >mind), but small independent stations in other countries are less likely to. >It was always pot luck which smaller stations would work.

    So personally I'd stick with a phone or tablet. At least the stations know >they need to support iOS and Android and you can always run their
    app/website if they get grumpy about third party platforms.

    Theo

    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which
    stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just
    save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    The radio sounds pretty good through its own loudspeakers (yes,
    plural, in stereo) for something of its size, but could also be
    connected to a hi-fi using a 3.5mm analogue stereo connector, and it
    can be connected to the internet using either wi-fi or ethernet.

    It's probably possible to connect a phone or a tablet to the hi-fi,
    but I've never tried. I prefer to use my phone as a phone.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Jan 31 11:04:27 2023
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which
    stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just
    save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    It has happened even for your radio: https://www.avforums.com/threads/roberts-stream-93i.1945133/

    (BBC broke on demand audio, Roberts fixed it 15 months later, BBC broke it, Roberts fixed it again)

    If all you listen to is the internet equivalent of what you find on DAB or
    FM, you'll probably be fine - live audio is simpler and the manufacturer is incentivised to make big stations work.

    Once you start going to on-demand services or less popular stations abroad, there is less incentive to keep it working.

    Some of the radios are based on global 'platforms' from the silicon vendor
    (eg Frontier) - if Frontier sells a lot of radios in Spain, they might be incentivised to make Spanish stations work nicely. But if they don't sell
    many radios in Venezuela then there's not so much interest in them keeping their local stations working.

    (That's my experience from being on the now-defunct Reciva platform - other platforms may do it better than Reciva did)

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Theo@21:1/5 to charles on Tue Jan 31 12:02:53 2023
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <JJl*U1J9y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    It has happened even for your radio: https://www.avforums.com/threads/roberts-stream-93i.1945133/

    (BBC broke on demand audio, Roberts fixed it 15 months later, BBC broke
    it, Roberts fixed it again)

    More likely Roberts made radio without looking at the spec. Simply made it work on what was being brodcast. This happened with some tv makers over Ceefax.

    Usually there isn't a spec - it's just whatever the broadcaster decided to
    do. Services like iPlayer are not designed by some standardisation body -
    it's just a website cooked up by the BBC. It is not 'radio' - the audio streams for live radio are just some URLs on a website. BBC changes what
    they do, the clients break. It is up to the radio platform to keep track of the changes - across all the radio stations in the world. Hence cat and
    mouse.

    Or the broadcaster decided to cut off third party clients for commercial reasons. Like removing services from Alexa as per the BBC link I posted upthread.

    Theo

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Tue Jan 31 11:15:38 2023
    In article <JJl*U1J9y@news.chiark.greenend.org.uk>, Theo <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which
    stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just
    save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    It has happened even for your radio: https://www.avforums.com/threads/roberts-stream-93i.1945133/

    (BBC broke on demand audio, Roberts fixed it 15 months later, BBC broke
    it, Roberts fixed it again)

    More likely Roberts made radio without looking at the spec. Simply made it
    work on what was being brodcast. This happened with some tv makers over
    Ceefax.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Jan 31 12:31:11 2023
    On 31/01/2023 08:58, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    The radio sounds pretty good through its own loudspeakers (yes,
    plural, in stereo) for something of its size, but could also be
    connected to a hi-fi using a 3.5mm analogue stereo connector, and it
    can be connected to the internet using either wi-fi or ethernet.

    It's probably possible to connect a phone or a tablet to the hi-fi,
    but I've never tried. I prefer to use my phone as a phone.



    The only thing that I do not like about the Roberts 94i is that I think
    the Bluetooth is only an input so you cannot feed an external speaker by
    BT.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk on Tue Jan 31 13:20:42 2023
    On 31 Jan 2023 11:04:27 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which
    stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just
    save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    It has happened even for your radio: >https://www.avforums.com/threads/roberts-stream-93i.1945133/

    (BBC broke on demand audio, Roberts fixed it 15 months later, BBC broke it, >Roberts fixed it again)

    If all you listen to is the internet equivalent of what you find on DAB or >FM, you'll probably be fine - live audio is simpler and the manufacturer is >incentivised to make big stations work.

    Once you start going to on-demand services or less popular stations abroad, >there is less incentive to keep it working.

    Some of the radios are based on global 'platforms' from the silicon vendor >(eg Frontier) - if Frontier sells a lot of radios in Spain, they might be >incentivised to make Spanish stations work nicely. But if they don't sell >many radios in Venezuela then there's not so much interest in them keeping >their local stations working.

    (That's my experience from being on the now-defunct Reciva platform - other >platforms may do it better than Reciva did)

    Theo

    For what it's worth, I rarely listen to anything from the BBC. I use
    the Roberts as a bedside radio mostly for listening to music. A couple
    of my favourites, Ancient FM and Otto's Baroque have never failed, and
    are also available via radio player apps on the Nvidia Shield and
    Amazon Fire TV. None of my experience with these feels like a system
    that's unreliable. They're easy to use and they just work, and the
    sound quality is excellent.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Tue Jan 31 13:25:58 2023
    On Tue, 31 Jan 2023 12:31:11 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    On 31/01/2023 08:58, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    The radio sounds pretty good through its own loudspeakers (yes,
    plural, in stereo) for something of its size, but could also be
    connected to a hi-fi using a 3.5mm analogue stereo connector, and it
    can be connected to the internet using either wi-fi or ethernet.

    It's probably possible to connect a phone or a tablet to the hi-fi,
    but I've never tried. I prefer to use my phone as a phone.



    The only thing that I do not like about the Roberts 94i is that I think
    the Bluetooth is only an input so you cannot feed an external speaker by
    BT.

    I have the 93i, which as far as I know is pretty much the same but
    without Bluetooth. If I ever wanted to connect it to an external
    loudspeaker or hi-fi system, there are 3.5mm output jacks for both an externally amplified system, and for headphones, which would probably
    drive a loudspeaker directly. There's also an input.

    When I was young, we connected things together using an ancient
    technology called wire. It still works.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 31 19:45:19 2023
    In article <up4ith9uvd9u7vgrno9rackqee926obfbg@4ax.com>, Roderick
    Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> scribeth thus
    On 31 Jan 2023 11:04:27 +0000 (GMT), Theo
    <theom+news@chiark.greenend.org.uk> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    Maybe the "cat and mouse game" of which you speak depends on which
    stations you listen to, but I've had no problems at all listening to
    the ones I like on an internet radio designed for the purpose. I just
    save them on the presets and they stay put. It's a Roberts 93i.

    It has happened even for your radio: >>https://www.avforums.com/threads/roberts-stream-93i.1945133/

    (BBC broke on demand audio, Roberts fixed it 15 months later, BBC broke it, >>Roberts fixed it again)

    If all you listen to is the internet equivalent of what you find on DAB or >>FM, you'll probably be fine - live audio is simpler and the manufacturer is >>incentivised to make big stations work.

    Once you start going to on-demand services or less popular stations abroad, >>there is less incentive to keep it working.

    Some of the radios are based on global 'platforms' from the silicon vendor >>(eg Frontier) - if Frontier sells a lot of radios in Spain, they might be >>incentivised to make Spanish stations work nicely. But if they don't sell >>many radios in Venezuela then there's not so much interest in them keeping >>their local stations working.

    (That's my experience from being on the now-defunct Reciva platform - other >>platforms may do it better than Reciva did)

    Theo

    For what it's worth, I rarely listen to anything from the BBC. I use
    the Roberts as a bedside radio mostly for listening to music. A couple
    of my favourites, Ancient FM and Otto's Baroque have never failed, and
    are also available via radio player apps on the Nvidia Shield and
    Amazon Fire TV. None of my experience with these feels like a system
    that's unreliable. They're easy to use and they just work, and the
    sound quality is excellent.

    Rod.


    Thats a lovely station that:)..


    https://www.ancientfm.com/
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From David Paste@21:1/5 to David Paste on Tue Jan 31 14:02:39 2023
    On Sunday, 29 January 2023 at 23:07:15 UTC, David Paste wrote:
    [waffle]

    Thanks to everyone for replies. I have decided that for the moment a repurposed old phone will be a good starting point. I can then judge if something else will be
    more convenient for me. Thanks again!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)