• Channel 4: Culture Secretary Michelle Donelan confirms U-turn on privat

    From NY@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 5 12:37:32 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64174141

    [quote]
    The government has confirmed it will not go ahead with a controversial plan
    to privatise Channel 4.

    Former Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries had said government ownership was "holding Channel 4 back".

    But her successor Michelle Donelan has now said the broadcaster "should not
    be sold", instead proposing other reforms because "change is necessary".

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even more
    of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 5 13:09:57 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 05/01/2023 12:37, NY wrote:
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64174141

    [quote]
    The government has confirmed it will not go ahead with a controversial
    plan to privatise Channel 4.

    Good.

    Former Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries had said government ownership
    was "holding Channel 4 back".

    Please stop, My sides hurt from laughing at that idea.

    But her successor Michelle Donelan has now said the broadcaster "should
    not be sold", instead proposing other reforms because "change is
    necessary".

    Because what the country really, really, needs is yet another "race to
    the bottom" TV channel to help scrape the bottom of the programme barrel
    really clean. :-/

    I'd go for a reform banning all "reality" shows, though.

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even
    more of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    Bear in mind they dropped their "killer programme" years ago. Countdown
    has never been the same since Richard Whiteley and Carol Vorderman left.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Thu Jan 5 14:47:42 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    "Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:k1o5reFcie4U1@mid.individual.net...
    On 05/01/2023 13:09, John Williamson wrote:

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even
    more of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    Bear in mind they dropped their "killer programme" years ago. Countdown
    has never been the same since Richard Whiteley and Carol Vorderman left.

    I don't think Richard had any other choice but to leave the show !

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ppXEjf8lCzg "The clock stopped too soon".
    You could see that Carol only just made it to the end of that final
    sentence. I wonder how many takes she took to get right the way through.
    Poor lass.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Hall@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Thu Jan 5 14:52:27 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    In message <k1o0h8FboqsU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> writes
    Bear in mind they dropped their "killer programme" years ago. Countdown
    has never been the same since Richard Whiteley and Carol Vorderman
    left.

    Channel 4 had no choice in the matter as far as Whiteley was concerned,
    since they are unable to raise the dead.
    --
    John Hall "Do you have cornflakes in America?"
    "Well, actually, they're American."
    "So what brings you to Britain then if you have cornflakes already?"
    Bill Bryson: "Notes from a Small Island"

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Jan 5 14:40:46 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 05/01/2023 13:09, John Williamson wrote:

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even
    more of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    Bear in mind they dropped their "killer programme" years ago.
    Countdown has never been the same since Richard Whiteley and Carol
    Vorderman left.

    I don't think Richard had any other choice but to leave the show !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Thu Jan 5 15:32:00 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 05/01/2023 14:40, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 05/01/2023 13:09, John Williamson wrote:

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even
    more of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    Bear in mind they dropped their "killer programme" years ago.
    Countdown has never been the same since Richard Whiteley and Carol
    Vorderman left.

    I don't think Richard had any other choice but to leave the show !

    A minor hiccup. ;-)

    (Yes I know why he "left", I wasn't being entirely serious.)

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alexander@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Jan 5 20:36:53 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    "John Williamson" <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:k1o0h8FboqsU1@mid.individual.net...

    Because what the country really, really, needs is yet another "race to
    the bottom" TV channel to help scrape the bottom of the programme barrel really clean. :-/

    If someone said to ne "race to the bottom TV channel" the first that
    came to mind would be Channel 4 - a mixture of formulaic banal daytime
    drivel and, in so-called primetime, lots of lewd filth justified by some
    WOKE ideological box-ticking exercise.

    Cancellation of the privatisation plans mean that the nepotism will
    continue I suspect - people who are only in management positions because
    of the people they know, awarding lucrative programme-making contracts
    to their own chums.

    The broadcaster will continue its descent into irrelevance.

    In my opinion.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Alexander on Thu Jan 5 20:49:50 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 05/01/2023 20:36, Alexander wrote:
    The broadcaster will continue its descent into irrelevance.



    Very true, Channel is a shadow of what it was once, I rarely watch it.

    Combination of too much soft porn and very Left wing woke reporting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Alexander on Fri Jan 6 01:12:44 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 05/01/2023 08:36 pm, Alexander wrote:

    "John Williamson" <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:k1o0h8FboqsU1@mid.individual.net...

    Because what the country really, really, needs is yet another "race to
    the bottom" TV channel to help scrape the bottom of the programme barrel
    really clean. :-/

    If someone said to ne "race to the bottom TV channel" the first that
    came to mind would be Channel 4 - a mixture of formulaic banal daytime
    drivel and, in so-called primetime, lots of lewd filth justified by some
    WOKE ideological box-ticking exercise.

    Cancellation of the privatisation plans mean that the nepotism will
    continue I suspect - people who are only in management positions because
    of the people they know, awarding lucrative programme-making contracts
    to their own chums.

    The broadcaster will continue its descent into irrelevance.

    In my opinion.

    Your opinion is well-founded.

    Years ago, Phil Redmond offered to buy Channel Four, willingly accepting
    all public service obligations. As left-wing as he is, I'm sure that it
    would have been better for the industry and the viewer than the current situation.

    The government refused. This was when Blair or Broon was PM.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to me@privacy.invalid on Fri Jan 6 09:09:38 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    Whatever that might mean. One of course has to assume that the Digital world
    is real, and not some construct of the people who want things to all be on
    line so they can see who consumes what and when.
    Also of cours it opens the doors for a lot more micro subscriptions etc. Myself, I feel that if we are not careful, there will be no free to air tv
    and radio at all in 10 years since if everyone needs the internet that costs money.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "NY" <me@privacy.invalid> wrote in message
    news:tp6g9u$2qlvg$1@dont-email.me...
    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-64174141

    [quote]
    The government has confirmed it will not go ahead with a controversial
    plan to privatise Channel 4.

    Former Culture Secretary Nadine Dorries had said government ownership was "holding Channel 4 back".

    But her successor Michelle Donelan has now said the broadcaster "should
    not be sold", instead proposing other reforms because "change is
    necessary".

    Channel 4 welcomed the news, saying the decision "allows us to be even
    more of a power in the digital world".
    [/quote]

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 6 10:43:36 2023
    On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 20:36:53 -0000, "Alexander" <none@nowhere.fr>
    wrote:


    If someone said to ne "race to the bottom TV channel" the first that
    came to mind would be Channel 4 - a mixture of formulaic banal daytime
    drivel and, in so-called primetime, lots of lewd filth justified by some
    WOKE ideological box-ticking exercise.

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Johnson@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Sat Jan 7 17:53:11 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 20:49:50 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:


    Combination of too much soft porn

    Where do you find porn on C4 these days?
    It was known for the 'foreign films' that it broadcast when it started
    but it's been a long time since they broadcast any of them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Peter Johnson on Sat Jan 7 21:32:19 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 07/01/2023 17:53, Peter Johnson wrote:
    Where do you find porn on C4 these days?
    It was known for the 'foreign films' that it broadcast when it started
    but it's been a long time since they broadcast any of them.


    There is at least an hour most weekday evenings with people parading
    around stark naked with plenty of close-ups?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alexander@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Jan 7 23:00:30 2023
    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:fjufrhp9esjkj4e7lk4suidah8nkblr4pf@4ax.com...

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike Swift@21:1/5 to peter@parksidewood.nospam on Sun Jan 8 01:11:02 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    In article <r7cjrh5gec2k0n654icf64qeptbces0e48@4ax.com>, Peter Johnson <peter@parksidewood.nospam> writes
    Combination of too much soft porn

    Where do you find porn on C4 these days?
    It was known for the 'foreign films' that it broadcast when it started but it's
    been a long time since they broadcast any of them.


    Never watched it, honest, but i seem to remember Naked Attraction raised
    a few eyebrows in the media for showing intimate male and female bits, I
    assume it's still being shown.

    Mike

    --
    Michael Swift We do not regard Englishmen as foreigners.
    Kirkheaton We look on them only as rather mad Norwegians.
    Yorkshire Halvard Lange

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Alexander on Sun Jan 8 08:39:46 2023
    Alexander <none@nowhere.fr> wrote:

    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:fjufrhp9esjkj4e7lk4suidah8nkblr4pf@4ax.com...

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.




    Doesn’t need to be, but the commercial streamers, with one or two minor exceptions, are doing a very poor job of delivering much that is not US/mid-Atlantic centric. Even when they do, they don’t seem to be able to
    do a very good job with the sub titles. In general, the PSBs put up
    decently large lettering, with the outlines properly edged. The streamers
    seem to prefer a much smaller size.

    Ch4 has put some effort into curating a collection of decent foreign
    series, under the Walter Presents genere. I haven’t seen any other service doing this. BBC4 are also well known for presenting foreign series.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 8 11:06:22 2023
    On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 23:00:30 -0000, "Alexander" <none@nowhere.fr>
    wrote:


    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:fjufrhp9esjkj4e7lk4suidah8nkblr4pf@4ax.com...

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.

    Indeed. The "World Drama" section on All4 is a handy collection of
    them in one place, but this could be done by any streaming channel.

    Most of the TV outlets, i.e. broadcast channels or streaming services,
    appear to be gravitating towards being simply purveyors of material
    made by other people, in the same way that bookshops don't actually
    publish or even commission the books, and you can usually buy the same
    books in different shops.

    Even the BBC doesn't make a lot of its programmes itself nowadays
    (though it sometimes tries to fool us by making use of a production
    company called "BBC Studios" which is a separate commercial enterprise
    and not part of the corporation that the BBC is supposed to be).
    There's nothing about these programmes that makes them specifically
    "BBC programmes", any more than a book would be a "Waterstones book",
    or a "W H Smith book", but just something acquired through a
    particular vendor that might as well be anybody. What you see on
    screen depends on the programme makers and not on whoever's technology
    brings it to you.

    Somebody once said "People don't watch channels; they watch
    programmes" and this is becoming more true by the day. The various TV
    channels will face a struggle to convince us that they still have
    distinct identities.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sun Jan 8 13:05:23 2023
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 23:00:30 -0000, "Alexander" <none@nowhere.fr>
    wrote:


    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:fjufrhp9esjkj4e7lk4suidah8nkblr4pf@4ax.com...

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.

    Indeed. The "World Drama" section on All4 is a handy collection of
    them in one place, but this could be done by any streaming channel.

    But isn’t…..

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alexander@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sun Jan 8 13:41:34 2023
    "Tweed" <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tpdvgi$3q5uk$1@dont-email.me...
    Alexander <none@nowhere.fr> wrote:

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.


    Doesn’t need to be, but the commercial streamers, with one or two minor exceptions, are doing a very poor job of delivering much that is not US/mid-Atlantic centric. Even when they do, they don’t seem to be able to do a very good job with the sub titles. In general, the PSBs put up
    decently large lettering, with the outlines properly edged. The streamers seem to prefer a much smaller size.

    Ch4 has put some effort into curating a collection of decent foreign
    series, under the Walter Presents genere. I haven’t seen any other service doing this. BBC4 are also well known for presenting foreign series.

    That's definitely my favourite defence for the existence of State-owned broadcasters yet - "They need to be State-owned, otherwise the subtitles
    would be too small".
    I'll be sure to try that one myself, if ever I take the paid job with
    Capita, to defend the TV Licence model on internet forums ;-)


    The presence of State-owned broadcasters which have been
    given a de facto prominent position by government decree (and
    regardless of their merit), will always distort the commercial market.

    In other words, if the BBC/C4 weren't doing X, and there was a public
    demand for X, then the market would step in to provide X. No problem at
    all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Alexander on Sun Jan 8 14:05:17 2023
    Alexander <none@nowhere.fr> wrote:

    "Tweed" <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tpdvgi$3q5uk$1@dont-email.me...
    Alexander <none@nowhere.fr> wrote:

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.


    Doesn’t need to be, but the commercial streamers, with one or two minor
    exceptions, are doing a very poor job of delivering much that is not
    US/mid-Atlantic centric. Even when they do, they don’t seem to be able to >> do a very good job with the sub titles. In general, the PSBs put up
    decently large lettering, with the outlines properly edged. The streamers
    seem to prefer a much smaller size.

    Ch4 has put some effort into curating a collection of decent foreign
    series, under the Walter Presents genere. I haven’t seen any other service >> doing this. BBC4 are also well known for presenting foreign series.

    That's definitely my favourite defence for the existence of State-owned broadcasters yet - "They need to be State-owned, otherwise the subtitles would be too small".
    I'll be sure to try that one myself, if ever I take the paid job with
    Capita, to defend the TV Licence model on internet forums ;-)


    The presence of State-owned broadcasters which have been
    given a de facto prominent position by government decree (and
    regardless of their merit), will always distort the commercial market.

    In other words, if the BBC/C4 weren't doing X, and there was a public
    demand for X, then the market would step in to provide X. No problem at
    all.




    Ch5 has a prominent EPG position but provides no foreign language
    programming, nor does ITV.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AnthonyL@21:1/5 to peter@parksidewood.nospam on Sun Jan 8 14:19:27 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On Sat, 07 Jan 2023 17:53:11 +0000, Peter Johnson
    <peter@parksidewood.nospam> wrote:

    On Thu, 5 Jan 2023 20:49:50 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:


    Combination of too much soft porn

    Where do you find porn on C4 these days?
    It was known for the 'foreign films' that it broadcast when it started
    but it's been a long time since they broadcast any of them.

    Was it Eurotrash or similar on C4 many years back? Mildly amusing at
    best.

    Is the Mull of Kintyre test still in use?



    --
    AnthonyL

    Why ever wait to finish a job before starting the next?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Alexander on Sun Jan 8 14:47:41 2023
    On 08/01/2023 13:41, Alexander wrote:
    In other words, if the BBC/C4 weren't doing X, and there was a public
    demand for X, then the market would step in to provide X. No problem at
    all.


    No always true, often "X" will be too expensive for some small private
    station to do properly considering that many are really being run as a
    hobby virtually. Also standards can vary.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to AnthonyL on Sun Jan 8 14:58:35 2023
    XPost: uk.media.tv.misc, uk.tech.digital-tv

    On 08/01/2023 14:19, AnthonyL wrote:
    Is the Mull of Kintyre test still in use?


    I remember reading somewhere that one of the men on Naked Attraction
    came close to failing that test when his prospective partner appeared naked.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alexander@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sun Jan 8 15:53:36 2023
    "Tweed" <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote in message news:tpeiit$3rufm$1@dont-email.me...

    Ch5 has a prominent EPG position but provides no foreign language programming, nor does ITV.

    You've missed my point - nevermind.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Alexander@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Sun Jan 8 15:55:31 2023
    "MB" <MB@nospam.net> wrote in message news:tpel2d$3s2vq$2@dont-email.me...
    On 08/01/2023 13:41, Alexander wrote:
    In other words, if the BBC/C4 weren't doing X, and there was a public
    demand for X, then the market would step in to provide X. No problem at
    all.


    No always true, often "X" will be too expensive for some small private station to do properly considering that many are really being run as a
    hobby virtually. Also standards can vary.

    So let's force everyone to pay for it to be broadcast nationwide?

    We have internet streaming now, so niche content for small
    audiences is economically viable.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sun Jan 8 19:28:50 2023
    On Sun, 8 Jan 2023 13:05:23 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 7 Jan 2023 23:00:30 -0000, "Alexander" <none@nowhere.fr>
    wrote:


    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message
    news:fjufrhp9esjkj4e7lk4suidah8nkblr4pf@4ax.com...

    They have quite a good selection of foreign TV dramas with subtitles
    on their streaming service. BBC4 has showed how popular this can be.

    It doesn't need to be State-owned to deliver foreign TV with
    subtitles.

    Indeed. The "World Drama" section on All4 is a handy collection of
    them in one place, but this could be done by any streaming channel.

    But isn’t…..


    True, but if it wasn't, somebody else probably would.

    If you want a particular type of programme you go to whoever is
    offering it. If there's a demand, somebody will offer it, and as far
    as the viewer is concerned it doesn't matter who it is.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)