• TOT: LED light bulbs

    From Woody@21:1/5 to All on Wed Nov 9 17:36:50 2022
    Can anyone give me a <definitive> answer to this one please?

    One can easily buy 'dimmable' LED bulbs, but there are many bulbs that
    are stated to be non-dimmable.

    Would I be right in assuming:-

    1 So-called dimmable bulbs are designed to work with ordinary
    incandescent (i.e. leading egde) dimmers?

    2 Any LED bulb can be safely dimmed with a trailing edge dimmer whether specified as being suitable for dimming or not?

    All of our LED bulbs were purchased as dimmable, but I found out that
    Screwfix do trailing edge dimmers only a little more expensive than a
    standard dimmer so I fitted those and have had no trouble at all.

    Thoughts of the group would be much appreciated.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Woody on Wed Nov 9 18:07:04 2022
    On 09/11/2022 17:36, Woody wrote:

    2 Any LED bulb can be safely dimmed with a trailing edge dimmer whether specified as being suitable for dimming or not?

    Non dimmable LEDs are designed to give a constant light output over a
    wide range of input voltages, so as you dim them, they stay bright until
    you drop the voltage too low, when they tend to cut off.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Woody on Wed Nov 9 19:15:12 2022
    Woody wrote:

    Would I be right in assuming:-

    1 So-called dimmable bulbs are designed to work with ordinary incandescent (i.e.
    leading egde) dimmers?

    not necessarily, some LED lamps require trailing edge dimmers

    2 Any LED bulb can be safely dimmed with a trailing edge dimmer whether specified as being suitable for dimming or not?

    Don't think so, they might just have a capacitive dropper and be flickery.

    All of our LED bulbs were purchased as dimmable, but I found out that Screwfix
    do trailing edge dimmers only a little more expensive than a standard dimmer so
    I fitted those and have had no trouble at all.

    I like the varilight v-pro dimmers, they are "programmable" to work with any type of lighting.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Nov 10 10:19:16 2022
    That is right, to a degree. They contain a switch mode psu, similar to the
    sort you get in those plug inusb power supplies. However though they are
    quite efficient they are dissipating more power on the higher voltages, but
    not as much as, say, an older type voltage regulator does.
    I don't use lights much these days, but I have had friends complaiing at
    this sort of thing.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "John Williamson" <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:jt28ibFoltqU1@mid.individual.net...
    On 09/11/2022 17:36, Woody wrote:

    2 Any LED bulb can be safely dimmed with a trailing edge dimmer whether
    specified as being suitable for dimming or not?

    Non dimmable LEDs are designed to give a constant light output over a wide range of input voltages, so as you dim them, they stay bright until you
    drop the voltage too low, when they tend to cut off.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Thu Nov 10 11:08:14 2022
    Reminds of a call on Jeremy Vine's programme a few days ago.

    Someone was talking about the high cost of electricity and said they
    were being very careful with their heating.

    But they also said they were leaving all their lights off! Shows how
    many have no appreciation of the cost difference between running a LED
    light taking only a few watts and electric heating.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Thu Nov 10 10:49:59 2022
    Brian Gaff wrote:

    That is right, to a degree. They contain a switch mode psu

    The cheaper, nastier LEDs don't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Woody on Thu Nov 10 11:38:34 2022
    On 09/11/2022 17:36, Woody wrote:
    Can anyone give me a <definitive> answer to this one please?

    One can easily buy 'dimmable' LED bulbs, but there are many bulbs that
    are stated to be non-dimmable.

    Would I be right in assuming:-

    1 So-called dimmable bulbs are designed to work with ordinary
    incandescent (i.e. leading egde) dimmers?

    2 Any LED bulb can be safely dimmed with a trailing edge dimmer whether specified as being suitable for dimming or not?

    All of our LED bulbs were purchased as dimmable, but I found out that Screwfix do trailing edge dimmers only a little more expensive than a standard dimmer so I fitted those and have had no trouble at all.

    Thoughts of the group would be much appreciated.

    One day all lighting circuits will be low voltage DC. Then we can use
    PWM dimmers and there won't be any problems. And with RGB LEDs we can
    change the hue at will. And no-one will get a shock when they touch the
    cables.

    (Just for fun a few years ago I made a PWM dimmer based on circuits
    found on the Internet that drives a 12V LED strip.)

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Thu Nov 10 11:30:49 2022
    On 10/11/2022 10:19, Brian Gaff wrote:

    That is right, to a degree. They contain a switch mode psu, similar to the sort you get in those plug inusb power supplies. However though they are quite efficient they are dissipating more power on the higher voltages, but not as much as, say, an older type voltage regulator does.
    I don't use lights much these days, but I have had friends complaiing at this sort of thing.

    I would have thought that the problem results from interference between
    the dimmer circuit and the LED's PSU in some way.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to max_demian@bigfoot.com on Fri Nov 11 08:43:53 2022
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:38:34 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    One day all lighting circuits will be low voltage DC. Then we can use
    PWM dimmers and there won't be any problems. And with RGB LEDs we can
    change the hue at will. And no-one will get a shock when they touch the >cables

    One day maybe, but which year?

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Nov 11 10:16:56 2022
    On 11/11/2022 08:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:38:34 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    One day all lighting circuits will be low voltage DC. Then we can use
    PWM dimmers and there won't be any problems. And with RGB LEDs we can
    change the hue at will. And no-one will get a shock when they touch the
    cables

    One day maybe, but which year?

    If you have grid power available, it's not worth the bother of
    installing a low voltage supply circuit to do it, while for off grid
    uses, it happened a while ago. I live on a boat, and all my 12 volt
    lights got replaced by LED equivalents about five years ago.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From steve1001908@outlook.com@21:1/5 to steve1001908@outlook.com on Fri Nov 11 11:06:52 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:55:46 +0000, steve1001908@outlook.com wrote:

    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000, John Williamson ><johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 08:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:38:34 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    One day all lighting circuits will be low voltage DC. Then we can use
    PWM dimmers and there won't be any problems. And with RGB LEDs we can
    change the hue at will. And no-one will get a shock when they touch the >>>> cables

    One day maybe, but which year?

    If you have grid power available, it's not worth the bother of
    installing a low voltage supply circuit to do it, while for off grid
    uses, it happened a while ago. I live on a boat, and all my 12 volt
    lights got replaced by LED equivalents about five years ago.

    My wife bought a new bulb yesterday. It's LED and works on our UK 240
    volt mains supply. All the pessary electronics are built in to the
    bulb holder. No separate parts are needed.

    Steve

    Of course that should be necessary.

    Steve

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From steve1001908@outlook.com@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Fri Nov 11 10:55:46 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 08:43, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:38:34 +0000, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    One day all lighting circuits will be low voltage DC. Then we can use
    PWM dimmers and there won't be any problems. And with RGB LEDs we can
    change the hue at will. And no-one will get a shock when they touch the
    cables

    One day maybe, but which year?

    If you have grid power available, it's not worth the bother of
    installing a low voltage supply circuit to do it, while for off grid
    uses, it happened a while ago. I live on a boat, and all my 12 volt
    lights got replaced by LED equivalents about five years ago.

    My wife bought a new bulb yesterday. It's LED and works on our UK 240
    volt mains supply. All the pessary electronics are built in to the
    bulb holder. No separate parts are needed.

    Steve

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Fri Nov 11 12:15:10 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:15:35 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 11/11/2022 10:55, steve1001908@outlook.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000, John Williamson

    My wife bought a new bulb yesterday. It's LED and works on our UK 240
    volt mains supply. All the pessary electronics are built in to the
    bulb holder. No separate parts are needed.


    The problem with the cheaper types of those is that they emit a lot of
    RFI, which can wipe out weak AM signals on all the common wavebands.

    I use 240 volt LED worklights, but I don't listen on AM and as I live in
    a steel box anyway, the RFI doesn't affect the neighbours.

    Every light in my house is LED and they don't interfere with anything.

    LEDs are practically standard now, and they consume about a tenth of
    the power of incandescent bulbs, so why would anyone want to buy
    anything else even if they could? Radio is FM in the car or internet
    at home, some people listen to DAB, and youngsters listen to stuff on
    their phones, but it's been many years since I heard anyone listen to
    anything on AM radio. I'm not even sure if you can still buy one.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to steve1001908@outlook.com on Fri Nov 11 11:15:35 2022
    On 11/11/2022 10:55, steve1001908@outlook.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000, John Williamson

    My wife bought a new bulb yesterday. It's LED and works on our UK 240
    volt mains supply. All the pessary electronics are built in to the
    bulb holder. No separate parts are needed.


    The problem with the cheaper types of those is that they emit a lot of
    RFI, which can wipe out weak AM signals on all the common wavebands.

    I use 240 volt LED worklights, but I don't listen on AM and as I live in
    a steel box anyway, the RFI doesn't affect the neighbours.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Nov 11 12:44:58 2022
    "John Williamson" <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:jt6p6oFf6plU1@mid.individual.net...
    On 11/11/2022 10:55, steve1001908@outlook.com wrote:
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 10:16:56 +0000, John Williamson

    My wife bought a new bulb yesterday. It's LED and works on our UK 240
    volt mains supply. All the pessary electronics are built in to the
    bulb holder. No separate parts are needed.


    The problem with the cheaper types of those is that they emit a lot of
    RFI, which can wipe out weak AM signals on all the common wavebands.

    I use 240 volt LED worklights, but I don't listen on AM and as I live in a steel box anyway, the RFI doesn't affect the neighbours.

    I spent ages trying to track down why recordings from the PSB1 Freeview multiplex got a lot of interference every evening. It took me an
    embarrassingly long time to relate it to times when the lights were turned
    on. I gradually narrowed it down to one bulb of several GU10 LED bulbs in my study which is directly below the TV aerial. When that bulb was turned on,
    PSB1 showed a very poor SNR (as seen by a DVB-USB tuner connected to the Raspberry Pi that I use for recording TV). All other multiplexes had no
    effect.

    I replaced that GU10 bulb with one of a different make, and moved the
    offending GU10 bulb to another part of the house, much further from the TV aerial, and the problem went away.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From steve1001908@outlook.com@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Fri Nov 11 13:33:28 2022
    On Fri, 11 Nov 2022 11:15:35 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    The problem with the cheaper types of those is that they emit a lot of
    RFI, which can wipe out weak AM signals on all the common wavebands.


    I don't know what it cost. It was a replacement for the last filament
    light in our house.

    I use 240 volt LED worklights, but I don't listen on AM and as I live in
    a steel box anyway, the RFI doesn't affect the neighbours.

    I have not listened to AM radio stations for decades. I don't know
    about my neighbours.

    Steve

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Nov 11 13:43:14 2022
    On 11/11/2022 12:15, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    Every light in my house is LED and they don't interfere with anything.

    Some do, some don't. It depends on the circuitry inside, some is
    designed to be low RFI.

    LEDs are practically standard now, and they consume about a tenth of
    the power of incandescent bulbs, so why would anyone want to buy
    anything else even if they could? Radio is FM in the car or internet
    at home, some people listen to DAB, and youngsters listen to stuff on
    their phones, but it's been many years since I heard anyone listen to anything on AM radio. I'm not even sure if you can still buy one.

    I saw a cheap (About a tenner) radio with Medium wave, nine short wave
    bands and FM for sale in a shop recently, and medium wave, long wave and
    many short wave bands are all still alive and kicking.

    Just because your experience is that those whose interests are purely
    for popular broadcast news and other programmes don't suffer from
    interference on FM and digital doesn't mean that radio amateurs and
    those wanting to hear a different version of the news aren't annoyed by
    the RFI from cheap LEDs.

    I often speak to a guy on line who is a short wave listener, and he has
    really bad problems with neighbours' LED lighting blotting out the
    weaker stations.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Nov 11 17:09:26 2022
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    [...]
    I often speak to a guy on line who is a short wave listener, and he has really bad problems with neighbours' LED lighting blotting out the
    weaker stations.

    I have quite a large long-wire aerial in a good location with a screened downlead, but found reception on short wave was getting progressively
    worse. A friend suggested I should pay more attention to the earth, so
    I hammered some stakes into the ground underneath the window of the
    bedroom where the receiver was. They were spaced across the front of
    the house a few feet apart, wired together with hefty wire which was
    soldered on by means of a blowlamp.

    Joining this earth to the chassis of the receiver helped enormously but
    the real improvement came when I interpersed a proper filter in the
    mains lead. Not one of the cheapo socket-strip types, but a home-made
    job with bifilar chokes and decent capacitors.

    I haven't found a way of getting rid of the deliberately-transmitted spread-spectrum digital hash that is now an almost continuous foreground
    across many of the bands.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Mon Nov 14 10:12:59 2022
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:08:14 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Reminds of a call on Jeremy Vine's programme a few days ago.

    Someone was talking about the high cost of electricity and said they
    were being very careful with their heating.

    But they also said they were leaving all their lights off! Shows how
    many have no appreciation of the cost difference between running a LED
    light taking only a few watts and electric heating.

    A friend of mine believes it is better to use a battery powered radio
    (with Duracell batteries) to reduce use of mains electricity.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Mon Nov 14 11:00:48 2022
    On 14/11/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:08:14 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Reminds of a call on Jeremy Vine's programme a few days ago.

    Someone was talking about the high cost of electricity and said they
    were being very careful with their heating.

    But they also said they were leaving all their lights off! Shows how
    many have no appreciation of the cost difference between running a LED
    light taking only a few watts and electric heating.

    A friend of mine believes it is better to use a battery powered radio
    (with Duracell batteries) to reduce use of mains electricity.

    That doesn't even make sense if they are rechargeable.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Mon Nov 14 12:04:29 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:00:48 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 14/11/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:08:14 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Reminds of a call on Jeremy Vine's programme a few days ago.

    Someone was talking about the high cost of electricity and said they
    were being very careful with their heating.

    But they also said they were leaving all their lights off! Shows how
    many have no appreciation of the cost difference between running a LED
    light taking only a few watts and electric heating.

    A friend of mine believes it is better to use a battery powered radio
    (with Duracell batteries) to reduce use of mains electricity.

    That doesn't even make sense if they are rechargeable.

    It doesn't makes sense if they're disposable batteries either because
    it takes energy to manufacture them.

    There definitely seems to be a widespread belief that NIMBY energy is equivalent to magic. Out of sight, out of mind.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Mon Nov 14 12:42:59 2022
    On 14/11/2022 12:19, John Williamson wrote:
    Many even ignore the embedded CO2 and other pollution in Wind turbines
    and the solar panels on their roofs.


    And if you live in a rural area, you will see the number of roads built
    to get the things up to the sites (often in what were beautiful areas).

    And of course they leave a big lump of the concrete in the ground which
    is unlikely to be ever removed.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Mon Nov 14 12:19:03 2022
    On 14/11/2022 12:04, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:00:48 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 14/11/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:

    A friend of mine believes it is better to use a battery powered radio
    (with Duracell batteries) to reduce use of mains electricity.

    That doesn't even make sense if they are rechargeable.

    It doesn't makes sense if they're disposable batteries either because
    it takes energy to manufacture them.

    They are by far the most carbon intensive and polluting way to power
    stuff, even if they get recycled.

    There definitely seems to be a widespread belief that NIMBY energy is equivalent to magic. Out of sight, out of mind.

    Many even ignore the embedded CO2 and other pollution in Wind turbines
    and the solar panels on their roofs.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk on Mon Nov 14 13:02:47 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:04:29 +0000, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 11:00:48 +0000, John Williamson ><johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 14/11/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:
    On Thu, 10 Nov 2022 11:08:14 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Reminds of a call on Jeremy Vine's programme a few days ago.

    Someone was talking about the high cost of electricity and said they
    were being very careful with their heating.

    But they also said they were leaving all their lights off! Shows how
    many have no appreciation of the cost difference between running a LED >>>> light taking only a few watts and electric heating.

    A friend of mine believes it is better to use a battery powered radio
    (with Duracell batteries) to reduce use of mains electricity.

    That doesn't even make sense if they are rechargeable.

    It doesn't makes sense if they're disposable batteries either because
    it takes energy to manufacture them.

    There definitely seems to be a widespread belief that NIMBY energy is >equivalent to magic. Out of sight, out of mind.

    The argument was on cost rather than environmental grounds. Running a
    radio on the mains pushes up the electricity bill :-)

    On your second point, obviously you need to make sure batteries are
    made in China so that any emissions are part of China's statistics not
    ours.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Mon Nov 14 16:09:43 2022
    On 14/11/2022 13:02, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:04:29 +0000, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    There definitely seems to be a widespread belief that NIMBY energy is
    equivalent to magic. Out of sight, out of mind.

    The argument was on cost rather than environmental grounds. Running a
    radio on the mains pushes up the electricity bill :-)

    Even at the current rip off rates, a pound's worth of battery holds much
    less than a penny's worth of grid power. (Using high power AA cells, you
    get about 3 watt hours per cell.)

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Mon Nov 14 16:19:17 2022
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 16:09:43 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 14/11/2022 13:02, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 14 Nov 2022 12:04:29 +0000, Roderick Stewart
    <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    There definitely seems to be a widespread belief that NIMBY energy is
    equivalent to magic. Out of sight, out of mind.

    The argument was on cost rather than environmental grounds. Running a
    radio on the mains pushes up the electricity bill :-)

    Even at the current rip off rates, a pound's worth of battery holds much
    less than a penny's worth of grid power. (Using high power AA cells, you
    get about 3 watt hours per cell.)

    This is of course the argument that I was advancing during the debate
    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)