• I found some boundary microphones

    From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to All on Sat Oct 29 09:11:48 2022
    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions say
    put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound. Well having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing something?
    These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like a thick ally plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound went in.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to brian1gaff@gmail.com on Sat Oct 29 09:37:55 2022
    What you describe sounds like what I know as a PZM, or Pressure Zone Microphone. They seem to be used a lot in police interview rooms
    because they pick up everything, every cough sniff or shuffle that
    takes place in the room, though they are not much use for music or
    drama for exactly the same reason.

    Rod.

    On Sat, 29 Oct 2022 09:11:48 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions say >put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound. Well >having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing something?
    These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like a thick ally
    plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound went in.
    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to brian1gaff@gmail.com on Sat Oct 29 10:18:27 2022
    In article <tjin89$3dgst$1@dont-email.me>, Brian Gaff
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:
    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions
    say put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound.
    Well having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing something? These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like a thick ally plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound
    went in. Brian

    Reaistic was a brand name used by Tandy.

    I've never heard of boudary mics being used forthat. As I understood them,
    they were omnidirectional - idealfor zoom meetings since the mic captured everybody round a table (if the mic was in the middle).

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SimonM@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Oct 29 11:31:51 2022
    On 29/10/2022 10:18, charles wrote:
    In article <tjin89$3dgst$1@dont-email.me>, Brian Gaff
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:
    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions
    say put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound.
    Well having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing
    something? These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like a
    thick ally plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound
    went in. Brian

    Reaistic was a brand name used by Tandy.

    I've never heard of boudary mics being used forthat. As I understood them, they were omnidirectional - idealfor zoom meetings since the mic captured everybody round a table (if the mic was in the middle).


    The Realistic PZMs were made for Radio Shack /
    Tandy by Crown, and are capable of excellent results.

    As sold they were unbalanced, but there's a mod
    that basically converts them to the electrical
    equivalent of Crown's professional version (and
    IIRC will run them on phantom power, too).

    I used them in one odd task: building a TV studio
    that doubled up as a conference hall, the mix
    point could either be at the back of the hall, or
    in a separate control room. In the latter case I
    had a well-spaced pair of PZMs mounted up on the
    back wall of the auditorium, feeding into one of
    the monitor inputs of the mixer (Soundcraft Delta,
    which was quite flexible). It gave an acceptable
    idea of what was happening in the room, for
    whoever was mixing in the control room to assess
    the PA (as long as nobody messed with amplifier
    gain etc.). To my surprise it worked rather well.

    They are also handy for under pianos, etc. They
    have a hemispherical polar pattern, and a good
    even frequency response, but because they're
    essentially half of an omni mic, they are hard to
    apply in real life. They are far less useful as a
    spot mic than you might think.

    I've got the conversion information somewhere, but
    no idea where presently! It must be on the interweb...

    There was a DIY equivalent: ElectroVoice sold a
    "Mic Mouse" accessory in the 1970s and 1980s. Just
    a rounded block of acoustically transparent foam,
    that would accept a 635A (half-omni) or a C451 EB
    (CK1, half-cardioid). You could theoretically put
    them on the front of a stage to pick up theatrical
    dialogue or singing, but they also picked up
    footfalls rather too well, sadly. Both that and
    the PZMs used the boundary effect, however.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to SimonM on Sat Oct 29 16:00:17 2022
    SimonM <somewhere@large.in.the.world> wrote:

    [...]
    ... They are far less useful as a
    spot mic than you might think.

    I made one many years ago and tried it out in various situations such as
    sound reinforcement for widely-spaced fast-moving performers* and
    recording a small group of performers gathered around in a circle. I
    was distinctly unimpressed and came to the conclusion it was either a
    solution looking for a problem or simply a sales gimmick.


    *A morris side in a vilage square who thought it was funny to smash it
    with their sticks at the end of the performance. It was no great loss.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to charles on Sun Oct 30 09:07:30 2022
    Yes I know they were Tandy. I had one of their three head cassette decks,
    one of the best decks I ever had in fact, a name much maligned by many, but they made good well built nice sounding Hi Fis and many things.
    As for the microphones, yes they seemed to pick up even the rustling of clothing, which was not of much help when trying to make recordings.
    I think they were a solution looking for a problem!
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "charles" <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote in message news:5a3ee71ec4charles@candehope.me.uk...
    In article <tjin89$3dgst$1@dont-email.me>, Brian Gaff
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:
    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions
    say put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound.
    Well having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing
    something? These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like a
    thick ally plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound
    went in. Brian

    Reaistic was a brand name used by Tandy.

    I've never heard of boudary mics being used forthat. As I understood them, they were omnidirectional - idealfor zoom meetings since the mic captured everybody round a table (if the mic was in the middle).

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to SimonM on Sun Oct 30 09:12:07 2022
    Interesting, but would not some omni mikes have worked much the same? These
    I am reliably informed were originally bought for the local talking
    newspaper but picked up far too much echo outside noise and clothing rustle. Does the boundary effect really work?

    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "SimonM" <somewhere@large.in.the.world> wrote in message news:tjiven$3efg8$1@dont-email.me...
    On 29/10/2022 10:18, charles wrote:
    In article <tjin89$3dgst$1@dont-email.me>, Brian Gaff
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:
    What exactly are they, and what is the point of them? The instructions
    say put them on the walls and they record a much less reverberent sound. >>> Well having tried this. I have to say, oh no they don't. Am I missing
    something? These were branded Realistic and were Electrets, looked like
    a
    thick ally plate with a mound in the middle where at one end the sound
    went in. Brian

    Reaistic was a brand name used by Tandy.

    I've never heard of boudary mics being used forthat. As I understood
    them,
    they were omnidirectional - idealfor zoom meetings since the mic captured
    everybody round a table (if the mic was in the middle).


    The Realistic PZMs were made for Radio Shack / Tandy by Crown, and are capable of excellent results.

    As sold they were unbalanced, but there's a mod that basically converts
    them to the electrical equivalent of Crown's professional version (and
    IIRC will run them on phantom power, too).

    I used them in one odd task: building a TV studio that doubled up as a conference hall, the mix point could either be at the back of the hall, or
    in a separate control room. In the latter case I had a well-spaced pair of PZMs mounted up on the back wall of the auditorium, feeding into one of
    the monitor inputs of the mixer (Soundcraft Delta, which was quite
    flexible). It gave an acceptable idea of what was happening in the room,
    for whoever was mixing in the control room to assess the PA (as long as nobody messed with amplifier gain etc.). To my surprise it worked rather well.

    They are also handy for under pianos, etc. They have a hemispherical polar pattern, and a good even frequency response, but because they're
    essentially half of an omni mic, they are hard to apply in real life. They are far less useful as a spot mic than you might think.

    I've got the conversion information somewhere, but no idea where
    presently! It must be on the interweb...

    There was a DIY equivalent: ElectroVoice sold a "Mic Mouse" accessory in
    the 1970s and 1980s. Just a rounded block of acoustically transparent
    foam, that would accept a 635A (half-omni) or a C451 EB (CK1,
    half-cardioid). You could theoretically put them on the front of a stage
    to pick up theatrical dialogue or singing, but they also picked up
    footfalls rather too well, sadly. Both that and the PZMs used the boundary effect, however.



    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From SimonM@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sun Oct 30 12:00:28 2022
    On 30/10/2022 09:12, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Interesting, but would not some omni mikes have worked much the same? These
    I am reliably informed were originally bought for the local talking
    newspaper but picked up far too much echo outside noise and clothing rustle. Does the boundary effect really work?

    Yes the boundary effect is real, and you can
    duplicate it, simply by putting a small personal
    mic such as an ECM77 on a flat surface (with
    masking tape or similar).

    I am fairly certain the hype surrounding the Crown
    stuff, was just that - based on copy written by
    the sales department.

    "Mic mice" are more useful, since you can get half
    a cardioid out of them (Crown's design was indeed
    a hemisphere) I have never tried a hypercardioid,
    but I don't see why it shouldn't work.

    Obviously you need some sort of steep HP filter to
    eliminate footfalls, but obviously they are handy
    for picking up tap dancing (now an almost lost
    art, obviously).


    The issue is that there's nowhere to put one in
    most situations. Never on a lectern! The only
    application I can think of is for a stage play or
    similar, or a real police interview room. Several
    manufacturers made models specifically for that
    application, because you can build them right into
    a wall, with nothing sticking out at all, making
    them less vulnerable. You also sometimes see the
    equivalent in the meter bridge of a console.

    I have a vague memory of spotting some on "The
    Good Old Days", but I think it was a test, as that
    show usually had short guns or cardioids hidden
    behind set decoration at the front of the stage.
    And I think they also had boom coverage too.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to brian1gaff@gmail.com on Sun Oct 30 12:59:08 2022
    On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:12:07 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does the boundary effect really work?

    Yes, and if you fix one to a wall, it picks up structural noise too.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mary Wolstenholme@21:1/5 to rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk on Sun Oct 30 13:56:59 2022
    On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 12:59:08 +0000, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Sun, 30 Oct 2022 09:12:07 -0000, "Brian Gaff"
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    Does the boundary effect really work?

    Yes, and if you fix one to a wall, it picks up structural noise too.

    Rod.

    Like next doors bed creaking. It's too near the wall.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sun Oct 30 18:09:08 2022
    Brian Gaff <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    Yes I know they were Tandy. I had one of their three head cassette decks,
    one of the best decks I ever had in fact, a name much maligned by many, but they made good well built nice sounding Hi Fis and many things.
    As for the microphones, yes they seemed to pick up even the rustling of clothing, which was not of much help when trying to make recordings.
    I think they were a solution looking for a problem!

    The pressure-doubling efect should mean they generate 6dB more signal
    than the equivalent omnidirectional mic in free space - but unless mic
    noise levels are important, this is little advantage.

    In theory there should also be a 6dB gain for signals originating in the neighbourhood of the surface they are attached to, so a group of
    speakers around a table should sound 6dB louder than they would with an omnidirectional mic located further away from the table top. The room
    noise and echoes should remain at the original level, so the result
    should be a 6dB improvement in the "S/N ratio." of the room.

    I have my doubts about whether that effect really takes place to any
    noticeable extent - and it would only apply above frequencies where the wavelength was significantly smaller than the smallest dimension of the
    table top.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)