• Setting levels

    From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 10:12:39 2022
    I was lying in the bath last night, listening to Gold, when I started
    to wonder how the levels are set on radio nowadays.

    When I was a boy, I was taught (for recording generally) that the idea
    was to find the loudest part of the passage and take the needle as
    close as possible to the red - and that it was okay for the needle to
    stray occasionally into the red as long as it did not stay there for
    any length of time. This was to avoid the whole track being too quiet
    because of one loud note.

    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Aug 30 10:53:39 2022
    On 30/08/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:

    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    For a long time now, recording studios have been able to produce very
    high quality recordings with a wide dynamic range, but have chosen not
    to. (See :- "Loudness Wars")

    Then the radio stations put a multi band dynamics compressor on the feed
    to the transmitter, for instance:-

    https://www.orban.com/optimodfm-8700i

    Most stations now use software in the playout computer to do the job,
    and Otimod sell a plug in to do the job.

    https://www.orban.com/overview-opticodec7600

    When used as most are, they can be set to almost eliminate any
    remaining dynamic range and massage the frequency bands on the output to
    give your station it's own unique "sound", be that aggressive and edgy
    or laid back and smooth, no matter what is on the original track.

    For marketing purposes, they can make heavy metal sound like the mic
    swallowing crooners or vice versa.

    As almost all the material is now digital, the peak level in the chain
    is set to the digital maximum, and they work from there. Even the faders
    on the desk work in the digital domain, with the announcer's mic being
    fed into an ADC.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Aug 30 10:33:25 2022
    On 30/08/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:
    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    Any VHF FM station will have some sort of limiter,

    Station have been hit with high penalties for over deviating.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Unsteadyken@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 10:34:38 2022
    In article <6nkrgh5v79p45ppfkr28o813dibd794j0e@4ax.com>,

    Scott says...

    Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level?

    I had a Sony CD player which had the facility to scan the entire CD,
    find the loudest passage and play this section repeatedly in A-B mode to faciliate setting levels on a recorder


    --
    Ken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to unsteadyken@gmail.com on Tue Aug 30 11:54:40 2022
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:34:38 +0100, Unsteadyken
    <unsteadyken@gmail.com> wrote:

    In article <6nkrgh5v79p45ppfkr28o813dibd794j0e@4ax.com>,

    Scott says...

    Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level?

    I had a Sony CD player which had the facility to scan the entire CD,
    find the loudest passage and play this section repeatedly in A-B mode to >faciliate setting levels on a recorder

    Did it scan in real time though, or was it a fast scan?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Tue Aug 30 13:00:56 2022
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:53:39 +0100, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    For a long time now, recording studios have been able to produce very
    high quality recordings with a wide dynamic range, but have chosen not
    to. (See :- "Loudness Wars")

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the dynamic range of the
    average living room? Audio with wide dynamic range is often available
    in movie soundtracks, and with more people in recent years watching
    movies at home, more people are being exposed to it in listening
    environments that really aren't suitable.

    A very common complaint about TV sound, particularly in dramas and
    movies, is music and effects being much too loud compared with the
    dialogue, requiring frequent manipulation of the volume control to be
    able to follow what is going on without annoying the neighbours.
    Directors may love the "realism" of a huge dynamic range when they
    hear it in an editing room, but I think some of them forget who they
    are selling it to. Perhaps they still think they're mixing their
    soundtracks for a captive audience in a cinema so it doesn't matter if
    the loud bits are deafening.

    Maybe the purveyors of music recordings, who have always sold their
    wares for listening in the home, have had longer to learn what pleases
    their customers and what causes them to complain.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 14:04:20 2022
    In article <jn6514FbinmU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> scribeth thus
    On 30/08/2022 10:12, Scott wrote:

    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    For a long time now, recording studios have been able to produce very
    high quality recordings with a wide dynamic range, but have chosen not
    to. (See :- "Loudness Wars")

    Then the radio stations put a multi band dynamics compressor on the feed
    to the transmitter, for instance:-

    https://www.orban.com/optimodfm-8700i

    Most stations now use software in the playout computer to do the job,
    and Otimod sell a plug in to do the job.

    https://www.orban.com/overview-opticodec7600

    When used as most are, they can be set to almost eliminate any
    remaining dynamic range and massage the frequency bands on the output to
    give your station it's own unique "sound", be that aggressive and edgy
    or laid back and smooth, no matter what is on the original track.

    For marketing purposes, they can make heavy metal sound like the mic >swallowing crooners or vice versa.

    As almost all the material is now digital, the peak level in the chain
    is set to the digital maximum, and they work from there. Even the faders
    on the desk work in the digital domain, with the announcer's mic being
    fed into an ADC.



    In reality they are for most all radio broadcasting a necessary evil.

    The radio for most is treated like a noise in the background to hum
    along to tunes you know, to hear if your lucky a bit of local news and
    maybe the weather, and thats it your competing with other audible
    distractions.

    Very few will sit in the comfy chair and listen to a classical concert
    under ideal conditions that rarely happens! OK it does here as I'm a
    dedicated Radio 3 fan. But for most like Scott I'm sure the acoustics of
    his bathroom are superb;)


    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run
    the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy
    do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..




    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to tony sayer on Tue Aug 30 14:33:51 2022
    On 30/08/2022 14:04, tony sayer wrote:
    Very few will sit in the comfy chair and listen to a classical concert
    under ideal conditions that rarely happens! OK it does here as I'm a dedicated Radio 3 fan. But for most like Scott I'm sure the acoustics of
    his bathroom are superb;)

    It's only music, the purists will probably claim to only listen to live
    music in a concert hall (only the very best concert halls of course).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Aug 30 14:13:50 2022
    "Scott" <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:6nkrgh5v79p45ppfkr28o813dibd794j0e@4ax.com...
    I was lying in the bath last night, listening to Gold, when I started
    to wonder how the levels are set on radio nowadays.

    When I was a boy, I was taught (for recording generally) that the idea
    was to find the loudest part of the passage and take the needle as
    close as possible to the red - and that it was okay for the needle to
    stray occasionally into the red as long as it did not stay there for
    any length of time. This was to avoid the whole track being too quiet because of one loud note.

    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    My 1980s-vintage music centre system (CD/tuner/turntable/cassette/amplifier) scans a CD at high speed before copying it to cassette (you can hear a faint burbling for the few seconds while it does this) and sets the recording
    level appropriately - presumably to allow occasional excursions slightly
    over the 0dB level but with the level mostly being just below this.

    I would imagine it is a fairly easy process with a digital file to scan for
    the highest peak, and then again for the average level over a brief
    interval, and set a replay level appropriately. The main thing is that
    digital systems don't tolerate overloading and fail "disgracefully" if you max-out the sample level for more than a very short period of time.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Unsteadyken@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 15:21:20 2022
    In article <22rrgh507ngo3muvurn3ch0dj4uqktl13e@4ax.com>,

    Scott says...

    Did it scan in real time though, or was it a fast scan?


    Fast, less than 20 seconds, I never used it, only tried it out of
    curiosity, as I was using the digital out to record to MiniDisc

    --
    Ken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Aug 30 18:38:30 2022
    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:togsgh54hcfd3emqf40mr1ohm2cp6g46sl@4ax.com...
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:04:20 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run >>the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy
    do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind
    -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc

    I find it curious that although one of the pictures shows a room full
    of women engineers being trained in 1941, when I worked in BBC
    Engineering between 1968 and 1975, I never met one, or even heard of
    any, either at work or on any training course I ever attended. I
    remember being quite hopeful on seeing that the map of Wood Norton in
    the little blue booklet they sent me included women's quarters, which
    meant that presumably they had to cater for them, so I might meet
    some. Although I'd never met any girls or women who had any interest
    in electronics, maybe they did exist after all and there were some in
    the BBC, but apparently this was not the case. I worked in television,
    not radio, so I wonder if this is what made the difference? However it
    seems improbable that radio would be swarming with women engineers
    while there were none at all in television.

    It is interesting that when I was at university in the early 1980s, there
    were two women on my elec eng course (and one of them changed to do law
    after a year). In contrast, in similar size classes, there was a much
    greater proportion of women doing mechanical, aeronautical and civil engineering. Was my year unusual, or was it normal that electronic
    engineering attracts fewer women than other branches of engineering?

    The general consensus that I got from talking to various women doing engineering and physics was that schools, especially all-girls schools, were dissuading women from doing anything scientific and (even more so) anything that involved engineering, using excuses like "that's not the sort of thing that women as a career", which is an attitude that I'd have expected in the 1930s, not the 1980s. The proportion in the physics class at university was about 1/4 women - still a long way short of 50:50, but a lot better than one woman in a class of 40.

    When I worked in industry as a software engineer, there were very few women: probably about 5 in a department of about 60. Other related departments such
    as software testing or technical authoring had a much greater proportion of women.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 18:27:50 2022
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:04:20 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run
    the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy
    do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc

    I find it curious that although one of the pictures shows a room full
    of women engineers being trained in 1941, when I worked in BBC
    Engineering between 1968 and 1975, I never met one, or even heard of
    any, either at work or on any training course I ever attended. I
    remember being quite hopeful on seeing that the map of Wood Norton in
    the little blue booklet they sent me included women's quarters, which
    meant that presumably they had to cater for them, so I might meet
    some. Although I'd never met any girls or women who had any interest
    in electronics, maybe they did exist after all and there were some in
    the BBC, but apparently this was not the case. I worked in television,
    not radio, so I wonder if this is what made the difference? However it
    seems improbable that radio would be swarming with women engineers
    while there were none at all in television.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Tue Aug 30 21:04:57 2022
    In article <togsgh54hcfd3emqf40mr1ohm2cp6g46sl@4ax.com>,
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:04:20 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run >the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy
    do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc

    I find it curious that although one of the pictures shows a room full
    of women engineers being trained in 1941, when I worked in BBC
    Engineering between 1968 and 1975, I never met one, or even heard of
    any, either at work or on any training course I ever attended. I
    remember being quite hopeful on seeing that the map of Wood Norton in
    the little blue booklet they sent me included women's quarters, which
    meant that presumably they had to cater for them, so I might meet
    some. Although I'd never met any girls or women who had any interest
    in electronics, maybe they did exist after all and there were some in
    the BBC, but apparently this was not the case. I worked in television,
    not radio, so I wonder if this is what made the difference? However it
    seems improbable that radio would be swarming with women engineers
    while there were none at all in television.

    There were a few, there was one VT at TV Centre. I worked with another in
    EID* and TCPD had one of the first BBC Home Workers. I talked to her on the phone reasonably often. She caused quite a sensation at a cConference on Radiation Safety held at ERA as being the only woman in the room. She
    spoke very well on the topic.
    * very useful for fielding calls from members of the public who wouldn't
    talk to the female clerk who answered the phone, demanding to tbe put
    through to "an engineer".

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England - sent from my RISC OS 4té
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 21:11:37 2022
    In article <tel3k0$1fth8$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> scribeth
    thus
    On 30/08/2022 14:04, tony sayer wrote:
    Very few will sit in the comfy chair and listen to a classical concert
    under ideal conditions that rarely happens! OK it does here as I'm a
    dedicated Radio 3 fan. But for most like Scott I'm sure the acoustics of
    his bathroom are superb;)

    It's only music, the purists will probably claim to only listen to live
    music in a concert hall (only the very best concert halls of course).


    Yes inddedy but thats an expensive old hobby these days mind you here in Cambridge we have the West road hall of the Uni

    http://www.westroad.org/

    Plus that old chapel place useful for Xmas carols;)

    https://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/chapel

    and a saffron hall over at Saffron Walden a very nice place funded by a
    local entrepreneur!

    https://www.saffronhall.com/

    And despite this being an add-on to a school!, they do put on very good concerts as that whats on list shows small town out on the wilds of
    Essex!.

    Other then that its a trip to London to the RAH still affordable but
    maybe not so easy for our Northern folk still you don't do too bad i
    'opp North of Watford;)..
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Tue Aug 30 21:15:20 2022
    In article <telhuj$1hdmj$1@dont-email.me>, NY <me@privacy.invalid>
    scribeth thus
    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message >news:togsgh54hcfd3emqf40mr1ohm2cp6g46sl@4ax.com...
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:04:20 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run >>>the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy >>>do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind
    -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc

    I find it curious that although one of the pictures shows a room full
    of women engineers being trained in 1941, when I worked in BBC
    Engineering between 1968 and 1975, I never met one, or even heard of
    any, either at work or on any training course I ever attended. I
    remember being quite hopeful on seeing that the map of Wood Norton in
    the little blue booklet they sent me included women's quarters, which
    meant that presumably they had to cater for them, so I might meet
    some. Although I'd never met any girls or women who had any interest
    in electronics, maybe they did exist after all and there were some in
    the BBC, but apparently this was not the case. I worked in television,
    not radio, so I wonder if this is what made the difference? However it
    seems improbable that radio would be swarming with women engineers
    while there were none at all in television.

    It is interesting that when I was at university in the early 1980s, there >were two women on my elec eng course (and one of them changed to do law
    after a year). In contrast, in similar size classes, there was a much
    greater proportion of women doing mechanical, aeronautical and civil >engineering. Was my year unusual, or was it normal that electronic >engineering attracts fewer women than other branches of engineering?

    The general consensus that I got from talking to various women doing >engineering and physics was that schools, especially all-girls schools, were >dissuading women from doing anything scientific and (even more so) anything >that involved engineering, using excuses like "that's not the sort of thing >that women as a career", which is an attitude that I'd have expected in the >1930s, not the 1980s. The proportion in the physics class at university was >about 1/4 women - still a long way short of 50:50, but a lot better than one >woman in a class of 40.

    When I worked in industry as a software engineer, there were very few women: >probably about 5 in a department of about 60. Other related departments such >as software testing or technical authoring had a much greater proportion of >women.


    Yes i expect thats the way it is but sometimes you see programs about
    new railways and lines being built not that uncommon to see a slip of a
    girl leading a team of 20 odd burly blokes!..

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Aug 31 11:42:15 2022
    If it was like the one on the Akai cd player it was quite fast, not exactly instant. I believe Sansui had a similar idea. One has to remember that both companies made Cassette decks and so wanted to not overload things.
    Technics, however did not have this, since most of their decks by then used DBX noise reduction and outperformed the other decks by miles in dynamic
    range.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Scott" <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:22rrgh507ngo3muvurn3ch0dj4uqktl13e@4ax.com...
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:34:38 +0100, Unsteadyken
    <unsteadyken@gmail.com> wrote:

    In article <6nkrgh5v79p45ppfkr28o813dibd794j0e@4ax.com>,

    Scott says...

    Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level?

    I had a Sony CD player which had the facility to scan the entire CD,
    find the loudest passage and play this section repeatedly in A-B mode to >>faciliate setting levels on a recorder

    Did it scan in real time though, or was it a fast scan?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Aug 31 11:38:12 2022
    They can be, but from a listen I'd say they use a limiter as well, quite a severe one, though not quite amass bad as the one on Radio, I'm assuming
    they use Optimod or its successor, probably now in software.
    Back in the early days of Capital they did occasionally when CDs came out
    do a few shows with no processing, and it was a revelation. This was
    stopped, one assumes as it needed an engineer and cost money.
    They had a play with Dolby for a while but decided the sound of unprocessed Dolby was bad, so went to Optimod.
    I stopped listening shortly after.

    Its actually very hard to get perceived loudness and the levels right as
    many of the old single records were compressed and many of today's releases
    are also compressed, but not all. So those not compressed sound quiet. I
    think much of today's radio is compressed so it can be heard better in a car with the high ambient noise.
    If you can hear a station playing the full version of Riders on the Storm,
    and listen to the rain pumping up and down compared to the cd release then
    you can easily embarrassed the compression.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Scott" <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:6nkrgh5v79p45ppfkr28o813dibd794j0e@4ax.com...
    I was lying in the bath last night, listening to Gold, when I started
    to wonder how the levels are set on radio nowadays.

    When I was a boy, I was taught (for recording generally) that the idea
    was to find the loudest part of the passage and take the needle as
    close as possible to the red - and that it was okay for the needle to
    stray occasionally into the red as long as it did not stay there for
    any length of time. This was to avoid the whole track being too quiet because of one loud note.

    I am wondering what happens now. Can software scan the entire audio
    file and set the optimum level? Given that most music is played using
    a playout system (certainly Gold is), are the levels set when the
    tracks are uploaded?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to brian1gaff@gmail.com on Wed Aug 31 11:49:23 2022
    On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:42:15 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    If it was like the one on the Akai cd player it was quite fast, not exactly >instant. I believe Sansui had a similar idea. One has to remember that both >companies made Cassette decks and so wanted to not overload things.
    Technics, however did not have this, since most of their decks by then used
    DBX noise reduction and outperformed the other decks by miles in dynamic >range.
    Brian

    Surely it was not just a question of overloading? If you were making
    a compilation tape for a party or whatever, or to listen to in the
    car, you would try to get all the tracks at approximately the same
    volume.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Unsteadyken on Wed Aug 31 11:46:49 2022
    Did anyone remember a demo run by Philips and a certain German maker of in
    car stereo where the digigital stream could be adjusted to play the discs with different amounts of dynamic ranges so it could be heard better in a
    car. As far as I can recall, I did hear of this possibly being muted as a function on DAB, but nothing ever seemed to appear. Rumour says that the producers of music did not like the idea of their productions being fiddled with, I bet they are pretty sick now then, considering what passes for good quality on concerts and other radio programmes. The bland sound seems to be
    the norm nowadays.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Unsteadyken" <unsteadyken@gmail.com> wrote in message news:MPG.3d782d33240ab9db9897d1@News.Individual.NET...
    In article <22rrgh507ngo3muvurn3ch0dj4uqktl13e@4ax.com>,

    Scott says...

    Did it scan in real time though, or was it a fast scan?


    Fast, less than 20 seconds, I never used it, only tried it out of
    curiosity, as I was using the digital out to record to MiniDisc

    --
    Ken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Wed Aug 31 11:52:15 2022
    Hmm, there are some recordings made in the popular genre which have good dynamics, but all too often when that artist goes, say to Nashville to
    record they tend to make everything from a whisper to a full vocal onslaught have about 3db dynamic range. Compare the Shires first album made here with
    the subsequent ones made in Nashville. The technique is completely
    different. I prefer the former over the latter.
    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:7strghdevkobndhj0aqti9vonq9isgg5bi@4ax.com...
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 10:53:39 +0100, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    For a long time now, recording studios have been able to produce very
    high quality recordings with a wide dynamic range, but have chosen not
    to. (See :- "Loudness Wars")

    I wonder if this has anything to do with the dynamic range of the
    average living room? Audio with wide dynamic range is often available
    in movie soundtracks, and with more people in recent years watching
    movies at home, more people are being exposed to it in listening
    environments that really aren't suitable.

    A very common complaint about TV sound, particularly in dramas and
    movies, is music and effects being much too loud compared with the
    dialogue, requiring frequent manipulation of the volume control to be
    able to follow what is going on without annoying the neighbours.
    Directors may love the "realism" of a huge dynamic range when they
    hear it in an editing room, but I think some of them forget who they
    are selling it to. Perhaps they still think they're mixing their
    soundtracks for a captive audience in a cinema so it doesn't matter if
    the loud bits are deafening.

    Maybe the purveyors of music recordings, who have always sold their
    wares for listening in the home, have had longer to learn what pleases
    their customers and what causes them to complain.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to brian1gaff@gmail.com on Wed Aug 31 11:53:07 2022
    On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:46:49 +0100, "Brian Gaff"
    <brian1gaff@gmail.com> wrote:

    Did anyone remember a demo run by Philips and a certain German maker of in >car stereo where the digigital stream could be adjusted to play the discs >with different amounts of dynamic ranges so it could be heard better in a >car. As far as I can recall, I did hear of this possibly being muted as a >function on DAB, but nothing ever seemed to appear. Rumour says that the >producers of music did not like the idea of their productions being fiddled >with, I bet they are pretty sick now then, considering what passes for good >quality on concerts and other radio programmes. The bland sound seems to be >the norm nowadays.
    Brian

    I thought it was a feature of DAB, called dynamic range control (DRC)
    which can be set as 0, 1/2 or 1. I don't think it ever works though.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Wed Aug 31 11:56:53 2022
    Yes, but do the public who never go to a live concert actually appreciate it
    I wonder?
    Although a lot better than it used to be, Carsick FM still is compressed to hell.
    It used to be so bad piano notes momentarily overloaded or the orchestra ducked when loud solo instrument played.

    Some of the remixed and remastered versions of Elton John records have
    pretty good dynamic ranges as does the I've got the Music in me Kiki Dee
    band remaster.

    Brian

    --

    --:
    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Roderick Stewart" <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:togsgh54hcfd3emqf40mr1ohm2cp6g46sl@4ax.com...
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 14:04:20 +0100, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    You may not have seen this but a bit here on the women engineers who run >>the audio side of mainly BBC radio 3!, nice to see that Susan and Tanzy
    do their "level best" to get the audio as good as it can be:)..

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/articles/2X7JQpy3fFGyRQVYgQvPYxB/behind
    -the-scenes-with-the-women-who-make-the-bbc

    I find it curious that although one of the pictures shows a room full
    of women engineers being trained in 1941, when I worked in BBC
    Engineering between 1968 and 1975, I never met one, or even heard of
    any, either at work or on any training course I ever attended. I
    remember being quite hopeful on seeing that the map of Wood Norton in
    the little blue booklet they sent me included women's quarters, which
    meant that presumably they had to cater for them, so I might meet
    some. Although I'd never met any girls or women who had any interest
    in electronics, maybe they did exist after all and there were some in
    the BBC, but apparently this was not the case. I worked in television,
    not radio, so I wonder if this is what made the difference? However it
    seems improbable that radio would be swarming with women engineers
    while there were none at all in television.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Wed Aug 31 17:27:08 2022
    On 31/08/2022 11:56, Brian Gaff wrote:
    Although a lot better than it used to be, Carsick FM still is compressed to hell.

    Are the studios in Sheffield S10 3LW?

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to williamwright on Wed Aug 31 18:28:20 2022
    On 31/08/2022 17:27, williamwright wrote:
    On 31/08/2022 11:56, Brian Gaff wrote:
      Although a lot better than it used to be, Carsick FM still is
    compressed to
    hell.

    Are the studios in Sheffield S10 3LW?

    There's carsick all over the roads round there ;-)

    I'm surprised the roads were named Carsick <Drive/Lane/Crescent/View> or
    that residents didn't campaign to have the names changed.

    I imagine my former colleague Hans Puke (pronounced Poo-ka) would live
    there ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Wed Aug 31 19:05:45 2022
    On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:28:20 +0100, NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

    On 31/08/2022 17:27, williamwright wrote:
    On 31/08/2022 11:56, Brian Gaff wrote:
      Although a lot better than it used to be, Carsick FM still is
    compressed to
    hell.

    Are the studios in Sheffield S10 3LW?

    There's carsick all over the roads round there ;-)

    I'm surprised the roads were named Carsick <Drive/Lane/Crescent/View> or
    that residents didn't campaign to have the names changed.

    I imagine my former colleague Hans Puke (pronounced Poo-ka) would live
    there ;-)

    R4 once did a programme on street names incorporating the word
    'Mafeking' and all the confusion this can cause. Think about it :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BrightsideS9@21:1/5 to me@privacy.net on Wed Aug 31 19:12:07 2022
    On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 18:28:20 +0100, NY <me@privacy.net> wrote:

    On 31/08/2022 17:27, williamwright wrote:
    On 31/08/2022 11:56, Brian Gaff wrote:
      Although a lot better than it used to be, Carsick FM still is
    compressed to
    hell.

    Are the studios in Sheffield S10 3LW?

    There's carsick all over the roads round there ;-)

    I'm surprised the roads were named Carsick <Drive/Lane/Crescent/View> or
    that residents didn't campaign to have the names changed.



    It comes from Carr, meaning wet woodland and Syke meaning valley.

    The residents, usually affluent, probably know the derivation and are
    happy to leave it alone.


    --
    Brightside S9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jon@21:1/5 to Brian Gaff on Sun Sep 4 13:43:00 2022
    On Wed, 31 Aug 2022 11:38:12 +0100, Brian Gaff wrote:

    They can be, but from a listen I'd say they use a limiter as well, quite
    a severe one, though not quite amass bad as the one on Radio, I'm
    assuming they use Optimod or its successor, probably now in software.
    Back in the early days of Capital they did occasionally when CDs came
    out
    do a few shows with no processing, and it was a revelation. This was
    stopped, one assumes as it needed an engineer and cost money.
    They had a play with Dolby for a while but decided the sound of
    unprocessed
    Dolby was bad, so went to Optimod.
    I stopped listening shortly after.

    Its actually very hard to get perceived loudness and the levels right
    as
    many of the old single records were compressed and many of today's
    releases are also compressed, but not all. So those not compressed sound quiet. I think much of today's radio is compressed so it can be heard
    better in a car with the high ambient noise.
    If you can hear a station playing the full version of Riders on the
    Storm,
    and listen to the rain pumping up and down compared to the cd release
    then you can easily embarrassed the compression.
    Brian

    There is a lot of booming from Times Radio, had to substantially reduce
    the bass on my Sonos speakers. I think there is a desk mounted microphone, sometimes people being interviewed rattle their fingers on the table or
    wave there arms about when talking.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From jon@21:1/5 to tony sayer on Sun Sep 4 13:31:13 2022
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:11:37 +0100, tony sayer wrote:

    In article <tel3k0$1fth8$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> scribeth
    thus
    On 30/08/2022 14:04, tony sayer wrote:
    Very few will sit in the comfy chair and listen to a classical concert
    under ideal conditions that rarely happens! OK it does here as I'm a
    dedicated Radio 3 fan. But for most like Scott I'm sure the acoustics
    of his bathroom are superb;)

    It's only music, the purists will probably claim to only listen to live >>music in a concert hall (only the very best concert halls of course).


    Yes inddedy but thats an expensive old hobby these days mind you here in Cambridge we have the West road hall of the Uni

    http://www.westroad.org/

    Plus that old chapel place useful for Xmas carols;)

    https://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/chapel

    and a saffron hall over at Saffron Walden a very nice place funded by a
    local entrepreneur!

    https://www.saffronhall.com/

    And despite this being an add-on to a school!, they do put on very good concerts as that whats on list shows small town out on the wilds of
    Essex!.

    Other then that its a trip to London to the RAH still affordable but
    maybe not so easy for our Northern folk still you don't do too bad i
    'opp North of Watford;)..

    Where is Watford.?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Sun Sep 4 15:57:46 2022
    In article <tf29b1$38207$1@dont-email.me>, jon <jon@nospam.cn> scribeth
    thus
    On Tue, 30 Aug 2022 21:11:37 +0100, tony sayer wrote:

    In article <tel3k0$1fth8$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> scribeth
    thus
    On 30/08/2022 14:04, tony sayer wrote:
    Very few will sit in the comfy chair and listen to a classical concert >>>> under ideal conditions that rarely happens! OK it does here as I'm a
    dedicated Radio 3 fan. But for most like Scott I'm sure the acoustics
    of his bathroom are superb;)

    It's only music, the purists will probably claim to only listen to live >>>music in a concert hall (only the very best concert halls of course).


    Yes inddedy but thats an expensive old hobby these days mind you here in
    Cambridge we have the West road hall of the Uni

    http://www.westroad.org/

    Plus that old chapel place useful for Xmas carols;)

    https://www.kings.cam.ac.uk/chapel

    and a saffron hall over at Saffron Walden a very nice place funded by a
    local entrepreneur!

    https://www.saffronhall.com/

    And despite this being an add-on to a school!, they do put on very good
    concerts as that whats on list shows small town out on the wilds of
    Essex!.

    Other then that its a trip to London to the RAH still affordable but
    maybe not so easy for our Northern folk still you don't do too bad i
    'opp North of Watford;)..

    Where is Watford.?

    Dunno squire, my old gran used to say isn't Norfolke in Suffolke she
    never went out of her little village, Duxford, in her 70 year old
    life;)..
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to jon on Sun Sep 4 16:32:38 2022
    On 04/09/2022 14:31, jon wrote:

    Where is Watford.?

    Starting "Oop North", head South, and when you get there, you will
    notice a lack of civilisation.

    There are two Watfords, one of which is famous for the Watford Gap
    motorway services. This one marks the Southern boundary of civilisation
    in the UK. The other one is famous for being the home of Elton John's
    favourite football team.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)