Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
On Sat 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
But its going to take two years to build.
Even Emley tower didn't take that long!! This one is going to be a
lattice mast - and the temp they built at Emley whilst the tower
aerials were change didn't even take six months!
I said at the start that I wondered if they would re-purpose the
'temp' mast at Emley and use it at Bilsdale Major?
But its going to take two years to build.
Since when has, 'up to 19 months' been two years ?
On 19/02/2022 15:33, Woody wrote:
On Sat 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
But its going to take two years to build.
Since when has, 'up to 19 months' been two years ?
Even Emley tower didn't take that long!! This one is going to be a
lattice mast - and the temp they built at Emley whilst the tower
aerials were change didn't even take six months!
Emley Tower took about 15 months
http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=336&pageid=126
I said at the start that I wondered if they would re-purpose the
'temp' mast at Emley and use it at Bilsdale Major?
I don't think it's man enough, very different design and support arrangements if you compare the planning drawings for both.
Peterborough replacement was an 18 month project, and there they didn't
need to worry about any newts etc
On 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
Anyone know why the site is "...probably the most sensitive and
protected spot in the entire country"?
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
On Sat 19/02/2022 16:43, Mark Carver wrote:
On 19/02/2022 15:33, Woody wrote:
On Sat 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
But its going to take two years to build.
Since when has, 'up to 19 months' been two years ?
Even Emley tower didn't take that long!! This one is going to be a
lattice mast - and the temp they built at Emley whilst the tower
aerials were change didn't even take six months!
Emley Tower took about 15 months
http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=336&pageid=126
I said at the start that I wondered if they would re-purpose the
'temp' mast at Emley and use it at Bilsdale Major?
I don't think it's man enough, very different design and support
arrangements if you compare the planning drawings for both.
Peterborough replacement was an 18 month project, and there they
didn't need to worry about any newts etc
Peterborough was a complete rebuild, tower, buildings, access,
security etc etc.
The 'two years' was where I saw the report (thank you BBC!) - perhaps
poor journalistic maths?
Anyone know why the site is "...probably the most sensitive and
protected spot in the entire country"?
On 19/02/2022 19:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
Anyone know why the site is "...probably the most sensitive and
protected spot in the entire country"?
Usual in accuracy of hacks - did they mean "entire county"?
In message <surmc0$4tv$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> writes
On 19/02/2022 19:00, Jeff Layman wrote:
Anyone know why the site is "...probably the most sensitive and
protected spot in the entire country"?
Usual in accuracy of hacks - did they mean "entire county"?
It's given as a direct quote from "North York Moors National Park
planning director Chris France", so one would hope it's what he actually said.
But why? What's so special about Bilsdale?
On 19/02/2022 21:35, John Hall wrote:
In message <surmc0$4tv$1@dont-email.me>, MB <MB@nospam.net> writes
On 19/02/2022 19:00, Jeff Layman wrote:It's given as a direct quote from "North York Moors National Park
Anyone know why the site is "...probably the most sensitive and
protected spot in the entire country"?
Usual in accuracy of hacks - did they mean "entire county"?
planning director Chris France", so one would hope it's what he actually
said.
But why? What's so special about Bilsdale?
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
On Sat 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
But its going to take two years to build. Even Emley tower didn't take
that long!! This one is going to be a lattice mast - and the temp they
built at Emley whilst the tower aerials were change didn't even take six months!
I said at the start that I wondered if they would re-purpose the 'temp'
mast at Emley and use it at Bilsdale Major?
On 19/02/2022 15:33, Woody wrote:
On Sat 19/02/2022 15:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
But its going to take two years to build.
Since when has, 'up to 19 months' been two years ?
Even Emley tower didn't take that long!! This one is going to be a
lattice mast - and the temp they built at Emley whilst the tower aerials
were change didn't even take six months!
Emley Tower took about 15 months
http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=336&pageid=126
I said at the start that I wondered if they would re-purpose the 'temp'
mast at Emley and use it at Bilsdale Major?
I don't think it's man enough, very different design and support
arrangements if you compare the planning drawings for both.
Peterborough replacement was an 18 month project, and there they didn't
need to worry about any newts etc
If they are just replacing it how come they need planning permission?
Like for like replacements don't need planning permission, but anything
that isn't an exact replica does.
So have they given up on the tubular guyed masts now? I mean, surely with modern materials they could be built more robustly.I think they are considered inherently too unstable today. About half a
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
On 19.02.2022 16:08, Mark Carver wrote:
Planning permission granted for the 1000 ft replacement mast
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-york-north-yorkshire-60445095
Radio services are/were going to be moved to the new Bilsdale tower next Tuesday 16th, with local services (BBC Tees) on 95.0 MHz. The temporary transmitters at Eston Nab (95.0 MHz) and Darlington (104.0 MHz) will be closed.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/reception/work-warning/news/bilsdale-radio-retune
These changes appear to be delayed, maybe due to bad weather:
On 13/01/2024 14:57, Ulrich Onken wrote:
https://www.bbc.co.uk/reception/work-warning/news/bilsdale-radio-retune
These changes appear to be delayed, maybe due to bad weather:
The antennas and feeders will already be in place if the switch on was
to be this Tuesday. Therefore I doubt the hold up is weather related
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 297 |
Nodes: | 16 (0 / 16) |
Uptime: | 122:34:07 |
Calls: | 6,662 |
Files: | 12,212 |
Messages: | 5,334,620 |