• BBC News: Ofcom to investigate Channel 4 over subtitle outage

    From MB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 28 14:34:21 2022
    Ofcom to investigate Channel 4 over subtitle outage

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60167724

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 28 14:47:17 2022
    On 28/01/2022 14:34, MB wrote:
    Ofcom to investigate Channel 4 over subtitle outage

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60167724

    Untouched by journalists version

    <https://www.ofcom.org.uk/news-centre/2022/ofcom-to-investigate-channel-4-over-subtitle-problems?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Ofcom%20to%20investigate%20Channel%204%20over%20subtitle%20problems&utm_content=Ofcom%20to%20investigate%20Channel%204%20over%
    20subtitle%20problems+CID_3eafe6d639f2e87da93ddd9423cbf44d&utm_source=updates&utm_term=news%20release>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 28 16:14:10 2022
    Not a good time to break that particular rule with public awareness of
    deaf viewers heightened after Strictly Come Dancing and the proposed
    bill to give BSL full recognition.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pamela@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 28 17:48:09 2022
    On 16:14 28 Jan 2022, MB said:

    Not a good time to break that particular rule with public awareness of
    deaf viewers heightened after Strictly Come Dancing and the proposed
    bill to give BSL full recognition.

    I can only hope the new BSL proposals don't further clutter up our
    screens with signers gesticulating distractingly at the side of the
    screen.

    Sign language is surely fully replacable by subtitles on tv broadcasts.
    Subtitles convey specialist terms (such as "devolution") far better
    than sign language and nowadays automatically generated ones are
    surprisingly accurate.

    This new regulation seems to be a last gasp fightback by devoted
    signers demanding rights. There's little more than 150,000 people in
    the UK who understand sign language and only a half of those are deaf.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Sat Jan 29 08:04:36 2022
    Yes well stables and lost horses come to mind here. The world is constantly Changing, and sadly as it does so we lose the ability to cope when
    Single point of failure should be avoided as much as is practical.
    Brian
    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "MB" <MB@nospam.net> wrote in message news:st0utc$n8n$1@dont-email.me...
    Ofcom to investigate Channel 4 over subtitle outage

    https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/entertainment-arts-60167724


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Jan 29 08:47:27 2022
    On 29/01/2022 08:36, Tweed wrote:
    I presume the point of the investigation is to encourage all broadcasters from this point onwards to make sure their subtitling hardware and software is up to date and resilient, rather than some afterthought using ancient
    kit. It allows engineering to make a stronger case to the manglement if the latter fear regulatory grief might fall upon them.

    You can't beat a heavy financial penalty for concentrating minds.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to briang1@blueyonder.co.uk on Sat Jan 29 08:36:50 2022
    Brian Gaff \(Sofa\) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
    Yes well stables and lost horses come to mind here. The world is constantly Changing, and sadly as it does so we lose the ability to cope when
    Single point of failure should be avoided as much as is practical.
    Brian

    I presume the point of the investigation is to encourage all broadcasters
    from this point onwards to make sure their subtitling hardware and software
    is up to date and resilient, rather than some afterthought using ancient
    kit. It allows engineering to make a stronger case to the manglement if the latter fear regulatory grief might fall upon them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com on Sat Jan 29 10:47:55 2022
    On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:48:09 GMT, Pamela
    <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 16:14 28 Jan 2022, MB said:

    Not a good time to break that particular rule with public awareness of
    deaf viewers heightened after Strictly Come Dancing and the proposed
    bill to give BSL full recognition.

    I can only hope the new BSL proposals don't further clutter up our
    screens with signers gesticulating distractingly at the side of the
    screen.

    Sign language is surely fully replacable by subtitles on tv broadcasts.
    Subtitles convey specialist terms (such as "devolution") far better
    than sign language and nowadays automatically generated ones are
    surprisingly accurate.

    This new regulation seems to be a last gasp fightback by devoted
    signers demanding rights. There's little more than 150,000 people in
    the UK who understand sign language and only a half of those are deaf.

    It would also be technically feasible, as I've suggested before, to
    transmit the signing person on a separate channel (at lower resolution
    on one of the red button channels perhaps?) and combine it in any
    required manner at the receiver. A special receiver, or a modified
    one, or maybe a separate adaptor unit that would combine the outputs
    of two standard receivers, could present the result on a single screen
    in the way that is currently done by the broadcasters. Alternatively,
    a user who was interested in using this service could simply buy an
    extra receiver to display it on a separate screen. If they wanted to,
    the broadcasters could start tomorrow. I wonder how long it's been
    since they stopped recruiting people with imagination.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pamela@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Jan 29 18:49:19 2022
    On 10:47 29 Jan 2022, Roderick Stewart said:

    On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:48:09 GMT, Pamela
    <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 16:14 28 Jan 2022, MB said:

    Not a good time to break that particular rule with public awareness
    of deaf viewers heightened after Strictly Come Dancing and the
    proposed bill to give BSL full recognition.

    I can only hope the new BSL proposals don't further clutter up our
    screens with signers gesticulating distractingly at the side of the
    screen.

    Sign language is surely fully replacable by subtitles on tv
    broadcasts.
    Subtitles convey specialist terms (such as "devolution") far better
    than sign language and nowadays automatically generated ones are >>surprisingly accurate.

    This new regulation seems to be a last gasp fightback by devoted
    signers demanding rights. There's little more than 150,000 people in
    the UK who understand sign language and only a half of those are
    deaf.

    It would also be technically feasible, as I've suggested before, to
    transmit the signing person on a separate channel (at lower
    resolution on one of the red button channels perhaps?) and combine it
    in any required manner at the receiver. A special receiver, or a
    modified one, or maybe a separate adaptor unit that would combine the
    outputs of two standard receivers, could present the result on a
    single screen in the way that is currently done by the broadcasters. Alternatively, a user who was interested in using this service could
    simply buy an extra receiver to display it on a separate screen. If
    they wanted to, the broadcasters could start tomorrow. I wonder how
    long it's been since they stopped recruiting people with imagination.

    Rod.

    That might win the technical battle but signers appear to have won the political battle. Seems we're destinated to have even more
    gesticulaters on screen for years to come even if no one is watching
    them.

    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.
    There's a lesson there although I can't say exactly what it is!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Pamela on Sun Jan 30 02:10:49 2022
    On 29/01/2022 18:49, Pamela wrote:
    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com on Sun Jan 30 07:45:21 2022
    On Sat, 29 Jan 2022 18:49:19 GMT, Pamela
    <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 10:47 29 Jan 2022, Roderick Stewart said:

    On Fri, 28 Jan 2022 17:48:09 GMT, Pamela
    <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 16:14 28 Jan 2022, MB said:

    Not a good time to break that particular rule with public awareness
    of deaf viewers heightened after Strictly Come Dancing and the
    proposed bill to give BSL full recognition.

    I can only hope the new BSL proposals don't further clutter up our >>>screens with signers gesticulating distractingly at the side of the >>>screen.

    Sign language is surely fully replacable by subtitles on tv
    broadcasts.
    Subtitles convey specialist terms (such as "devolution") far better
    than sign language and nowadays automatically generated ones are >>>surprisingly accurate.

    This new regulation seems to be a last gasp fightback by devoted
    signers demanding rights. There's little more than 150,000 people in
    the UK who understand sign language and only a half of those are
    deaf.

    It would also be technically feasible, as I've suggested before, to
    transmit the signing person on a separate channel (at lower
    resolution on one of the red button channels perhaps?) and combine it
    in any required manner at the receiver. A special receiver, or a
    modified one, or maybe a separate adaptor unit that would combine the
    outputs of two standard receivers, could present the result on a
    single screen in the way that is currently done by the broadcasters.
    Alternatively, a user who was interested in using this service could
    simply buy an extra receiver to display it on a separate screen. If
    they wanted to, the broadcasters could start tomorrow. I wonder how
    long it's been since they stopped recruiting people with imagination.

    Rod.

    That might win the technical battle but signers appear to have won the >political battle. Seems we're destinated to have even more
    gesticulaters on screen for years to come even if no one is watching
    them.

    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.
    There's a lesson there although I can't say exactly what it is!

    They could regard themselves as having won a battle if some kind of
    invisible metadata scheme such as the one I described were ever
    implemented, because it would mean that *all* programmes could be
    signed, rather than just a selected few late at night. This would mean
    much more work for the signers. Win-win. We have the technology; we
    just need to use it.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to williamwright on Sun Jan 30 08:49:43 2022
    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to williamwright on Sun Jan 30 14:16:38 2022
    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 29/01/2022 18:49, Pamela wrote:
    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    I was once called in as a First Aider to a case of Transient Global
    Amnesia, it was quite frightening and definitely not fun.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Sun Jan 30 16:14:05 2022
    On Sun, 30 Jan 2022 at 02:10:49, williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On 29/01/2022 18:49, Pamela wrote:
    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Bill

    I couldn't help but be reminded of

    "Would you like to play 'Global Thermonuclear Warfare'?"

    [Not as funny as it might've been given current circumstances. )-:.]
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    They put two and two together and make a dozen, provided they take off their socks to help them count that far. (From "Walking the Dog", by "Smilodon".)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Mon Jan 31 22:21:57 2022
    On 30/01/2022 14:16, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 29/01/2022 18:49, Pamela wrote:
    I can't ever forget the fake signer at Nelson mandela's funeral.

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    I was once called in as a First Aider to a case of Transient Global
    Amnesia, it was quite frightening and definitely not fun.


    As the patient I was quite unmoved, then for a while it all seemed
    rather amusing. I took a lot of photographs.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Jan 31 22:16:03 2022
    On 30/01/2022 08:49, Andy Burns wrote:
    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?


    Probably ARW has told you the full story?

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Mon Jan 31 22:54:34 2022
    On 30/01/2022 08:49, Andy Burns wrote:
    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?


    I hope so...

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to williamwright on Tue Feb 1 07:54:32 2022
    williamwright wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?

    Probably ARW has told you the full story?

    He mentioned that it happened, and how badly it affected you, but when I read about it, it seems like it often reoccurs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Tue Feb 1 19:20:31 2022
    On 01/02/2022 07:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    williamwright wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?

    Probably ARW has told you the full story?

    He mentioned that it happened, and how badly it affected you, but when I
    read about it, it seems like it often reoccurs?

    No, it was a one-off, at least so far. It was a 24 hour event, but
    recovery took a while. It was a case of learning many things again. I
    still have practical problems caused by missing memories. However apart
    from that I have all my faculties. I took a cognitive impairment test a fortnight after the event and passed it with flying colours. I remain a charming, witty, and urbane soul. Oh and modest as well.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pamela@21:1/5 to williamwright on Tue Feb 1 20:43:08 2022
    On 19:20 1 Feb 2022, williamwright said:

    On 01/02/2022 07:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    williamwright wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?

    Probably ARW has told you the full story?

    He mentioned that it happened, and how badly it affected you, but
    when I read about it, it seems like it often reoccurs?

    No, it was a one-off, at least so far. It was a 24 hour event, but
    recovery took a while. It was a case of learning many things again. I
    still have practical problems caused by missing memories. However
    apart from that I have all my faculties. I took a cognitive
    impairment test a fortnight after the event and passed it with flying colours. I remain a charming, witty, and urbane soul. Oh and modest
    as well.

    Bill

    There are a few cases of transient global amnesia in people after
    starting statin medication. A NASA doctor wrote a book about his
    experience.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Pamela on Wed Feb 2 13:24:29 2022
    On 01/02/2022 20:43, Pamela wrote:


    There are a few cases of transient global amnesia in people after
    starting statin medication. A NASA doctor wrote a book about his
    experience.

    I hadn't heard of that one.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Pamela on Wed Feb 2 15:41:51 2022
    Pamela <pamela.private.mailbox@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 19:20 1 Feb 2022, williamwright said:

    On 01/02/2022 07:54, Andy Burns wrote:
    williamwright wrote:

    Andy Burns wrote:

    williamwright wrote:

    Tried global amnesia? It's great fun.

    Was that a one-off?

    Probably ARW has told you the full story?

    He mentioned that it happened, and how badly it affected you, but
    when I read about it, it seems like it often reoccurs?

    No, it was a one-off, at least so far. It was a 24 hour event, but
    recovery took a while. It was a case of learning many things again. I
    still have practical problems caused by missing memories. However
    apart from that I have all my faculties. I took a cognitive
    impairment test a fortnight after the event and passed it with flying colours. I remain a charming, witty, and urbane soul. Oh and modest
    as well.

    Bill

    There are a few cases of transient global amnesia in people after
    starting statin medication. A NASA doctor wrote a book about his
    experience.

    That's very interesting, I'll ask my victim (sorry, patient!) if she had recently started statins.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Pamela@21:1/5 to williamwright on Wed Feb 2 17:49:41 2022
    On 13:24 2 Feb 2022, williamwright said:

    On 01/02/2022 20:43, Pamela wrote:


    There are a few cases of transient global amnesia in people after
    starting statin medication. A NASA doctor wrote a book about his
    experience.

    I hadn't heard of that one.

    Bill

    He was called Duane Graveline and had a web site about his experience.

    "My personal introduction to the incredible world of transient
    global amnesia (TGA) occurred six weeks after Lipitor - atorvastatin
    - was started during my annual astronaut physical at Johnson Space
    Center. My cholesterol had been trending upwards for several years."

    https://spacedoc.com/articles/lipitor-thief-of-memory

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)