• Teleswitching

    From MB@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 15:13:08 2022
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to
    change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their records.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 15:36:27 2022
    On 10/01/2022 15:13, MB wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need
    to change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching
    service will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.



    Same for my mother, she has a spring reserve switch too, (that is about
    12 hours out), and a two phase/four meter arrangement that no other
    supplier than SSE (SEB in old money) will support.

    I suspect she will be receiving a letter too. I was rather hoping the
    'issue' would out live her  !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Mon Jan 10 15:22:19 2022
    MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their records.


    Perhaps your spring winds down by that date….

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From BrightsideS9@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Mon Jan 10 16:59:09 2022
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:13:08 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to >change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their records.


    You can refuse to have smart meters fitted. See:- https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/information-consumers/energy-advice-households/getting-smart-meter

    --
    brightysidse S9

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Mon Jan 10 17:10:00 2022
    I don't think I've heard of the term. I bet its not ending just costing them too much to still use it. Is it not piggy backed on the long wave radio 4 or somesuch, or is it what we used to call rugby.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "MB" <MB@nospam.net> wrote in message news:srhie3$93c$1@dont-email.me...
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service will
    end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.




    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Mon Jan 10 17:13:29 2022
    Why not just switch it with a conventional radio controlled clock. There
    used to be loads of those about for water heaters on off peak, Most were
    just time switches with digital control sealed against customer tampering.
    If you look back at how long my smart meter lasted, ie August to Christmas
    day before it stopped switching, I'm not impressed.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:j4323rFs61tU1@mid.individual.net...
    On 10/01/2022 15:13, MB wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to
    change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service will
    end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.



    Same for my mother, she has a spring reserve switch too, (that is about 12 hours out), and a two phase/four meter arrangement that no other supplier than SSE (SEB in old money) will support.

    I suspect she will be receiving a letter too. I was rather hoping the
    'issue' would out live her !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.inv on Mon Jan 10 17:15:08 2022
    I have nothing against them, especially with its talking terminal,but I do worry that with the increase of complexity, things can go wrong more often.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "BrightsideS9" <reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:evootgdkmghi8ieqsga19ikni6vlc4vm8g@4ax.com...
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:13:08 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to >>change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned >>clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their >>records.


    You can refuse to have smart meters fitted. See:- https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/information-consumers/energy-advice-households/getting-smart-meter

    --
    brightysidse S9





    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Robin on Mon Jan 10 17:34:15 2022
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service
    ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"? I'm not aware that Ofcom or other regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff. (Most suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy
    if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to
    - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is not
    there to switch. Obviously my timeswitch will continue to operate but
    if it failed then they would probably hit me with a large charge to do
    the changed after the date.

    I will wait until better weather until arranging a date.

    I know I do not pay directly but all customers will pay through our
    bills, I think it was estimated at several hundred pounds per meter.

    I do get annoyeed at all the wild claims they make about saving me money
    which is complete rubbish.

    Wasn't there a Liberal party politician pushing the legislation through Parliament even though he had a connection to the company making the meters?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robin@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 17:25:15 2022
    On 10/01/2022 15:13, MB wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.

    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service
    ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"? I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff. (Most suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy
    if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to
    - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.


    --
    Robin
    reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 17:56:13 2022
    On 10/01/2022 17:34, MB wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service
    ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"?  I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff.  (Most
    suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy
    if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to
    - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.

    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating.  How do they expect you
    to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 17:51:44 2022
    On 10/01/2022 17:13, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    Why not just switch it with a conventional radio controlled clock. There
    used to be loads of those about for water heaters on off peak, Most were just time switches with digital control sealed against customer tampering.

    Need two, (one for each phase) both rated at about 50 to 60 Amps, and
    then the matter of compliance with SSE.
    What's to stop me setting them to come on during the day ? (Although
    their current one does anyway)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Tweed on Mon Jan 10 18:50:42 2022
    On 10/01/2022 18:24, Tweed wrote:
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:34, MB wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service >>>> ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than >>>> those which use a Smart Meter"?  I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff.  (Most >>>> suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy >>>> if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to >>>> - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand. >>> It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.
    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating.  How do they expect you
    to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating !

    With a smart meter you don’t need any form of switch.

    Well, I might pre empt my mother's situation when Spring arrives. I'll
    need to be there, her electrical system covers an area of wall that's
    1.5 metres wide, by about 700mm 'high', in the hallway. Quite how the
    SEB felt that was aesthetically acceptable (even in 1966) is beyond me.
    My late father enclosed the lot in a cupboard he built around it,

    Four smart meters all in the same place, I hope the bloke that turns up
    knows what he's doing, and the mouse clickers back at base don't get the
    ID codes etc muddled up on her account.

    As I say, I really was hoping not to have to get involved

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Mon Jan 10 18:24:40 2022
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:34, MB wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service >>> ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"?  I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff.  (Most >>> suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy
    if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to >>> - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.

    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating.  How do they expect you
    to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating !


    With a smart meter you don’t need any form of switch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Mon Jan 10 19:00:40 2022
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 18:24, Tweed wrote:
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:34, MB wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service >>>>> ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than >>>>> those which use a Smart Meter"?  I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff.  (Most >>>>> suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy >>>>> if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to >>>>> - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand. >>>> It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.
    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating.  How do they expect you >>> to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating ! >>>
    With a smart meter you don’t need any form of switch.

    Well, I might pre empt my mother's situation when Spring arrives. I'll
    need to be there, her electrical system covers an area of wall that's
    1.5 metres wide, by about 700mm 'high', in the hallway. Quite how the
    SEB felt that was aesthetically acceptable (even in 1966) is beyond me.
    My late father enclosed the lot in a cupboard he built around it,

    Four smart meters all in the same place, I hope the bloke that turns up
    knows what he's doing, and the mouse clickers back at base don't get the
    ID codes etc muddled up on her account.

    As I say, I really was hoping not to have to get involved


    I’ll correct my statement about not needing a switch - you do need
    something to turn on something like a storage heater circuit at the cheap
    time. But of course the smart meter can dream up any form of time based charging, which of course is why we are getting them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Mon Jan 10 19:46:15 2022
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 18:24, Tweed wrote:
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating ! >>>
    That is one reason I will not be installing gas in my new-to-me flat and shop.

    With a smart meter you don’t need any form of switch.

    If you have storage heaters, it has been pointed out upthread somewhere
    that you need a way to tell them that "electricity is now (relatively)
    cheap" or they are likely to end up storing expensive energy. Or you
    could install IoT switching that can be remotely controlled.


    Apparently the magic words are 5 port smart meter. This has a separate
    switched output for the storage heater circuit.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Tweed on Mon Jan 10 19:23:26 2022
    On 10/01/2022 18:24, Tweed wrote:
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating !

    That is one reason I will not be installing gas in my new-to-me flat and
    shop.

    With a smart meter you don’t need any form of switch.

    If you have storage heaters, it has been pointed out upthread somewhere
    that you need a way to tell them that "electricity is now (relatively)
    cheap" or they are likely to end up storing expensive energy. Or you
    could install IoT switching that can be remotely controlled.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 19:51:50 2022
    I wil probably ring them to see if they need access to the house. The
    meters and timeswitch are outside in a cabinet (with a door that has
    never fasten properly!)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Mike on Mon Jan 10 20:33:05 2022
    On 10/01/2022 20:06, Mike wrote:
    In article <j43a9tFtldgU2@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.

    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating. How do they expect you
    to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    Not a problem, you'll be charging them at 7 hours a day at
    probably north of 33p a unit by then!

    One good thing about electricity at the moment is that the cost of
    producing it is not going up nearly as fast as the cost of gas, as over
    half of it it made by renewable and nuclear sources, so the increase due
    to the cost of gas should not be too steep. Unless the suppliers jump on
    the bandwagon, hoping we don't realise. :-/

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Mon Jan 10 20:06:28 2022
    In article <j43a9tFtldgU2@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is
    not there to switch.

    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating.  How do they expect you
    to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    Not a problem, you'll be charging them at 7 hours a day at
    probably north of 33p a unit by then!

    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Vir Campestris@21:1/5 to All on Mon Jan 10 21:52:16 2022
    On 10/01/2022 15:13, MB wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.

    Mine sent me a letter telling me they needed to change my meter because
    it is out of calibration. I called them. I said I doubt a smart meter
    will work here, because the mobile signal is so bad.

    Pause, tap, tap, "Oh yes, we have had some failed installs around there,
    we won't need to do it".

    "But what about the calibration?" I asked.

    "Oh that doesn't matter".

    So the calibration story was just a lie.

    Andy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Mon Jan 10 21:25:33 2022
    In article <j43jg2FttsU1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating. How do they expect you >>> to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    Not a problem, you'll be charging them at 7 hours a day at
    probably north of 33p a unit by then!

    One good thing about electricity at the moment is that the cost of
    producing it is not going up nearly as fast as the cost of gas, as over
    half of it it made by renewable and nuclear sources, so the increase due
    to the cost of gas should not be too steep. Unless the suppliers jump on
    the bandwagon, hoping we don't realise. :-/

    Current fix due to end this month :-

    Day/kWh: 15.27p
    Night/kWh: 11.29p
    Standing/day: 16.66p

    Gas/kWh: 2.78p
    Standing/day: 13.77p

    Proposed "We're not jumping on the bandwagon or ripping you off" fixed
    tarriff :-

    Day/kWh: 29.86p
    Night/kWh: 19.3p
    Standing/day: 34.28p

    Gas/kWh: 7.47p
    Standing/day: 33.42p

    Now, you tell me :-

    Electricity price to almost *double*, fixed for a year to come (yay!) presumably ALL the electricity is really coming from Burning Gas
    and nothing is really generated by the windmills, wave machines,
    nukes and solar ... despite so-called green/eco/credentials.

    **Standing charges** due to more than double (due to the increased
    wholesale cost and shortages of "standing" caused by Covid/Brexit/
    Ship Stuck In The Suez etc...)

    As per Martin Lewis. "Do nothing!". Go to standard variable (currently
    cheaper to April) and hope this nonsense stops soon.

    For people on 100% "eco" tarrifs, where *every* unit of electricity
    comes from unicorns on treadmills etc -- they will of course be the
    true test: Their bills will remain untouched, right? ;)

    The cynic in me says otherwise.


    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to vir.campestris@invalid.invalid on Mon Jan 10 22:15:55 2022
    In article <sri9qh$p0o$1@dont-email.me>,
    Vir Campestris <vir.campestris@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Mine sent me a letter telling me they needed to change my meter because
    it is out of calibration.

    Mine needed to be changed "for safety reasons", which was also
    a fat lie. As that lie was sent by my *supplier* (not the meter
    manufacturer, or Western Power Distribution, who might have an
    actual say in it) it was one of the reasons I cited when changing
    supplier in their "exit questionnaire", along with inability to
    relate metered usage to direct debit amount. Or return excess
    credit when asked.

    "But what about the calibration?" I asked.
    "Oh that doesn't matter".

    Would it have helped if they'd said "We've wasted a fortune
    on this stupid-ass SMETS1 dumb meters, we've got boxes of the
    things to get rid of, and congratulations, you've been
    selected as the mug in your postcode to get one! Help us out
    here?"

    Whether SMETS1 or SMETS2, they are being sold on the OTHER lie
    that if you get a smart meter fitted, you will somehow magically
    be saving the planet, your bills will fall etc. -- which is mostly
    nonsense, and always caveated/excused with the [*] in the advert
    which says "* assuming you are currently a wasteful person and
    you stop doing that. Behavioural change needed. For best savings,
    turn off the lights and heat and shiver in the dark!"

    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to Mike on Mon Jan 10 23:40:43 2022
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 21:25:33, Mike <mjb@signal11.invalid> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    In article <j43jg2FttsU1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    []
    One good thing about electricity at the moment is that the cost of >>producing it is not going up nearly as fast as the cost of gas, as over >>half of it it made by renewable and nuclear sources, so the increase due
    to the cost of gas should not be too steep. Unless the suppliers jump on >>the bandwagon, hoping we don't realise. :-/

    Naw, they wouldn't do that, would they (-:!

    Current fix due to end this month :-
    []
    Standing/day: 16.66p
    []
    Standing/day: 13.77p

    Proposed "We're not jumping on the bandwagon or ripping you off" fixed
    []
    Standing/day: 34.28p
    []
    Standing/day: 33.42p

    Now, you tell me :-

    Electricity price to almost *double*, fixed for a year to come (yay!) >presumably ALL the electricity is really coming from Burning Gas
    and nothing is really generated by the windmills, wave machines,
    nukes and solar ... despite so-called green/eco/credentials.

    I follow @NationalGridESO, who put out a daily tweet of where the
    nation's electricity comes from. The top two sources are nearly always
    wind and gas - usually about 30% each (the 4.37pm tweet on the 10th has
    30.0% gas, 28.5% wind, as part of 56% "low carbon", which includes
    nuclear [and solar and hydro, but those are small - 1.4% and 2.3% in
    that tweet, which is typical]). Sometimes gas is ahead, sometimes wind,
    but they average out at about 30% each, with the rest making up the
    slack.

    **Standing charges** due to more than double (due to the increased
    wholesale cost and shortages of "standing" caused by Covid/Brexit/
    Ship Stuck In The Suez etc...)

    That's the most insidious of all these, and I don't think there's any
    viable justification (so "because we can" is the only real reason).

    As per Martin Lewis. "Do nothing!". Go to standard variable (currently >cheaper to April) and hope this nonsense stops soon.

    I cant see how it's going to stop. Or are you saying wholesale prices
    will drop?

    For people on 100% "eco" tarrifs, where *every* unit of electricity
    comes from unicorns on treadmills etc -- they will of course be the
    true test: Their bills will remain untouched, right? ;)

    Wow, I hadn't thought of that! Yes, they shouldn't, other than a
    secondary effect. I'm surprised no-one else has picked up on this!

    The cynic in me says otherwise.

    Me too (-:

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I don't like activity holidays. I like /inactivity/ holidays.
    - Miriam Margolyes, RT 2017/4/15-21

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.inv on Mon Jan 10 23:21:43 2022
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 16:59:09, BrightsideS9 <reply_to_address_is_not@invalid.invalid> wrote (my responses usually
    follow points raised):
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 15:13:08 +0000, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote:

    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to >>change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service
    will end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned >>clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their records. >>

    You can refuse to have smart meters fitted. See:- >https://www.ofgem.gov.uk/information-consumers/energy-advice-households/ >getting-smart-meter

    They may be able to (or do a damn good job of pretending) that you need
    to have a remote meter (note lack of use of word "smart"!) if you want
    to continue to have a dual-rate timed supply.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I don't like activity holidays. I like /inactivity/ holidays.
    - Miriam Margolyes, RT 2017/4/15-21

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 11 07:19:12 2022
    On 10/01/2022 23:21, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    They may be able to (or do a damn good job of pretending) that you need
    to have a remote meter (note lack of use of word "smart"!) if you want
    to continue to have a dual-rate timed supply.

    It is their meter so they can use whatever they want. Hopefully it can
    all go in the cabinet around the back of the house and I will not need
    to look at it now they can read remotely.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Mike on Tue Jan 11 08:37:21 2022
    On 10/01/2022 21:25, Mike wrote:
    Current fix due to end this month :-
    Day/kWh: 15.27p
    Night/kWh: 11.29p
    Standing/day: 16.66p

    Gas/kWh: 2.78p
    Standing/day: 13.77p

    Proposed "We're not jumping on the bandwagon or ripping you off" fixed tarriff :-

    Day/kWh: 29.86p
    Night/kWh: 19.3p
    Standing/day: 34.28p

    Gas/kWh: 7.47p
    Standing/day: 33.42p

    Now, you tell me :-

    Electricity price to almost *double*, fixed for a year to come (yay!) presumably ALL the electricity is really coming from Burning Gas
    and nothing is really generated by the windmills, wave machines,
    nukes and solar ... despite so-called green/eco/credentials.

    **Standing charges** due to more than double (due to the increased
    wholesale cost and shortages of "standing" caused by Covid/Brexit/
    Ship Stuck In The Suez etc...)

    As per Martin Lewis. "Do nothing!". Go to standard variable (currently cheaper to April) and hope this nonsense stops soon.

    For people on 100% "eco" tarrifs, where *every* unit of electricity
    comes from unicorns on treadmills etc -- they will of course be the
    true test: Their bills will remain untouched, right? ;)

    The cynic in me says otherwise.
    Ha, yes, very interesting. They are doing all they can to 'front load'
    their revenue.

    I've got an electric smart meter, but a dumb gas one (long story).
    Therefore I manually send my gas readings.
    They are so bloody cheeky, for the last three months despite me sending
    them the gas
    reading on the day the billing cycle closes, they slap on an estimated
    reading that's 15 units higher.
    You can see it on the bill, my reading, then their estimate both tagged
    as the same day.

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what
    happens

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to All on Tue Jan 11 09:05:38 2022
    Well EDF say that Economy 7 and other time based tariffs are not going to be changed, and since mine is guaranteed till 2024 now, I'm not worried. It
    could in the long run change however if enough people in the UK want to
    charge their cars at night, but from what I hear some other way to get
    charging done affordable is needed as those who lobby for a night economy,
    do not really want families to stay at home to charge their cars up.

    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Robin" <rbw@outlook.com> wrote in message news:f98c1a7f-0d0a-9037-7618-79e66fa0f5e0@outlook.com...
    On 10/01/2022 15:13, MB wrote:
    Just had a letter from the electricity supplier to say that they need to
    change my meter to a "Smart" Meter because the Teleswitching service will
    end in March 2023.

    Only thing is that my day/night switching uses a good old fashioned
    clockwork time-switch! Does not say a lot for the accuracy of their
    records.

    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service
    ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"? I'm not aware that Ofcom or other regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff. (Most suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy if
    it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to -
    say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.


    --
    Robin
    reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Tue Jan 11 09:09:43 2022
    Exactly, that is my position. Until we get really efficient batteries what other way will there be?

    I do however feel that what might happen is that some dynamic process could
    be there to control when the storage heaters get charged, which might not
    be always overnight. As long as they can find a minimum number of hours per day, it might even be better if its more flexible.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Mark Carver" <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:j43a9tFtldgU2@mid.individual.net...
    On 10/01/2022 17:34, MB wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 17:25, Robin wrote:
    Might the letter may be shorthand for "because the Teleswitching service >>> ends in 2023 we'll be ending all Economy 7 and like tarrifs other than
    those which use a Smart Meter"? I'm not aware that Ofcom or other
    regulatiosn require suppliers to offer a clockwork-based tariff. (Most
    suppliers don't offer Economy 7.) And doubt you'd get a lot of sympathy
    if it was pointed out that clockwork allows people to play the system to >>> - say - charge their EV with cheap power during periods of peak demand.

    It says that the night time rates will end when the Teleswitching is not
    there to switch.

    That's ridiculous. Do you have storage heating. How do they expect you to 'charge' them up for 7 hours a day at 18p/unit ?

    I thought it's all supposed to be a non gas future for domestic heating !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Tue Jan 11 09:15:17 2022
    It has however been pretty obvious that the power suppliers have run out of funds to keep solvent. so we need to look back down the supply chain to find out why, niche words of a satirirical political spoof, Current conditions
    are not considered likely by the third party companies we pay. which begs
    the question, if we paid directly to those actually generating the supply
    would it not cut out one layer of administration?
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote in message news:OjiTfCj7PM3hFwk9@255soft.uk...
    On Mon, 10 Jan 2022 at 21:25:33, Mike <mjb@signal11.invalid> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    In article <j43jg2FttsU1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    []
    One good thing about electricity at the moment is that the cost of >>>producing it is not going up nearly as fast as the cost of gas, as over >>>half of it it made by renewable and nuclear sources, so the increase due >>>to the cost of gas should not be too steep. Unless the suppliers jump on >>>the bandwagon, hoping we don't realise. :-/

    Naw, they wouldn't do that, would they (-:!

    Current fix due to end this month :-
    []
    Standing/day: 16.66p
    []
    Standing/day: 13.77p

    Proposed "We're not jumping on the bandwagon or ripping you off" fixed
    []
    Standing/day: 34.28p
    []
    Standing/day: 33.42p

    Now, you tell me :-

    Electricity price to almost *double*, fixed for a year to come (yay!) >>presumably ALL the electricity is really coming from Burning Gas
    and nothing is really generated by the windmills, wave machines,
    nukes and solar ... despite so-called green/eco/credentials.

    I follow @NationalGridESO, who put out a daily tweet of where the nation's electricity comes from. The top two sources are nearly always wind and
    gas - usually about 30% each (the 4.37pm tweet on the 10th has 30.0% gas, 28.5% wind, as part of 56% "low carbon", which includes nuclear [and solar and hydro, but those are small - 1.4% and 2.3% in that tweet, which is typical]). Sometimes gas is ahead, sometimes wind, but they average out at about 30% each, with the rest making up the slack.

    **Standing charges** due to more than double (due to the increased >>wholesale cost and shortages of "standing" caused by Covid/Brexit/
    Ship Stuck In The Suez etc...)

    That's the most insidious of all these, and I don't think there's any
    viable justification (so "because we can" is the only real reason).

    As per Martin Lewis. "Do nothing!". Go to standard variable (currently >>cheaper to April) and hope this nonsense stops soon.

    I cant see how it's going to stop. Or are you saying wholesale prices will drop?

    For people on 100% "eco" tarrifs, where *every* unit of electricity
    comes from unicorns on treadmills etc -- they will of course be the
    true test: Their bills will remain untouched, right? ;)

    Wow, I hadn't thought of that! Yes, they shouldn't, other than a secondary effect. I'm surprised no-one else has picked up on this!

    The cynic in me says otherwise.

    Me too (-:

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    I don't like activity holidays. I like /inactivity/ holidays.
    - Miriam Margolyes, RT 2017/4/15-21

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Tweed on Tue Jan 11 08:39:31 2022
    On 10/01/2022 19:46, Tweed wrote:

    Apparently the magic words are 5 port smart meter. This has a separate switched output for the storage heater circuit.
    Thank you Mr Tweed. I've written that on a Post It sticker, and it's
    pinned to my notice board

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Tue Jan 11 09:44:06 2022
    On 11/01/2022 08:37, Mark Carver wrote:
    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what happens

    With most of our sites at work being remote and only occasionally
    visited, I would often take an electricity reading to perhaps save the
    Hydro meter reader a walk.

    I was asked to stop because their system generated a bill every time
    they received a reading and our office people did not like the extra work!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to charles on Tue Jan 11 09:43:33 2022
    On 11/01/2022 09:34, charles wrote:
    In article <j44u23F8dtrU2@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 19:46, Tweed wrote:
    Apparently the magic words are 5 port smart meter. This has a separate
    switched output for the storage heater circuit.
    Thank you Mr Tweed. I've written that on a Post It sticker, and it's
    pinned to my notice board

    you could write the time on the sticker, too. Save looking at your watch.

    Good thinking !

    I've just had a chat with a friend, whose parents also have the same
    1960s whacky two phase, multiple storage heating solution as my mum.

    Apparently they went through this ' You are going to need a smart meter
    because of teleswitching ending etc' thing a while ago.

    SSE turned up with great enthusiasm, took one look at their power
    system, and walked away totally bamboozled. Result.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Tue Jan 11 09:34:05 2022
    In article <j44u23F8dtrU2@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 10/01/2022 19:46, Tweed wrote:

    Apparently the magic words are 5 port smart meter. This has a separate switched output for the storage heater circuit.
    Thank you Mr Tweed. I've written that on a Post It sticker, and it's
    pinned to my notice board


    you could write the time on the sticker, too. Save looking at your watch.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Tue Jan 11 19:42:41 2022
    In article <j44tu1F8dtrU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what >happens

    :)

    Do not do this. I broke First Utility/Shell's already broken
    billing system by taking this tack when they annoyed me ...

    Agreement is: "You provide us with monthly readings".

    OK. I did. Sent reading, they used reading. Happy.

    Then, it became: Sent reading, it was used to "inform their
    estimate". Yep, estimate *every* month, corrected back by
    the supplied reading as a patch on the NEXT bill. Hmm. Clumsy.

    Then "You need to send us a reading" reminders start coming,
    even when I'd only just sent one. Clumsy AND annoying.

    I started sending them weekly (for this is the frequency
    that the meters are read and recorded *here*, independent
    of suppliers).

    This way, they can pick whatever damn readings they want and
    sort it out.

    This seemed to sort it for a while, with each bill showing
    a set of open-close readings, each a week long. No more
    estimates and reminders.

    Then, (for GAS only) they started marking the readings from "Pending"
    to "Invalid" and then "Deleted" (not "Accepted").

    Because there was now no reading, they estimated again, and because
    they are incompetent moneygrabbers, they would estimate over.

    I complained about the endemic crapness of this situation, and
    told them to take the reading over the phone, apply it, and bill
    me properly.

    Eventually, they came to the conclusion I was providing "too many
    readings" (and I told them why), then suggested a smart meter again,
    (no, if you can't cope with one reading a week, how will you cope
    with readings every half an hour, or whatever super-accuracy you
    are claiming today).

    Although they never followed up on explaining *why* their billing
    couldn't cope, why it kept ignoring readings/nagging when they
    were sent/wrongly estimating, the billing did (eventually) balance
    once you worked through it all. Which was an un-necessary pain
    in the backside ...
    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Mike on Thu Jan 13 18:50:32 2022
    mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) wrote:

    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what
    happens

    Do not do this. I broke First Utility/Shell's already broken
    billing system by taking this tack when they annoyed me ...
    Agreement is: "You provide us with monthly readings".

    I'm still mid-switch from UtilityPoint to EDF (4 months ago tomorrow and still counting).

    They only want readings every 6 months, and do advise against sending them more frequently.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Woody@21:1/5 to All on Thu Jan 13 20:03:15 2022
    On Thu 13/01/2022 19:59, NY wrote:
    "Andy Burns" <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote in message news:j4bajpFfg6gU1@mid.individual.net...
    mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) wrote:

    Mark Carver  <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what >>>> happens

    Do not do this. I broke First Utility/Shell's already broken
    billing system by taking this tack when they annoyed me ...
    Agreement is: "You provide us with monthly readings".

    I'm still mid-switch from UtilityPoint to EDF (4 months ago tomorrow
    and still counting).

    They only want readings every 6 months, and do advise against sending
    them more frequently.

    We're with Octopus. They allow you to send readings (for example) every
    month and they will bill you based on your readings - so your bill
    fluctuates as your usage does, instead of you having to pay an average, estimated amount which leaves you in credit at some times and even more
    in credit at others ;-)

    When I was with Southern Electric, there were only two choices: pay an average estimated amount, the same every month - but by Direct Debit if
    you want; or pay the exact amount on the bill, but it must be by cheque
    or BACS, and not by direct debit. They didn't have a system to do direct debits of variable amounts depending on how usage changes from month to month. I ran up a large credit and wanted to claim some of it back. I
    was told (and I'm not sure whether I believe this) that the only time I
    could get my excess credit back (because I'd been charged for more than
    I 'd used) was if I closed the account when I moved house; they even
    claimed (surely wrongly) that if I switched to another supplier, the
    credit would be transferred and could not be returned to me. I do
    suspect that the person I spoke to may not have been telling me official company policy but was instead telling me porkies because she'd had a
    hard day.


    +1 Octopus Energy

    If its good enough for M&S........

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Jan 13 19:59:56 2022
    "Andy Burns" <usenet@andyburns.uk> wrote in message news:j4bajpFfg6gU1@mid.individual.net...
    mjb@signal11.invalid (Mike) wrote:

    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what
    happens

    Do not do this. I broke First Utility/Shell's already broken
    billing system by taking this tack when they annoyed me ...
    Agreement is: "You provide us with monthly readings".

    I'm still mid-switch from UtilityPoint to EDF (4 months ago tomorrow and still counting).

    They only want readings every 6 months, and do advise against sending them more frequently.

    We're with Octopus. They allow you to send readings (for example) every
    month and they will bill you based on your readings - so your bill
    fluctuates as your usage does, instead of you having to pay an average, estimated amount which leaves you in credit at some times and even more in credit at others ;-)

    When I was with Southern Electric, there were only two choices: pay an
    average estimated amount, the same every month - but by Direct Debit if you want; or pay the exact amount on the bill, but it must be by cheque or BACS, and not by direct debit. They didn't have a system to do direct debits of variable amounts depending on how usage changes from month to month. I ran
    up a large credit and wanted to claim some of it back. I was told (and I'm
    not sure whether I believe this) that the only time I could get my excess credit back (because I'd been charged for more than I 'd used) was if I
    closed the account when I moved house; they even claimed (surely wrongly)
    that if I switched to another supplier, the credit would be transferred and could not be returned to me. I do suspect that the person I spoke to may not have been telling me official company policy but was instead telling me
    porkies because she'd had a hard day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Thu Jan 13 19:17:50 2022
    Andy Burns wrote:

    I'm still mid-switch from UtilityPoint to EDF (4 months ago tomorrow and still
    counting).

    And ten minutes after that, they sent an email saying my switching process is complete ... except my credit amounts from UtilityPoint are still not credited to my EDF account, I feel a phone call coming on ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to Woody on Fri Jan 14 11:45:53 2022
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 20:03:15, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Thu 13/01/2022 19:59, NY wrote:
    []
    We're with Octopus. They allow you to send readings (for example)
    every month and they will bill you based on your readings - so your
    bill fluctuates as your usage does, instead of you having to pay an >>average, estimated amount which leaves you in credit at some times
    and even more in credit at others ;-)

    Same here - though only with type 1 (or whatever the term is) smart
    meters.

    I had considerable trouble getting them to just bill me (they do it by
    DD) for what I'd used rather than the rolling average, though - though I
    admit once it was set up, it hasn't been a problem (the e-bills just say
    "you elect to pay for what you use" or a similar phrasing). [They make
    the bills look complicated - especially if the tariff changes - but that
    seems to be universal across all service providers (Bt being one of the
    worst I've seen so far).]

    When I was with Southern Electric, there were only two choices: pay
    an average estimated amount, the same every month - but by Direct
    Debit if you want; or pay the exact amount on the bill, but it must
    be by cheque or BACS, and not by direct debit. They didn't have a
    system to do direct debits of variable amounts depending on how usage >>changes from month to month. I ran up a large credit and wanted to

    (Fortunately Octopus seem not to have any problem there.)

    claim some of it back. I was told (and I'm not sure whether I believe >>this) that the only time I could get my excess credit back (because
    I'd been charged for more than I 'd used) was if I closed the account
    when I moved house; they even claimed (surely wrongly) that if I
    switched to another supplier, the credit would be transferred and
    could not be returned to me. I do suspect that the person I spoke to
    may not have been telling me official company policy but was instead >>telling me porkies because she'd had a hard day.

    [I've had something similar with tsoHost (for hosting services, not
    energy) - they extracted a payment from me despite my having more credit
    than was needed to pay both bills.]

    +1 Octopus Energy

    Sort of. They're far from perfect, but less bother than some others I've
    tried. Their TV ad.s imply they've won something from Which for a few
    years running, for whatever little that's worth. Though I haven't seen
    any of those ad.s since shortly after all the energy companies have been obliged to sell us energy at less than they're paying for it! Though the
    ad.s _did_ continue for a short while after that became the case, which
    puzzled me. I thought they'd pull them as soon as getting more customers
    hurt them.)

    If its good enough for M&S........

    Well ... it's Octopus _pretending_ to be M&S. I found dealing with them
    direct was far more effective, though I'm _nominally_ still getting from
    M&S, through lethargy. A few years ago M&S changed their pretend
    supplier - previously they resold I think it was sse. (Who were one of
    the more impenetrable bill providers I had the misfortune to deal with -
    not least, they wanted gas and electric paid separately.)


    Has anyone, with a smart meter, experienced a hostile remote switch-off?
    The capability is there, technically. I quizzed the chap installing
    mine, and he assured me it couldn't be done without a court order - but
    on further prodding, he agreed it could be changed to a prepaid meter
    remotely, and if it has that capability, it has the remote cutoff
    ability at least technically. I can't help wondering if that aspect -
    _never_ mentioned in all of the publicity! - is one reason the suppliers
    are so keen on smart meter fitting, anticipating changes in legislation
    (which I fear they would get) that enables them to do it more easily.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    The motto of the Royal Society is: 'Take nobody's word for it'. Scepticism has value. - Brian Cox, RT 2015/3/14-20

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Woody@21:1/5 to All on Fri Jan 14 18:02:15 2022
    On Fri 14/01/2022 11:45, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    On Thu, 13 Jan 2022 at 20:03:15, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Thu 13/01/2022 19:59, NY wrote:
    []
     We're with Octopus. They allow you to send readings (for example)
    every  month and they will bill you based on your readings - so your
    bill  fluctuates as your usage does, instead of you having to pay an
    average,  estimated amount which leaves you in credit at some times
    and even more  in credit at others ;-)

    Same here - though only with type 1 (or whatever the term is) smart meters.

    I had considerable trouble getting them to just bill me (they do it by
    DD) for what I'd used rather than the rolling average, though - though I admit once it was set up, it hasn't been a problem (the e-bills just say
    "you elect to pay for what you use" or a similar phrasing). [They make
    the bills look complicated - especially if the tariff changes - but that seems to be universal across all service providers (Bt being one of the
    worst I've seen so far).]

     When I was with Southern Electric, there were only two choices: pay
    an  average estimated amount, the same every month - but by Direct
    Debit if  you want; or pay the exact amount on the bill, but it must
    be by cheque  or BACS, and not by direct debit. They didn't have a
    system to do direct  debits of variable amounts depending on how
    usage changes from month to  month. I ran up a large credit and
    wanted to

    (Fortunately Octopus seem not to have any problem there.)

    claim some of it back. I  was told (and I'm not sure whether I
    believe this) that the only time I  could get my excess credit back
    (because I'd been charged for more than  I 'd used) was if I closed
    the account when I moved house; they even  claimed (surely wrongly)
    that if I switched to another supplier, the  credit would be
    transferred and could not be returned to me. I do  suspect that the
    person I spoke to may not have been telling me official  company
    policy but was instead telling me porkies because she'd had a  hard day. >>
    [I've had something similar with tsoHost (for hosting services, not
    energy) - they extracted a payment from me despite my having more credit
    than was needed to pay both bills.]

    +1 Octopus Energy

    Sort of. They're far from perfect, but less bother than some others I've tried. Their TV ad.s imply they've won something from Which for a few
    years running, for whatever little that's worth. Though I haven't seen
    any of those ad.s since shortly after all the energy companies have been obliged to sell us energy at less than they're paying for it! Though the
    ad.s _did_ continue for a short while after that became the case, which puzzled me. I thought they'd pull them as soon as getting more customers
    hurt them.)

    If its good enough for M&S........

    Well ... it's Octopus _pretending_ to be M&S. I found dealing with them direct was far more effective, though I'm _nominally_ still getting from
    M&S, through lethargy. A few years ago M&S changed their pretend
    supplier - previously they resold I think it was sse. (Who were one of
    the more impenetrable bill providers I had the misfortune to deal with -
    not least, they wanted gas and electric paid separately.)


    Has anyone, with a smart meter, experienced a hostile remote switch-off?
    The capability is there, technically. I quizzed the chap installing
    mine, and he assured me it couldn't be done without a court order - but
    on further prodding, he agreed it could be changed to a prepaid meter remotely, and if it has that capability, it has the remote cutoff
    ability at least technically. I can't help wondering if that aspect -
    _never_ mentioned in all of the publicity! - is one reason the suppliers
    are so keen on smart meter fitting, anticipating changes in legislation (which I fear they would get) that enables them to do it more easily.

    The switch-off capability is one of the main reasons I have fought off a
    SM so far. For instance what happens if someone presses the wrong key
    and cuts you off despite you being paid up to date and/or in credit?
    Also if you had a type 1 meter (don't know if it still applies to type
    2?) and they cut off the supply whether deliberately or accidentally
    they had to replace the SM and did not consider that an urgent job. Ergo
    you could be left with no supply for days/weeks.

    Thankfully Octopus will supply a SM if requested but they don't push it otherwise. Also they don't offer (AFAIK) cheaper tariffs to SM users as
    some other suppliers do.

    I'm not sure about the need for a Court Order to disconnect electricity
    but I'm pretty certain they do for gas under safety issues. Give the SM
    feeds both electricity and gas metering, how can they turn off one
    without the other?

    The main reason for not having a SM on my systems is the charging. <IF>
    they can read your meter as often as they wish it will not take long to establish a usage pattern. They can then change their unit charges <to
    you only> for say, low medium or high demand and then charge you (me)
    the highest unit rate when I am on highest use and make more money out
    of me without doing anything to justify it.

    Smart Meter? Not bl**dy likely!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Woody on Fri Jan 14 21:10:12 2022
    Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:

    [...]

    The main reason for not having a SM on my systems is the charging. <IF>
    they can read your meter as often as they wish it will not take long to establish a usage pattern. They can then change their unit charges <to
    you only> for say, low medium or high demand and then charge you (me)
    the highest unit rate when I am on highest use and make more money out
    of me without doing anything to justify it.

    Smart Meter? Not bl**dy likely!

    One of my concerns is whether they charge for the actual energy or for
    the Volt-Amps. There could be a big difference if the power factor of
    your load isn't near unity. Typically older fluorescent lamps and
    anything with an induction motor will have a power factor that isn't
    unity. In industrial installations it is worth correcting this with a
    bank of capacitors, but for domestic installations it is usually
    ignored.

    For at least the last three years EDF has bombarded me with letters,
    about one per fortnight, telling me to get a smart meter fitted. I now automatically bin them without bothering to open them ...I think a
    couple of electricity bills must have gone the same way, because red
    ones have recently started arriving.

    The letters for self-reading the meter are recognisably different, so I
    open them. A couple of years ago I received one, read the meter and
    'phoned the number they gave me. I tapped the identification number
    into the keypad and then got a recorded diatribe about how much better
    it would be if I had a smart meter fitted - so I hung up. This happened
    every time I tried to send them my meter reading, so I now just let them
    get to the point where they are legally obliged to send round a meter
    reader.

    He enquired why I wasn't reading my own meter, so I told him I was, but
    I wasn't prepared to waste my time listening to advertisments for
    something I didn't want when I was trying to help them.. He said he
    would report this back - but if he doesn't, it will make sure he stays
    in a job.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Mike on Sat Jan 15 15:13:41 2022
    On 11/01/2022 19:42, Mike wrote:
    In article <j44tu1F8dtrU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and see what
    happens
    :)

    Do not do this.

    I've just read the gas meter, I've subtracted 15 units from the actual
    reading, and sent that to them.
    Let's see what they 'estimate' my use at now !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Ashley Booth@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Tue Jan 18 10:14:13 2022
    Mark Carver wrote:

    On 11/01/2022 19:42, Mike wrote:
    In article <j44tu1F8dtrU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    I'm inclined to send them my gas reading every single day, and
    see what happens
    :)

    Do not do this.

    I've just read the gas meter, I've subtracted 15 units from the
    actual reading, and sent that to them. Let's see what they
    'estimate' my use at now !

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)

    --


    --
    This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to Ashley Booth on Tue Jan 18 22:25:27 2022
    In article <j4ni7lFpkndU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Ashley Booth <removetab@snglinks.com> wrote:

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)

    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)

    Of course they could normally argue SUBTRACTING units from the
    bill is fraud, under-declaring your usage etc.

    So, if you're ADDING units to the bill, then ... that can't
    be fraud, right? Even though, under *current* conditions, it
    would end up saving you money long-term.

    I suppose all you're doing is what the energy companies
    do, pre-buy energy "options" for future energy when it looks
    cheap to avoid some of the rises. Sauce for goose ...

    Another good reason not to have a smart meter!
    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Woody@21:1/5 to Mike on Tue Jan 18 23:18:06 2022
    On Tue 18/01/2022 22:25, Mike wrote:
    In article <j4ni7lFpkndU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Ashley Booth <removetab@snglinks.com> wrote:

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)

    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)

    Of course they could normally argue SUBTRACTING units from the
    bill is fraud, under-declaring your usage etc.

    So, if you're ADDING units to the bill, then ... that can't
    be fraud, right? Even though, under *current* conditions, it
    would end up saving you money long-term.

    I suppose all you're doing is what the energy companies
    do, pre-buy energy "options" for future energy when it looks
    cheap to avoid some of the rises. Sauce for goose ...

    Another good reason not to have a smart meter!

    However the supply company has a history of your usage so unless there
    was a particular and substantial change in the weather pattern to cause
    it they would catch on quite quickly (they probably have software that
    watches it all the time) and pay you a visit to get accurate meter readings.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to Woody on Wed Jan 19 10:58:09 2022
    On Tue, 18 Jan 2022 at 23:18:06, Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Tue 18/01/2022 22:25, Mike wrote:
    In article <j4ni7lFpkndU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Ashley Booth <removetab@snglinks.com> wrote:

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill
    therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)
    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)
    Of course they could normally argue SUBTRACTING units from the
    bill is fraud, under-declaring your usage etc.
    So, if you're ADDING units to the bill, then ... that can't
    be fraud, right? Even though, under *current* conditions, it
    would end up saving you money long-term.
    I suppose all you're doing is what the energy companies
    do, pre-buy energy "options" for future energy when it looks
    cheap to avoid some of the rises. Sauce for goose ...
    Another good reason not to have a smart meter!

    However the supply company has a history of your usage so unless there
    was a particular and substantial change in the weather pattern to cause
    it they would catch on quite quickly (they probably have software that >watches it all the time) and pay you a visit to get accurate meter
    readings.

    You'd have to moderate your "pre-buying" to something believable, or not
    worth their cost of redirecting a meter-reader's route. I imagine
    they're being particularly attentive under the current situation.

    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    All change is not necessarily improvement, but all improvement is change.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robin@21:1/5 to Mike on Wed Jan 19 10:59:54 2022
    On 18/01/2022 22:25, Mike wrote:
    In article <j4ni7lFpkndU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Ashley Booth <removetab@snglinks.com> wrote:

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)

    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)

    Of course they could normally argue SUBTRACTING units from the
    bill is fraud, under-declaring your usage etc.

    So, if you're ADDING units to the bill, then ... that can't
    be fraud, right? Even though, under *current* conditions, it
    would end up saving you money long-term.

    You'd be giving a reading:

    a. that's false;

    b. that you know is false

    c. so you gain/the supplier loses

    which adds up to fraud by false representation.

    Of course chances of being caught are slim and of being prosecuted
    vanishingly small.

    I suppose all you're doing is what the energy companies
    do, pre-buy energy "options" for future energy when it looks
    cheap to avoid some of the rises. Sauce for goose ...

    No. The equivalent of suppliers who hedge is your signing up to a fixed
    price deal.




    --
    Robin
    reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Robin on Wed Jan 19 17:34:44 2022
    Robin <rbw@outlook.com> wrote:
    On 18/01/2022 22:25, Mike wrote:
    In article <j4ni7lFpkndU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Ashley Booth <removetab@snglinks.com> wrote:

    With energy prices going up one could add units to the bill therefore
    saving money as you're buying them at a cheaper price! :)

    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)

    Of course they could normally argue SUBTRACTING units from the
    bill is fraud, under-declaring your usage etc.

    So, if you're ADDING units to the bill, then ... that can't
    be fraud, right? Even though, under *current* conditions, it
    would end up saving you money long-term.

    You'd be giving a reading:

    a. that's false;

    b. that you know is false

    c. so you gain/the supplier loses

    which adds up to fraud by false representation.

    Of course chances of being caught are slim and of being prosecuted vanishingly small.

    I suppose all you're doing is what the energy companies
    do, pre-buy energy "options" for future energy when it looks
    cheap to avoid some of the rises. Sauce for goose ...

    No. The equivalent of suppliers who hedge is your signing up to a fixed price deal.


    People roughly divide into those that don’t do bad things because they know it to be wrong. The others think anything goes as long as they don’t stand
    a chance of getting caught. Unfortunately we are now getting many more of
    the latter. The PM is a third category - doesn’t matter even if you do get caught.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to harrogate3@ntlworld.com on Wed Jan 19 17:47:02 2022
    In article <ss7hre$i1u$1@dont-email.me>,
    Woody <harrogate3@ntlworld.com> wrote:

    Now there's a tip Martin Lewis couldn't give out ;)

    However the supply company has a history of your usage so unless there
    was a particular and substantial change in the weather pattern to cause
    it they would catch on quite quickly (they probably have software that >watches it all the time) and pay you a visit to get accurate meter readings.

    True. In theory. ;) I'm sure the revenue protection side of things
    look at that data far more closely than the numpties in billing (given
    how they can oscillate between "We can't estimate your usage, we
    don't have enough data" on one view, and "Given your usage, we predict ridiculous figures in our favour every time" ...)


    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)