• Caroline 648

    From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 16 20:21:55 2021
    I am surprised how good the reception was in Glasgow this evening of
    Radio Caroline on 648 kHz. I know the power has been increased (to 5
    kW I believe). What would happen if they put the power up to (say)
    100 kW? What sort of coverage area would this produce (day and
    night)?

    I would say the reception was better than the World Service used to
    be, but presumably this is because WS was highly directional. I am
    wondering how it compares with Radio Luxembourg 208 m in the day. I
    think it is probably better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Scott on Thu Dec 16 21:22:15 2021
    On 16/12/2021 20:21, Scott wrote:
    I am surprised how good the reception was in Glasgow this evening of
    Radio Caroline on 648 kHz. I know the power has been increased (to 5
    kW I believe). What would happen if they put the power up to (say)
    100 kW? What sort of coverage area would this produce (day and
    night)?

    I would say the reception was better than the World Service used to
    be, but presumably this is because WS was highly directional. I am
    wondering how it compares with Radio Luxembourg 208 m in the day. I
    think it is probably better.

    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at 100KW?
    How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to Medium Wave.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 16 21:36:14 2021
    On 16/12/2021 21:22, MB wrote:

    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at 100KW?
    How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to Medium Wave.

    Caroline has enough listeners to pay the bills on its various output
    streams by selling advertising. It is also run by an group of
    enthusiasts who aren't too fussed about getting rich, some of whom
    worked for the station in its pirate days. The transmitter site they are
    using at the moment used to have a 500 kilowatt transmitter serving the
    BBC World Service on 648kHz, which is their allocated frequency.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 16 21:39:27 2021
    On 16/12/2021 21:22, MB wrote:

    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at 100KW?
    How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to Medium Wave.
    Yu may like to look at this page:-

    http://www.radiocaroline.co.uk/#history_of_648.html

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Dec 16 22:30:58 2021
    On 16/12/2021 21:36, John Williamson wrote:
    Caroline has enough listeners to pay the bills on its various output
    streams by selling advertising. It is also run by an group of
    enthusiasts who aren't too fussed about getting rich, some of whom
    worked for the station in its pirate days. The transmitter site they are using at the moment used to have a 500 kilowatt transmitter serving the
    BBC World Service on 648kHz, which is their allocated frequency.


    So how many million listeners do they have?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Fri Dec 17 01:15:13 2021
    On Thu, 16 Dec 2021 at 21:22:15, MB <MB@nospam.net> wrote (my responses
    usually follow points raised):
    On 16/12/2021 20:21, Scott wrote:
    I am surprised how good the reception was in Glasgow this evening of
    Radio Caroline on 648 kHz. I know the power has been increased (to 5
    []
    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at
    100KW? How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to
    Medium Wave.

    You know _of_ at least one - you reposted him above (-:
    [I suppose you may not _know_ him.]
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    ... and how lovely, warm, funny, and just all-round Victoria Woodish she was.
    - Richard Osman on Victoria Wood, RT 2017/4/8-14

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 08:06:03 2021
    On 17/12/2021 01:15, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:
    You know_of_ at least one - you reposted him above (-:
    [I suppose you may not_know_ him.]


    You need a lot more than that to attract advertising and make a profit.

    A small local transmitter can be run on a shoestring but operating a 100
    KW transmitter along with the masts and antenna is much more expensive.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Dec 17 09:08:17 2021
    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Scott" <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote in message news:6i7nrghk1g9sbb97s7qs5hqvg74124hsfd@4ax.com...
    I am surprised how good the reception was in Glasgow this evening of
    Radio Caroline on 648 kHz. I know the power has been increased (to 5
    kW I believe). What would happen if they put the power up to (say)
    100 kW? What sort of coverage area would this produce (day and
    night)?

    I would say the reception was better than the World Service used to
    be, but presumably this is because WS was highly directional. I am
    wondering how it compares with Radio Luxembourg 208 m in the day. I
    think it is probably better.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to MB@nospam.net on Fri Dec 17 09:12:04 2021
    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!
    These seem to be the main users of medium wave these days on the road.
    Of course shortwave anoraks like myself still do with our amplified loops
    and ferrite rods. Its beena lot easier since France turned off all its
    medium wave stuff and only seems to have long wave now, and of course we
    are turning off the bbc local stuff.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "MB" <MB@nospam.net> wrote in message news:spgam6$m2r$1@dont-email.me...
    On 16/12/2021 20:21, Scott wrote:
    I am surprised how good the reception was in Glasgow this evening of
    Radio Caroline on 648 kHz. I know the power has been increased (to 5
    kW I believe). What would happen if they put the power up to (say)
    100 kW? What sort of coverage area would this produce (day and
    night)?

    I would say the reception was better than the World Service used to
    be, but presumably this is because WS was highly directional. I am
    wondering how it compares with Radio Luxembourg 208 m in the day. I
    think it is probably better.

    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at 100KW?
    How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to Medium Wave.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Dec 17 09:16:46 2021
    Yes I'd imagine being allowed to run at high power would cost them a lot
    more dosh and probably interfere with other local services. Its also interesting to notice that every so often, BBC Essex has a day when its a
    kind of version of the old Caroline, and also Manx radio often do a few
    hours called Caroline north. Most of these tend to be publicity our the
    upkeep of radio history, mainly the ships which are still afloat but mostly
    in harbours and estuaries these days.
    Nostalgia is a wonderful thing.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "John Williamson" <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote in message news:j21pqfFdfdiU1@mid.individual.net...
    On 16/12/2021 21:22, MB wrote:

    How much would it cost to increase power to 100 KW and operate at 100KW?
    How many listeners? I don't even know anyone who listens to Medium
    Wave.

    Caroline has enough listeners to pay the bills on its various output
    streams by selling advertising. It is also run by an group of enthusiasts
    who aren't too fussed about getting rich, some of whom worked for the
    station in its pirate days. The transmitter site they are using at the
    moment used to have a 500 kilowatt transmitter serving the BBC World
    Service on 648kHz, which is their allocated frequency.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to briang1@blueyonder.co.uk on Fri Dec 17 09:43:51 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in >others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 09:41:18 2021
    Yes, and Caroline is on a number of small scale DAB muxes. I've heard it
    on the little mux that covers Farnborough and Woking

    On 17/12/2021 09:08, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Dec 17 10:17:00 2021
    On 17/12/2021 09:43, Scott wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in >> others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian
    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.
    10 kW out of the back of the transmitter, will take more than 10 kW of electricity in. I don't know what the efficiency of modern AM
    transmitters is, probably better than 50% ?

    There's the old joke about BBC TV Centre, a Megawatt in to produce just
    2 x 1 volt p-p into 75 Ohms

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 10:18:41 2021
    On 16/12/2021 22:30, MB wrote:
    On 16/12/2021 21:36, John Williamson wrote:
    Caroline has enough listeners to pay the bills on its various output
    streams by selling advertising. It is also run by an group of
    enthusiasts who aren't too fussed about getting rich, some of whom
    worked for the station in its pirate days. The transmitter site they are
    using at the moment used to have a 500 kilowatt transmitter serving the
    BBC World Service on 648kHz, which is their allocated frequency.


    So how many million listeners do they have?

    Probably thousands rather than millions on AM, they are also keeping
    quiet about the online numbers, and don't make a fuss about the airtime
    they sell to religious organisations, which is what seems to pay the bills.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Fri Dec 17 10:31:28 2021
    In article <j236ctFldcoU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 09:43, Scott wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in others, Its also on the internet of course. Brian
    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.
    10 kW out of the back of the transmitter, will take more than 10 kW of electricity in. I don't know what the efficiency of modern AM
    transmitters is, probably better than 50% ?

    There's the old joke about BBC TV Centre, a Megawatt in to produce just
    2 x 1 volt p-p into 75 Ohms

    you forgot the 2 x 1mW into 600 ohms., and it was well over 1 MW. I saw the power meters in CAR.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to charles on Fri Dec 17 11:02:27 2021
    On 17/12/2021 10:31, charles wrote:
    In article <j236ctFldcoU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 09:43, Scott wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in others, Its also on the internet of course. Brian
    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.
    10 kW out of the back of the transmitter, will take more than 10 kW of
    electricity in. I don't know what the efficiency of modern AM
    transmitters is, probably better than 50% ?
    There's the old joke about BBC TV Centre, a Megawatt in to produce just
    2 x 1 volt p-p into 75 Ohms
    you forgot the 2 x 1mW into 600 ohms., and it was well over 1 MW. I saw the power meters in CAR.

    Ah yes, but of course they saved that by using Sound-In-Syncs   :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 13:40:26 2021
    On 17/12/2021 09:12, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!
    These seem to be the main users of medium wave these days on the road.

    Not if they've got DAB

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to briang1@blueyonder.co.uk on Fri Dec 17 13:48:29 2021
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 13:42:14 2021
    On 17/12/2021 09:16, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    Nostalgia is a wonderful thing.

    It's not as good as it used to be.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to williamwright on Fri Dec 17 15:42:24 2021
    Well the ones around here seem not to have judging by the crackling on the Asian am station they all seem to listen to.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "williamwright" <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote in message news:j23iaaFnk21U2@mid.individual.net...
    On 17/12/2021 09:12, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!
    These seem to be the main users of medium wave these days on the road.

    Not if they've got DAB

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Gaff (Sofa)@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 15:47:35 2021
    Well you obviously drive a more modern or more up market white van than the locals around here, of course I say white van man, I am not commenting on
    the colour of the man or his or her van here, I simply mean those vans
    that when they go sound like a bucket of rattling bolts and when parked up
    are very grubby and dented with those head height non foldable wing mirrors
    on brackets at pedestrian head height. You often also find them half on the pavement with bits of double glazed windows reared up against the fence of
    the house they are working on, all nattering over a very loud radio in some
    odd language.
    Brian

    --

    This newsgroup posting comes to you directly from...
    The Sofa of Brian Gaff...
    briang1@blueyonder.co.uk
    Blind user, so no pictures please
    Note this Signature is meaningless.!
    "Liz Tuddenham" <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote in message news:1pkc3jy.5ryn9wkpxxfgN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid...
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to briang1@blueyonder.co.uk on Fri Dec 17 17:55:15 2021
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    Well you obviously drive a more modern or more up market white van than the locals around here, of course I say white van man, I am not commenting on
    the colour of the man or his or her van here, I simply mean those vans
    that when they go sound like a bucket of rattling bolts and when parked up are very grubby and dented with those head height non foldable wing mirrors on brackets at pedestrian head height. You often also find them half on the pavement with bits of double glazed windows reared up against the fence of the house they are working on, all nattering over a very loud radio in some odd language.

    They are a blessng in disguise for me. I can get away with all sorts of
    things like some of those you have described because, even though my van
    is relatively tidy, people expect a white van to behave that way.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 20:52:33 2021
    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:16 schreef Brian Gaff (Sofa):
    Yes I'd imagine being allowed to run at high power would cost them a lot
    more dosh and probably interfere with other local services. Its also interesting to notice that every so often, BBC Essex has a day when its a kind of version of the old Caroline, and also Manx radio often do a few
    hours called Caroline north. Most of these tend to be publicity our the upkeep of radio history, mainly the ships which are still afloat but mostly in harbours and estuaries these days.
    Nostalgia is a wonderful thing.
    Brian



    Once a month Caroline makes a weekend radio which is also
    transmitted by Manx Radio.
    Manx Radio is transmitting on 1368 kHz, which is almost the frequency
    of Radio Northsea International in the 70's (1367 kHz - 220 m).

    Rink

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 21:02:43 2021
    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)" <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in >> others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Rink

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Fri Dec 17 19:25:54 2021
    On 17/12/2021 13:48, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    I drive a white van and I avoid Radio Four because the woke agenda does
    my head in.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 19:31:31 2021
    On 17/12/2021 15:42, Brian Gaff (Sofa) wrote:
    Well the ones around here seem not to have judging by the crackling on the Asian am station they all seem to listen to.
    Brian

    Ah well that problem hasn't yet spread to this area. No doubt it will eventually given the relative child bearing figures.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Rink on Fri Dec 17 20:19:30 2021
    On 17/12/2021 20:02, Rink wrote:
    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    The last domestic fan heater I bought was 2 kilowatts, there were 3
    kilowatt units on the other shelf for use on building sites.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    The main input fuse on my house is 80 Amps. The supply for each floor is
    rated at 50 Amps, according to the breaker.

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.

    Modern AM transmitters run at about 66% efficiency, needing, in the case
    of the one I just checked, 666 kW to produce 400 kW at 100% modulation.
    ERP is not the same as transmitter output power and varies with the
    antenna design. Directional antennae can produce more ERP than the
    transmitter produces.

    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    I hate to think what the BBC's total transmitter energy bill is.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl on Fri Dec 17 21:10:39 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Interestingly, IIRC the transmitter used by Caroline transmitted Radio Netherlands at one stage when there was a fire at the transmitter in
    Holland. (*)

    (*) I realise this was different transmitter (400 kW) and different
    antenna (as Caroline uses the reserve antenna).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Dec 17 21:25:04 2021
    In article <j249mjFs359U1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 20:02, Rink wrote:
    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    The last domestic fan heater I bought was 2 kilowatts, there were 3
    kilowatt units on the other shelf for use on building sites.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    The main input fuse on my house is 80 Amps. The supply for each floor is rated at 50 Amps, according to the breaker.

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.

    Modern AM transmitters run at about 66% efficiency, needing, in the case
    of the one I just checked, 666 kW to produce 400 kW at 100% modulation.
    ERP is not the same as transmitter output power and varies with the
    antenna design. Directional antennae can produce more ERP than the transmitter produces.

    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    I hate to think what the BBC's total transmitter energy bill is.

    It isn't their bill anymore. The transmittters were sold off year ago.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to charles@candehope.me.uk on Fri Dec 17 21:30:34 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:25:04 +0000 (GMT), charles
    <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <j249mjFs359U1@mid.individual.net>,
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 17/12/2021 20:02, Rink wrote:
    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    The last domestic fan heater I bought was 2 kilowatts, there were 3
    kilowatt units on the other shelf for use on building sites.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    The main input fuse on my house is 80 Amps. The supply for each floor is
    rated at 50 Amps, according to the breaker.

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.

    Modern AM transmitters run at about 66% efficiency, needing, in the case
    of the one I just checked, 666 kW to produce 400 kW at 100% modulation.
    ERP is not the same as transmitter output power and varies with the
    antenna design. Directional antennae can produce more ERP than the
    transmitter produces.

    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    I hate to think what the BBC's total transmitter energy bill is.

    It isn't their bill anymore. The transmittters were sold off year ago.

    If the cost is incurred by Arqiva, I think you can reasonably assume
    it will be passed on to the client so if the associated cost arises
    because of a decision made by the BBC it will turn up as part of their
    bill for transmission costs.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Scott on Fri Dec 17 21:45:48 2021
    In article <pnuprg5ftrvh2ocsdpqndtaoj4a2aftdlq@4ax.com>,
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Mine is only 60A. When the house was built that was probably considered far
    too big.


    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Interestingly, IIRC the transmitter used by Caroline transmitted Radio Netherlands at one stage when there was a fire at the transmitter in
    Holland. (*)

    (*) I realise this was different transmitter (400 kW) and different
    antenna (as Caroline uses the reserve antenna).

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 17 22:57:39 2021
    Op 17-12-2021 om 22:10 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    Wow, those are serious....


    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.


    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Interestingly, IIRC the transmitter used by Caroline transmitted Radio Netherlands at one stage when there was a fire at the transmitter in
    Holland. (*)

    (*) I realise this was different transmitter (400 kW) and different
    antenna (as Caroline uses the reserve antenna).


    I've read that Caroline bought the 25 kW transmitter, which was used
    in Heinenoord (south of Rotterdam) on 828 kHz. For example by Arrow
    Classic Rock, many years ago, later Radio 10 Gold.

    <https://radiovisie.eu/nieuwe-caroline-zender-heeft-een-nederlandse-geschiedenis/>



    Radio Netherlands was the world service, which only transmitted on
    shortwave in The Netherlands (Zeewolde, Flevoland).

    There were two fires in the same month (Lopik and Smilde), both in
    towers with VHF-FM stations, but no mediumwave transmitters.
    The Smilde mast collapsed. The Lopik mast was off air for some time.
    Dutch radio hired the big 648 kHz transmitter in Orfordness for
    the Dutch Radio 1, the news station.

    Rink

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to williamwright on Fri Dec 17 22:35:36 2021
    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 13:48, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    I drive a white van and I avoid Radio Four because the woke agenda does
    my head in.

    I'm listening to it less and less these days because of the apallingly
    bad production. Nobody seems to have told the meejah whizz-kids who
    make the programmes that if they use music to introduce a scene, they
    should *fade it out* when the dialogue starts, otherwise nobody can
    follow the dialogue properly.

    If they don't fade it out, I do - along with the programme.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Rink on Fri Dec 17 22:35:36 2021
    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very
    easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat Dec 18 09:01:33 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robin@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Dec 18 09:32:15 2021
    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very
    easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.


    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.


    --
    Robin
    reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat Dec 18 09:34:01 2021
    In article <1pkcr6w.6rxsmb33om1bN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,
    Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very easily take the total house load up to 100A.


    and, my car charging is 30A. That supply has a CT over the incoming feeder (60A). If it senses the load becoming too great, the car charger is
    switched off.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Dec 18 09:29:02 2021
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very
    easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have to
    apply to the distribution company before you install a charger. (And
    likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand it, any necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at the moment. My electrician, who’s been on a course with the distribution company to
    install such chargers, says that this will end soon, and it will be at your expense. There’s also going to be a crack down on unauthorised
    installations once you have to pay, with the consumer being billed for rectification work. I plan to get a charger point installed soon, even
    though I don’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this I’ve discovered things I didn’t know about how electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate it’s common to
    daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their fuse
    and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a charger installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of installing a bigger service fuse.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to charles@candehope.me.uk on Sat Dec 18 10:12:28 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:45:48 +0000 (GMT), charles
    <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <pnuprg5ftrvh2ocsdpqndtaoj4a2aftdlq@4ax.com>,
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I
    assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but
    could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Mine is only 60A. When the house was built that was probably considered far >too big.

    Definitely 100A here. Our supply was upgraded a couple of years ago.
    I don't remember what it was before.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat Dec 18 10:29:50 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    When my heating broke down, I put an electric heater in each room. The
    box in the landing started buzzing loudly (so much so that I got
    Scottish Power to come round and look). They said the whole street
    was due an upgrade (now completed).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to Robin on Sat Dec 18 10:40:46 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:32:15 +0000, Robin <rbw@outlook.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.

    I believe the same can be said for the fuses in the plugs.

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to charles@candehope.me.uk on Sat Dec 18 10:42:30 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:34:01 +0000 (GMT), charles
    <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <1pkcr6w.6rxsmb33om1bN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,
    Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:
    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:
    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very
    easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    and, my car charging is 30A. That supply has a CT over the incoming feeder >(60A). If it senses the load becoming too great, the car charger is
    switched off.

    I didn't know what a CT was but I do now!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sat Dec 18 10:38:44 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have to >apply to the distribution company before you install a charger. (And
    likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand it, any >necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at the moment. My >electrician, who’s been on a course with the distribution company to
    install such chargers, says that this will end soon, and it will be at your >expense. There’s also going to be a crack down on unauthorised
    installations once you have to pay, with the consumer being billed for >rectification work. I plan to get a charger point installed soon, even
    though I don’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this I’ve discovered things I didn’t know about how >electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate it’s common to
    daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their fuse >and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a charger >installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >installing a bigger service fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase
    with three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one
    phase, three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the
    third phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the
    three phases.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk on Sat Dec 18 10:43:17 2021
    In article <ttcrrg56mahhuhrlq43m4tehc0bg51gk4n@4ax.com>, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:45:48 +0000 (GMT), charles
    <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:

    In article <pnuprg5ftrvh2ocsdpqndtaoj4a2aftdlq@4ax.com>, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and
    rotten in others, Its also on the internet of course. Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought
    5 kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the
    station. I assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel
    interference both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter,
    but could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would
    be about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or
    break the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think... It's about 50A, which cannot
    be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Mine is only 60A. When the house was built that was probably considered
    far too big.

    Definitely 100A here. Our supply was upgraded a couple of years ago. I
    don't remember what it was before.

    I have 2 phases incoming, so if I needed a higher current, I could probably
    get a second meter

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl on Sat Dec 18 10:26:10 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:57:39 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 22:10 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    Op 17-12-2021 om 10:43 schreef Scott:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 09:08:17 -0000, "Brian Gaff \(Sofa\)"
    <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    It will vary over the seasons though. It may be good sometimes and rotten in
    others, Its also on the internet of course.
    Brian

    Thanks. I was more interested in the propagation (I never thought 5
    kW would travel nearly 500 miles) than the economics of the station. I >>>> assume the very low frequency and absence of co-channel interference
    both help.

    I can see that 100 kW may be prohibitively expensive but would an
    increase to 10 kW or whatever cost very much?

    I believe the the nominal power takes account of the gain at the
    antenna and is not the electricity consumption of the transmitter, but >>>> could someone clarify? If it is consumption, then 10 kW would be
    about the same as three fan heaters - hardly likely to make or break
    the station's business model.


    Please check the power used by your fan heaters....

    Here is one (Philips) that is rated at 3,000 Watts (ie 3 kW). Three
    of these would be 9 kW, so I am not far out.

    Wow, those are serious....

    I don't know. When the system was introduced a 13 amp plug could
    carry 3,120 Watts (13x240). When the heaters had bars, a one bar
    heater was 1 kW, two bar heater 2 kW and 3 bars 3 kW. The 'Sunhouse'
    one is the same. Maybe the older appliances were more powerful?

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    My ring main fuses are 32A, lighting 6A but this is domestic. I
    assume a commercial or industrial system would be different..

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Interestingly, IIRC the transmitter used by Caroline transmitted Radio
    Netherlands at one stage when there was a fire at the transmitter in
    Holland. (*)

    (*) I realise this was different transmitter (400 kW) and different
    antenna (as Caroline uses the reserve antenna).

    I've read that Caroline bought the 25 kW transmitter, which was used
    in Heinenoord (south of Rotterdam) on 828 kHz. For example by Arrow
    Classic Rock, many years ago, later Radio 10 Gold.

    <https://radiovisie.eu/nieuwe-caroline-zender-heeft-een-nederlandse-geschiedenis/>

    This is my line of thinking. If the transmitter is 25 kW and they
    have a sustantial antenna, the cost of a power increase would be
    fairly modest - just extra electricity - and in return they could get
    a larger reception area. I suspect (but don't know) that is may have
    more to do with Ofcom roules.

    Radio Netherlands was the world service, which only transmitted on
    shortwave in The Netherlands (Zeewolde, Flevoland).

    I thought that was Radio Netherlands International I used to listen
    to it.

    There were two fires in the same month (Lopik and Smilde), both in
    towers with VHF-FM stations, but no mediumwave transmitters.
    The Smilde mast collapsed. The Lopik mast was off air for some time.
    Dutch radio hired the big 648 kHz transmitter in Orfordness for
    the Dutch Radio 1, the news station.

    Yes, that is what I was thinking of. I knew it was the Dutch
    equivalent of Radio 4 but I couldn't remember the name.

    Rink

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Scott on Sat Dec 18 11:07:06 2021
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have to
    apply to the distribution company before you install a charger. (And
    likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand it, any
    necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at the moment. My >> electrician, whoÂ’s been on a course with the distribution company to
    install such chargers, says that this will end soon, and it will be at your >> expense. ThereÂ’s also going to be a crack down on unauthorised
    installations once you have to pay, with the consumer being billed for
    rectification work. I plan to get a charger point installed soon, even
    though I donÂ’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this IÂ’ve discovered things I didnÂ’t know about how
    electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate itÂ’s common to
    daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their fuse >> and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a charger
    installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in
    digging to change the feed arrangements. So itÂ’s not just a case of
    installing a bigger service fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase
    with three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one
    phase, three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the
    third phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the
    three phases.


    All single phase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 11:10:38 2021
    Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this >>>> house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have to >>> apply to the distribution company before you install a charger. (And
    likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand it, any
    necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at the moment. My >>> electrician, whoÂ’s been on a course with the distribution company to
    install such chargers, says that this will end soon, and it will be at your >>> expense. ThereÂ’s also going to be a crack down on unauthorised
    installations once you have to pay, with the consumer being billed for
    rectification work. I plan to get a charger point installed soon, even
    though I donÂ’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this IÂ’ve discovered things I didnÂ’t know about how >>> electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate itÂ’s common to
    daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their fuse >>> and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a charger
    installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>> digging to change the feed arrangements. So itÂ’s not just a case of
    installing a bigger service fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase
    with three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one
    phase, three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the
    third phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the
    three phases.


    All single phase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.



    The thing is, all the houses are fairly well to do detached properties with
    off street parking. It’s very likely that many of the owners will
    eventually migrate to electric cars and will want to charge them at home.
    The wires and the substation won’t stand it in the long run. I see
    rationing of authorisations coming in before upgrade of authorisations,
    hence my idea to get in early.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Robin@21:1/5 to Scott on Sat Dec 18 11:14:56 2021
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:32:15 +0000, Robin <rbw@outlook.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.

    I believe the same can be said for the fuses in the plugs.

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Cartridge unless very old. BS 1361 or BS 88. The latter blow a bit
    faster but an 80A fuse still take around 120A pretty well indefinitely.
    See e.g. the curves at <http://wiki.diyfaq.org.uk/index.php/Fuse#Incomer_Fuses_.28BS_88_.22HRC.22_.26_BS_1361.29>

    Fuses are used for incomers as they give faster protection for the
    really big currents from a fault and are more reliable. You can get
    MCBs that handle much more than 100A but reliability and speed matter
    for the last line of defence against massive short circuit currents.

    --
    Robin
    reply-to address is (intended to be) valid

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Scott on Sat Dec 18 11:12:11 2021
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:32:15 +0000, Robin <rbw@outlook.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.

    I believe the same can be said for the fuses in the plugs.

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.


    Cartridge fuse here.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 11:59:29 2021
    On 18/12/2021 11:22, Tweed wrote:

    There’s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    More likely they have just out another two developments onto the other
    two phases.

    The phase shifting you suggest requires some quite substantial electronics.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Dec 18 11:22:44 2021
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <spkfcp$6cr$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid >>>>> (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse). >>>>>>
    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a
    shower used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there >>>>>> are electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that
    could very easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an >>>>> electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of
    this house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have
    to apply to the distribution company before you install a charger.
    (And likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand
    it, any necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at
    the moment. My electrician, whoÂ’s been on a course with the
    distribution company to install such chargers, says that this will end >>>> soon, and it will be at your expense. ThereÂ’s also going to be a crack >>>> down on unauthorised installations once you have to pay, with the
    consumer being billed for rectification work. I plan to get a charger
    point installed soon, even though I donÂ’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this IÂ’ve discovered things I didnÂ’t know about how >>>> electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate itÂ’s common to >>>> daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their >>>> fuse and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a
    charger installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house >>>> down the road gained an electric car and the distribution company had
    to engage in digging to change the feed arrangements. So itÂ’s not just >>>> a case of installing a bigger service fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase with
    three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one phase,
    three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the third
    phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the three
    phases.


    All single phase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.

    That used to be the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just
    down the road was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.


    There’s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sat Dec 18 12:10:01 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 13:48, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    I drive a white van and I avoid Radio Four because the woke agenda does
    my head in.

    I'm listening to it less and less these days because of the apallingly
    bad production. Nobody seems to have told the meejah whizz-kids who
    make the programmes that if they use music to introduce a scene, they
    should *fade it out* when the dialogue starts, otherwise nobody can
    follow the dialogue properly.

    If they don't fade it out, I do - along with the programme.

    I'm finding similar with 'Today'. If the interviewer and interviewee
    speak at the same time it is difficult to follow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 11:14:58 2021
    In article <spkfcp$6cr$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a
    shower used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there >>>> are electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that
    could very easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of
    this house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you have
    to apply to the distribution company before you install a charger.
    (And likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I understand
    it, any necessary strengthening of the supply is at their expense at
    the moment. My electrician, who’s been on a course with the
    distribution company to install such chargers, says that this will end
    soon, and it will be at your expense. There’s also going to be a crack
    down on unauthorised installations once you have to pay, with the
    consumer being billed for rectification work. I plan to get a charger
    point installed soon, even though I don’t have an electric car.

    Since looking into this I’ve discovered things I didn’t know about how
    electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate it’s common to
    daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into house A to their
    fuse and then another wire comes out and over to house B. To have a
    charger installed this has to be replaced by a dedicated feed. A house
    down the road gained an electric car and the distribution company had
    to engage in digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just
    a case of installing a bigger service fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase with three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one phase,
    three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the third
    phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the three phases.


    All single phase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.

    That used to be the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just
    down the road was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 12:33:21 2021
    In article <spkga4$c92$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com>
    wrote:
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <spkfcp$6cr$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000,
    liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse). >>>>>>
    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a >>>>>> shower used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If
    there are electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, >>>>>> that could very easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical >>>>> heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or >>>>> an electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner
    of this house may have to make.

    Rod.


    Electric car charging is going to be the big issue. Even now you
    have to apply to the distribution company before you install a
    charger. (And likewise if you want to install a heat pump) ) As I
    understand it, any necessary strengthening of the supply is at their >>>> expense at the moment. My electrician, who’s been on a course with
    the distribution company to install such chargers, says that this
    will end soon, and it will be at your expense. There’s also going to >>>> be a crack down on unauthorised installations once you have to pay,
    with the consumer being billed for rectification work. I plan to get >>>> a charger point installed soon, even though I don’t have an electric >>>> car.

    Since looking into this I’ve discovered things I didn’t know about
    how electricity is supplied to houses. On this 1980s estate it’s
    common to daisy chain houses together, so the supply comes into
    house A to their fuse and then another wire comes out and over to
    house B. To have a charger installed this has to be replaced by a
    dedicated feed. A house down the road gained an electric car and the >>>> distribution company had to engage in digging to change the feed
    arrangements. So it’s not just a case of installing a bigger service >>>> fuse.

    Is this single phase? Ours comes into the building as three phase
    with three fuses at the point of entry. Three flats receive one
    phase, three flats receive the next phase and two flats receive the
    third phase. This arrangement is varied at each close to balance the
    three phases.


    All single phase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.

    That used to be the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows
    just down the road was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.


    There‘s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    If there is, it's under the road.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sat Dec 18 12:58:03 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Scott on Sat Dec 18 12:25:44 2021
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 17/12/2021 13:48, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Brian Gaff (Sofa) <briang1@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van and my radio is permanently tuned to R4
    VHF or L.W. Perhaps white van women have different tastes in radio
    :-).

    I drive a white van and I avoid Radio Four because the woke agenda does
    my head in.

    I'm listening to it less and less these days because of the apallingly
    bad production. Nobody seems to have told the meejah whizz-kids who
    make the programmes that if they use music to introduce a scene, they
    should *fade it out* when the dialogue starts, otherwise nobody can
    follow the dialogue properly.

    If they don't fade it out, I do - along with the programme.

    I'm finding similar with 'Today'. If the interviewer and interviewee
    speak at the same time it is difficult to follow.


    The BBC TV Breakfast studio presenters are proving to be better interviews
    than the alleged political specialists. They ask a question, politician
    waffles on by answering something entirely different, and then interviewer comes back, states they didn’t answer the question and they ask it again.
    Far more effective than interrupting, as the politician runs out of evasion ammunition eventually.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Dec 18 13:05:33 2021
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in
    digging to change the feed arrangements. So itÂ’s not just a case of
    installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Rod.


    It’s like all the nitwits that think lamp posts can be converted to car charging points without giving any thought as to how to get the power to
    the lamp post.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk on Sat Dec 18 13:17:39 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:58:03 +0000, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >>installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Friend of mine, retired engineer from a company that distributes a lot
    of power in central Scotland, says this also. Replacing gas with
    electricity for heating is a big problem too. He gets accused of
    being anti-green for holding such views :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Sat Dec 18 13:37:18 2021
    In article <j260p3F7aeaU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:22, Tweed wrote:

    There‘s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    More likely they have just out another two developments onto the other
    two phases.

    No other developments nearby. Certainly not served by the local sub.

    The phase shifting you suggest requires some quite substantial
    electronics.

    --

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Rink on Sat Dec 18 13:43:23 2021
    On 17/12/2021 21:57, Rink wrote:

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    Where's 'here' ? Presumably not the UK ?

    UK homes typically have 60A incoming fuses, newer properties 100 A,
    though my parents' house built in 1966 has 100A fuses, and a dual phase
    supply (because it has electric storage heating)

    Our domestic electrical circuits are based on a ring system, the sockets
    are in a daisy chain that returns as a loop back to the fuse (or MCB) box.

    Power sockets are rated at 13Amp load, the ring mains they are on are
    protected by 30 or 32A fuses.

    Large appliances are fed by dedicated radial circuits (as you describe)
    either 16A (water heaters) or 32A (cookers etc)

    You can easily pull a 10kW total load in most UK homes, though not all
    on the same circuit

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 13:55:05 2021
    On 18/12/2021 13:05, Tweed wrote:

    It’s like all the nitwits that think lamp posts can be converted to car charging points without giving any thought as to how to get the power to
    the lamp post.

    I saw recently a pavement that had been completely excavated, and a few
    years earlier all the lamp posts had been replaced, and (oddly) in most
    cases relocated quite a few metres from the old ones. You could see a
    complete mess of chopped off SWA cables, and others with scores of 'tap
    ins', splices, and other bodges. It would have been impossible, without
    a total excavation to work out what was dead, and what wasn't. Needless
    to say, totally unsuitable for anything other than a 100W load  per lamp
    post. Anyway, the whole lot was simply buried again under new tarmac for
    future generations to sort out !

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Sat Dec 18 13:47:06 2021
    In article <cemrrg9nksg8gttcnvfin895aqissdsmv3@4ax.com>,
    Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Rod.

    Don't be silly, the unicorns will deliver it

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Dec 18 14:06:06 2021
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road.
    That used to be the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just
    down the road was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just  your house Charles, probably balances out the total
    load with the other two phases  ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 14:40:44 2021
    On 18/12/2021 13:05, Tweed wrote:
    It’s like all the nitwits that think lamp posts can be converted to car charging points without giving any thought as to how to get the power to
    the lamp post.

    It is a common problem, they claim they will use existing infrastructure
    but when it comes to the crunch the lamp posts are completely unsuitable
    to will have to be replaced and the cabling will also need replacing but
    they claim to have just upgraded the existing infrastructure. We had
    some years when they put the Gaelic road signs, they would only change
    those that had to be changed. They changed every single one of course.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Scott on Sat Dec 18 14:30:25 2021
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:58:03 +0000, Roderick Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>> digging to change the feed arrangements. So itÂ’s not just a case of
    installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Friend of mine, retired engineer from a company that distributes a lot
    of power in central Scotland, says this also. Replacing gas with
    electricity for heating is a big problem too. He gets accused of
    being anti-green for holding such views :-)


    Well that’s the other issue. As I said, you also have to apply for authorisation to install a heat pump. If you want that and an electric car
    the power company is going to have a nervous breakdown.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to charles on Sat Dec 18 15:38:43 2021
    On 18/12/2021 15:31, charles wrote:
    In article <j2686eF8oq6U1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road. That used to be
    the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just down the road
    was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just your house Charles, probably balances out the total
    load with the other two phases ;-)
    an unlikely story. And the only Christmas lights we have are a tiny battery powered set. Still using last yeasr's batteries.

    LEDs are a modern miracle. Our 100% lit by LED home consumes an average
    of 9 kWh per day of electricity all year round.
    Apart from the day a friend turned up and charged his electric car we
    have never used more than 11 kWh/day. (If we're away on holiday, the
    base load seems to be 7 kWh/day )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Sat Dec 18 15:31:03 2021
    In article <j2686eF8oq6U1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road. That used to be
    the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just down the road
    was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just your house Charles, probably balances out the total
    load with the other two phases ;-)

    an unlikely story. And the only Christmas lights we have are a tiny battery powered set. Still using last yeasr's batteries.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Sat Dec 18 15:42:43 2021
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 15:31, charles wrote:
    In article <j2686eF8oq6U1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver
    <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road. That used to be
    the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just down the road >>>> was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just your house Charles, probably balances out the total >>> load with the other two phases ;-)
    an unlikely story. And the only Christmas lights we have are a tiny battery >> powered set. Still using last yeasr's batteries.

    LEDs are a modern miracle. Our 100% lit by LED home consumes an average
    of 9 kWh per day of electricity all year round.
    Apart from the day a friend turned up and charged his electric car we
    have never used more than 11 kWh/day. (If we're away on holiday, the
    base load seems to be 7 kWh/day )


    This is going to be the social etiquette question of the future - can you charge a friend/visitor for charging their car at your house? When will it
    be acceptable and when not?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 15:46:09 2021
    On 18/12/2021 15:42, Tweed wrote:
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 15:31, charles wrote:
    In article <j2686eF8oq6U1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver
    <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road. That used to be >>>>> the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just down the road >>>>> was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just your house Charles, probably balances out the total >>>> load with the other two phases ;-)
    an unlikely story. And the only Christmas lights we have are a tiny battery >>> powered set. Still using last yeasr's batteries.

    LEDs are a modern miracle. Our 100% lit by LED home consumes an average
    of 9 kWh per day of electricity all year round.
    Apart from the day a friend turned up and charged his electric car we
    have never used more than 11 kWh/day. (If we're away on holiday, the
    base load seems to be 7 kWh/day )

    This is going to be the social etiquette question of the future - can you charge a friend/visitor for charging their car at your house? When will it
    be acceptable and when not?

    Ha yes, (in this case he paid for all the booze when we went to the pub
    that night )

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Sat Dec 18 16:35:39 2021
    In article <j26dk4F9r0rU1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 15:31, charles wrote:
    In article <j2686eF8oq6U1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 11:14, charles wrote:
    ase. I expect the phases are balanced along the road. That used to be
    the idea, but a housing development of 24 bungalows just down the
    road was all put on one phase. Probably cheaper for thr developer.

    That's because just your house Charles, probably balances out the
    total load with the other two phases ;-)
    an unlikely story. And the only Christmas lights we have are a tiny
    battery powered set. Still using last yeasr's batteries.

    LEDs are a modern miracle. Our 100% lit by LED home consumes an average
    of 9 kWh per day of electricity all year round. Apart from the day a
    friend turned up and charged his electric car we have never used more
    than 11 kWh/day. (If we're away on holiday, the base load seems to be 7 kWh/day )

    I think that if I went away on holiday, I'd turn off power to my charging point.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Sat Dec 18 17:49:42 2021
    On 18/12/2021 13:43, Mark Carver wrote:
    Our domestic electrical circuits are based on a ring system, the sockets
    are in a daisy chain that returns as a loop back to the fuse (or MCB) box.

    This is interesting.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgTnFs7f5o

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 18 23:57:25 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 10:26:10, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    I don't know. When the system was introduced a 13 amp plug could
    carry 3,120 Watts (13x240). When the heaters had bars, a one bar
    heater was 1 kW, two bar heater 2 kW and 3 bars 3 kW. The 'Sunhouse'
    one is the same. Maybe the older appliances were more powerful?

    Certainly, 2.5 kW is commoner now (especially kettles).

    There is also the gradual change from 240 to 230 V (RMS) [at the same
    time as a lot of the rest of Europe were moving from 220 to 230; to move
    us to a common figure]. There was an initial trick using asymmetrical
    tolerance bands (rather than +/- the same amount, it was allowed to
    deviate more one way than the other) which meant initially nobody had to
    change immediately, but the change did proceed.

    For most things, it didn't matter - but filament lamps draw roughly
    constant current, so it does there (and it mattered more for high-power
    short life ones, such as in projectors) - not so much light output as
    life. And total power out of heaters.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. The _individual circuits_
    - with individual fuses, or circuit breakers, in the distribution unit
    or "fusebox"* - tends to be around 30/32/35/40 A for individual ring
    mains (e. g. "downstairs sockets" or "upstairs sockets", or some
    appliances, 15/16A for some other appliances, and 5/6A for lighting
    circuits. But there's a master fuse for the whole dwelling, which might
    be as low as 50 or 60 A for some houses, but 100A for modern ones.

    * Some weeks ago, I thought the weather forecaster told me I might get
    frost in a fusebox. Since I know some people have the electricity
    cupboard on the outside of the house I thought that was possible, but
    was still surprised: it was some time before I realised he'd said "in a
    few spots"!

    My ring main fuses are 32A, lighting 6A but this is domestic. I
    assume a commercial or industrial system would be different..

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think
    others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of
    the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an
    isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Who can refute a sneer? - Archdeacon Paley, in his book Moral Philosophy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to Tweed on Sat Dec 18 23:40:08 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 12:25:44, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    The BBC TV Breakfast studio presenters are proving to be better interviews >than the alleged political specialists. They ask a question, politician >waffles on by answering something entirely different, and then interviewer >comes back, states they didn’t answer the question and they ask it again. >Far more effective than interrupting, as the politician runs out of evasion >ammunition eventually.

    That's fine when the time is unlimited, which maybe it is more for
    breakfast TV. Where it is limited - and the politician will know it is!
    - if s/he can just talk out the available time, s/he has "won". (Most of
    them carry enough "evasion ammunition" to run out the time.)
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Who can refute a sneer? - Archdeacon Paley, in his book Moral Philosophy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Sun Dec 19 00:07:42 2021
    In article <j267hqF8m46U1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    years earlier all the lamp posts had been replaced, and (oddly) in most
    cases relocated quite a few metres from the old ones.

    We had that here. Seems to be a fashion thing. Whichever side
    of the pavement they used to be on, swap it ... if it was against
    a garden wall, it's now next to the kerb, and v.versa with no
    particular logic.

    to say, totally unsuitable for anything other than a 100W load  per lamp >post.

    Possibly not even that, especially if *disturbed* after bodging.

    A few days after Whoever-Fibre-Comm Ltd. was laying their latest
    bit of network in the pavements/verges, we started getting short
    glitches in the supply, which caused all the lamp posts to go off,
    and then come back on after a few minutes (some kind of brown out/power
    on detector action).

    Reporting it was not much use, responses ranging between "Have they
    come back on? Then it's working!" to "We'll send an engineer to check
    *your* consumer unit/fuse". And they did, even though explicitly
    asked not to. He kicked the tyres and said "Dunno, can't tell until
    I disconnect everything and pull the fuse" at which point he was
    asked to leave. Pointless exercise :(

    Eventually the fault made itself known, when part of the pavement
    ended up with a small self-excavating crater ... "there's your fault!",
    right near a lamp post, on the transition cable bodge, within
    the fibre-dig path ...

    I don't fancy the chances of adding chargers to the lampposts,
    not even if they add a solar panel on top for comedy purposes.
    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk on Sun Dec 19 00:22:03 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 12:58:03, Roderick Stewart
    <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >>installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Rod.

    I wouldn't worry (or, alternatively, be _very_ worried) - we're nowhere
    _near_ the capacity needed. I follow @NationalGridESO, who tweet daily
    the percentage of Britain's electricity that comes from various sources.
    To be fair, most days, gas and wind are about neck and neck - sometimes
    one a higher percentage, sometimes the other, averaging out at about a
    third each, I'd say, usually each in the range 20% to 40%.

    Today (so Friday), however, it was (see https://twitter.com/NationalGridESO/status/1472244683468378115) 55.7%
    gas, only 5.3% wind - even coal was 3.3% (usually about 0 to 1%). [The remainder: 15.4% nuclear, 10.4% imports, 6.5% biomass, 2.8% hydro, 0.6%
    solar.]

    So that's 59% coal and gas (plus whatever proportion of the "imports"
    was coal and gas) - and that's just the present electricity load, i. e.
    with very few electric vehicles and heat pumps in use yet. The nation as
    a whole uses about the same amount of energy at present for electricity,
    for transport (mostly petrol and diesel), and for heating (mostly gas).
    So will need _three times_ the capacity to take the latter two off
    fossil fuels. It will be a _little_ better because of improvements in efficiency, and reductions in travel (though the latter will be offset
    somewhat by more heating needed in homes).

    I'm actually pro-green: just, like someone's friend mentioned in another
    post, I consider present targets highly unrealistic. And expect to be
    thought non-green because of that.

    I'm very afraid there will be draconian restrictions on individual
    freedom to travel (i. e. private cars). Not, initially, to prevent the population travelling (e. g. to protests), but that would be seen as a convenient side-effect by some governments. I hope I'm wrong.
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    Train sets are like breasts: they are intended for children but it's dads who have the most fun playing with them.
    - Nick Odell (quoting someone else) in UMRA, 2021-2-10

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Sun Dec 19 07:32:06 2021
    J. P. Gilliver (John) <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 12:25:44, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    The BBC TV Breakfast studio presenters are proving to be better interviews >> than the alleged political specialists. They ask a question, politician
    waffles on by answering something entirely different, and then interviewer >> comes back, states they didn’t answer the question and they ask it again. >> Far more effective than interrupting, as the politician runs out of evasion >> ammunition eventually.

    That's fine when the time is unlimited, which maybe it is more for
    breakfast TV. Where it is limited - and the politician will know it is!
    - if s/he can just talk out the available time, s/he has "won". (Most of
    them carry enough "evasion ammunition" to run out the time.)

    The time available is part of the problem. The limits are usually entirely
    self imposed by the programme, that then moves onto something entirely
    trivial that could be dropped or moved. The Today programme is terrible for this.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Sun Dec 19 10:15:25 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 15:42:43 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    This is going to be the social etiquette question of the future - can you >charge a friend/visitor for charging their car at your house? When will it
    be acceptable and when not?

    If your visitors will be unable to go home until their car is charged,
    the answer may depend on how badly you want to get rid of them.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to wrightsaerials@f2s.com on Sun Dec 19 10:12:11 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 17:49:42 +0000, williamwright
    <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 13:43, Mark Carver wrote:
    Our domestic electrical circuits are based on a ring system, the sockets
    are in a daisy chain that returns as a loop back to the fuse (or MCB) box.

    This is interesting.

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FNgTnFs7f5o

    Bill

    You're right. It is. No great surprises, as I think we all know pretty
    well how electric currents behave in resistances, but it's nice to see
    it demonstrated so neatly.

    Even as a youngster I realised that if you count all the wall sockets
    in a house and multiply by thirteen the answer is a lot bigger than
    the main fuse, so the integrity of the system is dependent on not all
    of them being used to their fullest extent at the same time. I
    probably annoyed my mother with a ready answer based on this thinking
    when she would tell me not to do something or other (as mothers
    sometimes do) saying "What would happen if everybody wanted to do
    that...?" because of course in real life not everybody would.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Sun Dec 19 09:46:25 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:40:08 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 12:25:44, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote
    (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    The BBC TV Breakfast studio presenters are proving to be better interviews >>than the alleged political specialists. They ask a question, politician >>waffles on by answering something entirely different, and then interviewer >>comes back, states they didn’t answer the question and they ask it again. >>Far more effective than interrupting, as the politician runs out of evasion >>ammunition eventually.

    That's fine when the time is unlimited, which maybe it is more for
    breakfast TV. Where it is limited - and the politician will know it is!
    - if s/he can just talk out the available time, s/he has "won". (Most of
    them carry enough "evasion ammunition" to run out the time.)

    I think that's what's called filibustering: blocking any opposing view
    to ensure that your own is the only one that gets heard in the hope
    that it will effectivley be carried by default. It's such a cheap
    tactic and so easy to spot thet you'd think they would be embarrassed
    to keep using it

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Sun Dec 19 10:24:50 2021
    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 00:22:03 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    [re electric cars]
    I'm very afraid there will be draconian restrictions on individual
    freedom to travel (i. e. private cars). Not, initially, to prevent the >population travelling (e. g. to protests), but that would be seen as a >convenient side-effect by some governments. I hope I'm wrong.

    I think I will have travelled on my last journey and will no longer
    require electrical energy long before that happens.

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Mike on Sun Dec 19 18:46:51 2021
    Mike <mjb@signal11.invalid> wrote:


    I don't fancy the chances of adding chargers to the lampposts,
    not even if they add a solar panel on top for comedy purposes.

    I've just seen an array of 240 solar panels, each about 2ft x 4 ft, in a
    field with an electronic notice board facing the nearby footpath and
    canal. At about 10:30 this morning, the display proudly announced that
    the array was generating 2 kW and the total energy generated so far
    today was 5 kWH.

    None of the local dog walkers and passers-by seemed to find it as
    amusing as I did.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From MB@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Dec 19 19:13:36 2021
    On 19/12/2021 18:46, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    I've just seen an array of 240 solar panels, each about 2ft x 4 ft, in a field with an electronic notice board facing the nearby footpath and
    canal. At about 10:30 this morning, the display proudly announced that
    the array was generating 2 kW and the total energy generated so far
    today was 5 kWH.

    None of the local dog walkers and passers-by seemed to find it as
    amusing as I did.

    A colleague at my work had a relative who worked for a local business
    that use a lot of power. They proudly announced they had gone green
    with a solar panel, he had a look and it looked as if would be very
    lucky to produce 100w on a very sunny day.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mike@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Dec 19 20:39:30 2021
    In article <1pkg6jg.1osxgfi1okasigN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,
    Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:

    ... with an electronic notice board ...

    Surely that's correctly known as "the virtue signal" board -- the sign
    is 100% powered by the solar array... (and that's about all it powers
    at this time of year!) :)

    What else is there around there it might be powering? Seems oversized
    for an electric/cattle fence. A water pump? I doubt it's grid-tied and
    earning feed-in-tariff pennies.

    --
    --------------------------------------+------------------------------------ Mike Brown: mjb[-at-]signal11.org.uk | http://www.signal11.org.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Mike on Sun Dec 19 22:18:00 2021
    Mike <mjb@signal11.invalid> wrote:

    In article <1pkg6jg.1osxgfi1okasigN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,
    Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:

    ... with an electronic notice board ...

    Surely that's correctly known as "the virtue signal" board -- the sign
    is 100% powered by the solar array... (and that's about all it powers
    at this time of year!) :)

    What else is there around there it might be powering? Seems oversized
    for an electric/cattle fence. A water pump? I doubt it's grid-tied and earning feed-in-tariff pennies.

    It was advertised as powering the back pump for a large lock flight. My limited experience of solar panels suggests that it ought to have been
    capable of far more output than it showed, even though it was a dull
    misty day. My guess is that they hadn't connected it to the grid and,
    because the lock flight currently has more than enough catchment water
    to cope with the small number of users at this time of year, there was
    no need for the pumps.

    It was probably powering the anti-condensation heaters in the nearby
    pump house.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From J. P. Gilliver (John)@21:1/5 to rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk on Mon Dec 20 00:38:39 2021
    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 10:24:50, Roderick Stewart
    <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 00:22:03 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" ><G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    [re electric cars]
    I'm very afraid there will be draconian restrictions on individual
    freedom to travel (i. e. private cars). Not, initially, to prevent the >>population travelling (e. g. to protests), but that would be seen as a >>convenient side-effect by some governments. I hope I'm wrong.

    I think I will have travelled on my last journey and will no longer
    require electrical energy long before that happens.

    Rod.

    Don't even mention what it takes to run a crematorium!
    --
    J. P. Gilliver. UMRA: 1960/<1985 MB++G()AL-IS-Ch++(p)Ar@T+H+Sh0!:`)DNAf

    "Look, if it'll help you to do what I tell you, baby, imagine that I've got a blaster ray in my hand." "Uh - you _have_ got a blaster ray in your hand." "So you shouldn't have to tax your imagination too hard." (Link episode)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roderick Stewart@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Mon Dec 20 10:06:35 2021
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:38:39 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 at 10:24:50, Roderick Stewart ><rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote (my responses usually follow points >raised):
    On Sun, 19 Dec 2021 00:22:03 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" >><G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    [re electric cars]
    I'm very afraid there will be draconian restrictions on individual >>>freedom to travel (i. e. private cars). Not, initially, to prevent the >>>population travelling (e. g. to protests), but that would be seen as a >>>convenient side-effect by some governments. I hope I'm wrong.

    I think I will have travelled on my last journey and will no longer
    require electrical energy long before that happens.

    Rod.

    Don't even mention what it takes to run a crematorium!

    Well, as I understand it they run on gas, so at least it'll be about
    four and a half times cheaper than electricity.

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    Rod.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 18:38:20 2021
    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of
    the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are directional.

    Cellphone base stations actually concentrate the power in a shallow
    disc, which is why, if you are very close to a tall cellphone tower,
    your signal can be dire. Hold it higher and your signal improves
    noticeably. They get, say 10 watts ERP out of a 5 watt transmitter.

    It's harder to do in MW frequencies, as the antenna has to be large in
    relation to the wavelength.

    In the days when CB was popular, we used to have fun with legal rigs and directional antennae.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to G6JPG@255soft.uk on Mon Dec 20 18:17:32 2021
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 23:57:25 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)"
    <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 at 10:26:10, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk>
    wrote (my responses usually follow points raised):
    []
    I don't know. When the system was introduced a 13 amp plug could
    carry 3,120 Watts (13x240). When the heaters had bars, a one bar
    heater was 1 kW, two bar heater 2 kW and 3 bars 3 kW. The 'Sunhouse'
    one is the same. Maybe the older appliances were more powerful?

    Certainly, 2.5 kW is commoner now (especially kettles).

    Mine says 2,520 - 3,000 Watts. I suppose it depends on mains voltage.
    I should check that.

    There is also the gradual change from 240 to 230 V (RMS) [at the same
    time as a lot of the rest of Europe were moving from 220 to 230; to move
    us to a common figure]. There was an initial trick using asymmetrical >tolerance bands (rather than +/- the same amount, it was allowed to
    deviate more one way than the other) which meant initially nobody had to >change immediately, but the change did proceed.

    I thought the change was to the declared voltage only as the UK
    narrower band fitted inside the EU wider band.

    For most things, it didn't matter - but filament lamps draw roughly
    constant current, so it does there (and it mattered more for high-power
    short life ones, such as in projectors) - not so much light output as
    life. And total power out of heaters.

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    I thought the incoming fuse ('board fuse') was 100 Amps.

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    I think we're talking at cross-purposes here. The _individual circuits_
    - with individual fuses, or circuit breakers, in the distribution unit
    or "fusebox"* - tends to be around 30/32/35/40 A for individual ring
    mains (e. g. "downstairs sockets" or "upstairs sockets", or some
    appliances, 15/16A for some other appliances, and 5/6A for lighting
    circuits. But there's a master fuse for the whole dwelling, which might
    be as low as 50 or 60 A for some houses, but 100A for modern ones.

    100A here.

    * Some weeks ago, I thought the weather forecaster told me I might get
    frost in a fusebox. Since I know some people have the electricity
    cupboard on the outside of the house I thought that was possible, but
    was still surprised: it was some time before I realised he'd said "in a
    few spots"!

    Very good.

    My ring main fuses are 32A, lighting 6A but this is domestic. I
    assume a commercial or industrial system would be different..

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think >others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of
    the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an >isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    I make it 15kW needed. 100A would produce 23 kW so my suggestion is
    not at all outrageous. The power needed would be broadly one or two
    houses worth, not for example three streets, a small village or
    anything like that.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Mark Carver@21:1/5 to Scott on Mon Dec 20 19:50:21 2021
    On 20/12/2021 19:48, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:38:20 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think
    others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of
    the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an
    isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are directional.
    I understood the antenna at Orfordness was omnidirectional as it was
    the former reserve antenna not the one routinely used for BBC WS.
    http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1654&pageid=3360

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Mon Dec 20 19:48:39 2021
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:38:20 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think
    others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of
    the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an
    isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are directional.

    I understood the antenna at Orfordness was omnidirectional as it was
    the former reserve antenna not the one routinely used for BBC WS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Mark Carver on Mon Dec 20 20:04:52 2021
    On 20/12/2021 19:50, Mark Carver wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 19:48, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:38:20 +0000, John Williamson
    <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think >>>> others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of >>>> the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an
    isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are
    directional.
    I understood the antenna at Orfordness was omnidirectional as it was
    the former reserve antenna not the one routinely used for BBC WS.
    http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1654&pageid=3360

    It may flatten the spherical element of the wave pattern enough to
    offset any losses.

    Unfortunately, as far as I am concerned, antenna designers, though they
    use the same laws of physics as the rest of us, allegedly, might as well
    be wizards, so the folding here may just be to reduce the height to
    avoid annoying passing aircraft.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk on Mon Dec 20 22:10:18 2021
    In article <4it1sgl248ckjaddl4o828eqk8867jjh9n@4ax.com>, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:50:21 +0000, Mark Carver
    <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 20/12/2021 19:48, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:38:20 +0000, John Williamson
    <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I
    think others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less
    because of the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be >>>> against an isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is
    used.) []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are
    directional.
    I understood the antenna at Orfordness was omnidirectional as it was
    the former reserve antenna not the one routinely used for BBC WS. >http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1654&pageid=3360

    Interesting, thanks. It certainly looks omnidirectional. What's with
    the polypropylene rope though? When was polypropylene invented and when
    was the transmitter constructed? Was some other rope used in the old
    days or did this transmitter design not exist?

    Insulateed stays used to involve ceramic isolators - much easier to use
    strong insulating rope. It's been around since at the least the 1979s -
    There was some in the transmitter hall when it was struck by lighting -
    messy

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to mark.carver@invalid.invalid on Mon Dec 20 21:34:30 2021
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 19:50:21 +0000, Mark Carver
    <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    On 20/12/2021 19:48, Scott wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 18:38:20 +0000, John Williamson
    <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 23:57, J. P. Gilliver (John) wrote:

    Well, you need more because of the transmitter (in)efficiency - I think >>>> others here have said it approaches 66% now - but a lot less because of >>>> the aerial gain, if any. (ERP is usually considered to be against an
    isotropic radiator; sometimes the abbreviation EIRP is used.)
    []
    Many broadcast antennae have more than unity gain as they are directional. >> I understood the antenna at Orfordness was omnidirectional as it was
    the former reserve antenna not the one routinely used for BBC WS. >http://tx.mb21.co.uk/gallery/gallerypage.php?txid=1654&pageid=3360

    Interesting, thanks. It certainly looks omnidirectional. What's with
    the polypropylene rope though? When was polypropylene invented and
    when was the transmitter constructed? Was some other rope used in the
    old days or did this transmitter design not exist?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 22:42:04 2021
    In article <j266rsF8i1fU1@mid.individual.net>, Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> scribeth thus
    On 17/12/2021 21:57, Rink wrote:

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    Where's 'here' ? Presumably not the UK ?

    UK homes typically have 60A incoming fuses, newer properties 100 A,
    though my parents' house built in 1966 has 100A fuses, and a dual phase >supply (because it has electric storage heating)

    Our domestic electrical circuits are based on a ring system, the sockets
    are in a daisy chain that returns as a loop back to the fuse (or MCB) box.

    Power sockets are rated at 13Amp load, the ring mains they are on are >protected by 30 or 32A fuses.

    Large appliances are fed by dedicated radial circuits (as you describe) >either 16A (water heaters) or 32A (cookers etc)

    You can easily pull a 10kW total load in most UK homes, though not all
    on the same circuit


    And not all and once its called and works by "Diversity"

    Some years ago a local distribution cabinet blew a fuse i was there with
    the bloke form UK Powernotworks and he had a natty remote control in
    case the blown fuse was blown for a reason so he didn't have to put it
    in the fuse holder with a full short on it!, had a sort of large remote
    relay switch so he could hide behind his van just in case!. If all was
    well he'd just take relay switch out and put the fuse in by hand.

    After fuse was replaced, seemed old age had done it in, there were
    meters in the ac cabinet showing some 50 to 70 s amps on a Sunday
    lunchtime he said that if all cookers decided to switch a ring on at
    the same time .. he'd do nothing but replace fuses but as they don't or
    didn't all was well..

    Course with overnite electric car charging that may have to change...

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:12:06 2021
    In article <j260p3F7aeaU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> scribeth thus
    On 18/12/2021 11:22, Tweed wrote:

    There’s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to
    convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    More likely they have just out another two developments onto the other
    two phases.

    The phase shifting you suggest requires some quite substantial electronics.


    And seeing that the HV side is 3 phase too;!..

    I don't know where they are doing that from what I've seen of it your
    still going the need the same amount of cable overall...
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:28:19 2021
    In article <6onrrghsd59ic87ocit68u1ngqdbget5c4@4ax.com>, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> scribeth thus
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 12:58:03 +0000, Roderick Stewart ><rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>>digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >>>installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Friend of mine, retired engineer from a company that distributes a lot
    of power in central Scotland, says this also. Replacing gas with
    electricity for heating is a big problem too. He gets accused of
    being anti-green for holding such views :-)

    Well he's an engineer, not a Greenie!...

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:36:06 2021
    In article <tierrg1h7anlqe5vsfsmraskvt17lhnm6s@4ax.com>, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> scribeth thus
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:32:15 +0000, Robin <rbw@outlook.com> wrote:

    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.

    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.

    I believe the same can be said for the fuses in the plugs.

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an >electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Https://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Index/Consumer_Units_Index/HRC_Cartrid ge_Fuse_1/index.html


    Just a bigger version of a 13 amp fuse...
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:34:05 2021
    In article <842f88d4-06e2-7c7a-2b01-5003287aa647@outlook.com>, Robin <rbw@outlook.com> scribeth thus
    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower
    used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.


    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.



    Yes teenagers in showers.

    Anyone beaten my youngest daughters 2 hours 15 minutes?...


    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:26:20 2021
    In article <splt4e$evl$1@posie.signal11.org.uk>, Mike
    <mjb@signal11.invalid> scribeth thus
    In article <j267hqF8m46U1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    years earlier all the lamp posts had been replaced, and (oddly) in most >>cases relocated quite a few metres from the old ones.

    We had that here. Seems to be a fashion thing. Whichever side
    of the pavement they used to be on, swap it ... if it was against
    a garden wall, it's now next to the kerb, and v.versa with no
    particular logic.

    to say, totally unsuitable for anything other than a 100W load  per lamp >>post.

    Possibly not even that, especially if *disturbed* after bodging.

    A few days after Whoever-Fibre-Comm Ltd. was laying their latest
    bit of network in the pavements/verges, we started getting short
    glitches in the supply, which caused all the lamp posts to go off,
    and then come back on after a few minutes (some kind of brown out/power
    on detector action).

    Reporting it was not much use, responses ranging between "Have they
    come back on? Then it's working!" to "We'll send an engineer to check
    *your* consumer unit/fuse". And they did, even though explicitly
    asked not to. He kicked the tyres and said "Dunno, can't tell until
    I disconnect everything and pull the fuse" at which point he was
    asked to leave. Pointless exercise :(

    Eventually the fault made itself known, when part of the pavement
    ended up with a small self-excavating crater ... "there's your fault!",
    right near a lamp post, on the transition cable bodge, within
    the fibre-dig path ...

    I don't fancy the chances of adding chargers to the lampposts,
    not even if they add a solar panel on top for comedy purposes.

    Now a few years ago a substation round here kept blowing fuses till one
    day it blew a fuse with quite some gusto!

    Anyway a few men from UK Power came along and one of them had his remote
    fuse switch and asked the other blokes to stand in a line along the
    route of the power cable, said wait ready here we go and fuse closed
    loud bang as fuse blew and two of the blokes pointed to the where they
    thought the fault was!

    They then dug down and found an old cable hadn't been cut off properly
    and had arced over and sorting that cured the problem.


    So how did they know it was there?, no word of a lie they felt it
    through their feet !!!


    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Mon Dec 20 23:17:08 2021
    In article <cemrrg9nksg8gttcnvfin895aqissdsmv3@4ax.com>, Roderick
    Stewart <rjfs@escapetime.myzen.co.uk> scribeth thus
    On Sat, 18 Dec 2021 09:29:02 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    A house down the
    road gained an electric car and the distribution company had to engage in >>digging to change the feed arrangements. So it’s not just a case of >>installing a bigger service fuse.

    I think this is something a lot of people don't realise. If we're
    really all supposed to buy electric cars by some target date or other,
    even if we have the means to generate the necessary power we'll still
    have to dig up practically every street in the land to distribute it.

    Rod.

    A minor issue is that have we got the capacity to charge them all?, the
    grid is short of power a lot of the time the lack of a viable wind has a
    Lot to do with it, coal is to be phased out but what's replacing it?...

    http://www.gridwatch.templar.co.uk/
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to tony sayer on Tue Dec 21 09:48:00 2021
    tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:

    In article <j260p3F7aeaU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> scribeth thus
    On 18/12/2021 11:22, Tweed wrote:

    There’s probably a clever substation transformer winding arrangement to >> convert 3 phase incoming to single outgoing.

    More likely they have just out another two developments onto the other
    two phases.

    The phase shifting you suggest requires some quite substantial electronics.


    And seeing that the HV side is 3 phase too;!..

    I don't know where they are doing that from what I've seen of it your
    still going the need the same amount of cable overall...

    There are all sorts of arrangements with the main purpose of saving
    copper:

    Three-phase delta is used over long distances and saves having to use a
    neutral at all.

    Three-phase star, with a neutral, is used over shorter distances where
    240v supplies are required between the phase conductors and neutral.
    ...but the neutral conductor can be smaller in cross-section because it
    only carries part of the load at any one point and only the remainder of
    the off-balance load back to the sub-station.

    In places like a long rural valley, there is a three-phase delta 11 kV
    feeder running up the valley with a transformer across two of the phases
    at each village. The transformer primary receives a single phase supply
    but the secondary is 480v centre-tapped, so there are two phases 180
    degrees apart feeding the village. If the load is balanced between
    houses, the return current in the neutral is quite small and a smaller conductor can be used.

    In a moderately dense housing area, the houses are often distributed
    between the phases of a three phase system. In my area there was legacy cabling (two live + neutral) from an old D.C. system, so two phases are distributed in each street. The streets are connected to different
    pairs of phases, so the load at the transformer is fairly well balanced
    and the neutrals in each street only have to carry part of the return
    current.

    Those are the systems I know about, I'm sure there are more.

    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to tony sayer on Tue Dec 21 09:31:50 2021
    In article <LuJRVBHcERwhFwtM@bancom.co.uk>,
    tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:
    In article <splt4e$evl$1@posie.signal11.org.uk>, Mike
    <mjb@signal11.invalid> scribeth thus
    In article <j267hqF8m46U1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    years earlier all the lamp posts had been replaced, and (oddly) in most >>cases relocated quite a few metres from the old ones.

    We had that here. Seems to be a fashion thing. Whichever side
    of the pavement they used to be on, swap it ... if it was against
    a garden wall, it's now next to the kerb, and v.versa with no
    particular logic.

    to say, totally unsuitable for anything other than a 100W load per lamp >>post.

    Possibly not even that, especially if *disturbed* after bodging.

    A few days after Whoever-Fibre-Comm Ltd. was laying their latest
    bit of network in the pavements/verges, we started getting short
    glitches in the supply, which caused all the lamp posts to go off,
    and then come back on after a few minutes (some kind of brown out/power
    on detector action).

    Reporting it was not much use, responses ranging between "Have they
    come back on? Then it's working!" to "We'll send an engineer to check >*your* consumer unit/fuse". And they did, even though explicitly
    asked not to. He kicked the tyres and said "Dunno, can't tell until
    I disconnect everything and pull the fuse" at which point he was
    asked to leave. Pointless exercise :(

    Eventually the fault made itself known, when part of the pavement
    ended up with a small self-excavating crater ... "there's your fault!", >right near a lamp post, on the transition cable bodge, within
    the fibre-dig path ...

    I don't fancy the chances of adding chargers to the lampposts,
    not even if they add a solar panel on top for comedy purposes.

    Now a few years ago a substation round here kept blowing fuses till one
    day it blew a fuse with quite some gusto!

    Anyway a few men from UK Power came along and one of them had his remote
    fuse switch and asked the other blokes to stand in a line along the
    route of the power cable, said wait ready here we go and fuse closed
    loud bang as fuse blew and two of the blokes pointed to the where they thought the fault was!

    They then dug down and found an old cable hadn't been cut off properly
    and had arced over and sorting that cured the problem.


    So how did they know it was there?, no word of a lie they felt it
    through their feet !!!

    here an underground cable problem was spotted by bubbling tarmac,

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to charles on Tue Dec 21 10:57:44 2021
    charles <charles@candehope.me.uk> wrote:
    In article <LuJRVBHcERwhFwtM@bancom.co.uk>,
    tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:
    In article <splt4e$evl$1@posie.signal11.org.uk>, Mike
    <mjb@signal11.invalid> scribeth thus
    In article <j267hqF8m46U1@mid.individual.net>,
    Mark Carver <mark.carver@invalid.invalid> wrote:
    years earlier all the lamp posts had been replaced, and (oddly) in most >>>> cases relocated quite a few metres from the old ones.

    We had that here. Seems to be a fashion thing. Whichever side
    of the pavement they used to be on, swap it ... if it was against
    a garden wall, it's now next to the kerb, and v.versa with no
    particular logic.

    to say, totally unsuitable for anything other than a 100W load per lamp >>>> post.

    Possibly not even that, especially if *disturbed* after bodging.

    A few days after Whoever-Fibre-Comm Ltd. was laying their latest
    bit of network in the pavements/verges, we started getting short
    glitches in the supply, which caused all the lamp posts to go off,
    and then come back on after a few minutes (some kind of brown out/power
    on detector action).

    Reporting it was not much use, responses ranging between "Have they
    come back on? Then it's working!" to "We'll send an engineer to check
    *your* consumer unit/fuse". And they did, even though explicitly
    asked not to. He kicked the tyres and said "Dunno, can't tell until
    I disconnect everything and pull the fuse" at which point he was
    asked to leave. Pointless exercise :(

    Eventually the fault made itself known, when part of the pavement
    ended up with a small self-excavating crater ... "there's your fault!",
    right near a lamp post, on the transition cable bodge, within
    the fibre-dig path ...

    I don't fancy the chances of adding chargers to the lampposts,
    not even if they add a solar panel on top for comedy purposes.

    Now a few years ago a substation round here kept blowing fuses till one
    day it blew a fuse with quite some gusto!

    Anyway a few men from UK Power came along and one of them had his remote
    fuse switch and asked the other blokes to stand in a line along the
    route of the power cable, said wait ready here we go and fuse closed
    loud bang as fuse blew and two of the blokes pointed to the where they
    thought the fault was!

    They then dug down and found an old cable hadn't been cut off properly
    and had arced over and sorting that cured the problem.


    So how did they know it was there?, no word of a lie they felt it
    through their feet !!!

    here an underground cable problem was spotted by bubbling tarmac,


    A work friend told the tale of a faulty lamp post on his road. For some
    reason the metal case became live. It was during a hot summer and the fault current caused the ground around the post to dry out (presumably the
    protective earth conductor was also disconnected). As the dried out ground
    was rising to live potential and passers by were wearing largely insulating shoes there were only initial reports of funny tingles when brushing
    against the post. The fault was eventually revealed when his dog urinated against the post with much yelping. (Paws being much better connected to something nearer true ground)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 21 10:56:53 2021
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:34:05 +0000, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    In article <842f88d4-06e2-7c7a-2b01-5003287aa647@outlook.com>, Robin ><rbw@outlook.com> scribeth thus
    On 18/12/2021 09:01, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 22:35:36 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    [...]
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    Most UK houses have main fuses from 80A to 120A. A cooker and a shower >>>> used together might take 10kW (40A) plus 8kW (32A). If there are
    electrical heaters and an immersion heater also running, that could very >>>> easily take the total house load up to 100A.

    60A here. This is fine for my usage because I don't have electrical
    heating or an immersion heater or an electrically heated shower or an
    electric car, but who knows what adjustments some future owner of this
    house may have to make.


    worth bearing in mind that a main fuse can carry a lot more than its
    rated current for a fair while. And many things don't call for full
    power all the time - cookers, dishwashers etc. A more difficult
    equation can be electric showers + teenagers.

    Yes teenagers in showers.

    Anyone beaten my youngest daughters 2 hours 15 minutes?...

    My combi gas boiler has a setting to turn the hot water off after so
    many minutes of continuous use :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 21 10:55:40 2021
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 23:36:06 +0000, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:
    [snip]

    Just a bigger version of a 13 amp fuse...

    Thanks for clarifying that. I thought any electronic system would be
    too prone to false trips.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Dec 21 11:27:58 2021
    On 21/12/2021 10:56, Scott wrote:

    My combi gas boiler has a setting to turn the hot water off after so
    many minutes of continuous use :-)

    I will be installing a 80 litre hot water cylinder in my flat. One bath
    or, at my rate, about 8 showers. Then the water runs cold. :-)

    Gas might be an option, but I reckon the payback period is longer than
    natural gas will be available for, and a boiler I can convert to
    hydrogen would cost a fortune on top.

    You can buy a unit that cuts the water off to the whole house after you
    have drawn a set amount, which is handy in the case of a leak. Manual or
    auto reset.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Tue Dec 21 11:31:46 2021
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost
    a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c-mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclsrc=3p.ds


    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in
    normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least
    means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent
    fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a protection device.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Dec 21 11:18:45 2021
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost
    a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c-mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclsrc=3p.ds

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Tweed on Tue Dec 21 11:53:55 2021
    On 21/12/2021 11:31, Tweed wrote:
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost
    a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c-mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclsrc=3p.ds


    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in
    normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a protection device.

    Ones that need a key can be obtained, or a seal to prevent unauthorised resetting. That would be as safe as the existing system, as the seals
    are not hard to bypass, and the cartridges are available.

    Admittedly, the existing fuse is reliable, safe, reasonably secure, and
    *lot* cheaper than the clever option.

    I was making the point that 100 Amps is not "far too much" for an
    electronic device. The device could also be remotely controlled if that
    was wanted.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Tue Dec 21 12:33:34 2021
    On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 11:27:58 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 21/12/2021 10:56, Scott wrote:

    My combi gas boiler has a setting to turn the hot water off after so
    many minutes of continuous use :-)

    I will be installing a 80 litre hot water cylinder in my flat. One bath
    or, at my rate, about 8 showers. Then the water runs cold. :-)

    Gas might be an option, but I reckon the payback period is longer than >natural gas will be available for, and a boiler I can convert to
    hydrogen would cost a fortune on top.

    You can buy a unit that cuts the water off to the whole house after you
    have drawn a set amount, which is handy in the case of a leak. Manual or
    auto reset.

    And for breaches of the acceptable use policy :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Tue Dec 21 12:51:21 2021
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 21/12/2021 11:31, Tweed wrote:
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost >>> a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c-mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclsrc=3p.ds


    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in
    normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least
    means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent
    fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a
    protection device.

    Ones that need a key can be obtained, or a seal to prevent unauthorised resetting. That would be as safe as the existing system, as the seals
    are not hard to bypass, and the cartridges are available.

    Admittedly, the existing fuse is reliable, safe, reasonably secure, and
    *lot* cheaper than the clever option.

    I was making the point that 100 Amps is not "far too much" for an
    electronic device. The device could also be remotely controlled if that
    was wanted.


    There is actually remote control in smart meters - you can be remotely cut
    off, though I grant this is not for overload protection.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Tue Dec 21 13:46:31 2021
    On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:51:21 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 21/12/2021 11:31, Tweed wrote:
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an >>>>> electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost >>>> a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c-mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclsrc=3p.ds


    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in
    normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least >>> means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent
    fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a
    protection device.

    Ones that need a key can be obtained, or a seal to prevent unauthorised
    resetting. That would be as safe as the existing system, as the seals
    are not hard to bypass, and the cartridges are available.

    Admittedly, the existing fuse is reliable, safe, reasonably secure, and
    *lot* cheaper than the clever option.

    I was making the point that 100 Amps is not "far too much" for an
    electronic device. The device could also be remotely controlled if that
    was wanted.

    There is actually remote control in smart meters - you can be remotely cut >off, though I grant this is not for overload protection.

    That should avoid Scottish Power sending the boys round: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59733043

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Tue Dec 21 14:46:30 2021
    On 21/12/2021 13:46, Scott wrote:
    On Tue, 21 Dec 2021 12:51:21 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    I was making the point that 100 Amps is not "far too much" for an
    electronic device. The device could also be remotely controlled if that
    was wanted.

    There is actually remote control in smart meters - you can be remotely cut >> off, though I grant this is not for overload protection.

    That should avoid Scottish Power sending the boys round: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-59733043

    Currently trying to set up an account so they can actually take money
    off me legally...

    It took most of a day waiting to speak to half a dozen different people
    on the phone plus a few rounds of "You need to e-mail $random address"
    then a couple of days later it turned out that the only person who could authorise the reconnection to my new shop had been on annual leave. I'm
    still not sure whether the account is live, though the supply is. I set
    up an account on line, and they closed it within minutes of the guy
    putting the fuse back in.)

    I'm not sure if the rule locking me in to the previous supplier for a
    while still applies. (The fuse was pulled eight years ago and the place
    has been empty since.)

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Ratcliffe@21:1/5 to liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid on Wed Dec 22 12:48:17 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:48:29 +0000, Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van

    A transit?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Tweed@21:1/5 to Paul Ratcliffe on Wed Dec 22 13:06:09 2021
    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 22 12:22:06 2021
    In article <spsdv1$ff8$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> scribeth thus
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost
    a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c- >mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff09
    2c1&gclsrc=3p.ds


    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in
    normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least >means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent >fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a >protection device.


    The fuse is there for people like an old mate of mine who was daft
    enough to put a very large pair of wire cutters through the live and
    neutral coming from the incomer unit to the distribution box! Quite what
    he did that for god alone knows.

    There was a very loud bang a very bright flash and it the force of the explosion threw him a few yards away. His wife hearing this happen and
    him scream and his seemingly lifeless body on the floor had her phoning
    999 for an ambulance.

    The bloke from the power gently mentioned that she should get a proper
    spark's in to so the job whatever it was intended to be, the cutter
    blades for the greater part vaporised!...

    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to All on Wed Dec 22 12:33:49 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:22:06 +0000, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    In article <spsdv1$ff8$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> >scribeth thus
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an
    electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost >>> a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c- >>mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff09
    2c1&gclsrc=3p.ds

    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in >>normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least >>means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent >>fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a >>protection device.

    The fuse is there for people like an old mate of mine who was daft
    enough to put a very large pair of wire cutters through the live and
    neutral coming from the incomer unit to the distribution box! Quite what
    he did that for god alone knows.

    There was a very loud bang a very bright flash and it the force of the >explosion threw him a few yards away. His wife hearing this happen and
    him scream and his seemingly lifeless body on the floor had her phoning
    999 for an ambulance.

    The bloke from the power gently mentioned that she should get a proper >spark's in to so the job whatever it was intended to be, the cutter
    blades for the greater part vaporised!...

    Who paid for the damage? Did it count as a public liability claim
    against his home insurance?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Paul Ratcliffe@21:1/5 to rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl on Wed Dec 22 12:56:38 2021
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    How do you represent a number which includes both thousands and
    a fractional part?
    What happens with millions? Do you write it as 10.000.000 or what?
    Why can't use just use a comma like sensible folk?
    Or do you mis-use the comma as a decimal point?
    What happens if you want a list of numbers (generally separated by
    a comma and a space)?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Paul Ratcliffe on Wed Dec 22 13:08:43 2021
    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:48:29 +0000, Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van

    A transit?

    No, a Toyota Hiace.

    http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Van/vanconversion.htm


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to usenet.tweed@gmail.com on Wed Dec 22 13:34:33 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:06:09 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.

    Are we not misusing it as well? I thought the decimal point was
    supposed to be half way up the numerals, not on the baseline.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Dec 22 14:09:04 2021
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:06:09 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they've already used the comma as a decimal point.

    Are we not misusing it as well? I thought the decimal point was
    supposed to be half way up the numerals, not on the baseline.

    There is a character for that, but the code for it seems to vary between operating systems and it may not be included in every font.

    I tried to include an example in this reply, but the system rejected it
    because it was not an ISO standard character.



    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Wed Dec 22 14:08:26 2021
    On 22/12/2021 13:08, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Van/vanconversion.htm

    You've got big feet Liz.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Paul Ratcliffe on Wed Dec 22 14:05:25 2021
    On 22/12/2021 12:56, Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?

    We are Europeans

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Paul Ratcliffe on Wed Dec 22 14:04:32 2021
    On 22/12/2021 12:48, Paul Ratcliffe wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 13:48:29 +0000, Liz Tuddenham <liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid> wrote:

    You have not been in the cab with white van man then!

    Oi!

    I happen to drive a white van

    A transit?

    Mine is, and it's lovely. The best, most practical, car.

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Wed Dec 22 14:50:28 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 14:09:04 +0000, liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid
    (Liz Tuddenham) wrote:

    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:06:09 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they've already used the comma as a decimal point.

    Are we not misusing it as well? I thought the decimal point was
    supposed to be half way up the numerals, not on the baseline.

    There is a character for that, but the code for it seems to vary between >operating systems and it may not be included in every font.

    I rest my case :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From steve@justnn.com@21:1/5 to newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk on Wed Dec 22 15:42:10 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:34:33 +0000, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:06:09 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.

    Are we not misusing it as well? I thought the decimal point was
    supposed to be half way up the numerals, not on the baseline.

    I can be either but (half way up) needs an extra keyboard key.

    Steve
    --
    Neural Network Software http://www.npsnn.com
    JustNN Just a neural network http://www.justnn.com EasyNN-plus More than just a neural network http://www.easynn.com
    SwingNN Prediction software http://www.swingnn.com


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From steve@swingnn.com@21:1/5 to abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78 on Wed Dec 22 15:35:40 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:56:38 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    How do you represent a number which includes both thousands and
    a fractional part?
    What happens with millions? Do you write it as 10.000.000 or what?
    Why can't use just use a comma like sensible folk?
    Or do you mis-use the comma as a decimal point?
    What happens if you want a list of numbers (generally separated by
    a comma and a space)?

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    --
    Neural Network Software http://www.npsnn.com
    JustNN Just a neural network http://www.justnn.com EasyNN-plus More than just a neural network http://www.easynn.com
    SwingNN Prediction software http://www.swingnn.com


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to steve@swingnn.com on Wed Dec 22 16:30:16 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:35:40 +0000, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:56:38 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe ><abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink >><rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    How do you represent a number which includes both thousands and
    a fractional part?
    What happens with millions? Do you write it as 10.000.000 or what?
    Why can't use just use a comma like sensible folk?
    Or do you mis-use the comma as a decimal point?
    What happens if you want a list of numbers (generally separated by
    a comma and a space)?

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Am I simply wrong in thinking that the decimal point was originally
    placed half way up the characters?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to steve@justnn.com on Wed Dec 22 16:28:49 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:42:10 +0000, steve@justnn.com wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:34:33 +0000, Scott
    <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 13:06:09 -0000 (UTC), Tweed
    <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> wrote:

    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.

    Are we not misusing it as well? I thought the decimal point was
    supposed to be half way up the numerals, not on the baseline.

    I can be either but (half way up) needs an extra keyboard key.

    Exactly, so who is to say we are right and the 'Europeans' are wrong?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From charles@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Dec 22 17:18:34 2021
    In article <oik6sgtuikqq4d6478pcjv5l48oj5rrtok@4ax.com>,
    Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 15:35:40 +0000, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:56:38 GMT, Paul Ratcliffe ><abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:

    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink >><rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    How do you represent a number which includes both thousands and
    a fractional part?
    What happens with millions? Do you write it as 10.000.000 or what?
    Why can't use just use a comma like sensible folk?
    Or do you mis-use the comma as a decimal point?
    What happens if you want a list of numbers (generally separated by
    a comma and a space)?

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Am I simply wrong in thinking that the decimal point was originally
    placed half way up the characters?

    Certainly the hand weitten on used to be, and you could produce one on atypewriter, but computers never could cope.

    --
    from KT24 in Surrey, England
    "I'd rather die of exhaustion than die of boredom" Thomas Carlyle

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to steve@swingnn.com on Wed Dec 22 17:37:27 2021
    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK 1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as
    the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention alolows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to johnwilliamson@btinternet.com on Wed Dec 22 17:46:16 2021
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:37:27 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK >1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as
    the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention alolows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    So the decimal point is officially on the baseline now?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Tweed on Wed Dec 22 17:52:01 2021
    On 22/12/2021 13:06, Tweed wrote:
    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.

    There was an attempt to use a space as a thousands separator some years
    ago, but it only works for printed or typed numbers, not hand written.

    I wonder whether the Indian method of putting commas at the 3rd, 5th,
    7th and 9th places ever causes confusion? 1,00,000 does look rather like
    a million rather than a hundred thousand.

    (The Indians can't really be wrong as they invented our "Arabic" numbers.)

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to williamwright on Wed Dec 22 18:02:40 2021
    On 22/12/2021 17:52, williamwright wrote:
    On 22/12/2021 17:46, Scott wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:37:27 +0000, John Williamson
    <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth >>>> is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432 >>>>
    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK
    1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as >>> the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention alolows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    So the decimal point is officially on the baseline now?

    The decimal point is Alt + 0183. 99·99

    That is in the extended 8 bit ASCII as well as Unicode, but not in 7 bit
    ASCII.


    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Dec 22 18:01:08 2021
    On 22/12/2021 17:46, Scott wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:37:27 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK
    1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as
    the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention allows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    So the decimal point is officially on the baseline now?

    So it seems, though, like most others here, I was taught in school it
    was a raised dot. The raised dot though, mainly seems to be used now as
    a multiplication sign, especially when a computer is involved. I suspect
    the ASCII character set may be to blame, as the 7 bit version does not
    have a raised dot, though it is in the extended 8 bit set.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Scott on Wed Dec 22 17:52:49 2021
    On 22/12/2021 17:46, Scott wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:37:27 +0000, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3 B213 321 1,000,1230.222 c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK
    1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as
    the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention alolows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    So the decimal point is officially on the baseline now?

    The decimal point is Alt + 0183. 99·99

    ··· Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Wed Dec 22 17:56:07 2021
    On 22/12/2021 17:37, John Williamson wrote:
    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth
    is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3  B213 321 1,000,1230.222  c. 3,022,3333.432

    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK 1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as
    the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention alolows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    Using spaces as thousands separators doesn't really work for hand
    written numbers.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to williamwright on Wed Dec 22 21:47:28 2021
    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 13:08, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    http://www.poppyrecords.co.uk/Van/vanconversion.htm

    You've got big feet Liz.

    Thick socks.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Dec 23 11:28:35 2021
    On 22/12/2021 18:01, John Williamson wrote:
    On 22/12/2021 17:46, Scott wrote:
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 17:37:27 +0000, John Williamson
    <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:

    On 22/12/2021 15:35, steve@swingnn.com wrote:

    All the people I know use both commas and stops. A million and a tenth >>>> is written 1,000,000.1 and number separators are usually at least one
    space or letter like A12.3  B213 321 1,000,1230.222  c. 3,022,3333.432 >>>>
    Steve

    The standards for this I have come across in everyday use are the UK
    1,000,000.00. and the French 1 000 000,00 The US seem to use the same as >>> the UK. The spaces are narrow spaces narrower than an n-space.

    The SI convention allows 101 000,330 245 and 101 000.330 245

    So the decimal point is officially on the baseline now?

    So it seems, though, like most others here, I was taught in school it
    was a raised dot. The raised dot though, mainly seems to be used now as
    a multiplication sign, especially when a computer is involved.

    I've never seen that. Usually * for multiply, as the multiplication sign
    looks too much like an x. At school we used a cursive x to distinguish
    it from multiply. Decimal points were in the middle of the character,
    and a baseline . for multiply. Or just put the characters together as xy
    for x time y. I don't remember when we had to use the dot.

    On computers, usually a crossed O is used for zero, 0, but, I recall, it
    used to be the other way round, perhaps when computers were mainly used
    for numbers.

    For music, such as a song, # is used to show the text is sung, as
    resembling a sharp sign. A double quaver would be better, but few
    character sets include it.

    I've seen a lower case b used for flat, as "Sonata in Ab minor", which
    doesn't look good if only capitals can be shown, such as a radio with a 14-segment (starburst) display for the text.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Thu Dec 23 17:28:05 2021
    On 22/12/2021 18:02, John Williamson wrote:

    The decimal point is Alt + 0183.   99·99

    That is in the extended 8 bit ASCII as well as Unicode, but not in 7 bit ASCII.



    Is that anything to do with Arthur ASCII?

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Fri Dec 24 11:10:21 2021
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you up
    and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a few
    days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Roderick Stewart on Fri Dec 24 10:55:52 2021
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:
    On Mon, 20 Dec 2021 00:38:39 +0000, "J. P. Gilliver (John)" <G6JPG@255soft.uk> wrote:

    Don't even mention what it takes to run a crematorium!

    Well, as I understand it they run on gas, so at least it'll be about
    four and a half times cheaper than electricity.

    I thought they ran on body fat once they had got going.

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to John Williamson on Fri Dec 24 17:47:49 2021
    On 24/12/2021 11:10, John Williamson wrote:
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you up
    and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a few
    days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach,
    where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable to
    burying the whole body in a coffin. I wonder why it was abandoned? I
    think it was common practice in the time of Christ.

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Fri Dec 24 17:57:31 2021
    On 24/12/2021 17:47, Max Demian wrote:
    On 24/12/2021 11:10, John Williamson wrote:
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you
    up and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a
    few days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach,
    where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable to
    burying the whole body in a coffin. I wonder why it was abandoned? I
    think it was common practice in the time of Christ.

    Fashions and beliefs change. Look at what happened to those whose
    families could afford it in Egypt a couple of thousand years ago.

    Relatively short term burials then transfer of the bones to ossuaries
    were common in France within living memory but even there the relative cheapness of a cremation is leading to them becoming more common.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From NY@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Fri Dec 24 22:51:39 2021
    "Max Demian" <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote in message news:sq5149$mf8$1@gioia.aioe.org...
    or the Man blows the Last Trump

    Rather you than me, giving oral to the last son of the (former) POTAS ;-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 25 22:48:22 2021
    In article <j2lo4tF826lU1@mid.individual.net>, John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> scribeth thus
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you up
    and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a few
    days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Yes in Tibet i believe, sky burial they call it!..

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.


    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 25 22:59:23 2021
    In article <sq5149$mf8$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Max Demian
    <max_demian@bigfoot.com> scribeth thus
    On 24/12/2021 11:10, John Williamson wrote:
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you up
    and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a few
    days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach,
    where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable to
    burying the whole body in a coffin. I wonder why it was abandoned? I
    think it was common practice in the time of Christ.



    Umm have a look at this lot!!

    Enjoy!..

    Https://motomom.tripod.com/index-3.html

    https://life-globe.com/en/catacombs-capuchins-palermo/
    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From tony sayer@21:1/5 to All on Sat Dec 25 23:01:22 2021
    In article <jn66sg1912l1uapag6g6pc02kkdukvglhh@4ax.com>, Scott <newsgroups@gefion.myzen.co.uk> scribeth thus
    On Wed, 22 Dec 2021 12:22:06 +0000, tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk>
    wrote:

    In article <spsdv1$ff8$1@dont-email.me>, Tweed <usenet.tweed@gmail.com> >>scribeth thus
    John Williamson <johnwilliamson@btinternet.com> wrote:
    On 18/12/2021 10:40, Scott wrote:

    What is the main fuse anyway? Is it fuse wire, or a cartridge or an >>>>> electronic device? I would have thought 100 amps would be far too
    much for an electonic device.

    Electro mechanical circuit breakers are routinely available which can
    repeatedly and safely break current in the range of kiloamps.

    This will safely deal with a fault current of 20 kA, though it does cost >>>> a bit more than a piece of wire.

    https://www.cef.co.uk/catalogue/products/1557062-100a-sp-20ka-type-c- >>>mcb?msclkid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff092c1&gclid=574ffec058ac1b5cf6109f01eff
    09
    2c1&gclsrc=3p.ds

    The point about the incoming fuse is it is not supposed to rupture in >>>normal use. Having to bring the power company out to replace it at least >>>means a qualified person is on site to deal correctly with a persistent >>>fault. You’d not really want a householder repeatedly resetting such a >>>protection device.

    The fuse is there for people like an old mate of mine who was daft
    enough to put a very large pair of wire cutters through the live and >>neutral coming from the incomer unit to the distribution box! Quite what
    he did that for god alone knows.

    There was a very loud bang a very bright flash and it the force of the >>explosion threw him a few yards away. His wife hearing this happen and
    him scream and his seemingly lifeless body on the floor had her phoning
    999 for an ambulance.

    The bloke from the power gently mentioned that she should get a proper >>spark's in to so the job whatever it was intended to be, the cutter
    blades for the greater part vaporised!...

    Who paid for the damage? Did it count as a public liability claim
    against his home insurance?

    Cant remember now. I think the bloke from the power lot changed the fuse
    after someone else had re wired it! His wife gave him a real ear bend
    over it!...


    --
    Tony Sayer


    Man is least himself when he talks in his own person.

    Give him a keyboard, and he will reveal himself.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Sn!pe@21:1/5 to tony sayer on Sat Dec 25 23:31:36 2021
    tony sayer <tony@bancom.co.uk> wrote:
    [...]
    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach, >where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable to
    burying the whole body in a coffin. I wonder why it was abandoned? I
    think it was common practice in the time of Christ.



    Umm have a look at this lot!!

    Enjoy!..

    <Https://motomom.tripod.com/index-3.html>

    <https://life-globe.com/en/catacombs-capuchins-palermo/>


    I've been there. Our guide took great pleasure in pointing out his
    favourite mummy, who he thought looked like Niki Lauda. It was
    quite a good likeness, too.

    --
    ^Ï^ <https://youtu.be/_kqytf31a8E>

    My pet rock Gordon just is.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Andy Burns@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sun Dec 26 09:06:31 2021
    Max Demian wrote:

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach, where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are disarticulated, then stored
    in a smallish box is much preferable

    I was on a coach trip in Austria 40-odd years ago, which included a stop at a roadside ossuary. They seemed to store everything by bone type, e.g. pyramids of skulls, heaps of long bones i.e. femurs and tibias sorted by length, then boxes of fingers and toes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sun Dec 26 10:49:24 2021
    Max Demian <max_demian@bigfoot.com> wrote:

    On 24/12/2021 11:10, John Williamson wrote:
    On 24/12/2021 10:55, Max Demian wrote:
    On 20/12/2021 10:06, Roderick Stewart wrote:

    I wonder which is cheaper, an hour's worth of gas, or a small plot of
    land for a hundred years?

    A hundred years? Do you have inside information on the (much overdue)
    Day of Judgment?

    Depends on where you are. In the UK and some other countries, you and
    your family generally get tenancy until they build on it or the Man
    blows the Last Trump

    In most of Europe, you get a hundred years or less, then they dig you up and put the bones in an ossuary. In some countries, you just get a few
    days on a platform while the birds recycle you as bird droppings.

    Sorry, that may seem a bit too morbid for the time of year.

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach,
    where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable to
    burying the whole body in a coffin. I wonder why it was abandoned? I
    think it was common practice in the time of Christ.

    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions. Various bones would be
    removed from the ossuary and assembled in some way, then guidance would
    be sought on such things as when would be the best time to plant the
    crops that year.

    It's a bit like a solicitor, where advice will cost you an arm and a
    leg.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Max Demian@21:1/5 to Andy Burns on Sun Dec 26 11:36:41 2021
    On 26/12/2021 09:06, Andy Burns wrote:
    Max Demian wrote:

    If you must preserve your bones intact, it seems the ossuary approach,
    where bodies are kept on shelves in a tomb until they are
    disarticulated, then stored in a smallish box is much preferable

    I was on a coach trip in Austria 40-odd years ago, which included a stop
    at a roadside ossuary.  They seemed to store everything by bone type,
    e.g. pyramids of skulls, heaps of long bones i.e. femurs and tibias
    sorted by length, then boxes of fingers and toes.

    How are the angels going to sort out which bones belong to which on the
    Last Trump?

    --
    Max Demian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From John Williamson@21:1/5 to Max Demian on Sun Dec 26 11:58:02 2021
    On 26/12/2021 11:36, Max Demian wrote:
    On 26/12/2021 09:06, Andy Burns wrote:
    I was on a coach trip in Austria 40-odd years ago, which included a
    stop at a roadside ossuary. They seemed to store everything by bone
    type, e.g. pyramids of skulls, heaps of long bones i.e. femurs and
    tibias sorted by length, then boxes of fingers and toes.

    How are the angels going to sort out which bones belong to which on the
    Last Trump?

    They are, of course, excellent at doing jigsaw puzzles.

    --
    Tciao for Now!

    John.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Unsteadyken@21:1/5 to All on Sun Dec 26 13:05:20 2021
    In article <1pksj33.1sjqbjd93xbkqN%liz@poppyrecords.invalid.invalid>,

    Liz Tuddenham says...

    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions.

    Here in Northamptonshire, the charnel house in Rothwell contains the
    remains of 2,500 individuals. The bones appear to date from the 12th to
    19th centuries.
    Well worth a visit.It is quite a disturbing sight.

    https://www.rothwellholytrinity.org.uk/thebuilding.htm

    --
    Ken

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Liz Tuddenham on Sun Dec 26 14:48:57 2021
    On 26/12/2021 10:49, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions. Various bones would be
    removed from the ossuary and assembled in some way, then guidance would
    be sought on such things as when would be the best time to plant the
    crops that year.

    It's a bit like a solicitor, where advice will cost you an arm and a
    leg.

    I've copied that to my solicitor!

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Liz Tuddenham@21:1/5 to williamwright on Sun Dec 26 15:46:40 2021
    williamwright <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 26/12/2021 10:49, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions. Various bones would be removed from the ossuary and assembled in some way, then guidance would
    be sought on such things as when would be the best time to plant the
    crops that year.

    It's a bit like a solicitor, where advice will cost you an arm and a
    leg.

    I've copied that to my solicitor!

    You're welcome.


    --
    ~ Liz Tuddenham ~
    (Remove the ".invalid"s and add ".co.uk" to reply)
    www.poppyrecords.co.uk

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Scott@21:1/5 to wrightsaerials@f2s.com on Sun Dec 26 15:47:44 2021
    On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 14:48:57 +0000, williamwright
    <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 26/12/2021 10:49, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions. Various bones would be
    removed from the ossuary and assembled in some way, then guidance would
    be sought on such things as when would be the best time to plant the
    crops that year.

    It's a bit like a solicitor, where advice will cost you an arm and a
    leg.

    I've copied that to my solicitor!

    The reply will cost you 15 minutes in fees.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From williamwright@21:1/5 to Scott on Sun Dec 26 17:45:38 2021
    On 26/12/2021 15:47, Scott wrote:
    On Sun, 26 Dec 2021 14:48:57 +0000, williamwright
    <wrightsaerials@f2s.com> wrote:

    On 26/12/2021 10:49, Liz Tuddenham wrote:
    Apparently there was a pre-Christian belief that the bones of the
    ancestors could be used to make predictions. Various bones would be
    removed from the ossuary and assembled in some way, then guidance would
    be sought on such things as when would be the best time to plant the
    crops that year.

    It's a bit like a solicitor, where advice will cost you an arm and a
    leg.

    I've copied that to my solicitor!

    The reply will cost you 15 minutes in fees.

    Luckily I know it won't...

    Bill

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 31 23:27:00 2021
    Op 18-12-2021 om 14:43 schreef Mark Carver:
    On 17/12/2021 21:57, Rink wrote:

    Here it is 35 or 40A, (the fuse I cannot reach),
    The fuses I can reach are max 16A.

    Where's 'here' ? Presumably not the UK ?

    The Netherlands



    UK homes typically have 60A incoming fuses, newer properties 100 A,
    though my parents' house built in 1966 has 100A fuses, and a dual phase supply (because it has electric storage heating)

    Our domestic electrical circuits are based on a ring system, the sockets
    are in a daisy chain that returns as a loop back to the fuse (or MCB) box.

    Power sockets are rated at 13Amp load, the ring mains they are on are protected by 30 or 32A fuses.

    Large appliances are fed by dedicated radial circuits (as you describe) either 16A (water heaters) or 32A (cookers etc)

    You can easily pull a 10kW total load in most UK homes, though not all
    on the same circuit


    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mr_=D6n!on?=@21:1/5 to Rink on Fri Dec 31 22:57:23 2021
    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    By the way, the UK is part of Europe, you are Europeans too :-)

    Indeed, in the same sense that Taiwan is part of China.

    --
    \|/
    (((Ï))) Mr Ön!on

    When we shake the ketchup bottle
    First none comes and then a lot'll.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Fri Dec 31 23:35:18 2021
    Op 22-12-2021 om 14:06 schreef Tweed:
    Paul Ratcliffe <abuse@orac12.clara34.co56.uk78> wrote:
    On Fri, 17 Dec 2021 21:02:43 +0100, Rink
    <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    10.000 Watts is a lot more, I think...
    It's about 50A, which cannot be used in a normal house (35A fuse).

    And to produce 10kW ERP, you need a lot more power.
    All high power mediumwave transmissions ended in The Netherlands
    because of the energy bill. The told that it was about 100.000 euro
    per year, which will be much more nowadays.

    Why do you Europeans consistently mis-use the decimal point as
    a thousands separator?
    Because they’ve already used the comma as a decimal point.




    Correct!

    But I would not call it a "mis-use". It's normal for me.
    In your way I could call 1,000,000 a "mis-use" as well. But I don't,
    because you are used to it.
    It's the same as miles <-> kilometers and driving on the left or the
    right side of the road.
    Both are not wrong, it depends what you're used to do.

    By the way, the UK is part of Europe, you are Europeans too :-)

    Rink

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Rink@21:1/5 to All on Sat Jan 1 13:27:29 2022
    Op 31-12-2021 om 23:57 schreef Mr Ön!on:
    Rink <rink.hof.haalditmaarweg@planet.nl> wrote:

    By the way, the UK is part of Europe, you are Europeans too :-)

    Indeed, in the same sense that Taiwan is part of China.



    China is no continent.
    Europe is.

    China and Taiwan are parts of Asia.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)