1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. UK.REC.DRIVING

  • Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement?

    From TallHenry@21:1/5 to All on Sat Apr 27 19:07:28 2019
    XPost: uk.legal, uk.rec.cycling

    In article <uh99ce1hgd3ng58o9e9eskj7q2gj8un8qa@4ax.com>,
    sick old nazoid pedo Andrew "Andrzej" Baron (aka "Shitsack Moishe Goldbergsky") wrote:

    What the fuck do you care about legal requirements?

    Sigh. Look, you dirty, inferior sub-louse... I have, repeatedly,
    ordered you to be polite to humans. Please follow.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Tosspot on Sat Apr 27 21:00:45 2019
    XPost: uk.legal, uk.rec.cycling

    On Sat, 27 Apr 2019 20:37:49 +0100, Tosspot <frank.leake@gmail.com> wrote:

    On 27/04/2019 19.20, Commander Kinsey wrote:
    Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely
    cut down on the spray on a wet motorway.

    Get some decent windscreen wipers you pikey. Honestly, welcome to the
    21st century.

    So your wipers magically remove the spray that's metres in front of you? Idiot.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Commander Kinsey@21:1/5 to Mr Pounder Esquire on Sun Apr 28 21:04:47 2019
    XPost: uk.legal, uk.rec.cycling

    On Sun, 28 Apr 2019 19:51:21 +0100, Mr Pounder Esquire <MrPounder@rationalthought.com> wrote:

    Commander Kinsey wrote:
    Why aren't mudflaps on cars a legal requirement? They would severely
    cut down on the spray on a wet motorway.

    Prick.

    Did you even understand the question? You have been on a motorway in the rain?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)