1. Forum
  2. Usenet
  3. UK.REC.CYCLING

  • Re: Companies sentenced after failing to identify their speeding driver

    From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Thu Feb 15 14:04:06 2024
    On 15/02/2024 13:18, Simon Mason wrote:

    QUOTE:
    “Companies have a responsibility to know who is driving their vehicles at any given time, if they are unable to provide details of a driver at the time of an alleged speeding offence when requested, the company is liable instead. Not responding to
    our requests or being unable to name a driver can lead to higher fines and costs as has happened in these cases. ENDS

    In other words, "fessing up early doors" is always the best and least costly option.

    That is a LIE (yet another one from you).

    A company cannot be banned from driving because one of its vehicles is
    alleged to have done 43mph in a 40 limit.

    You know it makes sense, drivers.

    Most people do know what makes sense for them. When they want your
    advice on the subject, you can be absolutely certain that they will turn
    up to your door and seek it, M'Lud.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Spike@21:1/5 to JNugent on Thu Feb 15 22:01:58 2024
    JNugent <jennings&co@mail.com> wrote:
    On 15/02/2024 13:18, Simon Mason wrote:

    QUOTE:
    “Companies have a responsibility to know who is driving their vehicles
    at any given time, if they are unable to provide details of a driver at
    the time of an alleged speeding offence when requested, the company is
    liable instead. Not responding to our requests or being unable to name a
    driver can lead to higher fines and costs as has happened in these cases. ENDS

    In other words, "fessing up early doors" is always the best and least costly option.

    I remember one post by Mason in which he blamed in some way a person found guilty for ‘fessing up early doors’ and getting a reduced sentence because of that.

    Consistency trumped by expediency…

    That is a LIE (yet another one from you).

    A company cannot be banned from driving because one of its vehicles is alleged to have done 43mph in a 40 limit.

    You know it makes sense, drivers.

    Most people do know what makes sense for them. When they want your
    advice on the subject, you can be absolutely certain that they will turn
    up to your door and seek it, M'Lud.


    --
    Spike

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From JNugent@21:1/5 to Simon Mason on Sun Feb 18 12:54:50 2024
    On 18/02/2024 02:25, Simon Mason wrote:

    We will be widening our focus from the Fatal 4 to the Fatal 6 with the important addition of carelessness and the use of chav-bikes on the highway (especially on FOOTways).

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)