On 04/02/2024 06:51 am, Simon Mason wrote:
QUOTE:
His seized van was also crushed after he failed to collect it within the designated time frame.
The second seized vehicle, for which an owner could not be traced, was also crushed. ENDS
Here are the vans being taken away to be crushed. :-)) https://www.redbridge.gov.uk/media/11536/crushed-vans-carousel.jpg
Sounds good to me.
The owner of the first van obviously didn't value it as being worth as
much as the recovery costs.
The second van (if what you wrote was true) has been abandoned by its
last owner.
But they should really start doing the same thing - on SIGHT and
IMMEDIATELY - to chav-cycles left abandoned (some would say "parked") on FOOTways or other public spaces, whether chained to a piece of street
furniture or to the railings of a building.
Bolt cutters - snip the chain - hurl the chav-cycle into the back of an enforcement pickup-truck and straight to the crushing plant (maybe after
a half a dozen have been collected, which would provide an incentive to
those manning the truck - as they could have a tea-break back as the
factory).
Win / Win / Lose!
1st Win: pedestrians using the FOOTway.
2nd Win: local authority cleansing department.
1st and only Lose: the chav-cyclist who left the chav-cycle on the
FOOTway or other public space.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
