• =?UTF-8?Q?Get_your_anti=2Dcycling_bingo_cards_out=3A_Halfords_slam?= =?

    From Simon Mason@21:1/5 to All on Mon Nov 20 03:44:05 2023
    It’s that time of the year again, folks, when the social media admin for Halfords – the UK’s largest retailer of cycling products and services – scratches their head, has a long think over their morning coffee, and then decides to post something
    that will annoy cyclists and pit motorists against them.

    Last year, Halfords decided to weigh in on the whole bike helmet debate, for some reason (surely not to sell helmets?), by advising cyclists that they “strongly recommend” wearing one… just in case a tree branch falls on your head.

    And, just like clockwork, this winter’s questionable post comes courtesy of a gloriously ambiguous graphic depicting a cyclist and a motorist on the road, along with the not-at-all-inflammatory question: “Who has right of way?”

    https://scontent.xx.fbcdn.net/v/t39.30808-6/398100210_737402685082065_3620374959894565243_n.jpg?stp=dst-jpg_p526x296&_nc_cat=106&ccb=1-7&_nc_sid=5f2048&_nc_ohc=SqJdwtOEDeYAX87KTvn&_nc_ht=scontent.xx&edm=AN6CN6oEAAAA&oh=00_AfBwW2DO0LVf-
    evpGMwSIYLiW3h22N8wkl7G7P_q1oXMcg&oe=655FC0E8

    The eyebrow-raising post has so far received 9,000 comments and shares, so it’s fair to say the social media admin has done their job – but if you were expecting a thoughtful, articulate Facebook discussion on the new Highway Code and its pyramid of
    vulnerable road users, you’d be sorely mistaken.

    Instead, get your anti-cycling bingo cards at the ready…

    “Car. We pay to use the road,” answered Bryan, very helpfully.

    “The one who pays road tax!” added Rob, even more helpfully.

    While David, the most helpful of all, wrote: “The car has right of way , because he pays road tax and insurance – the cyclist should be on the pavement eating its vegan sausage roll and reading this week’s Trainspotting Weekly.”

    Great stuff David, cheers.

    “Cyclists have breaks [sic] too and should assess the situation and not assume they have priority,” says Sean.

    “Doesn’t look like there’s a cycle lane and I’d assume the car would be indicating left well before this so really the bike shouldn’t be in this position,” added the very presumptuous Eddie.

    And that’s before we even get to Danny’s extremely coherent comment, the contents of which I’ve decided to leave fully intact for your Monday morning enjoyment:

    You now the answer ??the first thing you would be told use your mirror ?? But the ciclist would be right because there is no laws for ciclist or padestrion only punish drivers ????

    Make of that what you will…

    Meanwhile, Anthony claimed “it’s the car” who has priority because “1) Car is in front. 2) Bike is undertaking. 3) There is no bike lane.”

    But, thankfully not everyone interpreted the admittedly highly dubious graphic in the same way.

    Replying to Anthony, Jamie wrote: “It’s not. Maybe back in 2000. Even maybe in 2019. In 2023 it’s the bike.

    “This is exactly why the theory test should expire every two or three years. Most people just follow the rules they were taught when they passed their test, sometimes many decades ago.”

    Meanwhile, ignoring the whole tedious discussion, others were extremely critical of Halfords even bringing the whole thing up in the first place, along with the questionable use of the term ‘right of way’.

    “There’s no such term as ‘right of way; it’s who has priority, so please ask the question correctly before asking for answers Halfords, okay?” wrote Dean.

    “Very poor and antagonistic of Halfords”, said John, before answering the antagonistic question anyway, “but let’s assume the car overtook the bike then made a left hand turn, then the bike has right of way, if the cyclist is undertaking (though
    assuming there’s no standing traffic so unlikely) then the cyclist is as daft as a brush, though this needs to be a video so that we can see the whole story, instead of making a decision on a snapshot.”

    Okay…

    Philippa, who alerted us to the post, described it as “shameful”, and says she has forwarded it – along with the “atrocious and inaccurate” comments – to Cycling UK and Stop Killing Cyclists.

    I’m sure next year’s Halfords cycling post will go down much better…

    https://road.cc/content/news/cycling-live-blog-20-november-2023-305179#live-blog-item-51943

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)