A lot of these conspiracy theories are pure astroturf coming from various PR efforts by the oil and auto industries.
The media, always wary of anything that might encourage critical thinking, would have you believe that some goober in a double wide with a confederate flag in the window was cranking out gun nut quotes in the 1980s and attributing them to the founders.
"Oh it's organic. GQP have great imaginations."
This is preposterous. Coastal elites in NY and LA are spreading the nonsense
On the 15 min city conspiracy theory it looks like LA and NY shills stole the idea from similar elites in London.
The media always play dumb, of course. Here's an example where NPR scrupulously avoids any discussion on who is starting these conspiracy theories.
https://www.npr.org/2023/10/08/1203950823/15-minute-cities-climate-solution "There is a time to run and a time to play dumb."
-- Louisiana politician
On 08/10/2023 08:02 pm, Bret Cahill wrote:
A lot of these conspiracy theories are pure astroturf coming from
various PR efforts by the oil and auto industries.
The media, always wary of anything that might encourage critical
thinking, would have you believe that some goober in a double wide with
a confederate flag in the window was cranking out gun nut quotes in the
1980s and attributing them to the founders.
"Oh it's organic. GQP have great imaginations."
"GQP"?
This is preposterous. Coastal elites in NY and LA are spreading the nonsense
Aren't they the same areas where the Democrats are in the ascendant?
JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
On 08/10/2023 08:02 pm, Bret Cahill wrote:
A lot of these conspiracy theories are pure astroturf coming from
various PR efforts by the oil and auto industries.
The media, always wary of anything that might encourage critical
thinking, would have you believe that some goober in a double wide with
a confederate flag in the window was cranking out gun nut quotes in the
1980s and attributing them to the founders.
"Oh it's organic. GQP have great imaginations."
"GQP"?
This is preposterous. Coastal elites in NY and LA are spreading the nonsense
Aren't they the same areas where the Democrats are in the ascendant?
You’re asking a politico-geographical question of Mason?
He has only one answer to use, centred on fat florid men and Brexit.
On 09/10/2023 03:48 pm, Spike wrote:
JNugent <jnugent@mail.com> wrote:
On 08/10/2023 08:02 pm, Bret Cahill wrote:
A lot of these conspiracy theories are pure astroturf coming from
various PR efforts by the oil and auto industries.
The media, always wary of anything that might encourage critical
thinking, would have you believe that some goober in a double wide with >>>> a confederate flag in the window was cranking out gun nut quotes in the >>>> 1980s and attributing them to the founders.
"Oh it's organic. GQP have great imaginations."
"GQP"?
This is preposterous. Coastal elites in NY and LA are spreading the nonsense
Aren't they the same areas where the Democrats are in the ascendant?
You’re asking a politico-geographical question of Mason?
I know that that would be pointless. It was aimed at Brett Cahill.
<shock realisation>
He isn't a May Sun sock, is he?
He has only one answer to use, centred on fat florid men and Brexit.
Cities where people can live a short walk from work, school and other daily essentials rather than braving traffic-clogged highways or long commutes: utopian ideal or dystopian nightmare?
In 2023, apparently, it depends on who you ask.plot to curtail individual freedoms.
Some conservative commentators and conspiracy theorists are increasingly convinced the concept of a “15-minute city” — an urban design principle recently embraced by cities ranging from Paris, France to Cleveland, Ohio — is the latest nefarious
“You won’t be able to use your own car on certain roads and highways without the government’s permission and consent,” claimed one Instagram user in a recent video that’s been liked more than 5,400 times. “You will be constantly monitoredby surveillance cameras to ensure that you don’t leave your designated residential zone without first being authorized to do so.”
But urban experts and city officials stress the idea has nothing to do with regulating people’s movements or taking away other freedoms. In some cases, they say, it’s being wrongly conflated with local plans to mitigate traffic-clogged roads.
Here’s a closer look at the facts.
CLAIM: “15-minute cities” are designed to restrict people’s movements, increase government surveillance and infringe on other individual rights.
THE FACTS: The urban planning concept is simply about building more compact, walkable communities where people are less reliant on cars.
The conspiracy theories took off late last year in the United Kingdom, as the concept was conflated with an effort to impose new traffic restrictions to ease congestion in and around the famous university community of Oxford.Drivers will still be able to travel to any part of the city at any time, but may have to take a different route.
The county government of Oxfordshire approved a system of “traffic filters” for six busy roads on which drivers will need a special permit to travel during daytime hours.
But Tony Ecclestone, spokesperson for the Oxford City Council, said the county’s initiative is separate from the council’s endorsement of the 15-minute cities concept, which is a key part of a city planning document it’s developing.
He pointed to a fact sheet the county and city governments issued jointly in December to set the record straight.
The fact sheet states that the filters aren’t physical barriers that will confine people to their local area, but instead traffic cameras that will photograph the license plates of any non-compliant drivers, who could then be subject to a fine.
The 15-minute neighborhoods proposal, meanwhile, aims to ensure that “every resident has all the essentials (shops, healthcare, parks) within a 15-minute walk of their home,” the fact sheet says. The goal is to “support and add services, notrestrict them.”
Urban planning experts credit Carlos Moreno, a professor at the University of Paris 1 Pantheon-Sorbonne, with popularizing the 15-minute city concept. Paris Mayor Anne Hidalgo has been one of its most visible proponents, making it a central tenet inher successful re-election campaign in 2020.
Dan Luscher, creator of The 15-Minute City, a blog devoted to the design concept, argues it’s “first and foremost” about choice, not coercion.
“It is about creating neighborhoods and cities with urban amenities close at hand, and with convenient and safe options for getting around,” he wrote in an email. “It is about enabling people to get their needs met within their own neighborhood,not confining them to that neighborhood. It is about mobility, not lockdown.”
Robert Steuteville, of the Congress for the New Urbanism, a D.C. nonprofit that advocates for walkable cities, agreed, adding the notion also isn’t all that novel: most cities built before 1950, when highways and suburbs became dominant, were 15-minute cities.
“The point is to provide more freedom of choice
as to where a person can comfortably and affordably live in the city, not to prevent freedom of movement,” Nate Storring, co-executive director of the Project for Public Spaces, a New York nonprofit advocating for better urban design, wrote in anemail.
Conspiracy theorists are tapping into COVID-19 pandemic-era vitriol against lockdowns when they falsely portray the concept as a “climate lockdown,” notes Carlo Ratti, director of the Senseable City Laboratory at the Massachusetts Institute ofTechnology.
They’re also drawing on far-right tropes about global-minded organizations pushing a “socialist agenda” and a “ Great Reset ” of society, he said. Indeed, a related conspiracy theory circulating online recently falsely claims the UnitedNations and the World Economic Forum will “forcibly remove” people living on polluted land and require them to live in “smart cities.”
“Even for those unversed in the vocabulary of the alt-right, the notion of distant elites ripping apart one’s way of life in order to conform to their notion of an optimal city can be a difficult one to stomach,” Ratti wrote in an email.
In Cleveland, Mayor Justin Bibb hopes his northeast Ohio city can become the country’s first to implement the planning framework.
But there’s been no talk of imposing new traffic regulations or restricting personal freedoms,
confirms Marie Zickefoose, Bibb’s spokesperson. City officials have so far conducted a land use study and are working on updating city policies to encourage a better mix of amenities along main commercial and transit corridors, she said.
“The goal of the 15-minute city is to provide convenient and equitable access to necessities like healthcare, schools, grocery stores, jobs, and greenspace,” Zickefoose wrote in an email. “Our transportation system and neighborhood configurationscurrently provide this access to residents with cars, which leaves out almost a quarter of our residents.”
___
This is part of AP’s effort to address widely shared misinformation, including work with outside companies and organizations to add factual context to misleading content that is circulating online. Learn more about fact-checking at AP.
Birth of a conspiracy theory
So, how did this fairly mundane strategy become a flashpoint for a
spiraling climate-related conspiracy theory?
For years, certain actors within the fossil fuel industry have been
trying to whip up anger about climate action by rebranding it as “climate tyranny,” said Jennie King, head of Climate Research and Policy at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a think tank focused on disinformation and extremism.
But this successful spinning of a huge conspiracy theory, by miscasting
the intentions of 15-minute cities, has worrying long term implications
for climate action, King said.
Governments, both local and national, may find it very hard to implement
any policies that even touch on the climate crisis, she warned. “They are the most vulnerable at the moment to this enormous surge of hostility and public mobilization.”
Birth of a conspiracy theorythink tank focused on disinformation and extremism.
So, how did this fairly mundane strategy become a flashpoint for a spiraling climate-related conspiracy theory?
For years, certain actors within the fossil fuel industry have been trying to whip up anger about climate action by rebranding it as “climate tyranny,” said Jennie King, head of Climate Research and Policy at the Institute for Strategic Dialogue, a
Pre-2020, however, they struggled to get traction, she told CNN.vaccine groups.
That changed with the pandemic.
Scientists slam Joe Rogan's podcast episode with Jordan Peterson as 'absurd' and 'dangerous'
A series of media articles arguing we should rebuild a post-Covid world that could maintain the drops in planet-warming pollution were seized upon to turbocharge a narrative claiming governments wanted to limit freedoms in the name of climate action.
The World Economic Forum’s “Great Reset” initiative, billed as an effort to tackle inequality and climate crisis post-pandemic, fanned the flames.
The term “climate lockdown” started swirling around, pushed by right-wing think tanks and climate-skeptic media figures. From there it filtered down to more extreme conspiracy communities, King said, including QAnon-affiliated groups and anti-
Fox News took it up, along with high-profile climate deniers.directs the MIT Senseable City Lab, told CNN.
Ordinary people were swept along, too. The pandemic left millions with genuine trauma and real concerns about government overreach, King said. “And that has been weaponized by a vast ecosystem of bad actors.”
The idea of 15-minute cities fits neatly into the “climate lockdown” conspiracy theory, partly because it is easy to spin that way.
“The conspiracy theorists are right that you can’t make a real city out of self-contained enclaves – those would just be villages,” Carlo Ratti, an architect, engineer, and Professor at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where he
But it misinterprets the idea, he said. It “gives people the freedom to live locally, but does not force them to do so.”space,” she added.
Yet “disinformation is opportunistic,” especially when it comes to climate, King said. Anything can become a lightning rod for manufactured controversy and when an issue starts to receive attention, a host of different actors “flood into the
In December, Canadian clinical psychologist and climate skeptic Jordan Peterson posted a tweet attacking 15-minute cities: “The idea that neighborhoods should be walkable is lovely. The idea that idiot tyrannical bureaucrats can decide by fiat whereyou’re ‘allowed’ to drive is perhaps the worst imaginable perversion of that idea.”
In early February, UK politician Nick Fletcher raised the conspiracy in Parliament, calling 15-minute cities an “international socialist concept” and claimed they “will cost us our personal freedom.”
And last weekend, online theories spilled into real life protests, as thousands of people, many from outside the area, took to the streets of Oxford to protest the traffic filtering and 15-minute city proposals.
There are, of course, plenty of criticisms of 15-minute cities, including their potential to fracture cities, furthering existing inequalities between richer and poorer areas.
And Enright, in Oxfordshire, acknowledged local people have legitimate concerns about the traffic filtering plan. They will continue to consult, he said.
But this successful spinning of a huge conspiracy theory, by miscasting the intentions of 15-minute cities, has worrying long term implications for climate action, King said.
Governments, both local and national, may find it very hard to implement any policies that even touch on the climate crisis, she warned. “They are the most vulnerable at the moment to this enormous surge of hostility and public mobilization.”
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 83:49:02 |
Calls: | 6,696 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,229 |
Messages: | 5,347,957 |