I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my
current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
In article <slrns2fpf...@home.stevens-bradfield.com>,
Julian Bradfield <j...@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my >current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
I don't think that it's that systematic. Rims and tyres vary slightly,
not least because the ISO value does not specify the outer rim size,
and some combinations do not match well. And there are also wheel
size and bead type effects, so its not a simple matter of exactly
what the diameters are.
I'm going to say it again, it's all technique. I mean, if one bead will
go on, the other will. It comes down to keeping the bead in the well of
the rim while buggering about on the other side of the wheel. I
consider zip ties disposable items for this process, Sheldon used old
fashion toe straps.
I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my
current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
In article <slrns2fpfa.b6t.jcb@home.stevens-bradfield.com>,
Julian Bradfield <jcb@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my
current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
I don't think that it's that systematic. Rims and tyres vary slightly,
not least because the ISO value does not specify the outer rim size,
and some combinations do not match well. And there are also wheel
size and bead type effects, so its not a simple matter of exactly
what the diameters are.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
Overinflating and letting
the tyre down again is often the best approach. But it's pretty
annoying doing this with a minipump.
Nick Maclaren <nmm@wheeler.UUCP> wrote:
In article <slrns2fpfa.b6t.jcb@home.stevens-bradfield.com>,Some of the early tubeless tires where very tight! Much better now, though
Julian Bradfield <jcb@inf.ed.ac.uk> wrote:
I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my
current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
I don't think that it's that systematic. Rims and tyres vary slightly,
not least because the ISO value does not specify the outer rim size,
and some combinations do not match well. And there are also wheel
size and bead type effects, so its not a simple matter of exactly
what the diameters are.
Regards,
Nick Maclaren.
I haven’t yet moved to tubeless as well for me tunes do just work.
I was idly pondering: what determines this? I have memories of wheels
and tyres where getting the tyre off was a 5-minute exercise of
holding down three tyre levers and working them round, while putting
them back on was another major effort, sometimes beyond the strength
of my thumbs and requiring serious force with a lever. However, on my
current bike, the tyres are so loose-fitting that not only is putting
them back on trivial, I can even take them off just with my hands.
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
Is this a change in tyre design, or just a variation between different
tyre designs?
Some of the early tubeless tires where very tight! Much better now,
though I haven’t yet moved to tubeless as well for me tunes do just
work.
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 296 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 62:45:47 |
Calls: | 6,654 |
Files: | 12,200 |
Messages: | 5,331,627 |