A real legal question.
Does the following article, assuming it reflects a true picture really
be so?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html
Our legal system works on the premise of negligence so if Pfizer have completed their studies as per their reports, why is this required.
Wouldn't this also protect Pfizer against any shenanigans such as (hypothetical) fraudulent reports etc?
On 10/12/2020 16:57:04, Fredxx wrote:
A real legal question.
Does the following article, assuming it reflects a true picture really
be so?
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/health/coronavirus-pfizer-vaccine-legal-indemnity-safety-ministers-b1765124.html
Our legal system works on the premise of negligence so if Pfizer have
completed their studies as per their reports, why is this required.
Wouldn't this also protect Pfizer against any shenanigans such as
(hypothetical) fraudulent reports etc?
Sorry, wrong group
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 296 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 80:30:31 |
| Calls: | 6,658 |
| Calls today: | 4 |
| Files: | 12,203 |
| Messages: | 5,333,186 |
| Posted today: | 1 |