• Re: Drum Brakes rather than Disc Brakes

    From Ian Jackson@21:1/5 to mail.invalid456@mail.invalid on Tue Nov 23 10:06:13 2021
    In message <snibh1$t1q$1@dont-email.me>, john west <mail.invalid456@mail.invalid> writes

    Looking at most smaller cars i can see the rear brakes are Drum type
    while at the front of the car are Disk type.
    I cannot think Drums are that much cheaper to manufacture than Disc
    type and i thought are less effective than Disc type. So why do
    manufacturers choose to make the rear brakes Drums rather than Discs ?

    Front disc, rear drum, became pretty standard in the 1960s. This is
    because discs provide better braking, and it's the front where most
    braking occurs.

    When braking hard, the drums heat up. Their diameter increases and
    releases the grip of the shoes. As a result, the braking action tends to
    fade. With discs it's the opposite. When discs heat up, their width
    expands, and they push harder against the pads - thus maintaining the
    braking action.

    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums are
    hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the
    shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they
    cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear
    (presumably because of their better braking action).
    --
    Ian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From john west@21:1/5 to All on Tue Nov 23 09:16:19 2021
    Looking at most smaller cars i can see the rear brakes are Drum type
    while at the front of the car are Disk type.
    I cannot think Drums are that much cheaper to manufacture than Disc type
    and i thought are less effective than Disc type. So why do manufacturers
    choose to make the rear brakes Drums rather than Discs ?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Plowman (News)@21:1/5 to john west on Tue Nov 23 11:02:39 2021
    In article <snibh1$t1q$1@dont-email.me>,
    john west <mail.invalid456@mail.invalid> wrote:

    Looking at most smaller cars i can see the rear brakes are Drum type
    while at the front of the car are Disk type.
    I cannot think Drums are that much cheaper to manufacture than Disc type
    and i thought are less effective than Disc type. So why do manufacturers choose to make the rear brakes Drums rather than Discs ?

    Many cars have a drum handbrake inside the rear disc.

    Seems to be cheaper/better to use a drum for the handbrake.

    But not impossible to make a handbrake that works on the disc.

    It may be to do with making a secure parking brake. With a disc, as it
    cools, the grip of a handbrake reduces. With a drum, it increases. Helps prevent law suits in some countries.

    --
    *What happens if you get scared half to death twice? *

    Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
    To e-mail, change noise into sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Abandoned_Trolley@21:1/5 to Ian Jackson on Mon Dec 13 16:23:03 2021
    On 23/11/2021 10:06, Ian Jackson wrote:


    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums are
    hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the
    shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they
    cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear (presumably because of their better braking action).


    Its a nice theory, but in reality the considerable length of the
    handbrake cable will most likely have an almost constant tension to
    compensate for it ?


    --
    random signature text inserted here

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian@21:1/5 to john west on Tue Dec 14 00:14:36 2021
    john west <mail.invalid456@mail.invalid> wrote:

    Looking at most smaller cars i can see the rear brakes are Drum type
    while at the front of the car are Disk type.
    I cannot think Drums are that much cheaper to manufacture than Disc type
    and i thought are less effective than Disc type. So why do manufacturers choose to make the rear brakes Drums rather than Discs ?


    It isn’t just small cars / vehicles. Our motorhome, plated at 3.65T, has
    drum brakes on the rear and disks on the front. The chassis can be up
    plated to at least 4T without changes to the brakes.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Plowman (News)@21:1/5 to fred@fred-smith.co.uk on Tue Dec 14 15:14:10 2021
    In article <sp7s18$983$1@dont-email.me>,
    Abandoned_Trolley <fred@fred-smith.co.uk> wrote:
    On 23/11/2021 10:06, Ian Jackson wrote:


    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums are hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear (presumably because of their better braking action).


    Its a nice theory, but in reality the considerable length of the
    handbrake cable will most likely have an almost constant tension to compensate for it ?

    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum
    handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it
    actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.

    --
    *You can't teach an old mouse new clicks *

    Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
    To e-mail, change noise into sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Abandoned_Trolley@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 14 15:33:45 2021

    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.



    My 1966 Mark 2 Jaguar, along with all E types, S type / 420 / Mark 10
    etc and all XJ saloons up to the mid 80s were fitted with a seperate
    mechanical handbrake caliper and pads with its own self adjusting mechanism.

    I seem to recall something similar on a 1967 Rover 2000 as well ? - it certainly had inboard rear discs which were a pain to maintain

    Back in the days when brake pads were less abrasive than they are now
    (they were allowed to use asbestos), the discs would often last the life
    of the car which led to another problem - if the handbrake was never
    used when the vehicle was in motion then the vanishingly small amout of
    wear on the pads would mean that the self adjust mechanism would seize
    up before you ever got to the first tooth on the ratchet :-\


    --
    random signature text inserted here

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 14 16:50:23 2021
    On 14/12/2021 15:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
    In article <sp7s18$983$1@dont-email.me>,
    Abandoned_Trolley <fred@fred-smith.co.uk> wrote:
    On 23/11/2021 10:06, Ian Jackson wrote:


    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also
    considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums are >>> hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the
    shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they
    cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear
    (presumably because of their better braking action).


    Its a nice theory, but in reality the considerable length of the
    handbrake cable will most likely have an almost constant tension to
    compensate for it ?

    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.

    Conversely there is little braking when going backwards down a steep
    hill, especially without the engine running.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Mills@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Tue Dec 14 18:35:45 2021
    On 14/12/2021 16:50, Fredxx wrote:
    On 14/12/2021 15:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
    In article <sp7s18$983$1@dont-email.me>,
        Abandoned_Trolley <fred@fred-smith.co.uk> wrote:
    On 23/11/2021 10:06, Ian Jackson wrote:


    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also >>>> considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums
    are
    hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the
    shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they >>>> cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear
    (presumably because of their better braking action).


    Its a nice theory, but in reality the considerable length of the
    handbrake cable will most likely have an almost constant tension to
    compensate for it ?

    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum
    handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German
    cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it
    actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.

    Conversely there is little braking when going backwards down a steep
    hill, especially without the engine running.


    For front drums, maybe - with two leading shoes, which become trailing
    shoes in reverse.

    But rear drums usually have one leading and one trailing shoe - so
    they're equally effective in both directions.

    When I was young, my father owned a 1939 Sunbeam Talbot 12 (I think) -
    which had a complex Bendix braking system. The brakes on all the wheels
    were rod operated from a central lateral tube which was rotated both by
    the brake pedal and the hand brake. This meant that the handbrake worked
    on all four wheels - which was good until it all froze up in the winter. However, there was no side to side or front to rear compensation, so
    adjusting them was a nightmare. Although each wheel had one leading and
    one trailing shoe, there was a complex system of levers which
    transferred force from one shoe to the other - making them act like two
    leading shoes. This wasn't too bad when going forwards but was
    absolutely lethal when you tried to stop when going backwards!
    --
    Cheers,
    Roger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Mills@21:1/5 to All on Tue Dec 14 18:45:25 2021
    On 14/12/2021 15:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:


    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?


    No, it's not just German cars. Both my Volvo V70s (2 different vintages)
    had this system - as does my Hyundai Tucson. You get the best of both
    worlds with this system.

    I'm surprised that no-one has mentioned transmission brakes. Landrovers
    used to a parking brake which consisted of an in-line drum brake on the propshaft. If you applied this on a slope, the vehicle would move quite
    a few inches while it wound up the transmission. If you applied it while
    in motion, the vehicle would rock violently backwards and forwards.
    --
    Cheers,
    Roger

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Plowman (News)@21:1/5 to fred@fred-smith.co.uk on Wed Dec 15 14:48:11 2021
    In article <spadgq$n0u$1@dont-email.me>,
    Abandoned_Trolley <fred@fred-smith.co.uk> wrote:


    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.



    My 1966 Mark 2 Jaguar, along with all E types, S type / 420 / Mark 10
    etc and all XJ saloons up to the mid 80s were fitted with a seperate mechanical handbrake caliper and pads with its own self adjusting
    mechanism.

    Yes. Which didn't work as well as the current idea of a drum within the
    rear disc.

    I seem to recall something similar on a 1967 Rover 2000 as well ? - it certainly had inboard rear discs which were a pain to maintain

    Early P6 were the same Dunlop brakes as the Jags. Later used Girling swing caliper rears, and the inbuilt handbrake mechanism extremely complex -
    although it did work well when in good nick.



    Back in the days when brake pads were less abrasive than they are now
    (they were allowed to use asbestos), the discs would often last the life
    of the car which led to another problem - if the handbrake was never
    used when the vehicle was in motion then the vanishingly small amout of
    wear on the pads would mean that the self adjust mechanism would seize
    up before you ever got to the first tooth on the ratchet :-\

    --
    *If all is not lost, where the hell is it?

    Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
    To e-mail, change noise into sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Plowman (News)@21:1/5 to Fredxx on Wed Dec 15 14:52:13 2021
    In article <spai0g$p9k$1@dont-email.me>,
    Fredxx <fredxx@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.

    Conversely there is little braking when going backwards down a steep
    hill, especially without the engine running.

    Eh? No servo with any handbrake I've ever seen. And a drum handbrake is
    one leading, one trailing shoe. So you get the same self servo action
    forwards or backwards.

    You're likely thinking of twin leading shoe front brakes which require
    less effort going forwards than backwards.

    --
    *Don't use no double negatives *

    Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
    To e-mail, change noise into sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Dave Plowman (News)@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Wed Dec 15 14:55:00 2021
    In article <j1s6eiFb31eU1@mid.individual.net>,
    Roger Mills <mills37.fslife@gmail.com> wrote:
    For front drums, maybe - with two leading shoes, which become trailing
    shoes in reverse.

    But rear drums usually have one leading and one trailing shoe - so
    they're equally effective in both directions.

    Yup. I had an old Bentley which had twin trailing shoes to the front
    brakes. With a very powerful servo. Seems training shoes are less prone to
    fade in use.

    --
    *DON'T SWEAT THE PETTY THINGS AND DON'T PET THE SWEATY THINGS.

    Dave Plowman dave@davenoise.co.uk London SW
    To e-mail, change noise into sound.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From AJH@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Wed Dec 15 22:35:39 2021
    On 14/12/2021 18:45, Roger Mills wrote:
    If you applied this on a slope, the vehicle would move quite a few
    inches while it wound up the transmission.


    ...and if one side was on a wet grassy verge the handbrake didn't work
    at all.

    If you applied it while in
    motion, the vehicle would rock violently backwards and forwards.

    '''and if it was a series LR it would eventually snap the shorter rear
    half shaft.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Hill@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 16 07:54:04 2021
    On 14/12/2021 15:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
    In article <sp7s18$983$1@dont-email.me>,
    Abandoned_Trolley <fred@fred-smith.co.uk> wrote:
    On 23/11/2021 10:06, Ian Jackson wrote:


    The rear remained drum because less braking is required. They are also
    considered safer, because if the handbrake is applied when the drums are >>> hot, as the drums cool down they contract and tighten the grip on the
    shoes. Discs do the opposite, and tend to release the handbrake as they
    cool down - but despite this, most cars now have discs on the rear
    (presumably because of their better braking action).


    Its a nice theory, but in reality the considerable length of the
    handbrake cable will most likely have an almost constant tension to
    compensate for it ?

    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars?

    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.


    It isn't all German cars. My bothers Audi A3 has a handbrake on the rear caliper. Electric handbrake.

    So it may only be M-B, BMW and Porsche.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Peter Hill@21:1/5 to Roger Mills on Thu Dec 16 07:55:27 2021
    On 14/12/2021 18:45, Roger Mills wrote:
    On 14/12/2021 15:14, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:


    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum
    handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German
    cars?


    No, it's not just German cars. Both my Volvo V70s (2 different vintages)
    had this system - as does my Hyundai Tucson. You get the best of both
    worlds with this system.


    Nissan used to have drum/discs on RWD models before Renault.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Fredxx@21:1/5 to All on Thu Dec 16 11:57:07 2021
    On 15/12/2021 14:52, Dave Plowman (News) wrote:
    In article <spai0g$p9k$1@dont-email.me>,
    Fredxx <fredxx@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    Trying to think how many cars have a true disc handrake. Isn't a drum
    handrake inside the rear disc the most common? Or is that just German cars? >>>
    But a drum also has a self servo action. If the car tries to move, it
    actually increases the braking effort. Not so with discs.

    Conversely there is little braking when going backwards down a steep
    hill, especially without the engine running.

    Eh? No servo with any handbrake I've ever seen.

    Not sure what the current MOT standards are, but I recall a while ago a handbrake need only be 16% efficient for a car with a split hydraulic
    system. That would barely hold on a 1 in 6 hill, and if moving not slow
    it down.

    And a drum handbrake is
    one leading, one trailing shoe. So you get the same self servo action forwards or backwards.

    You're likely thinking of twin leading shoe front brakes which require
    less effort going forwards than backwards.

    Quite, where all the breaking is. The rears are unlikely to provide more
    than 25% of the overall footbrake braking force, sometimes much less.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)