Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekerstotly
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly than they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it will be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that good a result for them.
On 5 May 2023 at 14:10:46 BST, "Ottavio Caruso" <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites.
I dare say you may have missed an element of sarcasm here.
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites.
On 05/05/2023 15:48, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly than
they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it will >> be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that
good
a result for them.
The only people who vote in local elections are activists,
twitterati, nutters, and virtually no-one under 35.
What was the turnout ?. (much) Less than 40% ?
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly than they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it will be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that good a result for them.
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites.
On 5 May 2023 at 16:04:17 BST, "Roger Hayter" <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
On 5 May 2023 at 14:10:46 BST, "Ottavio Caruso"
<ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites.
I dare say you may have missed an element of sarcasm here.
And it is just a possiblity that the original "Radio Man" post was a parody rather than an expression of opinion.
On 5 May 2023 at 16:04:17 BST, "Roger Hayter" <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
On 5 May 2023 at 14:10:46 BST, "Ottavio Caruso"
<ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites.
I dare say you may have missed an element of sarcasm here.
And it is just a possiblity that the original "Radio Man" post was a parody >rather than an expression of opinion.
Am 05/05/2023 um 15:05 schrieb Roger Hayter:
On 5 May 2023 at 16:04:17 BST, "Roger Hayter" <roger@hayter.org> wrote:
On 5 May 2023 at 14:10:46 BST, "Ottavio Caruso"
<ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:I dare say you may have missed an element of sarcasm here.
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web sites. >>>
And it is just a possiblity that the original "Radio Man" post was a parody >> rather than an expression of opinion.
So what have I missed? I know, I'm a bloody foreigner but I can use
Googel Trans-Layter while cooking my beans.
On 05/05/2023 15:48, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly than
they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it will >> be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that good >> a result for them.
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls. So, it doesn't look to be a question of whether Labour will win
the next general election but by how much.
On 5 May 2023 at 16:30:59 BST, "Ottavio Caruso" <ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 15:05 schrieb Roger Hayter:
On 5 May 2023 at 16:04:17 BST, "Roger Hayter" <roger@hayter.org>
wrote:
On 5 May 2023 at 14:10:46 BST, "Ottavio Caruso"
<ottavio2006-usenet2012@yahoo.com> wrote:
Am 05/05/2023 um 12:33 schrieb Jethro_uk:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 +0000, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers,
asylum seekers over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
How dare you object to the WILL OF THE PEOPLE.
Dare I ask some context? Not everybody is on right wing dark web
sites.
I dare say you may have missed an element of sarcasm here.
And it is just a possiblity that the original "Radio Man" post was
a parody rather than an expression of opinion.
So what have I missed? I know, I'm a bloody foreigner but I can use
Googel Trans-Layter while cooking my beans.
The Will of the People was a sarcastic comment that what's good for
the goose is good for the gander - bigoted old brexiteers have to
accept a Labour win in the election the same way as they kept saying
Brexit was the "WotP". The original Radioman was Reay, a noted crypto-fascist. But this, different, Radio Man was parodying his
views about the Labour Party. You don't need to be a native English
speaker, but having read ukra for a quarter of a century helps!
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 15:48, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly than >>> they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it will >>> be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that good
a result for them.
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls. So, it doesn't look to be a question of whether Labour will win
the next general election but by how much.
You might be interested in the analysis provided by Prof John Curtis of Strathclyde University on the BBC R4 PM programme today (starting about 17:06:20) in which he says that if these results were translated to a
General Election, Labour would be 20 seats short of a majority (at
17:08:50).
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls.
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in
the polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever
they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will
win.
On 05/05/2023 15:48, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 09:36, Radio Man wrote:Going by the results to hand, the Conservatives have done less badly
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum
seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
You probably won't like the results of the next General Election then.
than
they feared, and Labour hasn’t done as well as expected. Although it
will
be dressed up as a victory for the latter party, it really isn’t that
good
a result for them.
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls.
So, it doesn't look to be a question of whether Labour will win the next general election but by how much.
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in
the polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever
they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they
will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have
not made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a
past-the-mid-term vote on this scale, Labour is not doing well.
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the
polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on this scale, Labour is not doing well.
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekersBit Strange.... dtd you not claim to live in Derbyshire?
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
On 05/05/2023 23:26, Brian wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they >>>>>> actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>>>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not >>>> made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
Where do you suggest bookies get their ‘special information’ from to base
their calculations from?
I’ve no particular faith in polls, even less in pundits / political
‘experts’ etc, which is where the predictions the Media publish come from
but what makes you think bookies have a special source?
I didn't claim they do. However, it is their business to know how to calculate odds and they do so dispassionately. They can get it wrong,
but wouldn't stay in business if they made a habit of it.
Labour didn’t so much win the seats yesterday as the faux conservatives
lost them - it wasn’t a vote of confidence in Labour - they just aren’t >> Sunak who is destroying the economy.
Had Reform got their act together, the results would have been very
different.
They have been given slightly better odds of winning than the LibDems
100/1 v 120/1
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they >>>>> actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not >>> made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on >>> this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
Where do you suggest bookies get their ‘special information’ from to base their calculations from?
I’ve no particular faith in polls, even less in pundits / political ‘experts’ etc, which is where the predictions the Media publish come from
but what makes you think bookies have a special source?
Labour didn’t so much win the seats yesterday as the faux conservatives lost them - it wasn’t a vote of confidence in Labour - they just aren’t Sunak who is destroying the economy.
Had Reform got their act together, the results would have been very different.
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on >> this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term
vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 GMT, Radio Man <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>over services, and poofs over potholes.Bit Strange.... dtd you not claim to live in Derbyshire?
We're doomed.
On Fri, 05 May 2023 23:10:13 +0100, Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 GMT, Radio Man <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>
wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>over services, and poofs over potholes.Bit Strange.... dtd you not claim to live in Derbyshire?
We're doomed.
You silly cunt.
On Fri, 05 May 2023 22:33:44 GMT, Radio Man
<no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 23:10:13 +0100, Rambo wrote:
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 GMT, Radio Man <no.spam@thank.you.invalid>
wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers >>>> over services, and poofs over potholes.Bit Strange.... dtd you not claim to live in Derbyshire?
We're doomed.
You silly cunt.
You are Brian Reay M3OSN, AICMFP.
On 05/05/2023 23:26, Brian wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they >>>>>> actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>>>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not >>>> made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
Where do you suggest bookies get their ‘special information’ from to base
their calculations from?
I’ve no particular faith in polls, even less in pundits / political
‘experts’ etc, which is where the predictions the Media publish come from
but what makes you think bookies have a special source?
I didn't claim they do. However, it is their business to know how to calculate odds and they do so dispassionately. They can get it wrong,
but wouldn't stay in business if they made a habit of it.
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on >> this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
On Sat, 06 May 2023 06:48:58 +1000, Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellremovethis.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives
in the polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever
they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
have not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a
past-the-mid-term vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a
Conservative win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that
the bookies don't plan to make a loss.
But the bookies have fucked up spectacularly before and
the odds change radically as election day approaches.
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they >>>>> actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not >>> made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on >>> this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
The analysis this morning on BBC R4 Today programme was that if Labour want to form the next government, they have (quote) ‘an absolute mountain to climb’ (unquote).
And that’s from the pro-socialist BBC.
On Sat, 06 May 2023 08:57:03 +1000
"Rod Speed" <rod.speed.aaa@gmail.com> wrote:
On Sat, 06 May 2023 06:48:58 +1000, Colin Bignell
<cpb@bignellremovethis.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives
in the polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever
they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
have not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a
past-the-mid-term vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a
Conservative win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that
the bookies don't plan to make a loss.
But the bookies have fucked up spectacularly before and
the odds change radically as election day approaches.
"A week is a long time in politics."
On Fri, 05 May 2023 08:36:41 GMT, Radio Man <no.spam@thank.you.invalid> wrote:
Gone to the party that prioritises wokeism over workers, asylum seekers
over services, and poofs over potholes.
We're doomed.
Dear gutless coward, we don't give a fuck.
--
Sous-vide is little more than boil-in-the-bag with a physics
degree. - Bob Granleese, Guardian 3 May 2019
Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in the >>>>>>> polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever they >>>>>> actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a question >>>>> of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have not >>>> made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
The analysis this morning on BBC R4 Today programme was that if Labour want >> to form the next government, they have (quote) ‘an absolute mountain to
climb’ (unquote).
And that’s from the pro-socialist BBC.
While the faux conservatives have variously failed to prevent the insidious ‘growth’ of things like drag artists going into schools, address extremism,
etc the Left actively support it. I fully support teaching tolerance - be
it for race, religion, gender, orientation …. but there is a difference between teaching tolerance and promoting - let alone convincing impressionable youngsters there is a magical solution to their normal problems by changing gender.
Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives
in the polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying
whatever they actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they
will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour
have not made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a
past-the-mid-term vote on this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a
Conservative win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that
the bookies don't plan to make a loss.
The analysis this morning on BBC R4 Today programme was that if
Labour want to form the next government, they have (quote) ‘an
absolute mountain to climb’ (unquote).
And that’s from the pro-socialist BBC.
While the faux conservatives have variously failed to prevent the
insidious ‘growth’ of things like drag artists going into schools, address extremism, etc the Left actively support it. I fully support
teaching tolerance - be it for race, religion, gender, orientation ….
but there is a difference between teaching tolerance and promoting -
let alone convincing impressionable youngsters there is a magical
solution to their normal problems by changing gender.
That is before we even consider the economy. Boris & Sunak really
screwed the economy - not to mention sabotaging BREXIT ( remember,
Boris was a Remainer, he changed sides when he realised the way the
vote would go). But, Labour always screw up. They closed more coal
mines, cut more railways, more school milk, tax burden is always
higher. Labour introduced tuition fees, wrecked the University
system, ……..George Brown raided pensions.
It is the drift to the left which has wreck the conservatives, it has
been down hill since the Great Mrs Thatcher was betrayed.
The results on Thursday show people wanted to send Sunak a message,
not that they like Labour.
Spike <Aero.Spike@mail.invalid> wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 19:46, Spike wrote:
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
On 05/05/2023 18:17, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Fri, 5 May 2023 15:58:16 +0100
Colin Bignell <cpb@bignellREMOVETHIS.me.uk> wrote:
However, Labour is around 15 points ahead of the Conservatives in >>>>>>> the
polls.
And you believe these polls why? Especially in applying whatever
they
actually have measured to a putative GE result.
Because the margin of error is large enough for it only to be a
question
of how much Labour is going to win by, not whether they will win.
A Labour win at the next GE seems unlikely at present, as Labour have
not
made a sufficient advance to indicate that. For a past-the-mid-term
vote on
this scale, Labour is not doing well.
The bookies are offering 1/4 for a Labour win, 18/5 for a Conservative
win. If you don't trust the polls, you can trust that the bookies don't
plan to make a loss.
The analysis this morning on BBC R4 Today programme was that if Labour
want
to form the next government, they have (quote) ‘an absolute mountain to
climb’ (unquote).
And that’s from the pro-socialist BBC.
While the faux conservatives have variously failed to prevent the
insidious
‘growth’ of things like drag artists going into schools, address extremism,
etc the Left actively support it. I fully support teaching tolerance - be
it for race, religion, gender, orientation …. but there is a difference between teaching tolerance and promoting - let alone convincing impressionable youngsters there is a magical solution to their normal problems by changing gender.
That is before we even consider the economy. Boris & Sunak really screwed
the economy -
not to mention sabotaging BREXIT ( remember, Boris was a
Remainer, he changed sides when he realised the way the vote would go).
But, Labour always screw up. They closed more coal mines, cut more
railways, more school milk, tax burden is always higher. Labour
introduced
tuition fees, wrecked the University system, ……..George Brown raided pensions.
It is the drift to the left which has wreck the conservatives, it has
been
down hill since the Great Mrs Thatcher was betrayed.
The results on Thursday show people wanted to send Sunak a message,
not
that they like Labour.
| Sysop: | Keyop |
|---|---|
| Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
| Users: | 300 |
| Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
| Uptime: | 92:17:35 |
| Calls: | 6,697 |
| Calls today: | 2 |
| Files: | 12,232 |
| Messages: | 5,348,666 |