Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
via the Group!
Clearly, no criticism whatsoever will
be tolerated. No-one must read anything at all that
the little tin god doesn't like!
You couldn't make this up. Really!
So much for freedom of speech in amateur radio. Time
we told these petty little Hitlers to sod off, once
and for all.
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
via the Group! Clearly, no criticism whatsoever will
be tolerated. No-one must read anything at all that
the little tin god doesn't like!
You couldn't make this up. Really!
So much for freedom of speech in amateur radio. Time
we told these petty little Hitlers to sod off, once
and for all.
On 1 Sep 2022 at 09:01:21 BST, "Radio Nut" <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
via the Group!
It doesn't *recommend* a reply to the group, so as not to spam the group with job applications. OTOH it does nothing to stop you replying via the group if you have the slightest idea what you are doing.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Yes, it requires:
- Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.
So that's me out at the first hurdle.
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Yes, it requires:
- Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.
So that's me out at the first hurdle.
On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Yes, it requires:
- Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.
So that's me out at the first hurdle.
I don't think anyone here would qualify.
"A verifiable record of good conduct on the newsgroups going back at
least 10 minutes".
On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:
Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.
Yes, it requires:
- Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.
So that's me out at the first hurdle.
I don't think anyone here would qualify.
"A verifiable record of good conduct on the newsgroups going back atone mans good conduct is ...
least 10 minutes".
Brian
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 299 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 84:25:15 |
Calls: | 6,696 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,229 |
Messages: | 5,348,003 |