• Censors wanted

    From Radio Nut@21:1/5 to All on Thu Sep 1 09:01:21 2022
    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
    via the Group! Clearly, no criticism whatsoever will
    be tolerated. No-one must read anything at all that
    the little tin god doesn't like!

    You couldn't make this up. Really!

    So much for freedom of speech in amateur radio. Time
    we told these petty little Hitlers to sod off, once
    and for all.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Roger Hayter@21:1/5 to Radio Nut on Thu Sep 1 09:50:56 2022
    On 1 Sep 2022 at 09:01:21 BST, "Radio Nut" <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:


    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
    via the Group!

    It doesn't *recommend* a reply to the group, so as not to spam the group with job applications. OTOH it does nothing to stop you replying via the group if you have the slightest idea what you are doing.




    Clearly, no criticism whatsoever will
    be tolerated. No-one must read anything at all that
    the little tin god doesn't like!

    You couldn't make this up. Really!

    So much for freedom of speech in amateur radio. Time
    we told these petty little Hitlers to sod off, once
    and for all.


    --
    Roger Hayter

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to Radio Nut on Thu Sep 1 13:09:51 2022
    On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
    Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Yes, it requires:

    - Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.

    So that's me out at the first hurdle.

    --

    Brian Morrison

    "I am not young enough to know everything"
    Oscar Wilde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Stewart ...@21:1/5 to Radio Nut on Thu Sep 1 12:53:34 2022
    On 01/09/2022 09:01, Radio Nut wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
    via the Group!  Clearly, no criticism whatsoever will
    be tolerated. No-one must read anything at all that
    the little tin god doesn't like!

    You couldn't make this up. Really!

    So much for freedom of speech in amateur radio. Time
    we told these petty little Hitlers to sod off, once
    and for all.



    spot on OM

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Stewart ...@21:1/5 to Roger Hayter on Thu Sep 1 12:54:53 2022
    On 01/09/2022 10:50, Roger Hayter wrote:
    On 1 Sep 2022 at 09:01:21 BST, "Radio Nut" <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:


    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Interesting that it doesn't allow any sort of reply
    via the Group!

    It doesn't *recommend* a reply to the group, so as not to spam the group with job applications. OTOH it does nothing to stop you replying via the group if you have the slightest idea what you are doing.



    which I don't ....

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Stewart ...@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Thu Sep 1 13:27:27 2022
    On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
    Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Yes, it requires:

    - Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.

    So that's me out at the first hurdle.


    me too I also

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Howie@21:1/5 to Brian Morrison on Fri Sep 2 15:52:03 2022
    On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
    Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Yes, it requires:

    - Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.

    So that's me out at the first hurdle.


    I don't think anyone here would qualify.


    "A verifiable record of good conduct on the newsgroups going back at
    least 10 minutes".

    Brian
    --
    Brian

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Brian Morrison@21:1/5 to Brian Howie on Fri Sep 2 16:56:36 2022
    On Fri, 2 Sep 2022 15:52:03 +0100
    Brian Howie <nospam@b-howie.co.uk> wrote:

    On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
    Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Yes, it requires:

    - Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.

    So that's me out at the first hurdle.


    I don't think anyone here would qualify.


    "A verifiable record of good conduct on the newsgroups going back at
    least 10 minutes".

    I should not want that sort of verifiable record at all.

    --

    Brian Morrison

    "I am not young enough to know everything"
    Oscar Wilde

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)
  • From Jim Stewart ...@21:1/5 to Brian Howie on Sun Sep 4 11:15:28 2022
    On 02/09/2022 15:52, Brian Howie wrote:
    On 01/09/2022 13:09, Brian Morrison wrote:
    On Thu, 1 Sep 2022 09:01:21 +0100
    Radio Nut <no.spam@thank.you.com> wrote:

    Gawd's sake. Yet another desperate plea for censors.

    Yes, it requires:

    - Support of moderated newsgroups in principle.

    So that's me out at the first hurdle.


    I don't think anyone here would qualify.


    "A verifiable record of good conduct on the newsgroups going back at
       least 10 minutes".

    Brian
    one mans good conduct is ...

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)