Then came the observation by Twitter-based, constructive critic of the
RSGB, Ham Radio Gossip (@HamGoss), that a head-and-shoulders photograph
of all applicants is required by the society. This is not entirely
unheard of, but it is a little troubling.
Extract from RSGB application form (page 4), accessed 31/01/2021, 10:59UT.
@HamGoss, quite rightly, mocks the requirement with the following tweet:
For one thing, demanding a photo with an application gives the
appearance, even if it isn't true, that the RSGB only wants the 'right
kind' of people. Given the severe age, ethnicity and gender bias that is obvious amongst the current Board members, it's very disheartening to
see that they fall for this avoidable trap.
Secondly, demanding a photo has the clear and obvious risk of allowing
the RSGB selectors to be, consciously or otherwise, biased in their choices. That is why equal opportunities forms - where they are
actually provided to applicants - are never disclosed to those involved
in the selection process. A photo of someone reveals a multitide of information that, likewise, ought not to be revealed in the selection process.
Personal appearance is entirely irrelevant to a position at the RSGB, so
why demand a photo?
First, they allow an organisation, if operated with an open mind and the right motivation, to evaluate how well its workforce (or volunteers) represent society at large
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 93:28:15 |
Calls: | 6,697 |
Calls today: | 2 |
Files: | 12,232 |
Messages: | 5,348,914 |