I am a shareholder in a building consisting of several flats. Our block >management company is really slow to act to repair ongoing issues,
including urgent matters like roof leaks and overflowing gutters causing >damp.
Google Reviews of the company suggest that this is a common matter.
It has reached the point where tenants and the estate agents through which >tenants are found for landlords in the building are doing the repairs >independently. A tenant has left, citing damp & cracks on the wall that
have been unrepaired for six months now, despite the block management
company being asked multiple times (from the owner, tenants and estate
agent that introduced the first two) to get repairs done.
The block management company refuses to pay for repairs that should be
shared by all landlords (matters affecting the entire building) if they do >not pre-authorise the works and use their own builders.
What is the legal position on this? Replacing the block management company
is a medium term solution that will require an AGM and sufficient >shareholders to agree.
Can a shareholder/landlord undertake urgent repairs themselves and if >necessary sue the block management company to recover the cost of repairs?
What about deducting the cost of repairs from the service charge to the
block management company?
In short whoever appointed the management company has the responsibility
of ensuring it performs properly or booting it out. In my experience
there are no good management companies and landlords who manage
themselves are even worse.
As a medium term solution, can you recommend (ahem) a good management
company in London?
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 41:23:33 |
Calls: | 6,708 |
Calls today: | 1 |
Files: | 12,243 |
Messages: | 5,353,838 |