It is widely discussed and summarised in the Press, but for those who want
to see the actual report and read it, this is a link.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65e05420cf7eb1b0e5f57eff/E02740018_Angiolini_Inquiry_HC_530_Accessible.pdf
What seems (to me) to be missing is any criticism of our idiotic Covid >regulations and guidance, which gave Sarah Everard the impression that she >might have been breaking the law by walking home by herself and should >therefore obey the homicidal police officer, submit to being arrested and
get into his car.
On 29/02/2024 in message <l4bgsmFbqu0U3@mid.individual.net> The Todal wrote:
It is widely discussed and summarised in the Press, but for those who want >> to see the actual report and read it, this is a link.
https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/65e05420cf7eb1b0e5f57eff/E02740018_Angiolini_Inquiry_HC_530_Accessible.pdf
What seems (to me) to be missing is any criticism of our idiotic Covid
regulations and guidance, which gave Sarah Everard the impression that she >> might have been breaking the law by walking home by herself and should
therefore obey the homicidal police officer, submit to being arrested and
get into his car.
Every person applying to become a police officer should have "an person" interview. Were police officers really recruited without being interviewed?
Plus, while the COVID regs were idiotic, again I suspect even without
them, some other pretext would have been used. ( False drug
accusation, false claim of some ‘behaviour’ - I’m avoiding suggest
the victim was remotely at fault.)
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 300 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 56:32:42 |
Calls: | 6,712 |
Files: | 12,243 |
Messages: | 5,355,476 |