XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek
XPost: de.soc.weltanschauung.islam
24 hours has now elapsed since the complaint was lodged and we still await
any outcome to their administrative process…
— FACEBOOK OVERSIGHT BOARD DETERMINING WHETHER IT IS ACCEPTABLE RETORT TO VERBAL SLAPPING OF HEADS OF STATE BY THEN CALLING AN USER IDENTITY WITH A NUMBER APPELLATION A SOCK-PUPPET
A sock-puppet is typically an online identity, usually created by a person
or group in order to promote their own opinions or views.
The question is whether a person engaging in verbal slapping of elected individuals / heads of state on social media in reflecting the CAUSAE
COMMUNI nature of their profile is by such number attribution then
equivalently a “sock puppet”.
That the phrase: “Says the sock puppet… #31”
Cannot reasonably be considered reprehensible and in breach of Facebook Community Standards then requiring resolution by their independent
“Oversight Board.”
How did Facebook get the decision wrong?
The reference to “sock puppet” is consistent with the inclusion of #31 numbered reference in the person’s Facebook profile to which I was replying as reflecting the CAUSAE COMMUNI nature of their profile to then have
expressed a “muppet” [pejorative] to the PRIME MINISTER which ought to be in breach of community standards.
STRONGS biblical references:
#31 - H3538: false, lying
#31 - H3519: honour, reputation
#31 - H3027: hand
#31 - H2102: act presumptuously
I made such determination before replying.
Why did you post this content?
In response to a verbal slap made against the prime minister which is no different to the French President macron being physically slapped.
It is appropriate to convey a disapproval.
Does this content involve important social issues?
It was a disrespect made to the Prime Minister whom I had corresponded to
this morning on the subject of “The need by #491 - agency for disjunctive problem resolution.”
Provide a summary for your submission
A response to #31 - CAUSAE COMMUNI profile in kind
Which languages were used in your content?
English
Which countries is this content relevant to?
Australia
What keywords best describe your content?
Freedom of expression
Governments
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<
http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)