XPost: nl.politiek, alt.france, de.soc.weltanschauung.islam
XPost: aus.politics

-- A FOREIGNER AS ONE WHO LIVES IN A PLACE WITHOUT THE RIGHT OF CITIZENSHIP

So here is an example "I do hope that you find some balance in life and
find a happy space"

That is concerned with a place @ 1402 hours which gives matching
categories @298 and @361.

#304 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 1 MAY 2022 as [#40, #3, #6, #200,
#10, #5, #600] /
#298 as [#40, #3, #200, #10, #5, #40] = mâgûwr (H4033): {UMBRA: #249 %
#41 = #3} 1) sojourning place, dwelling-place, sojourning; 1a)
dwelling-place; 1b) sojourning, lifetime;

    #322 - NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 30 APRIL 2022 as [#30, #200, #2, #900] / #298 as [#200, #2, #90, #6] = rêbets (H7258): {UMBRA: #292 % #41 = #5}
1) resting or dwelling place, place of lying down;

YOUTUBE: "Here (2017 Remaster)"

<https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vsxJVdfmDO4>

#361 as [#80, #1, #100, #70, #10, #20, #70, #10] = pároikos (G3941):
{UMBRA: #551 % #41 = #18} 1) dwelling near, neighbouring; 2) in the NT,
a stranger, a foreigner, one who lives in a place without the right of citizenship; 3) metaphor; 3a) without citizenship in God's kingdom; 3b)
one who lives on earth as a stranger, a sojourner on the earth; 3c) of Christians whose home is in heaven;

<http://www.grapple369.com/?time:14.02>

IDEA 361 IN KANT's PROLEGOMENA (1783) JUST HAPPENS TO TALK ABOUT SPACE:
"The sensible world contains only appearances, which are still not
things in themselves, which latter things (noumena) the understanding
must there- fore assume for the very reason that it cognizes the objects
of experience as mere appearances. Both are considered together in our
reason, and the question arises: how does reason proceed in setting
boundaries for the understanding with respect to both fields?
Experience, which contains everything that belongs to the sensible
world, does not set a boundary for itself: from every conditioned it
always arrives merely at another conditioned. That which is to set its
boundary must lie completely outside it, and this is the field of pure intelligible beings. For us, however, as far as concerns the
determination of the nature of these intelligible beings, this is an
empty *SPACE*, and to that extent, if dogmatically determined concepts
[IDEA @361] are intended, we cannot go beyond the field of possible
experience. But since a boundary is itself something positive, which
belongs as much to what is within it as to the *SPACE* lying outside a
given totality, reason therefore, merely by expanding up to this
boundary, partakes of a real, positive cognition, provided that it does
not try to go out beyond the boundary, since there it finds an empty
*SPACE* before it, in which it can indeed think the forms for things,
but no things themselves." [page 111]

Some people can find that speech to time / noumenon resonance capability
of mine very off putting.

Augmenting any psychiatric techniques and interventions if we consider
that the metaphysical IDEAS @298 / @362 are an optimal grounding for any satisfactory existence then we obtain their teleological dispersal
throughout the noumenon and pay particular attention to each temporal
(time of day / day of year) occurrence as concern for the propositional consideration that these might then function as a STEEPING (ie. surround
or fill with a quality or influence) MECHANISM relative to those IDEA
concepts as holism generally.

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:361>

<http://www.grapple369.com/?telos:298>

IMMANUEL KANT PROLEGOMENA (1783) ON IDEA @298: "Empirical judgments,
insofar as they have objective validity, are judgments of experience;
those, however, that are only subjectively valid I call mere judgments
of perception. The latter do not require a pure concept of the
understanding, but only the logical connection of perceptions in a
thinking subject. But the former always demand, in addition to the representations of sensory intuition, special concepts originally
generated in the understanding, which are precisely what make the
judgment of experience objectively valid.

All of our judgments are at first mere judgments of perception; they
hold only for us, i.e., for our subject, and only afterwards do we give
them a new relation, namely to an object, and intend that the judgment
should also be valid at all times for us and for everyone else; for if a judgment agrees with an object, then all judgments of the same object
must also agree with one another, and hence the objective validity of a judgment of experience signifies nothing other than its necessary
universal validity.

But also conversely, if we find cause to deem a judgment necessarily, universally valid (which is never based on the perception, but on the
pure concept of the understanding under which the perception is
subsumed), we must then also deem it objective, i.e., as expressing not
merely a relation of a perception to a subject, but a property of an
object; for there would be no reason why other judgments necessarily
would have to agree with mine, if there were not the unity of the object
– an object to which they all refer, with which they all agree, and, for
that reason, also must all harmonize among themselves." [page 50]

The hypothesis being (ie. we have a logical IDEA pairing occurrence @
1402 HOURS as juxtaposition control) that if an APPRAISAL is made at
each particular IDEA temporal reference that some consideration can then
be given to what character of any MODULATION (ie.

the exertion of a modifying or controlling influence on something; the
process of changing from one form or condition into another

) that can be applied and which then ought have either an AMELIORATING / AUGMENTING effect upon those same category metaphysical elements that
are never consciously (ie. such requires a temporal construct) accessible.

HOLISM: is the theory that parts of a whole are in intimate
interconnection, such that they cannot exist independently of the whole,
or cannot be understood without reference to the whole, which is thus
regarded as greater than the sum of its parts. Holism is often applied
to mental states, language, and ecology. The opposite of atomism.
• Medicine the treating of the whole person, taking into account mental
and social factors, rather than just the symptoms of an illness.

Initial Post: 1 MAY 2022

--
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[S|T]
as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

<http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)

--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)