• =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=80=94=20ABORIGINAL=20RECONCILIATION:?= =?UTF-8?Q?=20CONSC

    From dolf@21:1/5 to All on Sat May 29 10:58:51 2021
    XPost: aus.politics, alt.france, nl.politiek
    XPost: aus.legal

    Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.

    It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon them.

    The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
    apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.

    lēx f (genitive lēgis);

    - a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a
    bill
    - (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
    - (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
    - (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
    - (figuratively) a condition, stipulation

    Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
    knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly.

    THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
    DEVELOPMENT

    In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's
    GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
    Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the
    same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding
    of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
    hypothesis.

    I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.

    ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there
    is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.

    THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
    impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence
    of consciousness.

    In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
    emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
    progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
    and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
    increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading
    to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.

    THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet
    basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’

    Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some
    of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap” between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.

    TERRA INCOGITIA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21
    x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24
    x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5
    - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as
    #369 - discriminating norm:

    #71 #1 #11
    #61 #81 #21
    #51 #41 #31

    We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie. ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of
    a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”) emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>

    The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
    (lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
    words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
    speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).

    [λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]

    [λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}

    ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
    (#35)}

    ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
    (#95)}

    ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
    HSIEN (#105)}

    κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}

    ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
    ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}

    ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
    OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}

    TELOS TOTAL: #245

    MALE: @180 + @182 = #362

    ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362

    MALE: @147 = #147

    DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147

    GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]

    GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
    24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]

    #278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2, #70, #200] /
    #342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
    #2, #70, #200, #600] /
    #288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
    /
    #322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
    #362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled;
    1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn,
    be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
    (fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
    guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
    consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous;
    2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
    stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to
    be grazed over;

    T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:

    UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
    H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;

    THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
    I am not the cause of weeping to any.

    #VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
    #TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
    #POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
    #TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
    #CANON: #168

    ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
    @1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
    @2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
    @3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
    (#111),
    @4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
    I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
    Male: #73; Feme: #168
    } // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE

    “Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day." [Exodus 35:3]

    <https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>

    Initial Post: 28 May 2021


    --


    YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"

    <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>

    SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
    {#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
    harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*

    Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit

    <http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>

    SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]

    Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
    assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
    (translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
    of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.

    It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
    = #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
    64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
    than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
    macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
    canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>

    The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
    a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
    REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."

    That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.

    <http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)

    After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
    expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
    TETRAD/TETRACTYS.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)