Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly.
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding
of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there
is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence
of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some
of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21
x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24
x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5
- stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as
#369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie. ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of
a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”) emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2, #70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn,
be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; 2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to
be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly.
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 - Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 - Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding
of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there
is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence
of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some
of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21
x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24
x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5
- stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as
#369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie. ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon: 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of
a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”) emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling. <https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2, #70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled; 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn,
be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; 2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to
be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
Correction: TERRA INCOGNITA
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst >> they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon
them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a
bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality >> being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of >> nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly. >>
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're >> going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's
GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the
same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding >> of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been
debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there >> is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence
of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading >> to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet
basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying >> principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of
progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 -
AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent
property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special
neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these
relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some
of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21 >> x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24 >> x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5 >> - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as
#369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI >> (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES >> OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50] >>
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2,
#70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / >> #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5] >> /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar
(H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled; >> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn, >> be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; >> 2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to
be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching: >> H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; >> I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath
day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
Just another informal research comment on the metalogic basis for IDEA formation by augmentation / amelioration, that I have an innate ability to write a nine line poem and by the #81 - reverse transcriptase then obtain
the decalogue and specifically the
#THREE (#123 - judgement sensibility),
#FOUR (#164 - principle of materiality),
#FIVE (#205 - principle of persistence)
= 12 x #41 as #492 - voluntary free will
as metalogic prototypes to then do a search against the Hebrew (22) / Greek (24) ipso facto: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 (‘OTH - #1092 days appears to be a relating to a pivot for truth determination as hypothesis)
CAMBRIDGE ARE PUBLISHING AN ENGLISH / GREEK LEXICON IN JULY 2021 AND WITH
ANY AVAILABLE HEBREW / ENGLISH DICTIONARY THIS CONSCIOUSNESS MAPPING OUGHT
TO BE GREATLY ENHANCED (ie. I note that both the 1st verse to the mosaic
book of GENESIS and the Decalogue have a 34 character line length which may then serve as a dialectic and heuristic as hypothesis)
I NOTE THAT I CANNOT SPEAK, READ OR WRITE EITHER HEBREW OR GREEK BUT IF I UTILISE MY METALOGIC METHOD I CAN DETERMINE THAT I EXHIBIT AN INNATE
ABILITY TO THINK WITHIN THOSE CATEGORIES WITH ACUMEN …
<https://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>
A comment on triggers for consciousness as then impetus for the dialog on CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING bâʻar (H1197) conveyed below was a NOBODY THERE phone call received at 1419 hours the day prior which corresponds to the
date 27 OCTOBER as the year in 1934 when the DUKE OF GLOUCESTER planted an oak tree in the park opposite my house before going to Sydney (over 700 km) to open the war memorial pictured below.
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:14.19>
Thusly I was able to deduce a single Greek word dynamic to then provide complex idea cohesion which mirrored an equivalent event to the picture
below related to aboriginal reconciliation as if I was present there in person (the event was reported on the news later that night) and it
included a smoking ceremony.
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
< https://liverpool.storylines.com.au/2018/09/11/goals-goal-setting-9/>
That I have no need of speech but rather a noumenon ignition as then
impetus for meaningful and strategic action.
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst >> they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon
them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a
bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality >> being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of >> nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly. >>
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're >> going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's
GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the
same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding >> of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been
debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there >> is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence
of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems),
and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading >> to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet
basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying >> principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of
progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 -
AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent
property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special
neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these
relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some
of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21 >> x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24 >> x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5 >> - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as
#369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon: >> 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of >> a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent
neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”) >> emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or
epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI >> (#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES >> OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50] >>
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36,
24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2,
#70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / >> #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5] >> /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar
(H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled; >> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn, >> be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; >> 2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to
be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching: >> H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; >> I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath
day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature contains Nature
That the #81 - reverse transcriptase in having a named form as MIND originating from antiquity, they might be considered in their most
primitive sense to be constituted by either a simple or complex twining conforming to the dialectic formulation as requisite for rationality
(Hebrew letters):
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
In dialectic terms the notion #81 - reverse transcriptase is either:
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature contains Nature
The postulation being that these trinomial stoicheion prototypes can be varied by a conformity the dialectic primitive formulation to then better meet the semantical nuance of nomenclature as the devising or choosing of names for things, especially in a science or other discipline.
Thusly I have varied:
#68 - DIMMING (meng) —> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE (chih) —> WORLDVIEW / DOMINION
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES appear to be a noumenon formulation devised for #75 - FAILURE (shih) assaying associated to the #8 - NORMA OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, @5) onomantic conception of #number as stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a
fluid dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was
devised to resolve the issue of HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4th plane)
Nous: #30
Time: 04:40 hrs
Date: 2021.6.1
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD {%10}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#123); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118
Dao: Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War
Tetra: #59 - MASSING (CHU)
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together (massing), Finished
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Just another informal research comment on the metalogic basis for IDEA
formation by augmentation / amelioration, that I have an innate ability to >> write a nine line poem and by the #81 - reverse transcriptase then obtain
the decalogue and specifically the
#THREE (#123 - judgement sensibility),
#FOUR (#164 - principle of materiality),
#FIVE (#205 - principle of persistence)
= 12 x #41 as #492 - voluntary free will
as metalogic prototypes to then do a search against the Hebrew (22) / Greek >> (24) ipso facto: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 (‘OTH - #1092 days appears to be a
relating to a pivot for truth determination as hypothesis)
CAMBRIDGE ARE PUBLISHING AN ENGLISH / GREEK LEXICON IN JULY 2021 AND WITH
ANY AVAILABLE HEBREW / ENGLISH DICTIONARY THIS CONSCIOUSNESS MAPPING OUGHT >> TO BE GREATLY ENHANCED (ie. I note that both the 1st verse to the mosaic
book of GENESIS and the Decalogue have a 34 character line length which may >> then serve as a dialectic and heuristic as hypothesis)
I NOTE THAT I CANNOT SPEAK, READ OR WRITE EITHER HEBREW OR GREEK BUT IF I
UTILISE MY METALOGIC METHOD I CAN DETERMINE THAT I EXHIBIT AN INNATE
ABILITY TO THINK WITHIN THOSE CATEGORIES WITH ACUMEN …
<https://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>
A comment on triggers for consciousness as then impetus for the dialog on >> CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING bâʻar (H1197) conveyed below was a NOBODY THERE >> phone call received at 1419 hours the day prior which corresponds to the
date 27 OCTOBER as the year in 1934 when the DUKE OF GLOUCESTER planted an >> oak tree in the park opposite my house before going to Sydney (over 700 km) >> to open the war memorial pictured below.
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:14.19>
Thusly I was able to deduce a single Greek word dynamic to then provide
complex idea cohesion which mirrored an equivalent event to the picture
below related to aboriginal reconciliation as if I was present there in
person (the event was reported on the news later that night) and it
included a smoking ceremony.
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / >> #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5] >> /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
< https://liverpool.storylines.com.au/2018/09/11/goals-goal-setting-9/>
That I have no need of speech but rather a noumenon ignition as then
impetus for meaningful and strategic action.
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst >>> they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon
them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which
apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a >>> bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality
being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of >>> nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly. >>>
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're >>> going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's >>> GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the >>> same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding >>> of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been >>> debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there >>> is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then
impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence >>> of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems), >>> and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading >>> to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems.
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet >>> basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying >>> principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of
progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - >>> AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent >>> property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special
neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these
relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some >>> of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21 >>> x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24 >>> x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5 >>> - stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as >>> #369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon: >>> 9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of >>> a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent
neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”) >>> emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or >>> epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO
(#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI
(#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION:
HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)}
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES >>> OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50] >>>
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36, >>> 24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2,
#70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / >>> #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5] >>> /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
#362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar
(H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled; >>> 1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn, >>> be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous; >>> 2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to >>> be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]:
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching: >>> H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; >>> I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92),
@3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 -
I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath
day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
CORRECTION:
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature
contains Nature
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
That the #81 - reverse transcriptase in having a named form as MIND
originating from antiquity, they might be considered in their most
primitive sense to be constituted by either a simple or complex twining
conforming to the dialectic formulation as requisite for rationality
(Hebrew letters):
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
In dialectic terms the notion #81 - reverse transcriptase is either:
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature
contains Nature
The postulation being that these trinomial stoicheion prototypes can be
varied by a conformity the dialectic primitive formulation to then better
meet the semantical nuance of nomenclature as the devising or choosing of
names for things, especially in a science or other discipline.
Thusly I have varied:
#68 - DIMMING (meng) —> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE (chih) —> WORLDVIEW / DOMINION
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES appear to be a noumenon formulation >> devised for #75 - FAILURE (shih) assaying associated to the #5 - NORMA
OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, @5) onomantic #8 - conception of >> #number as stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a
fluid dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was
devised to resolve the issue of HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4th plane)
Nous: #30
Time: 04:40 hrs
Date: 2021.6.1
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD
{%10}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#123); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118
Dao: Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War
Tetra: #59 - MASSING (CHU)
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together >> (massing), Finished
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Just another informal research comment on the metalogic basis for IDEA >>> formation by augmentation / amelioration, that I have an innate ability to >>> write a nine line poem and by the #81 - reverse transcriptase then obtain >>> the decalogue and specifically the
#THREE (#123 - judgement sensibility),
#FOUR (#164 - principle of materiality),
#FIVE (#205 - principle of persistence)
= 12 x #41 as #492 - voluntary free will
as metalogic prototypes to then do a search against the Hebrew (22) / Greek >>> (24) ipso facto: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 (‘OTH - #1092 days appears to be a >>> relating to a pivot for truth determination as hypothesis)
CAMBRIDGE ARE PUBLISHING AN ENGLISH / GREEK LEXICON IN JULY 2021 AND WITH >>> ANY AVAILABLE HEBREW / ENGLISH DICTIONARY THIS CONSCIOUSNESS MAPPING OUGHT >>> TO BE GREATLY ENHANCED (ie. I note that both the 1st verse to the mosaic >>> book of GENESIS and the Decalogue have a 34 character line length which may >>> then serve as a dialectic and heuristic as hypothesis)
I NOTE THAT I CANNOT SPEAK, READ OR WRITE EITHER HEBREW OR GREEK BUT IF I >>> UTILISE MY METALOGIC METHOD I CAN DETERMINE THAT I EXHIBIT AN INNATE
ABILITY TO THINK WITHIN THOSE CATEGORIES WITH ACUMEN …
<https://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>
A comment on triggers for consciousness as then impetus for the dialog on
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING bâʻar (H1197) conveyed below was a NOBODY THERE >>> phone call received at 1419 hours the day prior which corresponds to the >>> date 27 OCTOBER as the year in 1934 when the DUKE OF GLOUCESTER planted an >>> oak tree in the park opposite my house before going to Sydney (over 700 km) >>> to open the war memorial pictured below.
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:14.19>
Thusly I was able to deduce a single Greek word dynamic to then provide
complex idea cohesion which mirrored an equivalent event to the picture
below related to aboriginal reconciliation as if I was present there in
person (the event was reported on the news later that night) and it
included a smoking ceremony.
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] / >>> #333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5] >>> /
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] /
< https://liverpool.storylines.com.au/2018/09/11/goals-goal-setting-9/>
That I have no need of speech but rather a noumenon ignition as then
impetus for meaningful and strategic action.
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst
they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon
them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which >>>> apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse
transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a >>>> bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner
- (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality
being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of >>>> nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly.
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're >>>> going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's >>>> GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the >>>> same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding >>>> of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been >>>> debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there >>>> is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then >>>> impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence >>>> of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the
emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems), >>>> and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading
to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems. >>>>
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet >>>> basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying
principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of >>>> progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - >>>> AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent >>>> property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special
neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these
relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some >>>> of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21
x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24
x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5
- stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as >>>> #369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon:
9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of
a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent
neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”)
emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or >>>> epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO >>>> (#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI >>>> (#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: >>>> HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)} >>>>
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36, >>>> 24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2, >>>> #70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30,
#2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] /
#333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] / >>>> #362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar >>>> (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn, >>>> be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath
(fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of
guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to
consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous;
2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be
stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to >>>> be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]: >>>>
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching: >>>> H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the
beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait; >>>> I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92), >>>> @3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG
(#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 - >>>> I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath
day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
With regards to this statement “it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a fluid dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or
whether it was devised to resolve the issue of HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4th plane)” as #77 - COMPLIANCE (hsun) prototype.
Since we have provided some rhetorical conception which is capable of encapsulating the #CENTRE of each quadrant:
#68 (9 JUN: #5, #100, #40) - RIGHTS
#11 (14 MAY: #6, #5, #6) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg: derangement in the provision of goods and services}
#44 (29 MAY: #1, #30, #4) - ABROGATION of NORMA OBLIGANS prototypes to onomantic number
#17 (12 OCT: #10, #10, #7) - PAIRING TO #371 cycle of ecclesiastical
calendar as CAUSAE COMMUNI
#41 (16 SEPT: #1, #50, #1) - ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY
#65 (2 OCT: #30, #5, #8) - SOLDIER as anthropological prototype
#38 (8 FEB: #40, #8, #10) - ROMAN GOVERNANCE (#342) / TORAH PAIRING
#71 (14 JAN: #6, #40, #2) - DOMINION / WORLDVIEW
#14 (29 JAN: #10, #10, #30) - DEVISED FROM dialectic formulation (eg:
nature rejoices in its nature)
We would have to consult a rabbi on such a perspective.
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
CORRECTION:
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature
contains Nature
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
That the #81 - reverse transcriptase in having a named form as MIND
originating from antiquity, they might be considered in their most
primitive sense to be constituted by either a simple or complex twining
conforming to the dialectic formulation as requisite for rationality
(Hebrew letters):
<https://www.grapple369.com/images/DIALECT-FORMULATION.jpg>
In dialectic terms the notion #81 - reverse transcriptase is either:
SIMPLE: #8 - Transforming of Nature, #1 - Nature contains Nature
COMPLEX: #8 - Transforming of Nature (#5 - Act of Nature), #1 - Nature
contains Nature
The postulation being that these trinomial stoicheion prototypes can be
varied by a conformity to the dialectic primitive formulation to then better
meet the semantical nuance of nomenclature as the devising or choosing of >>> names for things, especially in a science or other discipline.
Thusly I have varied:
#68 - DIMMING (meng) —> RIGHTS
#71 - STOPPAGE (chih) —> WORLDVIEW / DOMINION
Whilst the #72 - TRINOMIAL HEBREW NAMES appear to be a noumenon formulation >>> devised for #75 - FAILURE (shih) assaying associated to the #6 - NORMA
OBLIGANS and the Pythagorean binomial (@1, @5) onomantic #8 - conception of >>> #number as stoicheion it is not known to me whether this apparatus is a
fluid dynamic (ie. a plumb line as conveyed below) or whether it was
devised to resolve the issue of HETERONOMY AGAINST AUTONOMY (4th plane)
Nous: #30
Time: 04:40 hrs
Date: 2021.6.1
Torah: [#8, #70, #40]@{
@1: Sup: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8); Ego: 8 - OPPOSITION: KAN (#8),
@2: Sup: 78 - ON THE VERGE: CHIANG (#86 - I AM NOT A ROBBER OF FOOD
{%10}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#78),
@3: Sup: 37 - PURITY: TS'UI (#123); Ego: 40 - LAW/MODEL: FA (#118),
Male: #123; Feme: #118
} // #118
Dao: Government without Coercion, Be Chary of War
Tetra: #59 - MASSING (CHU)
I-Ching: H45 - Gathering, Congregation, Clustering, Gathering together >>> (massing), Finished
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Just another informal research comment on the metalogic basis for IDEA >>>> formation by augmentation / amelioration, that I have an innate ability to >>>> write a nine line poem and by the #81 - reverse transcriptase then obtain >>>> the decalogue and specifically the
#THREE (#123 - judgement sensibility),
#FOUR (#164 - principle of materiality),
#FIVE (#205 - principle of persistence)
= 12 x #41 as #492 - voluntary free will
as metalogic prototypes to then do a search against the Hebrew (22) / Greek
(24) ipso facto: 24 x 7 x 13 = #2184 (‘OTH - #1092 days appears to be a >>>> relating to a pivot for truth determination as hypothesis)
CAMBRIDGE ARE PUBLISHING AN ENGLISH / GREEK LEXICON IN JULY 2021 AND WITH >>>> ANY AVAILABLE HEBREW / ENGLISH DICTIONARY THIS CONSCIOUSNESS MAPPING OUGHT >>>> TO BE GREATLY ENHANCED (ie. I note that both the 1st verse to the mosaic >>>> book of GENESIS and the Decalogue have a 34 character line length which may
then serve as a dialectic and heuristic as hypothesis)
I NOTE THAT I CANNOT SPEAK, READ OR WRITE EITHER HEBREW OR GREEK BUT IF I >>>> UTILISE MY METALOGIC METHOD I CAN DETERMINE THAT I EXHIBIT AN INNATE
ABILITY TO THINK WITHIN THOSE CATEGORIES WITH ACUMEN …
<https://www.grapple369.com/?scenario>
A comment on triggers for consciousness as then impetus for the dialog on
CATEGORY OF UNDERSTANDING bâʻar (H1197) conveyed below was a NOBODY THERE
phone call received at 1419 hours the day prior which corresponds to the >>>> date 27 OCTOBER as the year in 1934 when the DUKE OF GLOUCESTER planted an >>>> oak tree in the park opposite my house before going to Sydney (over 700 km)
to open the war memorial pictured below.
<https://www.grapple369.com/?time:14.19>
Thusly I was able to deduce a single Greek word dynamic to then provide >>>> complex idea cohesion which mirrored an equivalent event to the picture >>>> below related to aboriginal reconciliation as if I was present there in >>>> person (the event was reported on the news later that night) and it
included a smoking ceremony.
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] /
#333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] / >>>>
< https://liverpool.storylines.com.au/2018/09/11/goals-goal-setting-9/> >>>>
That I have no need of speech but rather a noumenon ignition as then
impetus for meaningful and strategic action.
- dolf
dolf <dolfboek@hotmail.com> wrote:
Dear ABC, I yesterday heard such fictional eulogy “as white guilt” directed
towards aboriginals by a profusion that I turned my radio off.
It simply contradicted rationality as viable value relationship that whilst
they’re in a natural state it is because law is an unnatural restraint upon
them.
The principles of Terra incognita and Rex Lex are considerations which >>>>> apply equally to language by ONTIC necessity as grounding and reverse >>>>> transcriptase as boundaries of gnosis.
lēx f (genitive lēgis);
- a proposition or motion for a law made to the people by a magistrate, a >>>>> bill
- (figuratively) a bill which has become a law, a law
- (figuratively) a precept, regulation, principle, rule, mode, manner >>>>> - (figuratively) a contract, agreement, covenant
- (figuratively) a condition, stipulation
Whilst they may interact with nature but do not have any exquisite
knowledge or vocabulary about nature’s principle of emanation as causality
being the temporal attribute of the seven day week as conformity to law of
nature nor the manifesting norm as covetous gain by the Irish particularly.
THAT CONSCIOUSNESS IS AN EMERGENT REALITY WHICH INVOLVES STAGES OF
DEVELOPMENT
In constructing our LEXKNOWNS{} form within the BOEK{} GNOSIS module we're
going to firstly have to discuss our dialectical method and whether it's >>>>> GEORG HEGEL’s @1 - Thesis; @2 - Anti-thesis; @3 - Synthesis; @4 -
Progression or KARL MARX’s @1 - Progression; @2 - Synthesis; @3 -
Anti-thesis; @4 - Thesis we conclude that they are two hemispheres of the >>>>> same circle where the central premise is the ONTIC necessity for grounding
of the formula of progression which is then circumscribed by the
hypothesis.
I’ll presumptively make comment on this abstract.
ABSTRACT: The role of emergence in the creation of consciousness has been >>>>> debated for over a century, but it remains unresolved. In particular there
is controversy over the claim that a “strong” or radical form of emergence
is required to explain phenomenal consciousness.
THAT IS: Whether such activity involves the STOICHEION ELEMENTS as then >>>>> impetus for #45 - extrusion of the #9 - autonomous principle as emergence >>>>> of consciousness.
In this paper we use some ideas of complex system theory to trace the >>>>> emergent features of life and then of complex brains through three
progressive stages or levels: Level 1 (life), Level 2 (nervous systems), >>>>> and Level 3 (special neurobiological features), each representing
increasing biological and neurobiological complexity and ultimately leading
to the emergence of phenomenal consciousness, all in physical systems. >>>>>
THAT IS: If we consider that the HEGEL / MARX dialectic conveys a septet >>>>> basis to all causality and its rationality: 22 /7 then the central unifying
principle is the actuation of ONTIC grounding as then a @6 - formula of >>>>> progression (@1 + @2 + @3) for consciousness as @168 {@1 + METALOGIC #8 - >>>>> AUTONOMOUS DELIMITER (#27): 28 x 6, 24 x 7, 21 x ‘8’
Along the way we show that consciousness fits the criteria of an emergent >>>>> property—albeit one with extreme complexity. The formulation Life + Special
neurobiological features → Phenomenal consciousness expresses these >>>>> relationships. Then we consider the implications of our findings for some >>>>> of the philosophical conundrums entailed by the apparent “explanatory gap”
between the brain and phenomenal consciousness.
TERRA INCOGNITA: That is the giving names to places is an encapsulation: 21
x 8 of gnosis to which can be applied as a resonance against rationalty: 24
x 7 x 13 = #2184 / @6 = 364 as to imply that consciousness requires some #5
- stoicheion grounding (#81 - reverse transcriptase) for its function as >>>>> #369 - discriminating norm:
#71 #1 #11
#61 #81 #21
#51 #41 #31
We conclude that consciousness stems from the personal life (ie.
ANTHROPOCENTRIC SINGULARITY - #205 <—> #164 intersection of its noumenon:
9x9x9 = #729 / 2 = 364.5 as @1 - SELF) of an organism with the addition of
a complex nervous system that is ideally suited to maximize emergent >>>>> neurobiological features and that it is an example of standard (“weak”)
emergence without a scientific explanatory gap. An “experiential” or >>>>> epistemic gap remains, although this is ontologically untroubling.
<https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7304239/>
The word lexicon is derived from Byzantine Greek λεξικόν (lexikón, “a
lexicon, a dictionary”), ellipsis from Ancient Greek λεξικὸν βιβλίον
(lexikòn biblíon, literally “a book of words”), from λεξικός (lexikós, “of
words”), from λέξις (léxis, “a saying, speech, word”), from λέγω (légō, “to
speak”), ultimately from Proto-Indo-European *leǵ- (“to gather, collect”).
[λ, ε, ξ, ι, κ, ό, ν]
[λ, {@1: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#30); Ego: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI
(#30)}
ε, {@2: Sup: 35 - GATHERING: LIEN (#65); Ego: 5 - KEEPING SMALL: SHAO >>>>> (#35)}
ξ, {@3: Sup: 14 - PENETRATION: JUI (#79); Ego: 60 - ACCUMULATION: CHI >>>>> (#95)}
ι, {@4: Sup: 24 - JOY: LE (#103); Ego: 10 - DEFECTIVENESS, DISTORTION: >>>>> HSIEN (#105)}
κ, {@5: Sup: 44 - STOVE: TSAO (#147); Ego: 20 - ADVANCE: CHIN (#125)} >>>>>
ο, {@6: Sup: 33 - CLOSENESS: MI (#180 - I COMMIT NOT ADULTERY WITH
ANOTHER'S WIFE {%19}); Ego: 70 - SEVERANCE: KE (#195)}
ν] {@7: Sup: 2 - FULL CIRCLE: CHOU (#182 - I AM NOT FRAUDULENT IN MEASURES
OF GRAIN {%6}); Ego: 50 - VASTNESS / WASTING: T'ANG (#245)}
TELOS TOTAL: #245
MALE: @180 + @182 = #362
ONTIC CHECKSUM TOTAL: #362
MALE: @147 = #147
DEME CHECKSUM TOTAL: #147
GRUMBLE (#182, #245)@[30, 30, 35, 5, 14, 60, 24, 10, 44, 20, 33, 70, 2, 50]
GRUNTLE (#476, #427)@[30, 30, 60, 30, 14, 35, 19, 5, 33, 14, 12, 60, 36, >>>>> 24, 46, 10, 9, 44, 29, 20, 62, 33, 51, 70, 53, 2, 22, 50]
#278 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#6, #2, >>>>> #70, #200] /
#342 - GLOBUS CRUCIGER / NOUMENON RESONANCE FOR 28 MAY 2021 as [#30, >>>>> #2, #70, #200, #600] /
#288 - REMEMBRANCE as [#6, #10, #2, #70, #200] / [#10, #2, #70, #200, #6] /
#333 - CENTRE PROTOTYPE OF ROMAN GOVERNANCE as [#6, #50, #2, #70, #200, #5]
/
#322 - DEMOCRACY as [#40, #2, #70, #10, #200] / [#50, #2, #70, #200] / >>>>> #362 - *ONTIC* *GROUNDING* as [#40, #2, #70, #200, #10, #600] = bâʻar >>>>> (H1197): {UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26} 1) to burn, consume, kindle, be kindled;
1a) (Qal); 1a1) to begin to burn, be kindled, start burning; 1a2) to burn,
be burning; 1a3) to burn, consume; 1a4) Jehovah's wrath, human wrath >>>>> (fig.); 1b) (Piel); 1b1) to kindle, burn; 1b2) to consume, remove (of >>>>> guilt) (fig.); 1c) (Hiphil); 1c1) to kindle; 1c2) to burn up; 1c3) to >>>>> consume (destroy); 1d) (Pual) to burn; 2) to be stupid, brutish, barbarous;
2a) (Qal) to be stupid, dull-hearted, unreceptive; 2b) (Niphal) to be >>>>> stupid, dull-hearted; 2c) (Piel) to feed, graze; 2d) (Hiphil) to cause to >>>>> be grazed over;
T'AI HSÜAN CHING {POLAR OPPOSITIONS / INTERPLAY OF OPPOSITES} [4 BCE]: >>>>>
UMBRA: #272 % #41 = #26 - Ambiguous Reversals, Virtue of Gravity; I-Ching:
H3 - Birth Throes, Initial Difficulties, Sprouting, Difficulty at the >>>>> beginning, Gathering support, Hoarding; Tetra: 3 - Mired;
THOTH MEASURE: #26 - Oh Basit, who makest thine appearance at the Shetait;
I am not the cause of weeping to any.
#VIRTUE: If it is Endeavor (no. #26), then joy, but
#TOOLS: If it is Departure (no. #66), then sorrow.
#POSITION: As to Following (no. #19), it is dragged along.
#TIME: As to Guardedness (no. #57), it is secured.
#CANON: #168
ONTIC_OBLIGANS_168@{
@1: Sup: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26); Ego: 26 - ENDEAVOUR: WU (#26),
@2: Sup: 11 - DIVERGENCE: CH'A (#37); Ego: 66 - DEPARTURE: CH'U (#92), >>>>> @3: Sup: 30 - BOLD RESOLUTION: YI (#67); Ego: 19 - FOLLOWING: TS'UNG >>>>> (#111),
@4: Sup: 6 - CONTRARIETY: LI (#73); Ego: 57 - GUARDEDNESS: SHOU (#168 - >>>>> I AM NOT THE CAUSE OF WEEPING TO ANY {%26}),
Male: #73; Feme: #168
} // #168 <— ONTIC / TEMPORAL INTERCHANGE
“Ye shall kindle-H1197 no fire throughout your habitations upon the sabbath
day." [Exodus 35:3]
<https://www.grapple369.com/Groundwork/Irish%20Republicanist%20Activism%20as%20Claims%20of%20Dominion%20Being%20Sedition.pdf>
Initial Post: 28 May 2021
Sysop: | Keyop |
---|---|
Location: | Huddersfield, West Yorkshire, UK |
Users: | 286 |
Nodes: | 16 (2 / 14) |
Uptime: | 87:59:46 |
Calls: | 6,496 |
Calls today: | 7 |
Files: | 12,100 |
Messages: | 5,277,265 |