XPost: alt.philosophy.taoism, aus.politics, aus.religion.judaism
XPost: aus.legal
That my reference is then Richard Lynn / Jane English translation with an addition of the Canon of Supreme Mystery as the means for a unity of apperception compromising Tao Te Ching, I Ching and Tetra from the supreme mystery (4th plane as dominion mapping)/
.jackNote@zen: 3, row: 7, col: 5, nous: 51 [DATE: 2021.12.5,
SUPER: #467 / #78 - Recognizing Fidelity, Trust in Faith; I-Ching: H59 - Dispersion, Dispersal (dissolution); Tetra: 47 - PATTERN (WEN),
EGO: #372 / #51 - Natural Guides and Nursing Virtuosity; I-Ching: H47 - Oppression (exhaustion), Confining, Entangled; Tetra: 69 - EXHAUSTION (CH'IUNG)]
one <
being@apolka.sign> wrote:
dolf wrote:
You dont seem to have the RICHARD LYNN translation of WANG BIs commentary
on the I CHING / DAO TE CHING.
I don't recall seeing Richard Lynn's work.
In my opinion such single entity literary opinion has merit.
To seek for Richard Lynn is possible for me.
His translation of the Daodejing does not appear to be online.
<< The Classic of the Way and Virtue:
A New Translation of the Tao-te ching of Laozi
as Interpreted by Wang Bi (Columbia University Press, 1999) >>
Curious, to me, is how various Romanizations occur
and appear when people mix and match the old Wade-Giles
and the newer pinyin spellings.
Lynn has Tao-te ching (Wade-Giles)
combined with Wang Bi (pinyin).
Wang Pi's version of the TTC tends to be the received one,
so-called, that is used by many, probably most, translators.
The I-Ching, aka Yijing is not of interest to me.
It appears to be an oracle of divination and would be
perhaps included in Taoist religion, aka Tao Chiao, how-
ever whether it happens to be in the Canon is unknown.
--
YOUTUBE: "The Meerkat Circus"
<
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H-7OuqWi4vQ>
SEE ALSO AS RELATIONSHIP: *INVALIDATING* {Perennial philosophy (HETEROS
{#390 - ROBBERS} v’s HOMOIOS {#391 - STEWARDS OF GOD’S HOUSE} THEORY OF NUMBER) as universal of right and wrong...} *THE* *ORTHODOX* *AND* *ROMAN* *CATHOLIC* *CHURCH'S* *CLAIM* {#390 as 1, #100, #80, #1, #3, #5, #200 as
harpax (G727): {#11 as #242} 1) rapacious, ravenous; 2) a extortioner, a robber} *TO* *JUBILEE2000* *AS* *BEING* *DELUSIONAL* *AND* *FRAUDULENT*
Private Street on the edge of the Central Business District dated 16th May, 2000 - This report is prepared in response to a TP00/55 as a Notice of an Application for Planning Permit
<
http://www.grapple369.com/jubilee2000.html>
SEE ALSO: HYPOSTASIS AS DAO OF NATURE (Chinese: ZIRAN) / COURSE (Greek: TROCHOS) OF NATURE (Greek: GENESIS) [James 3:6]
Chinese HAN Dynasty (206 BCE - 220CE) Hexagon Trigrams to Tetragram
assignments proposed by Yang Hsiung (53BCE - 18CE) which by 4BCE
(translation published within English as first European language in 1993), first appeared in draft form as a meta-thesis titled T'AI HSUAN CHING {ie. Canon of Supreme Mystery} on Natural Divination associated with the theory
of number, annual seasonal chronology and astrology reliant upon the seven visible planets as cosmological mother image and the zodiac.
It shows the ZIRAN as the DAO of NATURE / COURSE-trochos OF NATURE-genesis [James 3:6] as HYPOSTASIS comprising #81 trinomial tetragrammaton x 4.5 day
= #364.5 day / year as HOMOIOS THEORY OF NUMBER which is an amalgam of the
64 hexagrams as binomial trigrams / 81 as trinomial tetragrammaton rather
than its encapsulated contrived use as the microcosm to redefine the
macrocosm as the quintessence of the Pythagorean [Babylonian] as binomial
canon of transposition as HETEROS THEORY OF NUMBER.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/nature.html>
The Charter of Human Rights and Responsibilities No. 43 of Act 2006 defines
a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING” and the question is, if it is permissible to extend this definition to be a "PERSON MEANS A HUMAN BEING AS A CONSCIOUS REALITY OF HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] WHO IS INSTANTIATED WITHIN THE TEMPORAL
REALITY AS THEN THE CAUSE FOR REASONING AND RATIONALITY."
That my mathematical theoretical noumenon defines the meta-descriptor prototypes which are prerequisite to the BEING of HOMO[iOS] SAPIEN[T] as EXISTENCE / *OUSIA*.
<
http://www.grapple369.com/Grumble.zip> (Download resources)
After all the ENNEAD of THOTH and not the Roman Catholic Eucharist,
expresses an Anthropic Cosmological Principle which appears within its geometric conception as being equivalent to the Pythagorean
TETRAD/TETRACTYS.
--- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
* Origin: fsxNet Usenet Gateway (21:1/5)